Marek＇s forward-chaining construction is one of the important techniques for investigating the non-monotonic reasoning. By introduction of consistency property over a logic program, they proposed a class of logic pro...Marek＇s forward-chaining construction is one of the important techniques for investigating the non-monotonic reasoning. By introduction of consistency property over a logic program, they proposed a class of logic programs, FC-normal programs, each of which has at least one stable model. However, it is not clear how to choose one appropriate consistency property for deciding whether or not a logic program is FC-normal. In this paper, we firstly discover that, for any finite logic programⅡ, there exists the least consistency property LCon（Ⅱ） overⅡ, which just depends onⅡitself, such that, Ⅱ is FC-normal if and only ifⅡ is FC-normal with respect to （w.r.t.） LCon（Ⅱ）. Actually, in order to determine the FC-normality of a logic program, it is sufficient to check the monotonic closed sets in LCon（Ⅱ） for all non-monotonic rules, that is LFC（Ⅱ）. Secondly, we present an algorithm for computing LFC（Ⅱ）. Finally, we reveal that the brave reasoning task and cautious reasoning task for FC-normal logic programs are of the same difficulty as that of normal logic programs.展开更多
基金This work is partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No.60573009the Stadholder Foundation of Guizhou Province under Grant No.2005(212).
文摘Marek＇s forward-chaining construction is one of the important techniques for investigating the non-monotonic reasoning. By introduction of consistency property over a logic program, they proposed a class of logic programs, FC-normal programs, each of which has at least one stable model. However, it is not clear how to choose one appropriate consistency property for deciding whether or not a logic program is FC-normal. In this paper, we firstly discover that, for any finite logic programⅡ, there exists the least consistency property LCon（Ⅱ） overⅡ, which just depends onⅡitself, such that, Ⅱ is FC-normal if and only ifⅡ is FC-normal with respect to （w.r.t.） LCon（Ⅱ）. Actually, in order to determine the FC-normality of a logic program, it is sufficient to check the monotonic closed sets in LCon（Ⅱ） for all non-monotonic rules, that is LFC（Ⅱ）. Secondly, we present an algorithm for computing LFC（Ⅱ）. Finally, we reveal that the brave reasoning task and cautious reasoning task for FC-normal logic programs are of the same difficulty as that of normal logic programs.
