Predicting nanomaterial(NM)fate requires more than structural snapshots and degradation curves.Current 2D models,which focus on space(structural change)and time(kinetics),provide valuable insights but remain incomplet...Predicting nanomaterial(NM)fate requires more than structural snapshots and degradation curves.Current 2D models,which focus on space(structural change)and time(kinetics),provide valuable insights but remain incomplete.They cannot fully explain why identical NM behave differently across environments.Here,this Comment proposes a 3D framework that adds a critical third axis—environmental hierarchy—to capture transformations that are orthogonal to space and time.展开更多
基金SC acknowledges UK Research and Innovation-Natural Environment Research Council Independent Research Fellowship(NE/B000187/1)for supporting this work.
文摘Predicting nanomaterial(NM)fate requires more than structural snapshots and degradation curves.Current 2D models,which focus on space(structural change)and time(kinetics),provide valuable insights but remain incomplete.They cannot fully explain why identical NM behave differently across environments.Here,this Comment proposes a 3D framework that adds a critical third axis—environmental hierarchy—to capture transformations that are orthogonal to space and time.
