Background:Experimental animals are used to study physiological phenomena,pathological mechanisms,and disease prevention.The gut microbiome is known as a potential confounding factor for inconsistent data from preclin...Background:Experimental animals are used to study physiological phenomena,pathological mechanisms,and disease prevention.The gut microbiome is known as a potential confounding factor for inconsistent data from preclinical studies.Although many gut microbiome studies have been conducted in recent decades,few have focused on gut microbiota fluctuation among representative mouse strains.Methods:A range of frequently used mouse strains were selected from 34 isolation packages representing disease-related animal(DRA),immunity defect animal(IDA),or gene-editing animal(GEA)from the BALB/c and C57BL/6J backgrounds together with normal mice,and their microbial genomic DNA were isolated from mouse feces to sequence for the exploration of gut microbiota.Results:Mouse background strain,classification,introduced source,introduced year,and reproduction type significantly affected the gut microbiota structure(p<0.001 for all parameters),with background strain contributing the greatest influence(R^(2)=0.237).In normal groups,distinct gut microbiota types existed in different mouse strains.Sixty-four core operational taxonomic units were obtained from normal mice,and 12 belonged to Lactobacillus.Interestingly,the gut microbiota in C57BL/6J was more stable than that in BALB/c mice.Furthermore,the gut microbiota in the IDA,GEA,and DRA groups significantly differed from that in normal groups(p<0.001 for all).Compared with the normal group,there was a significantly higher Chao 1 and Shannon index(p<0.001 for all)in the IDA,GEA,and DRA groups.Markedly changed classes occurred with Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes.The abundances of Helicobacter,Blautia,Enterobacter,Bacillus,Clostridioides,Paenibacillus,and Clostridiales all significantly decreased in the IDA,GEA,and DRA groups,whereas those of Saccharimonas,Rikenella,and Odoribacter all significantly increased.展开更多
基金National Key R&D Program of ChinaGrant/Award Number:2021YFF0703400+3 种基金the National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaGrant/Award Number:General Program,82070103CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical ScienceGrant/Award Number:CIFMS,2021-I2M-1-036,2021-I 2M-1-034。
文摘Background:Experimental animals are used to study physiological phenomena,pathological mechanisms,and disease prevention.The gut microbiome is known as a potential confounding factor for inconsistent data from preclinical studies.Although many gut microbiome studies have been conducted in recent decades,few have focused on gut microbiota fluctuation among representative mouse strains.Methods:A range of frequently used mouse strains were selected from 34 isolation packages representing disease-related animal(DRA),immunity defect animal(IDA),or gene-editing animal(GEA)from the BALB/c and C57BL/6J backgrounds together with normal mice,and their microbial genomic DNA were isolated from mouse feces to sequence for the exploration of gut microbiota.Results:Mouse background strain,classification,introduced source,introduced year,and reproduction type significantly affected the gut microbiota structure(p<0.001 for all parameters),with background strain contributing the greatest influence(R^(2)=0.237).In normal groups,distinct gut microbiota types existed in different mouse strains.Sixty-four core operational taxonomic units were obtained from normal mice,and 12 belonged to Lactobacillus.Interestingly,the gut microbiota in C57BL/6J was more stable than that in BALB/c mice.Furthermore,the gut microbiota in the IDA,GEA,and DRA groups significantly differed from that in normal groups(p<0.001 for all).Compared with the normal group,there was a significantly higher Chao 1 and Shannon index(p<0.001 for all)in the IDA,GEA,and DRA groups.Markedly changed classes occurred with Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes.The abundances of Helicobacter,Blautia,Enterobacter,Bacillus,Clostridioides,Paenibacillus,and Clostridiales all significantly decreased in the IDA,GEA,and DRA groups,whereas those of Saccharimonas,Rikenella,and Odoribacter all significantly increased.
