Apical microsurgery is accurate and minimally invasive,produces few complications,and has a success rate of more than 90%.However,due to the lack of awareness and understanding of apical microsurgery by dental general...Apical microsurgery is accurate and minimally invasive,produces few complications,and has a success rate of more than 90%.However,due to the lack of awareness and understanding of apical microsurgery by dental general practitioners and even endodontists,many clinical problems remain to be overcome.The consensus has gathered well-known domestic experts to hold a series of special discussions and reached the consensus.This document specifies the indications,contraindications,preoperative preparations,operational procedures,complication prevention measures,and efficacy evaluation of apical microsurgery and is applicable to dentists who perform apical microsurgery after systematic training.展开更多
BACKGROUND Stage 1 rectal neuroendocrine tumors(NETs)are best treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)or transanal endoscopic microsurgery(TEM)for local resection.AIM To investigate the safety and efficacy o...BACKGROUND Stage 1 rectal neuroendocrine tumors(NETs)are best treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)or transanal endoscopic microsurgery(TEM)for local resection.AIM To investigate the safety and efficacy of ESD and TEM for local resection of stage 1 rectal NETs.METHODS This retrospective observational analysis included patients with clinical stage 1 rectal NETs(cT1N0M0,less than 20 mm)who underwent ESD or TEM.The ESD and TEM groups were matched to ensure that they had comparable lesion sizes,lesion locations,and pathological grades.We assessed the differences between groups in terms of en bloc resection rate,R0 resection rate,adverse event rate,recurrence rate,and hospital stay and cost.RESULTS Totally,128 Lesions(ESD=84;TEM=44)were included,with 58 Lesions within the matched groups(ESD=29;TEM=29).Both the ESD and TEM groups had identical en bloc resection(100.0%vs 100.0%,P=1.000),R0 resection(82.8%vs 96.6%,P=0.194),adverse event(0.0%vs 6.9%,P=0.491),and recurrence(0.0%vs 3.4%,P=1.000)rates.Nevertheless,the median hospital stay[ESD:5.5(4.5-6.0)vs TEM:10.0(7.0-12.0)days;P<0.001],and cost[ESD:11.6(9.8-12.6)vs TEM:20.9(17.0-25.1)kilo-China Yuan,P<0.001]were remarkably shorter and less for ESD.CONCLUSION Both ESD and TEM were well-tolerated and yielded favorable outcomes for the local removal of clinical stage 1 rectal NETs.ESD exhibits shorter hospital stay and fewer costs than TEM.展开更多
文摘Apical microsurgery is accurate and minimally invasive,produces few complications,and has a success rate of more than 90%.However,due to the lack of awareness and understanding of apical microsurgery by dental general practitioners and even endodontists,many clinical problems remain to be overcome.The consensus has gathered well-known domestic experts to hold a series of special discussions and reached the consensus.This document specifies the indications,contraindications,preoperative preparations,operational procedures,complication prevention measures,and efficacy evaluation of apical microsurgery and is applicable to dentists who perform apical microsurgery after systematic training.
基金Supported by the Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangzhou,No.202201011331the National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.82373118the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province,No.2023A1515010828.
文摘BACKGROUND Stage 1 rectal neuroendocrine tumors(NETs)are best treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)or transanal endoscopic microsurgery(TEM)for local resection.AIM To investigate the safety and efficacy of ESD and TEM for local resection of stage 1 rectal NETs.METHODS This retrospective observational analysis included patients with clinical stage 1 rectal NETs(cT1N0M0,less than 20 mm)who underwent ESD or TEM.The ESD and TEM groups were matched to ensure that they had comparable lesion sizes,lesion locations,and pathological grades.We assessed the differences between groups in terms of en bloc resection rate,R0 resection rate,adverse event rate,recurrence rate,and hospital stay and cost.RESULTS Totally,128 Lesions(ESD=84;TEM=44)were included,with 58 Lesions within the matched groups(ESD=29;TEM=29).Both the ESD and TEM groups had identical en bloc resection(100.0%vs 100.0%,P=1.000),R0 resection(82.8%vs 96.6%,P=0.194),adverse event(0.0%vs 6.9%,P=0.491),and recurrence(0.0%vs 3.4%,P=1.000)rates.Nevertheless,the median hospital stay[ESD:5.5(4.5-6.0)vs TEM:10.0(7.0-12.0)days;P<0.001],and cost[ESD:11.6(9.8-12.6)vs TEM:20.9(17.0-25.1)kilo-China Yuan,P<0.001]were remarkably shorter and less for ESD.CONCLUSION Both ESD and TEM were well-tolerated and yielded favorable outcomes for the local removal of clinical stage 1 rectal NETs.ESD exhibits shorter hospital stay and fewer costs than TEM.
