With the deepening of global digital transformation,digital resources have become key elements in reshaping economic and social structures,but their material footprint and energy use intensify ecological pressure and ...With the deepening of global digital transformation,digital resources have become key elements in reshaping economic and social structures,but their material footprint and energy use intensify ecological pressure and ethical risks such as algorithmic opacity,data divides,and intergenerational injustice.This paper examines“green orientation and ethical reconstruction in digital resource governance”at theoretical,instrumental,and institutional levels.Theoretically,it uses the tension between Ecological Modernization Theory and the Jevons Paradox to argue that digital environmental governance must shift from growth logic to ecological rationality.Instrumentally,it analyzes Carbon-Aware Computing,Digital Product Passports(DPP),and ISO/IEC 30134 indicators as a lifecycle-based green governance toolkit for digital infrastructure.Institutionally,it compares the European Union’s rule-oriented governance with China’s engineering-oriented governance and incorporates frugal digital innovation in the Global South to outline diversified governance paths.The paper then proposes a digital ethics framework integrating environmental responsibility,social inclusion,and intergenerational justice,and argues that future digital governance should move beyond a single efficiency paradigm toward composite governance centered on ecological integrity and social justice.展开更多
文摘With the deepening of global digital transformation,digital resources have become key elements in reshaping economic and social structures,but their material footprint and energy use intensify ecological pressure and ethical risks such as algorithmic opacity,data divides,and intergenerational injustice.This paper examines“green orientation and ethical reconstruction in digital resource governance”at theoretical,instrumental,and institutional levels.Theoretically,it uses the tension between Ecological Modernization Theory and the Jevons Paradox to argue that digital environmental governance must shift from growth logic to ecological rationality.Instrumentally,it analyzes Carbon-Aware Computing,Digital Product Passports(DPP),and ISO/IEC 30134 indicators as a lifecycle-based green governance toolkit for digital infrastructure.Institutionally,it compares the European Union’s rule-oriented governance with China’s engineering-oriented governance and incorporates frugal digital innovation in the Global South to outline diversified governance paths.The paper then proposes a digital ethics framework integrating environmental responsibility,social inclusion,and intergenerational justice,and argues that future digital governance should move beyond a single efficiency paradigm toward composite governance centered on ecological integrity and social justice.
