Chronic hepatitis C is a major reason for development of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma and a leading cause for liver transplantation. The development of direct-acting antiviral agents lead to(pegylated) inter...Chronic hepatitis C is a major reason for development of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma and a leading cause for liver transplantation. The development of direct-acting antiviral agents lead to(pegylated) interferon-alfa free antiviral therapy regimens with a remarkable increase in sustained virologic response(SVR) rates and opened therapeutic options for patients with advanced cirrhosis and liver graft recipients. This concise review gives an overview about most current prospective trials and cohort analyses for treatment of patients with liver cirrhosis and liver graft recipients. In patients with compensated cirrhosis Child-Pugh-Turcotte(CTP) class A, all approved agents are safe and SVR rates do not significantly differ from patients without cirrhosis in general. In patients with decompensated cirrhosis CTP class B or C, daclastasvir, ledipasvir, velpatasvir, and sofosbuvir are approved, and SVR rates higher than 90% can be achieved. Especially for patients with a model of end stage liver disease score higher than 15 and therefore eligible for liver transplantation, data is scarce. Reported SVR rates in patients with cirrhosis CTP class C are lower compared to patients with a less severe liver disease. In liver transplant recipients with a maximum of CTP class A, SVR rates are comparable to patients without LT. Patients with decompensated graft cirrhosis should be treated on an individual basis.展开更多
BACKGROUND The introduction of direct-acting antiviral drugs into clinical practice has revolutionized the treatment of chronic hepatitis C,making it highly effective and safe for patients.However,few researchers have...BACKGROUND The introduction of direct-acting antiviral drugs into clinical practice has revolutionized the treatment of chronic hepatitis C,making it highly effective and safe for patients.However,few researchers have analyzed the factors causing therapy failure in some patients.AIM To analyze factors influencing the failure of direct antiviral drugs in the large,multicenter EpiTer-2 cohort in a real-world setting.METHODS The study cohort consisted of patients with chronic hepatitis C treated at 22 Polish centers from 2016-2020.Data collected from the online EpiTer-2 database included the following:hepatitis C virus(HCV)genotype,stage of fibrosis,hematology and liver function parameters,Child-Turcotte-Pugh and Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores,prior antiviral therapy,concomitant diseases,and drugs used in relation to hepatitis B virus(HBV)and/or human immunodeficiency virus(HIV)coinfections.Adverse events observed during the treatment and follow-up period were reported.Both standard and machine learning methods were used for statistical analysis.RESULTS During analysis,12614 patients with chronic hepatitis C were registered,of which 11938(mean age:52 years)had available sustained virologic response(SVR)data[11629(97%)achieved SVR and 309(3%)did not].Most patients(78.1%)were infected with HCV genotype 1b.Liver cirrhosis was diagnosed in 2974 patients,while advanced fibrosis(F3)was diagnosed in 1717 patients.We included patients with features of hepatic failure at baseline[ascites in 142(1.2%)and encephalopathy in 68(0.6%)patients].The most important host factors negatively influencing treatment efficacy were liver cirrhosis,clinical and laboratory features of liver failure,history of hepatocellular carcinoma,and higher body mass index.Among viral factors,genotype 3 and viral load also exerted an influence on treatment efficacy.Classical statistical analysis revealed that treatment ineffectiveness seemed to be influenced by the male sex,which was not confirmed by the multivariate analysis using the machine learning algorithm(random forest).Coinfection with HBV(including patients with on-treatment reactivation of HBV infection)or HIV,extrahepatic manifestations,and renal failure did not significantly affect the treatment efficacy.CONCLUSION In patients with advanced liver disease,individualized therapy(testing for resistance-associated variants and response-guided treatment)should be considered to maximize the chance of achieving SVR.展开更多
Patients who are infected with hepatitis C virus(HCV) and also have advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis have beenrecognized as "difficult-to-treat" patients during an era when peginterferon and ribavirin combinat...Patients who are infected with hepatitis C virus(HCV) and also have advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis have beenrecognized as "difficult-to-treat" patients during an era when peginterferon and ribavirin combination therapy is the standard of care. Recent guidelines have clearly stated that treatment should be prioritized in this population to prevent complications such as decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma. Recent advances in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C have been achieved through the development of direct-acting antiviral agents(DAAs). Boceprevir and telaprevir are first-generation DAAs that inhibit the HCV NS3/4A protease. Boceprevir or telaprevir, in combination with peginterferon and ribavirin, improved the sustained virological response rates compared with peginterferon and ribavirin alone and were tolerated in patients with HCV genotype 1 infection without cirrhosis or compensated cirrhosis. However, the efficacy is lower especially in prior non-responders with or without cirrhosis. Furthermore, a high incidence of adverse events was observed in patients with advanced liver disease, including cirrhosis, in real-life settings. Current guidelines in the United States and in some European countries no longer recommend these regimens for the treatment of HCV. Next-generation DAAs include second-generation HCV NS3/4A protease inhibitors, HCV NS5 A inhibitors and HCV NS5 B inhibitors, which have a high efficacy and a lower toxicity. These drugs are used in interferon-free or in interferon-based regimens with or without ribavirin in combination with different classes of DAAs. Interferon-based regimens, such as simeprevir in combination with peginterferon and ribavirin, are well tolerated and are highly effective especially in treatmentnave patients and in patients who received treatment but who relapsed. The efficacy is less pronounced in nullresponders and in patients with cirrhosis. Interferonfree regimens in combination with ribavirin and/or two or more DAAs could be used for treatment-nave, treatment-experienced and even for interferon-ineligible or interferon-intolerant patients. Some clinical trials have demonstrated promising results, and have shown that the efficacy and safety were not different between patients with and without cirrhosis. There are also promising regimens for genotypes other than genotype 1. Interferonis contraindicated in patients with decompensated cirrhosis, and further studies are needed to establish the optimal treatment regimen for this population. In the future, interferon-free and ribavirin-free regimens with high efficacy and improved safety are expected for HCVinfected patients with advanced liver diseases.展开更多
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection induces steatosis and is accompanied by multiple metabolic alterations including hyperuricemia, reversible hypocholesterolemia and insulin resistance. Total cholesterol, low-density l...Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection induces steatosis and is accompanied by multiple metabolic alterations including hyperuricemia, reversible hypocholesterolemia and insulin resistance. Total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and triglyceride levels are increased by peginterferon and ribavirin combination therapy when a sustained virologic response (SVR) is achieved in patients with HCV. Steatosis is significantly more common in patients with HCV genotype 3 but interferon-free regimens are not always effective for treating HCV genotype 3 infections. HCV infection increases fatty acid synthase levels, resulting in the accumulation of fatty acids in hepatocytes. Of note, low-density lipoprotein receptor, scavenger receptor class B type I and Niemann-Pick C1-like 1 proteins are candidate receptors that may be involved in HCV. They are also required for the uptake of cholesterol from the external environment of hepatocytes. Among HCV-infected patients with or without human immunodeficiency virus infection, changes in serum lipid profiles are observed during interferon-free treatment and after the achievement of an SVR. It is evident that HCV affects cholesterol metabolism during interferon-free regimens. Although higher SVR rates were achieved with interferon-free treatment of HCV, special attention must also be paid to unexpected adverse events based on host metabolic changes including hyperlipidemia.展开更多
Chronic hepatitis C(CHC) is the most common indication for liver transplantation(LT). Aggressive treatment of hepatitis C virus(HCV) infection before cirrhosis development or decompensation may reduce LT need and risk...Chronic hepatitis C(CHC) is the most common indication for liver transplantation(LT). Aggressive treatment of hepatitis C virus(HCV) infection before cirrhosis development or decompensation may reduce LT need and risk of HCV recurrence post-LT. Factors associated with increased HCV risk or severity of recurrence include older age, immunosuppression, HCV genotype 1 and high viral load at LT. HCV recurrence post-LT leads to accelerated liver disease and cirrhosis development with reduced graft and patient survival. Currently, interferon(IFN)-based regimens can be used in dualagent regimens with ribavirin, in triple-agent antiviral strategies with direct-acting antivirals(e.g., protease inhibitors telaprevir or boceprevir), or before transplant in compensated patients to reduce HCV viral load to prevent or reduce the risk of post-LT recurrence and complications; they cannot be used in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. IFN-based regimens are used in less than half of HCV-infected patients waiting for LT due to extremely low efficacy and poor tolerability. However, antiviral therapy is indicated after LT in patients with histologically confirmed CHC despite tolerability issues. Improvements in side effect management have increased survival in patients achieving therapeutic targets. HCV treatment pre- and post-LT results in significant health care costs especially when lack of efficacy leads to disease worsening, although studies have shown sofosbuvir treatment before LT vs conventional post-LT dual antiviral is cost effective. The suboptimal efficacy and tolerability of IFN-based therapies, plus the significant economic burden, means the need for effective and well tolerated IFN-free antiHCV therapy for pre- and post-LT remains high.展开更多
Hepatitis C infection can lead to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma and it is an important cause of mortality and morbidity. Achieving a sustained virological response has been the major aim for decades. Interfer...Hepatitis C infection can lead to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma and it is an important cause of mortality and morbidity. Achieving a sustained virological response has been the major aim for decades. Interferon treatment was the primarily developed therapy against the infection. Addition of the guanosine analog ribavirin to stop viral RNA synthesis increased the response rates as well as the adverse effects of the treatment. The increasing demands for alternative regimens led to the development of direct-acting antivirals(DAAs). The approval of sofosbuvir and simeprevir signaled a new era of antiviral treatment for hepatitis C infection. Although the majority of studies have been performed with DAAs in combination with interferon and resulted in a decrease in treatment duration and increase in response rates, the response rates achieved with interferon-free regimens provided hope for patients ineligible for therapy with interferon. Most DAA studies are in phase Ⅱ leading to phase Ⅲ. In the near future more DAAs are expected to be approved. The main disadvantage of the therapy remains the cost of the drugs. Here, we focus on new treatment strategies for hepatitis C infection as well as agents targeting hepatitis C virus replication that are in clinical development.展开更多
To determine the number of mutations in the NS5A region of the hepatitis C virus(HCV)and its relationship to the response to antiviral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 who are non-responders to ...To determine the number of mutations in the NS5A region of the hepatitis C virus(HCV)and its relationship to the response to antiviral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 who are non-responders to two or more treatments.METHODSSequences within HCV NS5A[PKR binding domain(PKRBD)and the interferon-sensitivity-determining region(ISDR)]were analysed via direct sequencing in a selected cohort of 72 patients,with a total of 201 treatments[interferon-alpha(IFN-α),n=49;IFN-α+ribavirin(RBV),n=75;pegylated(peg)IFN-α+RBV,n=47;first-generation direct-acting antivirals(DAAs),n=13;and second-generation DAAs,n=17].Of these,48/201 achieved a sustained virological response(SVR)and 153/201 achieved no virological response(NVR).RESULTSFor both regions,treatments resulting in SVR were associated with more baseline mutations than were treatments resulting in NVR(SVR vs NVR;PKRBD:5.82±3 vs 4.86±2 mutations,P=0.045;ISDR:2.65±2 vs 1.51±1.7 mutations,P=0.005).A decrease or no change in the number of mutations over time between treatments in the PKRBD or ISDR,as shown by sequencing,was associated with patients who usually failed to respond to treatment(PKRBD,P=0.02;ISDR,P=0.001).Moreover,patients showing a post-treatment baseline viral load>600000 IU/mL and increased ISDR mutations with respect to the previous treatment were 9.21 times more likely to achieve SVR(P=0.001).CONCLUSIONThe obtained results show that among patients who have shown no response to two or more antiviral treatments,the likelihood of achieving SVR increases with the genetic variability in the ISDR region(≥2 mutations or number of substitutions from the HCV-J and HCV-1 prototype),especially when the viral load is greater than 600000 IU/mL.展开更多
Myanmar is adjacent to India, Bangladesh, Thailand, Laos and China. In Myanmar, the prevalence of hepatitis C virus(HCV) infection is 2%, and HCV infection accounts for 25% of hepatocellular carcinoma. In this study, ...Myanmar is adjacent to India, Bangladesh, Thailand, Laos and China. In Myanmar, the prevalence of hepatitis C virus(HCV) infection is 2%, and HCV infection accounts for 25% of hepatocellular carcinoma. In this study, we reviewed the prevalence of HCV genotypes in Myanmar. HCV genotypes 1, 3 and 6 were observed in volunteer blood donors in and around the Myanmar city of Yangon. Although there are several reports of HCV genotype 6 and its variants in Myanmar, the distribution of the HCV genotypes has not been well documented in areas other than Yangon. Previous studies showed that treatment with peginterferon and a weight-based dose of ribavirin for 24 or 48 wk could lead to an 80%-100% sustained virological response(SVR) rates in Myanmar. Current interferon-free treatments could lead to higher SVR rates(90%-95%) in patients infected with almost all HCV genotypes other than HCV genotype 3. In an era of heavy reliance on direct-acting antivirals against HCV, there is an increasing need to measure HCV genotypes, and this need will also increase specifically in Myanmar. Current available information of HCV genotypes were mostly from Yangon and other countries than Myanmar. The prevalence of HCV genotypes in Myanmar should be determined.展开更多
文摘Chronic hepatitis C is a major reason for development of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma and a leading cause for liver transplantation. The development of direct-acting antiviral agents lead to(pegylated) interferon-alfa free antiviral therapy regimens with a remarkable increase in sustained virologic response(SVR) rates and opened therapeutic options for patients with advanced cirrhosis and liver graft recipients. This concise review gives an overview about most current prospective trials and cohort analyses for treatment of patients with liver cirrhosis and liver graft recipients. In patients with compensated cirrhosis Child-Pugh-Turcotte(CTP) class A, all approved agents are safe and SVR rates do not significantly differ from patients without cirrhosis in general. In patients with decompensated cirrhosis CTP class B or C, daclastasvir, ledipasvir, velpatasvir, and sofosbuvir are approved, and SVR rates higher than 90% can be achieved. Especially for patients with a model of end stage liver disease score higher than 15 and therefore eligible for liver transplantation, data is scarce. Reported SVR rates in patients with cirrhosis CTP class C are lower compared to patients with a less severe liver disease. In liver transplant recipients with a maximum of CTP class A, SVR rates are comparable to patients without LT. Patients with decompensated graft cirrhosis should be treated on an individual basis.
文摘BACKGROUND The introduction of direct-acting antiviral drugs into clinical practice has revolutionized the treatment of chronic hepatitis C,making it highly effective and safe for patients.However,few researchers have analyzed the factors causing therapy failure in some patients.AIM To analyze factors influencing the failure of direct antiviral drugs in the large,multicenter EpiTer-2 cohort in a real-world setting.METHODS The study cohort consisted of patients with chronic hepatitis C treated at 22 Polish centers from 2016-2020.Data collected from the online EpiTer-2 database included the following:hepatitis C virus(HCV)genotype,stage of fibrosis,hematology and liver function parameters,Child-Turcotte-Pugh and Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores,prior antiviral therapy,concomitant diseases,and drugs used in relation to hepatitis B virus(HBV)and/or human immunodeficiency virus(HIV)coinfections.Adverse events observed during the treatment and follow-up period were reported.Both standard and machine learning methods were used for statistical analysis.RESULTS During analysis,12614 patients with chronic hepatitis C were registered,of which 11938(mean age:52 years)had available sustained virologic response(SVR)data[11629(97%)achieved SVR and 309(3%)did not].Most patients(78.1%)were infected with HCV genotype 1b.Liver cirrhosis was diagnosed in 2974 patients,while advanced fibrosis(F3)was diagnosed in 1717 patients.We included patients with features of hepatic failure at baseline[ascites in 142(1.2%)and encephalopathy in 68(0.6%)patients].The most important host factors negatively influencing treatment efficacy were liver cirrhosis,clinical and laboratory features of liver failure,history of hepatocellular carcinoma,and higher body mass index.Among viral factors,genotype 3 and viral load also exerted an influence on treatment efficacy.Classical statistical analysis revealed that treatment ineffectiveness seemed to be influenced by the male sex,which was not confirmed by the multivariate analysis using the machine learning algorithm(random forest).Coinfection with HBV(including patients with on-treatment reactivation of HBV infection)or HIV,extrahepatic manifestations,and renal failure did not significantly affect the treatment efficacy.CONCLUSION In patients with advanced liver disease,individualized therapy(testing for resistance-associated variants and response-guided treatment)should be considered to maximize the chance of achieving SVR.
文摘Patients who are infected with hepatitis C virus(HCV) and also have advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis have beenrecognized as "difficult-to-treat" patients during an era when peginterferon and ribavirin combination therapy is the standard of care. Recent guidelines have clearly stated that treatment should be prioritized in this population to prevent complications such as decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma. Recent advances in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C have been achieved through the development of direct-acting antiviral agents(DAAs). Boceprevir and telaprevir are first-generation DAAs that inhibit the HCV NS3/4A protease. Boceprevir or telaprevir, in combination with peginterferon and ribavirin, improved the sustained virological response rates compared with peginterferon and ribavirin alone and were tolerated in patients with HCV genotype 1 infection without cirrhosis or compensated cirrhosis. However, the efficacy is lower especially in prior non-responders with or without cirrhosis. Furthermore, a high incidence of adverse events was observed in patients with advanced liver disease, including cirrhosis, in real-life settings. Current guidelines in the United States and in some European countries no longer recommend these regimens for the treatment of HCV. Next-generation DAAs include second-generation HCV NS3/4A protease inhibitors, HCV NS5 A inhibitors and HCV NS5 B inhibitors, which have a high efficacy and a lower toxicity. These drugs are used in interferon-free or in interferon-based regimens with or without ribavirin in combination with different classes of DAAs. Interferon-based regimens, such as simeprevir in combination with peginterferon and ribavirin, are well tolerated and are highly effective especially in treatmentnave patients and in patients who received treatment but who relapsed. The efficacy is less pronounced in nullresponders and in patients with cirrhosis. Interferonfree regimens in combination with ribavirin and/or two or more DAAs could be used for treatment-nave, treatment-experienced and even for interferon-ineligible or interferon-intolerant patients. Some clinical trials have demonstrated promising results, and have shown that the efficacy and safety were not different between patients with and without cirrhosis. There are also promising regimens for genotypes other than genotype 1. Interferonis contraindicated in patients with decompensated cirrhosis, and further studies are needed to establish the optimal treatment regimen for this population. In the future, interferon-free and ribavirin-free regimens with high efficacy and improved safety are expected for HCVinfected patients with advanced liver diseases.
文摘Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection induces steatosis and is accompanied by multiple metabolic alterations including hyperuricemia, reversible hypocholesterolemia and insulin resistance. Total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and triglyceride levels are increased by peginterferon and ribavirin combination therapy when a sustained virologic response (SVR) is achieved in patients with HCV. Steatosis is significantly more common in patients with HCV genotype 3 but interferon-free regimens are not always effective for treating HCV genotype 3 infections. HCV infection increases fatty acid synthase levels, resulting in the accumulation of fatty acids in hepatocytes. Of note, low-density lipoprotein receptor, scavenger receptor class B type I and Niemann-Pick C1-like 1 proteins are candidate receptors that may be involved in HCV. They are also required for the uptake of cholesterol from the external environment of hepatocytes. Among HCV-infected patients with or without human immunodeficiency virus infection, changes in serum lipid profiles are observed during interferon-free treatment and after the achievement of an SVR. It is evident that HCV affects cholesterol metabolism during interferon-free regimens. Although higher SVR rates were achieved with interferon-free treatment of HCV, special attention must also be paid to unexpected adverse events based on host metabolic changes including hyperlipidemia.
基金provided by Mary Hines and Sheridan Henness of Springer Healthcare Communications,and funded by Gilead Sciences Srl
文摘Chronic hepatitis C(CHC) is the most common indication for liver transplantation(LT). Aggressive treatment of hepatitis C virus(HCV) infection before cirrhosis development or decompensation may reduce LT need and risk of HCV recurrence post-LT. Factors associated with increased HCV risk or severity of recurrence include older age, immunosuppression, HCV genotype 1 and high viral load at LT. HCV recurrence post-LT leads to accelerated liver disease and cirrhosis development with reduced graft and patient survival. Currently, interferon(IFN)-based regimens can be used in dualagent regimens with ribavirin, in triple-agent antiviral strategies with direct-acting antivirals(e.g., protease inhibitors telaprevir or boceprevir), or before transplant in compensated patients to reduce HCV viral load to prevent or reduce the risk of post-LT recurrence and complications; they cannot be used in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. IFN-based regimens are used in less than half of HCV-infected patients waiting for LT due to extremely low efficacy and poor tolerability. However, antiviral therapy is indicated after LT in patients with histologically confirmed CHC despite tolerability issues. Improvements in side effect management have increased survival in patients achieving therapeutic targets. HCV treatment pre- and post-LT results in significant health care costs especially when lack of efficacy leads to disease worsening, although studies have shown sofosbuvir treatment before LT vs conventional post-LT dual antiviral is cost effective. The suboptimal efficacy and tolerability of IFN-based therapies, plus the significant economic burden, means the need for effective and well tolerated IFN-free antiHCV therapy for pre- and post-LT remains high.
文摘Hepatitis C infection can lead to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma and it is an important cause of mortality and morbidity. Achieving a sustained virological response has been the major aim for decades. Interferon treatment was the primarily developed therapy against the infection. Addition of the guanosine analog ribavirin to stop viral RNA synthesis increased the response rates as well as the adverse effects of the treatment. The increasing demands for alternative regimens led to the development of direct-acting antivirals(DAAs). The approval of sofosbuvir and simeprevir signaled a new era of antiviral treatment for hepatitis C infection. Although the majority of studies have been performed with DAAs in combination with interferon and resulted in a decrease in treatment duration and increase in response rates, the response rates achieved with interferon-free regimens provided hope for patients ineligible for therapy with interferon. Most DAA studies are in phase Ⅱ leading to phase Ⅲ. In the near future more DAAs are expected to be approved. The main disadvantage of the therapy remains the cost of the drugs. Here, we focus on new treatment strategies for hepatitis C infection as well as agents targeting hepatitis C virus replication that are in clinical development.
基金Supported by“Consejería de Salud de la Junta de Andalucía”,No.PI0137/07“Instituto de Salud CarlosⅢ”,No.FISIntrasalud PI010/717
文摘To determine the number of mutations in the NS5A region of the hepatitis C virus(HCV)and its relationship to the response to antiviral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 who are non-responders to two or more treatments.METHODSSequences within HCV NS5A[PKR binding domain(PKRBD)and the interferon-sensitivity-determining region(ISDR)]were analysed via direct sequencing in a selected cohort of 72 patients,with a total of 201 treatments[interferon-alpha(IFN-α),n=49;IFN-α+ribavirin(RBV),n=75;pegylated(peg)IFN-α+RBV,n=47;first-generation direct-acting antivirals(DAAs),n=13;and second-generation DAAs,n=17].Of these,48/201 achieved a sustained virological response(SVR)and 153/201 achieved no virological response(NVR).RESULTSFor both regions,treatments resulting in SVR were associated with more baseline mutations than were treatments resulting in NVR(SVR vs NVR;PKRBD:5.82±3 vs 4.86±2 mutations,P=0.045;ISDR:2.65±2 vs 1.51±1.7 mutations,P=0.005).A decrease or no change in the number of mutations over time between treatments in the PKRBD or ISDR,as shown by sequencing,was associated with patients who usually failed to respond to treatment(PKRBD,P=0.02;ISDR,P=0.001).Moreover,patients showing a post-treatment baseline viral load>600000 IU/mL and increased ISDR mutations with respect to the previous treatment were 9.21 times more likely to achieve SVR(P=0.001).CONCLUSIONThe obtained results show that among patients who have shown no response to two or more antiviral treatments,the likelihood of achieving SVR increases with the genetic variability in the ISDR region(≥2 mutations or number of substitutions from the HCV-J and HCV-1 prototype),especially when the viral load is greater than 600000 IU/mL.
文摘Myanmar is adjacent to India, Bangladesh, Thailand, Laos and China. In Myanmar, the prevalence of hepatitis C virus(HCV) infection is 2%, and HCV infection accounts for 25% of hepatocellular carcinoma. In this study, we reviewed the prevalence of HCV genotypes in Myanmar. HCV genotypes 1, 3 and 6 were observed in volunteer blood donors in and around the Myanmar city of Yangon. Although there are several reports of HCV genotype 6 and its variants in Myanmar, the distribution of the HCV genotypes has not been well documented in areas other than Yangon. Previous studies showed that treatment with peginterferon and a weight-based dose of ribavirin for 24 or 48 wk could lead to an 80%-100% sustained virological response(SVR) rates in Myanmar. Current interferon-free treatments could lead to higher SVR rates(90%-95%) in patients infected with almost all HCV genotypes other than HCV genotype 3. In an era of heavy reliance on direct-acting antivirals against HCV, there is an increasing need to measure HCV genotypes, and this need will also increase specifically in Myanmar. Current available information of HCV genotypes were mostly from Yangon and other countries than Myanmar. The prevalence of HCV genotypes in Myanmar should be determined.
