Objective To evaluate the results of surgery on intercondylar of humerus. Methods Fifty-eight cases (26 males, 32 females), in an average age of 46. 6 (13 ~ 82 years), of intercondylar fracture of the humerus operated...Objective To evaluate the results of surgery on intercondylar of humerus. Methods Fifty-eight cases (26 males, 32 females), in an average age of 46. 6 (13 ~ 82 years), of intercondylar fracture of the humerus operated from September 1988 to September 1998 were followed up 29 months (8 ~ 63 months). According to the AO/MSIF classification 8, 7 and 5 cases were divided into type B1, B2 and B3 respectively while other 13, 10 and 15 patients into C1, C2 and C3 respectively. All the cases were evaluated by modified Jupiter assessment. Results Twenty-eight patients gained excellent results, while the good, fair and poor outcomes were found in twenty-two, three and five cases respectively. Conclusion Surgical treatment from posterior trans-olecranon approach with combination of internal fortion and bone graft, follwed by early active motion and adhesion relief procedure for elbow if necessary, was advocated in intercondylar fracture of humerus.展开更多
Background:The open reduction and internal fixation(ORIF)was a standard treatment approach for fracture at distal humerus intercondylar,whereas the optimal way before ORIF remains inconclusive.We,therefore,performed a...Background:The open reduction and internal fixation(ORIF)was a standard treatment approach for fracture at distal humerus intercondylar,whereas the optimal way before ORIF remains inconclusive.We,therefore,performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of olecranon osteotomy vs.triceps-sparing approach for patients with distal humerus intercondylar fracture.Methods:The electronic searches were systematically performed in PubMed,EmBase,Cochrane library,and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure from initial inception till December 2019.The primary endpoint was the incidence of excellent/good elbow function,and the secondary endpoints included Mayo elbow performance score,duration of operation,blood loss,and complications.Results:Nine studies involving a total of 637 patients were selected for meta-analysis.There were no significant differences between olecranon osteotomy and triceps-sparing approach for the incidence of excellent/good elbow function(odds ratio[OR]:1.37;95%confidence interval[CI]:0.69-2.75;P=0.371),Mayo elbow performance score(weight mean difference[WMD]:0.17;95%CI:-2.56 to 2.89;P=0.904),duration of operation(WMD:4.04;95%CI:-28.60 to 36.69;P=0.808),blood loss(WMD:33.61;95%CI:-18.35 to 85.58;P=0.205),and complications(OR:1.93;95%CI:0.49-7.60;P=0.349).Sensitivity analyses found olecranon osteotomy might be associated with higher incidence of excellent/good elbow function,longer duration of operation,greater blood loss,and higher incidence of complications as compared with triceps-sparing approach.Conclusions:This study found olecranon osteotomy did not yield additional benefit on the incidence of excellent/good elbow function,while the duration of operation,blood loss,and complications in patients treated with olecranon osteotomy might be inferior than triceps-sparing approach.展开更多
目的观察固定平台单髁置换加髁间窝成形术治疗中度固定屈曲畸形膝内侧间室骨关节炎的临床效果。方法选取2021年11月至2023年6月青岛市市立医院收治的合并有中度固定屈曲畸形的膝内侧间室骨关节炎患者50例,其中男24例,女26例,年龄64~75岁...目的观察固定平台单髁置换加髁间窝成形术治疗中度固定屈曲畸形膝内侧间室骨关节炎的临床效果。方法选取2021年11月至2023年6月青岛市市立医院收治的合并有中度固定屈曲畸形的膝内侧间室骨关节炎患者50例,其中男24例,女26例,年龄64~75岁,平均(69.69±3.53)岁。按手术方式分为研究组(采用固定平台单髁置换加髁间窝成形术)和对照组(采用全膝关节表面置换术)各25例。对比两组手术前后Lysholm评分、美国特种外科医院(the hospital for special surgery,HSS)膝关节评分及疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS),测量术前及术后12个月膝关节屈曲角度,对比两组伸膝角度改善情况。结果患者均获得12个月完整随访。术后2周、6周、3个月研究组Lysholm评分、HSS评分及VAS均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组术后6个月、12个月Lysholm评分、HSS评分及VAS差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组术后12个月残留畸形角度大于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对老年骨关节炎合并中度固定屈曲畸形患者采取固定平台单髁置换加髁间窝成形手术可以有效地减轻疼痛,改善膝关节功能,但对屈曲畸形的矫正能力小于全膝关节置换。展开更多
文摘Objective To evaluate the results of surgery on intercondylar of humerus. Methods Fifty-eight cases (26 males, 32 females), in an average age of 46. 6 (13 ~ 82 years), of intercondylar fracture of the humerus operated from September 1988 to September 1998 were followed up 29 months (8 ~ 63 months). According to the AO/MSIF classification 8, 7 and 5 cases were divided into type B1, B2 and B3 respectively while other 13, 10 and 15 patients into C1, C2 and C3 respectively. All the cases were evaluated by modified Jupiter assessment. Results Twenty-eight patients gained excellent results, while the good, fair and poor outcomes were found in twenty-two, three and five cases respectively. Conclusion Surgical treatment from posterior trans-olecranon approach with combination of internal fortion and bone graft, follwed by early active motion and adhesion relief procedure for elbow if necessary, was advocated in intercondylar fracture of humerus.
基金This study was supported by the grants from the Beiing Municipal Health Commission(No.BMHC2019-9)Beiing Natural Science Foundation(No.L192049)Beiing Jishuitan Hospital's“Discipline new star”Plan(No.XKXX201604)。
文摘Background:The open reduction and internal fixation(ORIF)was a standard treatment approach for fracture at distal humerus intercondylar,whereas the optimal way before ORIF remains inconclusive.We,therefore,performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of olecranon osteotomy vs.triceps-sparing approach for patients with distal humerus intercondylar fracture.Methods:The electronic searches were systematically performed in PubMed,EmBase,Cochrane library,and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure from initial inception till December 2019.The primary endpoint was the incidence of excellent/good elbow function,and the secondary endpoints included Mayo elbow performance score,duration of operation,blood loss,and complications.Results:Nine studies involving a total of 637 patients were selected for meta-analysis.There were no significant differences between olecranon osteotomy and triceps-sparing approach for the incidence of excellent/good elbow function(odds ratio[OR]:1.37;95%confidence interval[CI]:0.69-2.75;P=0.371),Mayo elbow performance score(weight mean difference[WMD]:0.17;95%CI:-2.56 to 2.89;P=0.904),duration of operation(WMD:4.04;95%CI:-28.60 to 36.69;P=0.808),blood loss(WMD:33.61;95%CI:-18.35 to 85.58;P=0.205),and complications(OR:1.93;95%CI:0.49-7.60;P=0.349).Sensitivity analyses found olecranon osteotomy might be associated with higher incidence of excellent/good elbow function,longer duration of operation,greater blood loss,and higher incidence of complications as compared with triceps-sparing approach.Conclusions:This study found olecranon osteotomy did not yield additional benefit on the incidence of excellent/good elbow function,while the duration of operation,blood loss,and complications in patients treated with olecranon osteotomy might be inferior than triceps-sparing approach.
文摘目的观察固定平台单髁置换加髁间窝成形术治疗中度固定屈曲畸形膝内侧间室骨关节炎的临床效果。方法选取2021年11月至2023年6月青岛市市立医院收治的合并有中度固定屈曲畸形的膝内侧间室骨关节炎患者50例,其中男24例,女26例,年龄64~75岁,平均(69.69±3.53)岁。按手术方式分为研究组(采用固定平台单髁置换加髁间窝成形术)和对照组(采用全膝关节表面置换术)各25例。对比两组手术前后Lysholm评分、美国特种外科医院(the hospital for special surgery,HSS)膝关节评分及疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS),测量术前及术后12个月膝关节屈曲角度,对比两组伸膝角度改善情况。结果患者均获得12个月完整随访。术后2周、6周、3个月研究组Lysholm评分、HSS评分及VAS均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组术后6个月、12个月Lysholm评分、HSS评分及VAS差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组术后12个月残留畸形角度大于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对老年骨关节炎合并中度固定屈曲畸形患者采取固定平台单髁置换加髁间窝成形手术可以有效地减轻疼痛,改善膝关节功能,但对屈曲畸形的矫正能力小于全膝关节置换。
