Objective: to summarize the method and effect of minimally invasive tooth extraction technology in the extraction of impacted teeth. Methods: 92 patients who underwent extraction of impacted teeth in our hospital from...Objective: to summarize the method and effect of minimally invasive tooth extraction technology in the extraction of impacted teeth. Methods: 92 patients who underwent extraction of impacted teeth in our hospital from June 2020 to June 2021 were selected and divided into two groups by different surgical methods. The conventional group and the experimental group were treated with traditional tooth extraction and minimally invasive tooth extraction respectively. The comparison was made between the two groups based on the extraction time, pain, integrity and the incidence of complications. Results: the extraction time, integrity and pain score of the experimental group were significantly better than those of the conventional group (P < 0.05). The incidence of complications in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: minimally invasive tooth extraction technology has obvious technical advantages for the extraction of impacted teeth. It not only has less pain, but also has higher alveolar integrity. It has obvious technical advantages and is worth popularizing.展开更多
文摘Objective: to summarize the method and effect of minimally invasive tooth extraction technology in the extraction of impacted teeth. Methods: 92 patients who underwent extraction of impacted teeth in our hospital from June 2020 to June 2021 were selected and divided into two groups by different surgical methods. The conventional group and the experimental group were treated with traditional tooth extraction and minimally invasive tooth extraction respectively. The comparison was made between the two groups based on the extraction time, pain, integrity and the incidence of complications. Results: the extraction time, integrity and pain score of the experimental group were significantly better than those of the conventional group (P < 0.05). The incidence of complications in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: minimally invasive tooth extraction technology has obvious technical advantages for the extraction of impacted teeth. It not only has less pain, but also has higher alveolar integrity. It has obvious technical advantages and is worth popularizing.
