The Global Precipitation Measurement(GPM)dual-frequency precipitation radar(DPR)products(Version 07A)are employed for a rigorous comparative analysis with ground-based operational weather radar(GR)networks.The reflect...The Global Precipitation Measurement(GPM)dual-frequency precipitation radar(DPR)products(Version 07A)are employed for a rigorous comparative analysis with ground-based operational weather radar(GR)networks.The reflectivity observed by GPM Ku PR is compared quantitatively against GR networks from CINRAD of China and NEXRAD of the United States,and the volume matching method is used for spatial matching.Additionally,a novel frequency correction method for all phases as well as precipitation types is used to correct the GPM Ku PR radar frequency to the GR frequency.A total of 20 GRs(including 10 from CINRAD and 10 from NEXRAD)are included in this comparative analysis.The results indicate that,compared with CINRAD matched data,NEXRAD exhibits larger biases in reflectivity when compared with the frequency-corrected Ku PR.The root-mean-square difference for CINRAD is calculated at 2.38 d B,whereas for NEXRAD it is 3.23 d B.The mean bias of CINRAD matched data is-0.16 d B,while the mean bias of NEXRAD is-2.10 d B.The mean standard deviation of bias for CINRAD is 2.15 d B,while for NEXRAD it is 2.29 d B.This study effectively assesses weather radar data in both the United States and China,which is crucial for improving the overall consistency of global precipitation estimates.展开更多
基金funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China(Grant No.2023YFB3907500)the National Natural Science Foundation(Grant No.42330602)the“Fengyun Satellite Remote Sensing Product Validation and Verification”Youth Innovation Team of the China Meteorological Administration(Grant No.CMA2023QN12)。
文摘The Global Precipitation Measurement(GPM)dual-frequency precipitation radar(DPR)products(Version 07A)are employed for a rigorous comparative analysis with ground-based operational weather radar(GR)networks.The reflectivity observed by GPM Ku PR is compared quantitatively against GR networks from CINRAD of China and NEXRAD of the United States,and the volume matching method is used for spatial matching.Additionally,a novel frequency correction method for all phases as well as precipitation types is used to correct the GPM Ku PR radar frequency to the GR frequency.A total of 20 GRs(including 10 from CINRAD and 10 from NEXRAD)are included in this comparative analysis.The results indicate that,compared with CINRAD matched data,NEXRAD exhibits larger biases in reflectivity when compared with the frequency-corrected Ku PR.The root-mean-square difference for CINRAD is calculated at 2.38 d B,whereas for NEXRAD it is 3.23 d B.The mean bias of CINRAD matched data is-0.16 d B,while the mean bias of NEXRAD is-2.10 d B.The mean standard deviation of bias for CINRAD is 2.15 d B,while for NEXRAD it is 2.29 d B.This study effectively assesses weather radar data in both the United States and China,which is crucial for improving the overall consistency of global precipitation estimates.
文摘董志塬地区位于黄土高原中心地带,滑坡灾害频发,亟需明确滑坡易发性分区,以支持该区域滑坡隐患的科学防控。因此,本文以董志塬为研究区,选取高程、坡向和NDVI等12个影响因素作为评价因子,基于频率比(frequency ratio,FR)模型,结合随机森林(random forest,RF)与人工神经网络(artificial neural network,ANN)模型开展滑坡静态易发性评价,并分析各因子对评价精度的贡献。结果表明,FRRF和FR-ANN模型的曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)值分别为0.922和0.918,表明FR-RF模型在董志塬滑坡易发性评价中的精度更高。坡度、坡向和道路密度对滑坡易发性的贡献率分别为16.7%、15.3%和1.4%。为克服地形复杂和数据更新滞后的问题,本文将FR-RF模型的易发性结果与InSAR Stacking结果相结合,将静态滑坡易发性评价精度由6.9%提升到8.1%。动态易发性结果表明,董志塬滑坡高易发区主要分布于河流沿岸,占总面积的6.5%,该区域的滑坡数量占总滑坡数的23.6%,滑坡密度15.7个/km^(2)。低易发区主要位于远离河流的中部区域,占总面积的81.7%,滑坡数量占总滑坡数的57.8%,滑坡密度4.7个/km^(2)。本研究通过融合InSAR Stacking方法,解决了静态滑坡易发性评价数据更新滞后问题,减少了假阴性错误,为传统滑坡易发性评价赋予了时效性,可以实现董志塬滑坡易发性动态评价,为灾害防治提供了重要数据支持。
