BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer(CRC)is one of the most common malignant tumors,and early screening is crucial to improving the survival rate of patients.The combination of colonoscopy and immune fecal occult blood detect...BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer(CRC)is one of the most common malignant tumors,and early screening is crucial to improving the survival rate of patients.The combination of colonoscopy and immune fecal occult blood detection has garnered significant attention as a novel method for CRC screening.Colonoscopy and fecal occult blood tests,when combined,can improve screening accuracy and early detection rates,thereby facilitating early intervention and treatment.However,certain risks and costs accompany it,making the establishment of a risk classification model crucial for accurate classification and management of screened subjects.AIM To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of colonoscopy,immune fecal occult blood test(FIT),and risk-graded screening strategies in CRC screening.METHODS Based on the randomized controlled trial of CRC screening in the population conducted by our hospital May 2020 to May 2023,participants who met the requirements were randomly assigned to a colonoscopy group,an FIT group,or a graded screening group at a ratio of 1:2:2(after risk assessment,the high-risk group received colonoscopy,the low-risk group received an FIT test,and the FITpositive group received colonoscopy).The three groups received CRC screening with different protocols,among which the colonoscopy group only received baseline screening,and the FIT group and the graded screening group received annual follow-up screening based on baseline screening.The primary outcome was the detection rate of advanced tumors,including CRC and advanced adenoma.The population participation rate,advanced tumor detection rate,and colonoscopy load of the three screening programs were compared.RESULTS A total of 19373 subjects who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled,including 8082 males(41.7%)and 11291 females(58.3%).The mean age was 60.05±6.5 years.Among them,3883 patients were enrolled in the colonoscopy group,7793 in the FIT group,and 7697 in the graded screening group.Two rounds of follow-up screening were completed in the FIT group and the graded screening group.The graded screening group(89.2%)and the colonoscopy group(42.3%)had the lowest overall screening participation rates,while the FIT group had the highest(99.3%).The results of the intentional analysis showed that the detection rate of advanced tumors in the colonoscopy group was greater than that of the FIT group[2.76%vs 2.17%,odds ratio(OR)=1.30,95%confidence interval(CI):1.01-1.65,P=0.037].There was no significant difference in the detection rate of advanced tumors between the colonoscopy group and the graded screening group(2.76%vs 2.35%,OR=1.9,95%CI:0.93-1.51,P=0.156),as well as between the graded screening group and the FIT group(2.35%vs 2.17%,OR=1.09%,95%CI:0.88-1.34,P=0.440).The number of colonoscopy examinations required for each patient with advanced tumors was used as an index to evaluate the colonoscopy load during population screening.The graded screening group had the highest colonoscopy load(15.4 times),followed by the colonoscopy group(10.2 times),and the FIT group had the lowest(7.8 times).CONCLUSION A hierarchical screening strategy based on CRC risk assessment is feasible for screening for CRC in the population.It can be used as an effective supplement to traditional colonoscopy and FIT screening programs.展开更多
BACKGROUND Certain subgroups are at an increased risk of false fecal immunochemical test(FIT)results;however,related studies are limited,and the available evidence is conflicting.AIM To evaluate factors associated wit...BACKGROUND Certain subgroups are at an increased risk of false fecal immunochemical test(FIT)results;however,related studies are limited,and the available evidence is conflicting.AIM To evaluate factors associated with false-positive and false-negative FIT results.METHODS This retrospective study was based on the database of the Tianjin Colorectal Cancer Screening Program from 2012 to 2020.A total of 4129947 residents aged 40-74 years completed at least one FIT.Of these,24890 asymptomatic participants who underwent colonoscopy examinations and completed lifestyle questionnaires were included in the analysis.Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify the factors associated with false FIT results.RESULTS Among the overall screening population,88687(2.15%)participants tested positive for FIT.The sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,and negative predictive value of FIT for advanced neoplasms were 58.2%,44.8%,9.7%,and 91.3%,respectively.Older age,female sex,smoking,alcohol consumption,higher body mass index,and hemorrhoids were significantly associated with increased odds of false-positive and lower odds of falsenegative FIT results.Moreover,features of high-grade dysplasia or villous for advanced adenoma and the presence of cancer were also associated with lower odds of false-negative results,while irregular exercise and diverticulum were associated with higher odds of false-positive results.CONCLUSION FIT results may be inaccurate in certain subgroups.Our results provide important evidence for further individualization of screening strategies.展开更多
BACKGROUND The incidence of colorectal cancer(CRC)in China is steadily rising,with a high proportion of advanced-stage diagnoses.This highlights the significance of early detection and prevention measures to enhance s...BACKGROUND The incidence of colorectal cancer(CRC)in China is steadily rising,with a high proportion of advanced-stage diagnoses.This highlights the significance of early detection and prevention measures to enhance survival rates.Fecal immunochemical testing(FIT)is a globally recommended CRC screening method;however,limited research has been conducted on its application in Hainan.AIM To assess the efficacy and adherence of FIT screening among average-risk individuals in Hainan,while also examining the risk factors associated with positive FIT results.METHODS This population-based cross-sectional study implemented FIT screening for CRC in 2000 asymptomatic participants aged 40-75 years from five cities and 21 community health centers in Hainan Province.The study was conducted from August 2022 to April 2023,employing a stratified sampling method to select participants.Individuals with positive FIT results subsequently underwent colonoscopy.Positive predictive values for confirmed CRC and advanced adenoma were calculated,and the relationship between relevant variables and positive FIT results was analyzed usingχ2 tests and multivariate logistic regression.RESULTS A total of 1788 participants completed the FIT screening,with a median age of 57 years(interquartile range:40-75).Among them,503(28.1%)were males,and 1285(71.9%)were females,resulting in an 89.4%compliance rate for FIT screening.The overall positivity rate of FIT was 4.4%[79 out of 1788;95%confidence interval(CI):3%-5%].The specific positivity rates for Haikou,Sanya,Orient City,Qionghai City,and Wuzhishan City were 9.6%(45 of 468;95%CI:8%-11%),1.3%(6 of 445;95%CI:0.1%-3.1%),2.7%(8 of 293;95%CI:1.2%-4.3%),3.3%(9 of 276;95%CI:1.0%-6.3%),and 4.2%(11 of 406;95%CI:1.2%-7.3%),respectively.Significant associations were found between age,dietary habits,and positive FIT results.Out of the 79 participants with positive FIT results,55 underwent colonoscopy,demonstrating an 82.2%compliance rate.Among them,10 had a clean gastrointestinal tract,43 had polyps or adenomas,and 2 were confirmed to have CRC,yielding a positive predictive value of 3.6%(95%CI:0.9%-4.2%).Among the 43 participants with polyps or adenomas,8 were diagnosed with advanced adenomas,resulting in an advanced adenoma rate of 14.5%(95%CI:10.1%-17.7%).CONCLUSION In the Hainan region,FIT screening for CRC among asymptomatic individuals at average risk is feasible and wellreceived.展开更多
Colorectal cancer(CRC)is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death worldwide.The leading risk factors for CRC include male gender,age over 50,family history,obesity,tobacco ...Colorectal cancer(CRC)is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death worldwide.The leading risk factors for CRC include male gender,age over 50,family history,obesity,tobacco smoking,alco-hol consumption,and unhealthy diet.CRC screening methods vary considerably between countries and depend on incidence,economic resources and healthcare structure.Important aspects of screening include adherence,which can vary signi-ficantly across ethnic and socioeconomic groups.Basic concepts of CRC screening include pre-stratification of patients by identifying risk factors and then using fecal immunochemical test or guaiac-based fecal occult blood test and/or colono-scopy or radiologic imaging techniques.Technological capabilities for CRC scree-ning are rapidly evolving and include stool DNA test,liquid biopsy,virtual colo-nography,and the use of artificial intelligence.A CRC prevention strategy should be comprehensive and include active patient education along with targeted imple-mentation of screening.展开更多
BACKGROUND Early detection of rectal cancer poses significant challenges.Current diagnostic methods,including colonoscopy,imaging techniques,and fecal tests,have limitations such as invasiveness,cost,and varying sensi...BACKGROUND Early detection of rectal cancer poses significant challenges.Current diagnostic methods,including colonoscopy,imaging techniques,and fecal tests,have limitations such as invasiveness,cost,and varying sensitivity.This study evaluated the diagnostic value of preoperative serum tumor markers in rectal cancer patients.AIM To investigate the value of a multi-marker approach for the preoperative diagnosis of rectal cancer.METHODS A retrospective analysis of 250 patients diagnosed with rectal cancer between July 2022 and July 2024 was conducted.Preoperative alpha-fetoprotein levels,carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA),cancer antigen 125(CA125),CA19-9,CA15-3,and CA72-4 were analyzed.All blood samples were collected under standardized conditions,including fasting status and proper storage methods,within two weeks before surgery.Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.Correlations among clinicopathological features were also evaluated.RESULTS CEA demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance among individual tumor markers with an area under the curve(AUC)of 0.78[95%confidence interval(CI):0.73-0.83].However,a combination of CEA,CA19-9,and CA72-4 showed superior performance,achieving an AUC of 0.87(95%CI:0.83-0.91).Significant correlations were observed between CEA levels and several clinicopatho-logical features,including tumor stage(P<0.001),lymph node involvement(P=0.002),and distant metastasis(P<0.001).Furthermore,in a subgroup analysis of patients diagnosed after July 2022,the integration of fecal occult blood testing with the tumor marker panel(CEA+CA19-9+CA72-4)significantly improved diagnostic accuracy,increasing the AUC to 0.91(95%CI:0.86-0.96).CONCLUSION A multimarker approach combining CEA,CA19-9,and CA72-4 with fecal occult blood testing enhances the preoperative assessment of patients with rectal cancer.These findings suggest potential improvements in risk stratification and management of patients with rectal cancer.展开更多
AIM To assess the diagnostic accuracy of a new fecal test for detecting Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori),using^(13)Curea breath test as the reference standard,and explore bacterial antibiotic resistance.METHODS We conduc...AIM To assess the diagnostic accuracy of a new fecal test for detecting Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori),using^(13)Curea breath test as the reference standard,and explore bacterial antibiotic resistance.METHODS We conducted a prospective two-center diagnostic test accuracy study.We enrolled consecutive people≥18 years without previous diagnosis of H.pylori infection,referred for dyspepsia between February and October 2017.At enrollment,all participants underwent 13 C-urea breath test.Participants aged over 50 years were scheduled to undergo upper endoscopy with histology.Participants collected stool samples 1-3 d after enrollment for a new fecal investigation(THD fecal test).The detection of bacterial 23 S rRNA subunit gene indicated H.pylori infection.We also used the index diagnostic test to examine mutations conferring resistance to clarithromycin and levofloxacin.Independent investigators analyzed index test and reference test standard results blinded to the other test findings.We estimated sensitivity,specificity,positive(PPV)and negative(NPV)predictive value,diagnostic accuracy,positive and negative likelihood ratio(LR),together with 95%confidence intervals(CI).RESULTS We enrolled 294 consecutive participants(age:Median 37.0 years,IQR:29.0-46.0 years;men:39.8%).Ninetyfive(32.3%)participants had a positive^(13)C-urea breath test.Twenty-three(7.8%)participants underwent upper endoscopy with histology,with a full concordance between^(13)C-urea breath test and histology in detecting H.pylori infection.Four(1.4%)out of the 294 participants withdrew from the study after the enrollment visit and did not undergo THD fecal testing.In the 290 participants who completed the study,the THD fecal test sensitivity was 90.2%(CI:84.2%-96.3%),specificity 98.5%(CI:96.8%-100%),PPV 96.5%(CI:92.6%-100%),NPV 95.6%(CI:92.8%-98.4%),accuracy 95.9%(CI:93.6%-98.2%),positive LR 59.5(CI:19.3-183.4),negative LR 0.10(CI:0.05-0.18).Out of 83 infected participants identified with the THD fecal test,34(41.0%)had bacterial genotypic changes consistent with antibiotic-resistant H.pylori infection.Of these,27(32.5%)had bacterial strains resistant to clarithromycin,3(3.6%)to levofloxacin,and 4(4.8%)to both antibiotics.CONCLUSION The THD fecal test has high performance for the non-invasive diagnosis of H.pylori infection while additionally enabling the assessment of bacterial antibiotic resistances.展开更多
Objective:Integration of risk stratification into fecal immunochemical test(FIT)might aid in the suboptimal detection of advanced neoplasms by FIT in colorectal cancer(CRC)screening.A comparative study was conducted t...Objective:Integration of risk stratification into fecal immunochemical test(FIT)might aid in the suboptimal detection of advanced neoplasms by FIT in colorectal cancer(CRC)screening.A comparative study was conducted to evaluate the participation and diagnostic yield of the parallel combination of questionnaire-based risk assessment(QRA)and FIT,FIT-only and QRA-only strategies in a CRC screening program in China.Methods:The study included 29,626 individuals aged 40-74 years and invited to participate in a CRC screening program in China.Participants were first invited to undertake QRA and one-time FIT(OC-sensor).Participants with positive QRA or FIT were deemed to be high-risk individuals who were recommended for subsequent colonoscopy.Participation,detection rate,and resource demand for colonoscopy were calculated and compared.Results:Of the 29,626 invitees,20,203 completed the parallel combination,8,592 completed the QRA-only,and11 completed the FIT-only strategy.For the parallel combination,FIT-only,and QRA-only strategies,the overall positivity rates were 10.2%(2,928/28,806),5.4%(1,096/20,214),and 6.8%(1,944/28,795),respectively;the yield of advanced neoplasm per 10,000 invitees were 46.9[95%confidence interval(95%CI):39.8-55.4],36.8(95%CI:30.5-44.4),and 12.2(95%CI:8.8-16.8),respectively;the positive predictive values for detecting advanced neoplasms among participants who completed colonoscopy were 4.7%(95%CI:4.0%-5.6%),9.9%(95%CI:8.3%-11.9%),and 1.9%(95%CI:1.3%-2.6%),respectively;the number of colonoscopies required to detect one advanced neoplasm was 11.4(95%CI:9.8-13.4),5.7(95%CI:4.8-6.7),and 28.4(95%CI:20.7-39.2),respectively.Conclusions:The parallel combination of QRA and FIT did not show superior efficacy for detecting advanced neoplasm compared with FIT alone in this CRC screening program.展开更多
AIM: To assess the risk of relapse in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients in clinical remission using mucosal status and fecal immunochemical test (FIT) results.METHODS: The clinical outcomes of 194 UC patients in clinic...AIM: To assess the risk of relapse in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients in clinical remission using mucosal status and fecal immunochemical test (FIT) results.METHODS: The clinical outcomes of 194 UC patients in clinical remission who underwent colonoscopy were based on evaluations of Mayo endoscopic subscores (MESs) and FIT results.RESULTS: Patients with an MES of 0 (n = 94, 48%) showed a ten-fold lower risk of relapse than those with an MES of 1-3 (n = 100, 52%) (HR = 0.10, 95%CI: 0.05-0.19). A negative FIT result (fecal hemoglobin concentrations ≤ 100 ng/mL) was predictive of patients with an MES of 0, with a sensitivity of 0.94 and a specific of 0.76. Moreover, patients with a negative FIT score had a six-fold lower risk of clinical relapse than those with a positive score (HR = 0.17, 95%CI: 0.10-0.28). Inclusion of the distinguishing parameter, sustaining clinical remission > 12 mo, resulted in an even stronger correlation between negative FIT results and an MES of 0 with respect to the risk of clinical relapse (HR = 0.11, 95%CI: 0.04-0.23).CONCLUSION: Negative FIT results one year or more after remission induction correlate with complete mucosal healing (MES 0) and better prognosis. Performing FIT one year after remission induction may be useful for evaluating relapse risk.展开更多
BACKGROUND The rate of positive tests using fecal immunochemical test(FIT)does not decrease with subsequent campaigns,but the positive predictive value of advanced neoplasia significantly decreases in subsequent campa...BACKGROUND The rate of positive tests using fecal immunochemical test(FIT)does not decrease with subsequent campaigns,but the positive predictive value of advanced neoplasia significantly decreases in subsequent campaign after a first negative test.A relationship between the fecal hemoglobin concentration(Fhb)and the opportunity to detect a colorectal cancer in subsequent campaign has been shown.AIM To predict the severity of colorectal lesions based on Fhb measured during previous colorectal cancer screening campaign.METHODS This etiological study included 293750 patients aged 50-74,living in Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes(France).These patients completed at least two FIT[test_((-1))and test_((0))]between June 2015 and December 2019.Delay between test_((-1))and test_((0))was>1year and test_((-1))result was negative(<150 ngHb/mL).The severity of colorectal lesions diagnosed at test_((0))was described according to Fhb measured at test_((-1))[Fhb_((-1))].The relationship between the severity classified in seven ordinal categories and the predictive factors was analyzed in an ordered multivariate polytomous regression model.RESULTS The test_((0))positive rate was 4.0%,and the colonoscopy completion rate was 97.1%in 11594 patients who showed a positive test_((0)).The colonoscopy detection rate was 77.7%in those 11254 patients who underwent a colonoscopy.A total of 8748 colorectal lesions were detected(including 2182 low-risk-polyps,2400 high-riskpolyp,and 502 colorectal cancer).The colonoscopy detection rate varied significantly with Fhb_((-1))[0 ngHb/mL:75.6%,(0-50 ngHb/mL):77.3%,(50-100 ngHb/mL):88.7%,(100-150 ngHb/mL):90.3%;P=0.001].People with a Fhb_((-1))within(100-150 ngHb/mL)(P=0.001)were 2.6(2.2;3.0)times more likely to have a high severity level compared to those having a Fhb_((-1))value of zero.This risk was reduced by 20%in patients aged 55-59 compared to those aged<55[adjusted odds ratio:0.8(0.6;1.0)].CONCLUSION The study showed that higher Fhb_((-1))is correlated to an increased risk of severity of colorectal lesions.This risk of severity increased among first-time participants(age<55)and the elderly(≥70).To avoid the loss of chance in these age groups,the FIT positivity threshold should be reduced to 100 ngHb/mL.The other alternative would be to reduce the time between the two tests in these age groups from the current 2 years to 1 year.展开更多
A high risk population consisting of 3034 people with history of rectal polyps or ulcers were screened for colorectal neoplasia with Reverse Passive Hemagglutination Fecal Occult Blood Test (RPHA FOB) and 60 cm fibero...A high risk population consisting of 3034 people with history of rectal polyps or ulcers were screened for colorectal neoplasia with Reverse Passive Hemagglutination Fecal Occult Blood Test (RPHA FOB) and 60 cm fiberoptic colonoscopy. Among 2553 subjects (84.1%)who completed both tests, 11 cases of colorectal malignancies and 465 cases of polyps were detected.Using colonoscopic finding and histopathological examination as the 'gold standard' of diagnosis, results showed that FOB positivity of polyps was related to their size, macroscopic appearance and surface features but no correlation between bleeding of polyps and their location, numbers, pathological types were found. In this study the sensitivity of RPHA in screening of colorectal malignancy was 63.6% (7/11), while that for polyps was only 21.1% (98/465) . For screening of colorectal neoplasia (cancer+polyps) the overall sensitivity and specificity of RPHA FOB were 22.1% and 82.4%, the positive and negative predictive values were 22.3% and 82.2% respectively. Amoug 465 polyps there were 195 adenomas, further analysis showed that villous and tubulovillous adenomas had higher intestinal bleeding rate (FOB positive)than tubular type (45.5%,30.0% and 17.8% respectively, X2=5.8, p=0.05). The results indicate that although the sensitivity of RPHA FOB in screening for colorectal polyps was generally low, but about 40% (8/21) of villous and tubulovillous adenoma which present higher tendency of malignant transformation can be detected by RPHA FOB as a screening Procedure. So the authors suggest that screening of colorectal neoplasia be not only a procedure of secondary prevention but also a measure of primary prevention for colorectal cancer.Accepted March 22, 1994展开更多
AIM: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of transfesrrin dipstick test (Tf) in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and precancerous lesions screening. METHODS: Eight hundreds and sixty-one individuals at high-ri...AIM: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of transfesrrin dipstick test (Tf) in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and precancerous lesions screening. METHODS: Eight hundreds and sixty-one individuals at high-risk for CRC were recruited. Six hundreds and eleven subsequently received the three fecal occult blood tests and colonoscopy with biopsy performed as needed. Fecal samples were obtained on the day before colonoscopy. Tf, immuno fecal occult blood test (IFOBT) and guaiac fecal occult blood test (g-FOBT) were performed simultaneously on the same stool. To minimize false-negative cases, all subjects with negative samples were asked to provide an additional stool specimen for a second test even a third test. If the results were all negative after testing three repeated samples, the subject was considered a true negative. The performance characteristics of Tf for detecting CRC and precancerous lesions were examined and compared to those of IFOBT and the combination of Tf, IFOBT and g-FOBT. RESULTS: A total of six hundreds and eleven subjects met the study criteria including 25 with CRC and 60 with precancerous lesions. Sensitivity for detecting CRC was 92% for Tf and 96% for IFOBT, specificities of Tf and IFOBT were both 72.0% (95% CI: 68.2%-75.5%; χ2 = 0.4, P > 0.05); positive likelihood ratios of those were 3.3 (95% CI: 2.8-3.9) and 3.4 (95% CI: 2.9-4.0), respectively. In precancerous lesions, sensitivities for Tf and IFOBT were 50% and 58%, respectively (χ 2 = 0.8, P > 0.05); specificities of Tf and IFOBT were 71.5% (95% CI: 67.6%-75.1%) and 72.2% (95% CI: 68.4%-75.8%); positive likelihood ratios of those were 1.8 (95% CI: 1.3-2.3) and 2.1 (95% CI: 1.6-2.7), respectively; compared to IFOBT, g-FOBT+ Tf+ IFOBT had a significantly higher positive rate for precancerous lesions (83% vs 58%, respectively; χ 2 = 9.1, P < 0.05). In patients with CRC and precancerous lesions, the sensitivities of Tf and IFOBT were 62% and 69% (χ 2 = 0.9, P > 0.05); specificities of those were 74.5% (95% CI: 70.6%-78.1%) and 75.5% (95% CI: 71.6%-79.0%); positive likelihood ratios of those were 2.5 (95% CI: 2.0-3.1) and 2.8 (95% CI: 2.3-3.5). Compared to IF-OBT alone, combining g-FOBT, IFOBT and Tf led to significantly increased sensitivity for detecting CRC and cancerous lesions (69% vs 88%, respectively; χ 2 = 9.0, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Tf dipstick test might be used as an ad- ditional tool for CRC and precancerous lesions screening in a high-risk cohort.展开更多
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer(CRC) is a major health problem. There is minimal consensus of the appropriate approach to manage patients with positive immunochemical fecal occult blood test(iFOBT), following a recent co...BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer(CRC) is a major health problem. There is minimal consensus of the appropriate approach to manage patients with positive immunochemical fecal occult blood test(iFOBT), following a recent colonoscopy.AIM To determine the prevalence of advanced neoplasia in patients with a positive iFOBT after a recent colonoscopy, and clinical and endoscopic predictors for advanced neoplasia.METHODS The study recruited i FOBT positive patients who underwent colonoscopy between July 2015 to March 2020. Data collected included demographics, clinical characteristics, previous and current colonoscopy findings. Primary outcome was the prevalence of CRC and advanced neoplasia in a patient with positive iFOBT and previous colonoscopy. Secondary outcomes included identifying any clinical and endoscopic predictors for advanced neoplasia.RESULTS The study included 1051 patients(male 53.6%;median age 63). Forty-two(4.0%) patients were diagnosed with CRC, 513(48.8%) with adenoma/sessile serrated lesion(A-SSL) and 257(24.5%) with advanced A-SSL(AA-SSL). A previous colonoscopy had been performed in 319(30.3%). In this cohort, four(1.3%) were diagnosed with CRC, 146(45.8%) with A-SSL and 56(17.6%) with AA-SSL. Among those who had a colonoscopy within 4 years, none had CRC and 7 had AA-SSL. Of the 732 patients with no prior colonoscopy, there were 38 CRCs(5.2%). Independent predictors for advanced neoplasia were male [odds ratio(OR) = 1.80;95% confidence interval(CI): 1.35-2.40;P < 0.001), age(OR = 1.04;95%CI: 1.02-1.06;P < 0.001) and no previous colonoscopy(OR = 2.07;95%CI: 1.49-2.87;P < 0.001).CONCLUSION A previous colonoscopy, irrespective of its result, was associated with low prevalence of advanced neoplasia, and if performed within four years of a positive iFOBT result, was protective against CRC.展开更多
BACKGROUND Elderly patients aged at least 75 years old(Elderly_75),represent 45%of colorectal cancer(CRC)incidence.As others,the French Colorectal Cancer Screening Program(CRCSP)does not include Elderly_75.To date,the...BACKGROUND Elderly patients aged at least 75 years old(Elderly_75),represent 45%of colorectal cancer(CRC)incidence.As others,the French Colorectal Cancer Screening Program(CRCSP)does not include Elderly_75.To date,there is little evidence to justify stopping screening at 74 years of age.AIM To describe CRC fecal screening test completion after age 74,source(CRCSP/Provider ordered)and outcomes of these tests.METHODS The study concerned 18704 Elderly_75 residing in eleven French districts(Ain,Doubs,Essonne,Haute-Saone,Hauts-de-Seine,Jura,Seine-Saint-Denis,Territoire-de-Belfort,Val-de-Marne,Val-d'Oise,Yonne),having performed a CRC screening test between January 2008 and December 2017.The tests performed in a circumstance of delayed response to a solicitation(DRS)from the local cancer screening managing center(Managing-Center)were distinguished from the tests non-solicited by the Managing-Center,performed after a recommendation by a General Practitioner(GP)or other provider ordered(RGP).DRS was any test realized by an Elderly_75 following an initial invitation from the ManagingCenter with a maximum 24 mo after this invitation.Any Non-DRS test was considered RGP.The outcomes of these tests were described according to the circumstances of test completion.RESULTS Of 18995 screening-tests were performed at ages:75(83.5%),76-80(13.4%)and>80(3.1%)years old.Elderly_75 performed the screening test in a circumstance of DRS(71.9%)or RGP(28.1%).The proportion of the tests that could not be analyzed and not restarted was 13.2%.For these unanalyzed tests,the reason was age-related in 78.0%of cases,related to the laboratory's refusal to analyze the test of people aged≥77.Reported colonoscopy completion rate was 81.3%.For those575 people with reported colonoscopy,no complication was listed.18.0%of the366 Elderly_75 with lesions had no anteriority in the CRCSP.The neoplasia(124 Low-risk-polyps,159 High-risk-polyps,13 Unspecified-polyps and 70 CRCs)detection rate was 19.3/1000 Elderly_75 screened and the CRC detection rate was3.7/1000 Elderly_75 screened.CONCLUSION The high rate of colonoscopy completion after a positive test and the high proportion of screened lesions observed suggest that the lengthening of the screening period could allow significant detection of CRC and polyps that occur in Elderly_75 excluded from CRCSP.展开更多
AIM: To improve the interpretation of fecal immunochemical test (FIT) results in colorectal cancer (CRC) cases from screening and referral cohorts. METHODS: In this comparative observational study, two prospective coh...AIM: To improve the interpretation of fecal immunochemical test (FIT) results in colorectal cancer (CRC) cases from screening and referral cohorts. METHODS: In this comparative observational study, two prospective cohorts of CRC cases were compared. The first cohort was obtained from 10 322 average risk subjects invited for CRC screening with FIT, of which, only subjects with a positive FIT were referred for colonoscopy. The second cohort was obtained from 3637 subjects scheduled for elective colonoscopy with a positive FIT result. The same FIT and positivity threshold (OC sensor; ≥ 50 ng/mL) was used in both cohorts. Colonoscopy was performed in all referral subjects and in FIT positive screening subjects. All CRC cases were selected from both cohorts. Outcome measurements were mean FIT results and FIT scores per tissue tumor stage (T stage). RESULTS: One hundred and eighteen patients with CRC were included in the present study: 28 cases obtained from the screening cohort (64% male; mean age 65 years, SD 6.5) and 90 cases obtained from the referral cohort (58% male; mean age 69 years, SD 9.8). The mean FIT results found were higher in the referral cohort (829 ± 302 ng/mLvs 613 ± 368 ng/mL,P = 0.02). Tissue tumor stage (T stage) distribution was dif-ferent between both populations [screening population: 13 (46%) T1, eight (29%) T2, six (21%) T3, one (4%) T4 carcinoma; referral population: 12 (13%) T1, 22 (24%) T2, 52 (58%) T3, four (4%) T4 carcinoma], and higher T stage was significantly associated with higher FIT results (P < 0.001). Per tumor stage, no significant difference in mean FIT results was observed (screening vs referral: T1 498 ± 382 ng/mL vs 725 ± 374 ng/mL, P = 0.22; T2 787 ± 303 ng/mL vs 794 ± 341 ng/mL, P = 0.79; T3 563 ± 368 ng/mLvs 870 ± 258 ng/mL,P = 0.13; T4 not available). After correction for T stage in logistic regression analysis, no significant differences in mean FIT results were observed between both types of cohorts (P = 0.10). CONCLUSION: Differences in T stage distribution largely explain differences in FIT results between screening and referral cohorts. Therefore, FIT results should be reported according to T stage.展开更多
Objective:To analyze the diagnostic value of fecal Fusobacterium nucleatum detection,fecal immunochemical test(FIT),and carbohydrate antigen 19-9(CA19-9)detection for colorectal cancer(CRC).Method:Atotal of 78 CRC pat...Objective:To analyze the diagnostic value of fecal Fusobacterium nucleatum detection,fecal immunochemical test(FIT),and carbohydrate antigen 19-9(CA19-9)detection for colorectal cancer(CRC).Method:Atotal of 78 CRC patients and 60 healthy individuals were enrolled in this study.Stool and blood samples were collected for the 3 diagnoses,and ROC curves were analyzed for diagnostic value.Result:The 3 diagnoses’positive detection rates in CRC samples were significantly higher than those of healthy samples(P<0.05).The combined CRC diagnoses showed significantly higher sensitivity as compared to individual fecal F.nucleatum detection(χ^(2)=6.495,P=0.011),FIT(χ^(2)=4.871,P=0.027),and serum CA19-9 detection(χ^(2)=7.371,P=0.007).The area under the ROC curve for fecal F.nucleatum detection was 0.63[95%confidence interval(CI)=1.124–6.238],with a sensitivity of 73.08%and specificity of 85.00%,whereas FIT was 0.65(95%CI=1.365–9.241),with a sensitivity of 51.28%and specificity of 96.67%,meanwhile,serum CA19-9 detection was 0.62(95%CI=1.517–12.342),with a sensitivity of 69.23%and specificity of 98.33%.The combined CRC diagnoses showed an area under the ROC curve of 0.76(95%CI=1.213–6.254),with a sensitivity of 87.18%and specificity of 70.00%.Conclusion:The combined diagnoses of fecal F.nucleatum detection,FIT,and serum CA19-9 detection can significantly improve the sensitivity and accuracy of CRC diagnosis,which has high clinical application value to provide guidance for clinical CRC screening and early intervention treatment.展开更多
Objective:To analyze the screening effectiveness of combining the fecal occult blood test with tumor marker detection for colorectal cancer.Methods:A total of thirty patients with colorectal cancer and thirty patients...Objective:To analyze the screening effectiveness of combining the fecal occult blood test with tumor marker detection for colorectal cancer.Methods:A total of thirty patients with colorectal cancer and thirty patients with benign colon hyperplasia who received treatment from January 2020 to January 2023 were selected.These patients were assigned to the observation group and the control group,respectively.All patients in both groups underwent both fecal occult blood tests and tumor marker detection.The levels of tumor markers between the two groups were compared,the tumor marker levels in different stages were assessed within the observation group,and the positive detection rates for single detection and combined detection were compared.Results:The levels of various tumor markers in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.05).Furthermore,as the Duke stage increased within the observation group,the levels of various tumor markers also increased(P<0.05).The positive detection rate of the combined test was notably higher than that of single detection(P<0.05).Conclusion:Combining the fecal occult blood test with tumor marker detection in colorectal cancer screening can significantly improve the overall detection rate.展开更多
At present,cancer is still an important factor threatening human health.Colorectal cancer(CRC)is one of the top three most common cancers worldwide and one of the deadliest malignancies in humans.The latest data showe...At present,cancer is still an important factor threatening human health.Colorectal cancer(CRC)is one of the top three most common cancers worldwide and one of the deadliest malignancies in humans.The latest data showed that CRC incidence and mortality rank third and second,respectively,among global malignancies.Early and accurate diagnosis is crucial to reduce the morbidity,mortality and improve survival of patients with CRC,but the current early diagnostic methods have limitations.The effectiveness and compliance of diagnostic methods have a certain impact on whether people choose screening.In this editorial,we explore strategies for the early diagnosis of CRC,including stool-based,blood-based,direct visualization,and imaging examinations.展开更多
In this editorial,we comment on the article entitled“Stage at diagnosis of colorectal cancer through diagnostic route:Who should be screened?”by Agatsuma et al.Colorectal cancer(CRC)is emerging as an important healt...In this editorial,we comment on the article entitled“Stage at diagnosis of colorectal cancer through diagnostic route:Who should be screened?”by Agatsuma et al.Colorectal cancer(CRC)is emerging as an important health issue as its incidence continues to rise globally,adversely affecting the quality of life.Although the public has become more aware of CRC prevention,most patients lack screening awareness.Some poor lifestyle practices can lead to CRC and symptoms can appear in the early stages of CRC.However,due to the lack of awareness of the disease,most of the CRC patients are diagnosed already at an advanced stage and have a poor prognosis.展开更多
Colorectal cancer is one of the predominant tumors in the world,primarily generated by a progression from polyp to cancer which can last several years,giving a great opportunity to the scientific community for its pre...Colorectal cancer is one of the predominant tumors in the world,primarily generated by a progression from polyp to cancer which can last several years,giving a great opportunity to the scientific community for its prevention by screening programs that can be done with invasive and non-invasive tests.In this issue,Lopes et al show us an excellent review of screening,its options,its advantages and disadvantages.展开更多
Colorectal cancer(CRC)is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in the world.The incidence and mortality show wide geographical variations.Screening is recommended to reduce both incidence and mortality.However,ther...Colorectal cancer(CRC)is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in the world.The incidence and mortality show wide geographical variations.Screening is recommended to reduce both incidence and mortality.However,there are significant differences among studies in implementation strategies and detection.This review aimed to present the results and strategies of different screening programs worldwide.We reviewed the literature on national and international screening programs published in Pub Med,on web pages,and in clinical guidelines.CRC Screening programs are currently underway in most European countries,Canada,specific regions in North and South America,Asia,and Oceania.The most extensive screening strategies were based on fecal occult blood testing,and more recently,the fecal immunochemical test(FIT).Participation in screening has varied greatly among different programs.The Netherlands showed the highest participation rate(68.2%)and some areas of Canada showed the lowest(16%).Participation rates were highest among women and in programs that used the FIT test.Men exhibited the greatest number of positive results.The FIT test has been the most widely used screening program worldwide.The advent of this test has increased participation rates and the detection of positive results.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer(CRC)is one of the most common malignant tumors,and early screening is crucial to improving the survival rate of patients.The combination of colonoscopy and immune fecal occult blood detection has garnered significant attention as a novel method for CRC screening.Colonoscopy and fecal occult blood tests,when combined,can improve screening accuracy and early detection rates,thereby facilitating early intervention and treatment.However,certain risks and costs accompany it,making the establishment of a risk classification model crucial for accurate classification and management of screened subjects.AIM To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of colonoscopy,immune fecal occult blood test(FIT),and risk-graded screening strategies in CRC screening.METHODS Based on the randomized controlled trial of CRC screening in the population conducted by our hospital May 2020 to May 2023,participants who met the requirements were randomly assigned to a colonoscopy group,an FIT group,or a graded screening group at a ratio of 1:2:2(after risk assessment,the high-risk group received colonoscopy,the low-risk group received an FIT test,and the FITpositive group received colonoscopy).The three groups received CRC screening with different protocols,among which the colonoscopy group only received baseline screening,and the FIT group and the graded screening group received annual follow-up screening based on baseline screening.The primary outcome was the detection rate of advanced tumors,including CRC and advanced adenoma.The population participation rate,advanced tumor detection rate,and colonoscopy load of the three screening programs were compared.RESULTS A total of 19373 subjects who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled,including 8082 males(41.7%)and 11291 females(58.3%).The mean age was 60.05±6.5 years.Among them,3883 patients were enrolled in the colonoscopy group,7793 in the FIT group,and 7697 in the graded screening group.Two rounds of follow-up screening were completed in the FIT group and the graded screening group.The graded screening group(89.2%)and the colonoscopy group(42.3%)had the lowest overall screening participation rates,while the FIT group had the highest(99.3%).The results of the intentional analysis showed that the detection rate of advanced tumors in the colonoscopy group was greater than that of the FIT group[2.76%vs 2.17%,odds ratio(OR)=1.30,95%confidence interval(CI):1.01-1.65,P=0.037].There was no significant difference in the detection rate of advanced tumors between the colonoscopy group and the graded screening group(2.76%vs 2.35%,OR=1.9,95%CI:0.93-1.51,P=0.156),as well as between the graded screening group and the FIT group(2.35%vs 2.17%,OR=1.09%,95%CI:0.88-1.34,P=0.440).The number of colonoscopy examinations required for each patient with advanced tumors was used as an index to evaluate the colonoscopy load during population screening.The graded screening group had the highest colonoscopy load(15.4 times),followed by the colonoscopy group(10.2 times),and the FIT group had the lowest(7.8 times).CONCLUSION A hierarchical screening strategy based on CRC risk assessment is feasible for screening for CRC in the population.It can be used as an effective supplement to traditional colonoscopy and FIT screening programs.
基金Supported by Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin,No.21JCZDJC00060 and No.21JCYBJC00180Tianjin Health and Medical Science and Technology Project,No.TJWJ2023QN040National Key Research and Development Program,No.2017YFC1700606 and No.2017YFC1700604.
文摘BACKGROUND Certain subgroups are at an increased risk of false fecal immunochemical test(FIT)results;however,related studies are limited,and the available evidence is conflicting.AIM To evaluate factors associated with false-positive and false-negative FIT results.METHODS This retrospective study was based on the database of the Tianjin Colorectal Cancer Screening Program from 2012 to 2020.A total of 4129947 residents aged 40-74 years completed at least one FIT.Of these,24890 asymptomatic participants who underwent colonoscopy examinations and completed lifestyle questionnaires were included in the analysis.Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify the factors associated with false FIT results.RESULTS Among the overall screening population,88687(2.15%)participants tested positive for FIT.The sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,and negative predictive value of FIT for advanced neoplasms were 58.2%,44.8%,9.7%,and 91.3%,respectively.Older age,female sex,smoking,alcohol consumption,higher body mass index,and hemorrhoids were significantly associated with increased odds of false-positive and lower odds of falsenegative FIT results.Moreover,features of high-grade dysplasia or villous for advanced adenoma and the presence of cancer were also associated with lower odds of false-negative results,while irregular exercise and diverticulum were associated with higher odds of false-positive results.CONCLUSION FIT results may be inaccurate in certain subgroups.Our results provide important evidence for further individualization of screening strategies.
基金Supported by the Innovation Platform for Academicians of Hainan Province,No.2022136the Specific Research Fund of the Innovation Platform for Academicians of Hainan Province,No.YSPTZX202313+2 种基金Hainan Province Clinical Medical Center,No.2021818Hainan Provincial Health Industry Research Project,No.22A200078National Clinical Key Specialty Capacity Building Project,China,No.202330.
文摘BACKGROUND The incidence of colorectal cancer(CRC)in China is steadily rising,with a high proportion of advanced-stage diagnoses.This highlights the significance of early detection and prevention measures to enhance survival rates.Fecal immunochemical testing(FIT)is a globally recommended CRC screening method;however,limited research has been conducted on its application in Hainan.AIM To assess the efficacy and adherence of FIT screening among average-risk individuals in Hainan,while also examining the risk factors associated with positive FIT results.METHODS This population-based cross-sectional study implemented FIT screening for CRC in 2000 asymptomatic participants aged 40-75 years from five cities and 21 community health centers in Hainan Province.The study was conducted from August 2022 to April 2023,employing a stratified sampling method to select participants.Individuals with positive FIT results subsequently underwent colonoscopy.Positive predictive values for confirmed CRC and advanced adenoma were calculated,and the relationship between relevant variables and positive FIT results was analyzed usingχ2 tests and multivariate logistic regression.RESULTS A total of 1788 participants completed the FIT screening,with a median age of 57 years(interquartile range:40-75).Among them,503(28.1%)were males,and 1285(71.9%)were females,resulting in an 89.4%compliance rate for FIT screening.The overall positivity rate of FIT was 4.4%[79 out of 1788;95%confidence interval(CI):3%-5%].The specific positivity rates for Haikou,Sanya,Orient City,Qionghai City,and Wuzhishan City were 9.6%(45 of 468;95%CI:8%-11%),1.3%(6 of 445;95%CI:0.1%-3.1%),2.7%(8 of 293;95%CI:1.2%-4.3%),3.3%(9 of 276;95%CI:1.0%-6.3%),and 4.2%(11 of 406;95%CI:1.2%-7.3%),respectively.Significant associations were found between age,dietary habits,and positive FIT results.Out of the 79 participants with positive FIT results,55 underwent colonoscopy,demonstrating an 82.2%compliance rate.Among them,10 had a clean gastrointestinal tract,43 had polyps or adenomas,and 2 were confirmed to have CRC,yielding a positive predictive value of 3.6%(95%CI:0.9%-4.2%).Among the 43 participants with polyps or adenomas,8 were diagnosed with advanced adenomas,resulting in an advanced adenoma rate of 14.5%(95%CI:10.1%-17.7%).CONCLUSION In the Hainan region,FIT screening for CRC among asymptomatic individuals at average risk is feasible and wellreceived.
文摘Colorectal cancer(CRC)is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death worldwide.The leading risk factors for CRC include male gender,age over 50,family history,obesity,tobacco smoking,alco-hol consumption,and unhealthy diet.CRC screening methods vary considerably between countries and depend on incidence,economic resources and healthcare structure.Important aspects of screening include adherence,which can vary signi-ficantly across ethnic and socioeconomic groups.Basic concepts of CRC screening include pre-stratification of patients by identifying risk factors and then using fecal immunochemical test or guaiac-based fecal occult blood test and/or colono-scopy or radiologic imaging techniques.Technological capabilities for CRC scree-ning are rapidly evolving and include stool DNA test,liquid biopsy,virtual colo-nography,and the use of artificial intelligence.A CRC prevention strategy should be comprehensive and include active patient education along with targeted imple-mentation of screening.
文摘BACKGROUND Early detection of rectal cancer poses significant challenges.Current diagnostic methods,including colonoscopy,imaging techniques,and fecal tests,have limitations such as invasiveness,cost,and varying sensitivity.This study evaluated the diagnostic value of preoperative serum tumor markers in rectal cancer patients.AIM To investigate the value of a multi-marker approach for the preoperative diagnosis of rectal cancer.METHODS A retrospective analysis of 250 patients diagnosed with rectal cancer between July 2022 and July 2024 was conducted.Preoperative alpha-fetoprotein levels,carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA),cancer antigen 125(CA125),CA19-9,CA15-3,and CA72-4 were analyzed.All blood samples were collected under standardized conditions,including fasting status and proper storage methods,within two weeks before surgery.Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.Correlations among clinicopathological features were also evaluated.RESULTS CEA demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance among individual tumor markers with an area under the curve(AUC)of 0.78[95%confidence interval(CI):0.73-0.83].However,a combination of CEA,CA19-9,and CA72-4 showed superior performance,achieving an AUC of 0.87(95%CI:0.83-0.91).Significant correlations were observed between CEA levels and several clinicopatho-logical features,including tumor stage(P<0.001),lymph node involvement(P=0.002),and distant metastasis(P<0.001).Furthermore,in a subgroup analysis of patients diagnosed after July 2022,the integration of fecal occult blood testing with the tumor marker panel(CEA+CA19-9+CA72-4)significantly improved diagnostic accuracy,increasing the AUC to 0.91(95%CI:0.86-0.96).CONCLUSION A multimarker approach combining CEA,CA19-9,and CA72-4 with fecal occult blood testing enhances the preoperative assessment of patients with rectal cancer.These findings suggest potential improvements in risk stratification and management of patients with rectal cancer.
文摘AIM To assess the diagnostic accuracy of a new fecal test for detecting Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori),using^(13)Curea breath test as the reference standard,and explore bacterial antibiotic resistance.METHODS We conducted a prospective two-center diagnostic test accuracy study.We enrolled consecutive people≥18 years without previous diagnosis of H.pylori infection,referred for dyspepsia between February and October 2017.At enrollment,all participants underwent 13 C-urea breath test.Participants aged over 50 years were scheduled to undergo upper endoscopy with histology.Participants collected stool samples 1-3 d after enrollment for a new fecal investigation(THD fecal test).The detection of bacterial 23 S rRNA subunit gene indicated H.pylori infection.We also used the index diagnostic test to examine mutations conferring resistance to clarithromycin and levofloxacin.Independent investigators analyzed index test and reference test standard results blinded to the other test findings.We estimated sensitivity,specificity,positive(PPV)and negative(NPV)predictive value,diagnostic accuracy,positive and negative likelihood ratio(LR),together with 95%confidence intervals(CI).RESULTS We enrolled 294 consecutive participants(age:Median 37.0 years,IQR:29.0-46.0 years;men:39.8%).Ninetyfive(32.3%)participants had a positive^(13)C-urea breath test.Twenty-three(7.8%)participants underwent upper endoscopy with histology,with a full concordance between^(13)C-urea breath test and histology in detecting H.pylori infection.Four(1.4%)out of the 294 participants withdrew from the study after the enrollment visit and did not undergo THD fecal testing.In the 290 participants who completed the study,the THD fecal test sensitivity was 90.2%(CI:84.2%-96.3%),specificity 98.5%(CI:96.8%-100%),PPV 96.5%(CI:92.6%-100%),NPV 95.6%(CI:92.8%-98.4%),accuracy 95.9%(CI:93.6%-98.2%),positive LR 59.5(CI:19.3-183.4),negative LR 0.10(CI:0.05-0.18).Out of 83 infected participants identified with the THD fecal test,34(41.0%)had bacterial genotypic changes consistent with antibiotic-resistant H.pylori infection.Of these,27(32.5%)had bacterial strains resistant to clarithromycin,3(3.6%)to levofloxacin,and 4(4.8%)to both antibiotics.CONCLUSION The THD fecal test has high performance for the non-invasive diagnosis of H.pylori infection while additionally enabling the assessment of bacterial antibiotic resistances.
文摘Objective:Integration of risk stratification into fecal immunochemical test(FIT)might aid in the suboptimal detection of advanced neoplasms by FIT in colorectal cancer(CRC)screening.A comparative study was conducted to evaluate the participation and diagnostic yield of the parallel combination of questionnaire-based risk assessment(QRA)and FIT,FIT-only and QRA-only strategies in a CRC screening program in China.Methods:The study included 29,626 individuals aged 40-74 years and invited to participate in a CRC screening program in China.Participants were first invited to undertake QRA and one-time FIT(OC-sensor).Participants with positive QRA or FIT were deemed to be high-risk individuals who were recommended for subsequent colonoscopy.Participation,detection rate,and resource demand for colonoscopy were calculated and compared.Results:Of the 29,626 invitees,20,203 completed the parallel combination,8,592 completed the QRA-only,and11 completed the FIT-only strategy.For the parallel combination,FIT-only,and QRA-only strategies,the overall positivity rates were 10.2%(2,928/28,806),5.4%(1,096/20,214),and 6.8%(1,944/28,795),respectively;the yield of advanced neoplasm per 10,000 invitees were 46.9[95%confidence interval(95%CI):39.8-55.4],36.8(95%CI:30.5-44.4),and 12.2(95%CI:8.8-16.8),respectively;the positive predictive values for detecting advanced neoplasms among participants who completed colonoscopy were 4.7%(95%CI:4.0%-5.6%),9.9%(95%CI:8.3%-11.9%),and 1.9%(95%CI:1.3%-2.6%),respectively;the number of colonoscopies required to detect one advanced neoplasm was 11.4(95%CI:9.8-13.4),5.7(95%CI:4.8-6.7),and 28.4(95%CI:20.7-39.2),respectively.Conclusions:The parallel combination of QRA and FIT did not show superior efficacy for detecting advanced neoplasm compared with FIT alone in this CRC screening program.
文摘AIM: To assess the risk of relapse in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients in clinical remission using mucosal status and fecal immunochemical test (FIT) results.METHODS: The clinical outcomes of 194 UC patients in clinical remission who underwent colonoscopy were based on evaluations of Mayo endoscopic subscores (MESs) and FIT results.RESULTS: Patients with an MES of 0 (n = 94, 48%) showed a ten-fold lower risk of relapse than those with an MES of 1-3 (n = 100, 52%) (HR = 0.10, 95%CI: 0.05-0.19). A negative FIT result (fecal hemoglobin concentrations ≤ 100 ng/mL) was predictive of patients with an MES of 0, with a sensitivity of 0.94 and a specific of 0.76. Moreover, patients with a negative FIT score had a six-fold lower risk of clinical relapse than those with a positive score (HR = 0.17, 95%CI: 0.10-0.28). Inclusion of the distinguishing parameter, sustaining clinical remission > 12 mo, resulted in an even stronger correlation between negative FIT results and an MES of 0 with respect to the risk of clinical relapse (HR = 0.11, 95%CI: 0.04-0.23).CONCLUSION: Negative FIT results one year or more after remission induction correlate with complete mucosal healing (MES 0) and better prognosis. Performing FIT one year after remission induction may be useful for evaluating relapse risk.
文摘BACKGROUND The rate of positive tests using fecal immunochemical test(FIT)does not decrease with subsequent campaigns,but the positive predictive value of advanced neoplasia significantly decreases in subsequent campaign after a first negative test.A relationship between the fecal hemoglobin concentration(Fhb)and the opportunity to detect a colorectal cancer in subsequent campaign has been shown.AIM To predict the severity of colorectal lesions based on Fhb measured during previous colorectal cancer screening campaign.METHODS This etiological study included 293750 patients aged 50-74,living in Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes(France).These patients completed at least two FIT[test_((-1))and test_((0))]between June 2015 and December 2019.Delay between test_((-1))and test_((0))was>1year and test_((-1))result was negative(<150 ngHb/mL).The severity of colorectal lesions diagnosed at test_((0))was described according to Fhb measured at test_((-1))[Fhb_((-1))].The relationship between the severity classified in seven ordinal categories and the predictive factors was analyzed in an ordered multivariate polytomous regression model.RESULTS The test_((0))positive rate was 4.0%,and the colonoscopy completion rate was 97.1%in 11594 patients who showed a positive test_((0)).The colonoscopy detection rate was 77.7%in those 11254 patients who underwent a colonoscopy.A total of 8748 colorectal lesions were detected(including 2182 low-risk-polyps,2400 high-riskpolyp,and 502 colorectal cancer).The colonoscopy detection rate varied significantly with Fhb_((-1))[0 ngHb/mL:75.6%,(0-50 ngHb/mL):77.3%,(50-100 ngHb/mL):88.7%,(100-150 ngHb/mL):90.3%;P=0.001].People with a Fhb_((-1))within(100-150 ngHb/mL)(P=0.001)were 2.6(2.2;3.0)times more likely to have a high severity level compared to those having a Fhb_((-1))value of zero.This risk was reduced by 20%in patients aged 55-59 compared to those aged<55[adjusted odds ratio:0.8(0.6;1.0)].CONCLUSION The study showed that higher Fhb_((-1))is correlated to an increased risk of severity of colorectal lesions.This risk of severity increased among first-time participants(age<55)and the elderly(≥70).To avoid the loss of chance in these age groups,the FIT positivity threshold should be reduced to 100 ngHb/mL.The other alternative would be to reduce the time between the two tests in these age groups from the current 2 years to 1 year.
文摘A high risk population consisting of 3034 people with history of rectal polyps or ulcers were screened for colorectal neoplasia with Reverse Passive Hemagglutination Fecal Occult Blood Test (RPHA FOB) and 60 cm fiberoptic colonoscopy. Among 2553 subjects (84.1%)who completed both tests, 11 cases of colorectal malignancies and 465 cases of polyps were detected.Using colonoscopic finding and histopathological examination as the 'gold standard' of diagnosis, results showed that FOB positivity of polyps was related to their size, macroscopic appearance and surface features but no correlation between bleeding of polyps and their location, numbers, pathological types were found. In this study the sensitivity of RPHA in screening of colorectal malignancy was 63.6% (7/11), while that for polyps was only 21.1% (98/465) . For screening of colorectal neoplasia (cancer+polyps) the overall sensitivity and specificity of RPHA FOB were 22.1% and 82.4%, the positive and negative predictive values were 22.3% and 82.2% respectively. Amoug 465 polyps there were 195 adenomas, further analysis showed that villous and tubulovillous adenomas had higher intestinal bleeding rate (FOB positive)than tubular type (45.5%,30.0% and 17.8% respectively, X2=5.8, p=0.05). The results indicate that although the sensitivity of RPHA FOB in screening for colorectal polyps was generally low, but about 40% (8/21) of villous and tubulovillous adenoma which present higher tendency of malignant transformation can be detected by RPHA FOB as a screening Procedure. So the authors suggest that screening of colorectal neoplasia be not only a procedure of secondary prevention but also a measure of primary prevention for colorectal cancer.Accepted March 22, 1994
基金Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China,No. 81071832the Key Scientific Research Project of the Health Bureau of Hubei Province, No. JX5A01
文摘AIM: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of transfesrrin dipstick test (Tf) in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and precancerous lesions screening. METHODS: Eight hundreds and sixty-one individuals at high-risk for CRC were recruited. Six hundreds and eleven subsequently received the three fecal occult blood tests and colonoscopy with biopsy performed as needed. Fecal samples were obtained on the day before colonoscopy. Tf, immuno fecal occult blood test (IFOBT) and guaiac fecal occult blood test (g-FOBT) were performed simultaneously on the same stool. To minimize false-negative cases, all subjects with negative samples were asked to provide an additional stool specimen for a second test even a third test. If the results were all negative after testing three repeated samples, the subject was considered a true negative. The performance characteristics of Tf for detecting CRC and precancerous lesions were examined and compared to those of IFOBT and the combination of Tf, IFOBT and g-FOBT. RESULTS: A total of six hundreds and eleven subjects met the study criteria including 25 with CRC and 60 with precancerous lesions. Sensitivity for detecting CRC was 92% for Tf and 96% for IFOBT, specificities of Tf and IFOBT were both 72.0% (95% CI: 68.2%-75.5%; χ2 = 0.4, P > 0.05); positive likelihood ratios of those were 3.3 (95% CI: 2.8-3.9) and 3.4 (95% CI: 2.9-4.0), respectively. In precancerous lesions, sensitivities for Tf and IFOBT were 50% and 58%, respectively (χ 2 = 0.8, P > 0.05); specificities of Tf and IFOBT were 71.5% (95% CI: 67.6%-75.1%) and 72.2% (95% CI: 68.4%-75.8%); positive likelihood ratios of those were 1.8 (95% CI: 1.3-2.3) and 2.1 (95% CI: 1.6-2.7), respectively; compared to IFOBT, g-FOBT+ Tf+ IFOBT had a significantly higher positive rate for precancerous lesions (83% vs 58%, respectively; χ 2 = 9.1, P < 0.05). In patients with CRC and precancerous lesions, the sensitivities of Tf and IFOBT were 62% and 69% (χ 2 = 0.9, P > 0.05); specificities of those were 74.5% (95% CI: 70.6%-78.1%) and 75.5% (95% CI: 71.6%-79.0%); positive likelihood ratios of those were 2.5 (95% CI: 2.0-3.1) and 2.8 (95% CI: 2.3-3.5). Compared to IF-OBT alone, combining g-FOBT, IFOBT and Tf led to significantly increased sensitivity for detecting CRC and cancerous lesions (69% vs 88%, respectively; χ 2 = 9.0, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Tf dipstick test might be used as an ad- ditional tool for CRC and precancerous lesions screening in a high-risk cohort.
文摘BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer(CRC) is a major health problem. There is minimal consensus of the appropriate approach to manage patients with positive immunochemical fecal occult blood test(iFOBT), following a recent colonoscopy.AIM To determine the prevalence of advanced neoplasia in patients with a positive iFOBT after a recent colonoscopy, and clinical and endoscopic predictors for advanced neoplasia.METHODS The study recruited i FOBT positive patients who underwent colonoscopy between July 2015 to March 2020. Data collected included demographics, clinical characteristics, previous and current colonoscopy findings. Primary outcome was the prevalence of CRC and advanced neoplasia in a patient with positive iFOBT and previous colonoscopy. Secondary outcomes included identifying any clinical and endoscopic predictors for advanced neoplasia.RESULTS The study included 1051 patients(male 53.6%;median age 63). Forty-two(4.0%) patients were diagnosed with CRC, 513(48.8%) with adenoma/sessile serrated lesion(A-SSL) and 257(24.5%) with advanced A-SSL(AA-SSL). A previous colonoscopy had been performed in 319(30.3%). In this cohort, four(1.3%) were diagnosed with CRC, 146(45.8%) with A-SSL and 56(17.6%) with AA-SSL. Among those who had a colonoscopy within 4 years, none had CRC and 7 had AA-SSL. Of the 732 patients with no prior colonoscopy, there were 38 CRCs(5.2%). Independent predictors for advanced neoplasia were male [odds ratio(OR) = 1.80;95% confidence interval(CI): 1.35-2.40;P < 0.001), age(OR = 1.04;95%CI: 1.02-1.06;P < 0.001) and no previous colonoscopy(OR = 2.07;95%CI: 1.49-2.87;P < 0.001).CONCLUSION A previous colonoscopy, irrespective of its result, was associated with low prevalence of advanced neoplasia, and if performed within four years of a positive iFOBT result, was protective against CRC.
文摘BACKGROUND Elderly patients aged at least 75 years old(Elderly_75),represent 45%of colorectal cancer(CRC)incidence.As others,the French Colorectal Cancer Screening Program(CRCSP)does not include Elderly_75.To date,there is little evidence to justify stopping screening at 74 years of age.AIM To describe CRC fecal screening test completion after age 74,source(CRCSP/Provider ordered)and outcomes of these tests.METHODS The study concerned 18704 Elderly_75 residing in eleven French districts(Ain,Doubs,Essonne,Haute-Saone,Hauts-de-Seine,Jura,Seine-Saint-Denis,Territoire-de-Belfort,Val-de-Marne,Val-d'Oise,Yonne),having performed a CRC screening test between January 2008 and December 2017.The tests performed in a circumstance of delayed response to a solicitation(DRS)from the local cancer screening managing center(Managing-Center)were distinguished from the tests non-solicited by the Managing-Center,performed after a recommendation by a General Practitioner(GP)or other provider ordered(RGP).DRS was any test realized by an Elderly_75 following an initial invitation from the ManagingCenter with a maximum 24 mo after this invitation.Any Non-DRS test was considered RGP.The outcomes of these tests were described according to the circumstances of test completion.RESULTS Of 18995 screening-tests were performed at ages:75(83.5%),76-80(13.4%)and>80(3.1%)years old.Elderly_75 performed the screening test in a circumstance of DRS(71.9%)or RGP(28.1%).The proportion of the tests that could not be analyzed and not restarted was 13.2%.For these unanalyzed tests,the reason was age-related in 78.0%of cases,related to the laboratory's refusal to analyze the test of people aged≥77.Reported colonoscopy completion rate was 81.3%.For those575 people with reported colonoscopy,no complication was listed.18.0%of the366 Elderly_75 with lesions had no anteriority in the CRCSP.The neoplasia(124 Low-risk-polyps,159 High-risk-polyps,13 Unspecified-polyps and 70 CRCs)detection rate was 19.3/1000 Elderly_75 screened and the CRC detection rate was3.7/1000 Elderly_75 screened.CONCLUSION The high rate of colonoscopy completion after a positive test and the high proportion of screened lesions observed suggest that the lengthening of the screening period could allow significant detection of CRC and polyps that occur in Elderly_75 excluded from CRCSP.
基金Supported by A Research Grant of Center for Translational Molecular Medicine, The Netherlands, to van Turenhout STGrant of Nycomed B.V., Hoofddorp to "the Amsterdam Gut-club", The Netherlands+1 种基金The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, ZonMW, No. 50-50115-98-060,project 63000004The original trial was registered under IS-RCTN57917442 at Current Controlled Trials (www.controlled-trials.com)
文摘AIM: To improve the interpretation of fecal immunochemical test (FIT) results in colorectal cancer (CRC) cases from screening and referral cohorts. METHODS: In this comparative observational study, two prospective cohorts of CRC cases were compared. The first cohort was obtained from 10 322 average risk subjects invited for CRC screening with FIT, of which, only subjects with a positive FIT were referred for colonoscopy. The second cohort was obtained from 3637 subjects scheduled for elective colonoscopy with a positive FIT result. The same FIT and positivity threshold (OC sensor; ≥ 50 ng/mL) was used in both cohorts. Colonoscopy was performed in all referral subjects and in FIT positive screening subjects. All CRC cases were selected from both cohorts. Outcome measurements were mean FIT results and FIT scores per tissue tumor stage (T stage). RESULTS: One hundred and eighteen patients with CRC were included in the present study: 28 cases obtained from the screening cohort (64% male; mean age 65 years, SD 6.5) and 90 cases obtained from the referral cohort (58% male; mean age 69 years, SD 9.8). The mean FIT results found were higher in the referral cohort (829 ± 302 ng/mLvs 613 ± 368 ng/mL,P = 0.02). Tissue tumor stage (T stage) distribution was dif-ferent between both populations [screening population: 13 (46%) T1, eight (29%) T2, six (21%) T3, one (4%) T4 carcinoma; referral population: 12 (13%) T1, 22 (24%) T2, 52 (58%) T3, four (4%) T4 carcinoma], and higher T stage was significantly associated with higher FIT results (P < 0.001). Per tumor stage, no significant difference in mean FIT results was observed (screening vs referral: T1 498 ± 382 ng/mL vs 725 ± 374 ng/mL, P = 0.22; T2 787 ± 303 ng/mL vs 794 ± 341 ng/mL, P = 0.79; T3 563 ± 368 ng/mLvs 870 ± 258 ng/mL,P = 0.13; T4 not available). After correction for T stage in logistic regression analysis, no significant differences in mean FIT results were observed between both types of cohorts (P = 0.10). CONCLUSION: Differences in T stage distribution largely explain differences in FIT results between screening and referral cohorts. Therefore, FIT results should be reported according to T stage.
基金The In-Hospital Fund of the Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University(2017Q004)the Medical Research Project of Hebei Provincial Health Commission(20190924)。
文摘Objective:To analyze the diagnostic value of fecal Fusobacterium nucleatum detection,fecal immunochemical test(FIT),and carbohydrate antigen 19-9(CA19-9)detection for colorectal cancer(CRC).Method:Atotal of 78 CRC patients and 60 healthy individuals were enrolled in this study.Stool and blood samples were collected for the 3 diagnoses,and ROC curves were analyzed for diagnostic value.Result:The 3 diagnoses’positive detection rates in CRC samples were significantly higher than those of healthy samples(P<0.05).The combined CRC diagnoses showed significantly higher sensitivity as compared to individual fecal F.nucleatum detection(χ^(2)=6.495,P=0.011),FIT(χ^(2)=4.871,P=0.027),and serum CA19-9 detection(χ^(2)=7.371,P=0.007).The area under the ROC curve for fecal F.nucleatum detection was 0.63[95%confidence interval(CI)=1.124–6.238],with a sensitivity of 73.08%and specificity of 85.00%,whereas FIT was 0.65(95%CI=1.365–9.241),with a sensitivity of 51.28%and specificity of 96.67%,meanwhile,serum CA19-9 detection was 0.62(95%CI=1.517–12.342),with a sensitivity of 69.23%and specificity of 98.33%.The combined CRC diagnoses showed an area under the ROC curve of 0.76(95%CI=1.213–6.254),with a sensitivity of 87.18%and specificity of 70.00%.Conclusion:The combined diagnoses of fecal F.nucleatum detection,FIT,and serum CA19-9 detection can significantly improve the sensitivity and accuracy of CRC diagnosis,which has high clinical application value to provide guidance for clinical CRC screening and early intervention treatment.
文摘Objective:To analyze the screening effectiveness of combining the fecal occult blood test with tumor marker detection for colorectal cancer.Methods:A total of thirty patients with colorectal cancer and thirty patients with benign colon hyperplasia who received treatment from January 2020 to January 2023 were selected.These patients were assigned to the observation group and the control group,respectively.All patients in both groups underwent both fecal occult blood tests and tumor marker detection.The levels of tumor markers between the two groups were compared,the tumor marker levels in different stages were assessed within the observation group,and the positive detection rates for single detection and combined detection were compared.Results:The levels of various tumor markers in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.05).Furthermore,as the Duke stage increased within the observation group,the levels of various tumor markers also increased(P<0.05).The positive detection rate of the combined test was notably higher than that of single detection(P<0.05).Conclusion:Combining the fecal occult blood test with tumor marker detection in colorectal cancer screening can significantly improve the overall detection rate.
基金Supported by the Talent Scientific Research Start-up Foundation of Wannan Medical College,No.WYRCQD2023045。
文摘At present,cancer is still an important factor threatening human health.Colorectal cancer(CRC)is one of the top three most common cancers worldwide and one of the deadliest malignancies in humans.The latest data showed that CRC incidence and mortality rank third and second,respectively,among global malignancies.Early and accurate diagnosis is crucial to reduce the morbidity,mortality and improve survival of patients with CRC,but the current early diagnostic methods have limitations.The effectiveness and compliance of diagnostic methods have a certain impact on whether people choose screening.In this editorial,we explore strategies for the early diagnosis of CRC,including stool-based,blood-based,direct visualization,and imaging examinations.
基金Supported by The Hangzhou Medical Health Science and Technology Project,No.B20220173The Public Welfare Technology Project of Zhejiang Province,No.LGF21H160033Zhejiang Medical Technology Plan Project,No.2021KY047.
文摘In this editorial,we comment on the article entitled“Stage at diagnosis of colorectal cancer through diagnostic route:Who should be screened?”by Agatsuma et al.Colorectal cancer(CRC)is emerging as an important health issue as its incidence continues to rise globally,adversely affecting the quality of life.Although the public has become more aware of CRC prevention,most patients lack screening awareness.Some poor lifestyle practices can lead to CRC and symptoms can appear in the early stages of CRC.However,due to the lack of awareness of the disease,most of the CRC patients are diagnosed already at an advanced stage and have a poor prognosis.
文摘Colorectal cancer is one of the predominant tumors in the world,primarily generated by a progression from polyp to cancer which can last several years,giving a great opportunity to the scientific community for its prevention by screening programs that can be done with invasive and non-invasive tests.In this issue,Lopes et al show us an excellent review of screening,its options,its advantages and disadvantages.
文摘Colorectal cancer(CRC)is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in the world.The incidence and mortality show wide geographical variations.Screening is recommended to reduce both incidence and mortality.However,there are significant differences among studies in implementation strategies and detection.This review aimed to present the results and strategies of different screening programs worldwide.We reviewed the literature on national and international screening programs published in Pub Med,on web pages,and in clinical guidelines.CRC Screening programs are currently underway in most European countries,Canada,specific regions in North and South America,Asia,and Oceania.The most extensive screening strategies were based on fecal occult blood testing,and more recently,the fecal immunochemical test(FIT).Participation in screening has varied greatly among different programs.The Netherlands showed the highest participation rate(68.2%)and some areas of Canada showed the lowest(16%).Participation rates were highest among women and in programs that used the FIT test.Men exhibited the greatest number of positive results.The FIT test has been the most widely used screening program worldwide.The advent of this test has increased participation rates and the detection of positive results.
