Gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs)are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract and arise from the interstitial cells of Cajal.They predominantly affect individuals between 50 and 70 years o...Gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs)are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract and arise from the interstitial cells of Cajal.They predominantly affect individuals between 50 and 70 years of age and often carry malignant potential despite being frequently asymptomatic.The stomach and small intestine are the most common locations,while involvement of the esophagus,colon,or rectum is relatively rare.GISTs are often discovered incidentally during endoscopic or radiologic evaluations,and the diagnosis is confirmed through tissue biopsy and immunohistochemical staining,particularly for KIT(CD117),DOG1,and PDGFRA.In the past decade,laparoscopic resection has been considered the standard treatment for localized GISTs smaller than 5 cm.However,recent advances in endoscopic technology have led to a growing role for endoscopic resection as a safe and effective treatment option for selected nonmetastatic GISTs.Endoscopic techniques such as endoscopic submucosal dissection,endoscopic submucosal excavation,submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection,and endoscopic full-thickness resection have demonstrated favorable outcomes,including high complete resection(R0)rates,shorter hospital stays,and quicker recovery compared to traditional surgery.The selection of an appropriate resection method depends on tumor size,location,depth of invasion,and proximity to vital structures.Endoscopic ultrasound has become an essential tool for preprocedural assessment,providing detailed information on tumor characteristics and helping to guide management decisions.While endoscopic resection is a promising minimally invasive approach,it should be performed by skilled endoscopists with appropriate training due to the technical complexity and risk of complications such as bleeding or perforation.This review summarizes recent developments in endoscopic resection of GISTs,with a focus on indications,procedural safety,clinical outcomes,and recommendations for optimal patient selection and procedural planning.展开更多
While rare,esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs)have higher mali-gnant potential and are typically diagnosed at larger sizes compared to gastric GISTs.However,well-defined guidelines for their optimal mana...While rare,esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs)have higher mali-gnant potential and are typically diagnosed at larger sizes compared to gastric GISTs.However,well-defined guidelines for their optimal management remain lacking.Most esophageal GISTs are surgically managed with enucleation,while esophagectomy is reserved for larger tumors.Recent advances in endoscopic techniques,such as endoscopic submucosal dissection and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection(ER),have allowed for endoscopic removal of submucosal esophageal lesions,including GISTs.Xu et al reported on the clinical and on-cological outcomes of 32 patients with esophageal GISTs treated with ER.The study demonstrated high en bloc resection rates and favorable 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival.However,it primarily focused on small,inci-dentally detected GISTs,with 75%of cases classified as very low or low risk according to the National Institutes of Health criteria.The authors favored the submucosal tunneling ER technique despite its procedural challenges in the upper esophagus.In this editorial,we briefly discuss the advantages and limitations of endoscopic techniques compared to surgical approaches.We also emphasize the need to establish specific management criteria for submucosal esophageal lesions to guide clinical practice.展开更多
Rectal neuroendocrine tumor(rNET)is an indolent malignancy often detected during colonoscopy screening.The incidence of rNET has increased approximately 10-fold over the past 30 years.Most rNETs detected during screen...Rectal neuroendocrine tumor(rNET)is an indolent malignancy often detected during colonoscopy screening.The incidence of rNET has increased approximately 10-fold over the past 30 years.Most rNETs detected during screening endoscopy are small,measuring<10 mm.Current guidelines recommend endoscopic resection for small,well-differentiated rNET using modified endoscopic submucosal resection(mEMR)or endoscopic submucosal dissection.However,the optimal endoscopic treatment method remains uncertain.This paper summarizes the evidence on mEMR with submucosal stretching,mEMR without submucosal stretching,endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic full-thickness resection.Given that rNETs often exhibit submucosal invasion,achieving adequate resection depth is crucial to ensure histological complete resection.mEMR with submucosal stretching appears favorable due to its high rate of histological complete resection,safety and convenience.Risk factors associated with lymph node and distant metastases are also discussed.A treatment algorithm is proposed to facilitate clinical decision-making.展开更多
Oesophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumours are rare,anatomically challenging lesions with higher surgical morbidity than their gastric counterparts.Emerging endoscopic resection techniques such as endoscopic submuco...Oesophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumours are rare,anatomically challenging lesions with higher surgical morbidity than their gastric counterparts.Emerging endoscopic resection techniques such as endoscopic submucosal dissection and submucosal tunnelling endoscopic resection show much promise for the management of patients who are not fit for,or wish to avoid the morbidity of,major surgical resection.These techniques require careful patient selection and advanced technical skills.We build on the recent review of such techniques by Vogli et al.Current evidence is limited to small case series with heterogeneity in patient selection,tumor size,and outcomes.Notably,long-term oncological data remain sparse,and complications such as bleeding or perforation may be life-threatening in patients unfit for surgical rescue.Nonetheless,endoscopic approaches have many potential advantages to offer such as preserved quality of life and definitive management of unfit patients.展开更多
In this letter,a commentary on the article by Xu et al has been provided.Gastrointestinal stomal tumours(GISTs)are rare tumours that originate commonly in stomach(60%-70%)and small intestine(30%-40%).The course of tre...In this letter,a commentary on the article by Xu et al has been provided.Gastrointestinal stomal tumours(GISTs)are rare tumours that originate commonly in stomach(60%-70%)and small intestine(30%-40%).The course of treatment especially oesophageal GIST is very complex and hard to diagnose because of limited availability of pathological and clinical data.Endoscopic resection(ER)is a minimally invasive approach for removing tumours from the oesophagus and digestive system that does not require open surgery and is especially successful for very small and low-risk GIST.A retrospective exami-nation of 32 patients treated with ER between 2012 and 2023 was conducted to analyse clinical and pathological characteristics,effectiveness of therapy,and long-term prognosis.The findings demonstrate en bloc resection was achieved in 96.9%of cases with an R0 resection rate of 75%with a median size of tumour was approximately 2.12 cm.Post-surgery complication like hydrothorax,post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome occurred in about 25%of cases which later go resolved by conservative treatment.Recurrence of GIST was approximately 9.4%primarily in high-risk cases.ER should be widely adopted in clinical practise preferably for managing low-risk oesophageal GIST because of its high success rate,low recurrence rates and excellent survival results,ensuring better patient prognosis.展开更多
BACKGROUND Rectal neuroendocrine tumors(NETs)smaller than 10 mm and well-differentiated tumors are generally considered to have a low risk of lymph node and distant metastasis,making them suitable for endoscopic resec...BACKGROUND Rectal neuroendocrine tumors(NETs)smaller than 10 mm and well-differentiated tumors are generally considered to have a low risk of lymph node and distant metastasis,making them suitable for endoscopic resection.In contrast,tumors≥20 mm in size typically require surgical resection.However,the optimal management of intermediate-sized(10-15 mm)rectal NETs remains controversial.AIM To compare the clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection of rectal NETs<1 cm and those 1-1.5 cm in size.METHODS A retrospective study was conducted on 1056 patients with rectal NETs treated at the Samsung Medical Center between January 2005 and June 2021.After propensity score matching(1:10)for age,sex,and type of endoscopic resection,225 patients with tumors<1 cm in size and 27 patients with tumors 1-1.5 cm in size were analyzed.RESULTS Surgical resection was more frequent in the 1-1.5 cm group(37.2%)than in the<1 cm group(10.7%)(P<0.01).Endoscopic submucosal dissection was also more commonly performed in the 1-1.5 cm group(48.1%vs 18.5%,P<0.01).Negative resection margins were achieved in 97.2%of the patients,with no significant difference between the groups(P=0.22).No lymphovascular invasion was observed.During a median follow-up of 54 months,no recurrence occurred in the 1-1.5 cm group,while one case of metachronous recurrence was noted in the<1 cm group(P=1.00).There was no significant difference in recurrence-free survival(P=0.48).CONCLUSION Endoscopic resection of 1-1.5 cm grade 1 rectal NETs yielded comparable outcomes to those<1 cm in size,suggesting its feasibility as a treatment.展开更多
Esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs)are exceedingly rare,often detected incidentally due to their asymptomatic nature.Historically,esophagec-tomy or enucleation has been the standard treatment,but these p...Esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs)are exceedingly rare,often detected incidentally due to their asymptomatic nature.Historically,esophagec-tomy or enucleation has been the standard treatment,but these procedures carry significant morbidity.The retrospective study by Xu et al provides compelling evidence that endoscopic resection(ER)is a viable,minimally invasive alternative for low-risk esophageal GISTs,demonstrating a high en bloc resection rate(96.9%)and favorable long-term oncologic outcomes,including a 5-year overall survival rate of 100%and disease-free survival of 90.6%.These results challenge the con-ventional surgical paradigm and highlight the need for a paradigm shift towards endoscopic approaches in carefully selected patients.However,several critical questions remain unanswered:What are the precise selection criteria for ER candidacy?How does ER compare to traditional surgical methods in terms of recurrence risk and long-term functional outcomes?Could neoadjuvant therapy enhance the feasibility of ER for larger lesions?As endoscopic techniques continue to evolve,interdisciplinary collaboration among gastroenterologists,oncologists,and surgeons will be crucial to refining treatment algorithms and optimizing patient outcomes.Future prospective studies and randomized trials are warranted to solidify the role of ER as the standard of care for esophageal GISTs.展开更多
Xu et al retrospectively assessed endoscopic resection(ER)for esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors(E-GISTs)and reported excellent 5-year survival rates.Although ER shows promise as a minimally invasive procedure...Xu et al retrospectively assessed endoscopic resection(ER)for esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors(E-GISTs)and reported excellent 5-year survival rates.Although ER shows promise as a minimally invasive procedure,the 75%R0 resection rate with recurrence observed even after R0 resection warrants further discussion.We highlight the need for careful patient selection based on tumor size,location,and risk,considering endoscopic and thoracoscopic approaches.Future studies should refine ER techniques,optimize patient selection,and establish long-term follow-up to guide E-GIST management.展开更多
BACKGROUND Ulcerative colitis(UC)increases the risk of colorectal dysplasia.While colectomy was once standard,advances in polypectomy,endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR),endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD),and endosco...BACKGROUND Ulcerative colitis(UC)increases the risk of colorectal dysplasia.While colectomy was once standard,advances in polypectomy,endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR),endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD),and endoscopic full-thickness resection(EFTR)now allow organ-sparing management in selected cases.AIM To summarize current evidence on the feasibility,safety,and outcomes of these techniques in UC-associated neoplasia.METHODS A scoping review was conducted using PubMed and EMBASE(1975-May 2025)with the search:(“endoscopic submucosal dissection”/exp OR“endoscopic mucosal resection”OR“full thickness resection”OR“polypectomy”)AND(“ulcerative colitis”/exp OR“ulcerative colitis”OR“pouch”).Screening followed PRISMA guidelines.Eligible studies included those reporting outcomes,feasibility,or novel techniques in the endoscopic management of UC-associated dysplasia.RESULTS Of 1075 identified records,754 were screened after duplicate removal,and 48 studies were included.Polypectomy was safe and effective for well-demarcated,lifting lesions without adjacent dysplasia.EMR has excellent outcomes for small,polypoid,or right-sided lesions that demonstrated adequate lifting.ESD is ind icated for flat,large,non-polypoid,or fibrotic lesions,particularly in the left colon.ESD achieved en bloc resection in 88%-100%and R0 resection in 73%-96%of cases.The overall complication rate with ESD was approximately 2%-10%,primarily bleeding or perforation.Local recurrence occurred in 0%-6.8%,and metachronous lesions developed in up to 31%of cases over follow-up durations of up to 15 years.Surgical intervention after ESD was required in 10%-20%of patients,typically for non-curative resection or new lesions.Submucosal fibrosis,a common obstacle in UC,limited lifting and increased procedural difficulty.Adjunctive strategies-such as water pressure-assisted dissection,pocket-creation method,self-assembling peptide injectables,and traction systems-enhanced technical success.EFTR,though limited to case series,was effective for non-lifting or anatomically complex lesions,particularly in post-surgical or pouch anatomy,but carried higher procedural risk including rare but serious adverse events.CONCLUSION Endoscopic resection offers a spectrum of curative,minimally invasive options for managing dysplasia in UC.EMR remains appropriate for simple,lifting lesions,while ESD and EFTR broaden the therapeutic landscape for complex or fibrotic pathology.Lesion morphology,lifting characteristics,and operator experience should guide technique selection.Long-term outcomes are favorable with appropriate surveillance,though the risk of metachronous neoplasia necessitates continued monitoring.展开更多
In this editorial,we provide commentary on a recently published study by Zhao et al in the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.The study discusses the clinical characteristics of patients undergoing endoscopic ...In this editorial,we provide commentary on a recently published study by Zhao et al in the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.The study discusses the clinical characteristics of patients undergoing endoscopic resection for gastric cancers.We feel it is important to engage our endoscopy community in a discussion on the current evidence in the literature on the necessary number of cases for training in endoluminal surgery techniques,particularly endoscopic submucosal dissection.This includes the latest recommendations from the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy,as well as a summary of key studies on the learning curve for these techniques.Additionally,we explore the impact of an endo-scopist’s specialty on endoscopy outcomes,drawing from current evidence in the literature to shape our perspective in this evolving field.展开更多
BACKGROUND In endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)and endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD),submucosal lifting agents such as crystalloid-oil emulsion solution(COES)are used for improved effect.Starch-based polysaccharid...BACKGROUND In endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)and endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD),submucosal lifting agents such as crystalloid-oil emulsion solution(COES)are used for improved effect.Starch-based polysaccharide solution(SPS),which in powder form acts as effective hemostatic agent,are now available as an alternative lifting agent.AIM To compare SPS to COES outcomes as lifting agents in colonic EMR and ESD.METHODS This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent colonic EMR or ESD and received submucosal injection of either SPS or COES at a single academic center from March 2021 to November 2023.A total of 79 patients were included in the COES group and 99 patients in the SPS group from chart review.Intraprocedural bleeding was defined as bleeding during a procedure requiring hemostatic intervention.Adverse events included were perforation or post-procedure gastrointestinal bleed within the first 30-day period.Data were analyzed using t-test and χ^(2) test.RESULTS Successful resection was achieved in all 178 patients.Average lesion size in SPS group was 2.6 cm vs 2.4 cm in COES group.Average procedure time was 22 minutes shorter in the SPS group(P<0.05).Intraprocedural bleeding was 24.1%more frequent in COES group(P<0.01).The 30-day adverse events were 9.37%more frequent in the COES group(P<0.01).En bloc resection was achieved 22.2%more frequently in patients receiving SPS submucosal injection(P<0.01).CONCLUSION SPS colonic submucosal injection appears to be beneficial over COES,as it is associated with lower intraprocedural bleeding,less adverse events,shorter procedures,and more frequent en bloc resections.展开更多
BACKGROUND Colorectal laterally spreading tumors(LSTs)are best treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection or endoscopic mucosal resection.AIM To analyze the clinicopathological and endoscopic profiles of colorectal...BACKGROUND Colorectal laterally spreading tumors(LSTs)are best treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection or endoscopic mucosal resection.AIM To analyze the clinicopathological and endoscopic profiles of colorectal LSTs,determine predictive factors for high-grade dysplasia(HGD)/carcinoma(CA),submucosal invasion,and complications.METHODS We retrospectively assessed the endoscopic and histological characteristics of 375 colorectal LSTs at our hospital between January 2016 and December 2023.We performed univariate and multivariate analysis to identify risk factors associated with HGD/CA,submucosal invasion and complications.RESULTS The numbers of granular(LST-G)and non-granular LST(LST-NG)were 260 and 115,respectively.The rates of low-grade dysplasia and HGD/CA were 60.3%and 39.7%,respectively.Multivariate analysis indicated that a tumor size≥30 mm[odds ratio(OR)=1.934,P=0.032],LST granular nodular mixed type(OR=2.100,P=0.005),and LST non-granular pseudo depressed type(NG-PD)(OR=3.016,P=0.015)were independent risk factors significantly associated with higher odds of HGD/CA.NG-PD(OR=6.506,P=0.001),tumor size(20-29 mm)(OR=2.631,P=0.036)and tumor size≥30 mm(OR=3.449,P=0.016)were associated with increased odds of submucosal invasion.Tumor size≥30 mm(OR=4.888,P=0.003)was a particularly important predictor of complications.A nomogram model demonstrated a satisfactory fit,with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.716(95%confidence interval:0.653-0.780),indicating strong predictive performance.CONCLUSION The novel nomogram incorporating tumor size,location,and morphology predicted HGD/CA during endoscopic resection for LSTs.NG-PD lesions larger than 20 mm were more likely to invade the submucosa.Tumor size≥30 mm was an important predictor of complications.展开更多
BACKGROUND Endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)is widely accepted for early gastric cancer(EGC)without lymph node metastasis,although ESD is challenging,even for small lesions,in the greater curvature(GC)of the upper...BACKGROUND Endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)is widely accepted for early gastric cancer(EGC)without lymph node metastasis,although ESD is challenging,even for small lesions,in the greater curvature(GC)of the upper(U)and middle(M)thirds of the stomach.Grasping forceps-assisted endoscopic resection(GF-ER)is a type of endoscopic mucosal resection that is performed via a double-channel endoscope.AIM To investigate the safety and efficacy of GF-ER vs ESD in the GC of the stomach’s U and M regions.METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 506 patients who underwent ER of 522 EGC lesions in the stomach’s U and M regions in three institutions between January 2016 and May 2020.Nine lesions from eight patients who underwent GF-ER for EGC(the GF-ER group)were compared to 63 lesions from 63 patients who underwent ESD(the ESD group).We also performed a subgroup analysis of small lesions(≤10 mm)in 6 patients(7 lesions)from the GF-ER group and 20 patients(20 lesions)from the ESD group.RESULTS There were no statistically significant differences between the GF-ER and ESD groups in the en bloc resection rates(100%vs 100%)and the R0 resection rates(100%vs 98.4%).The median procedure time in the GF-ER group was shorter than that in the ESD group(4.0 min vs 55.0 min,P<0.01).There were no adverse events in the GF-ER group,although five perforations(8.0%)and 1 case of postoperative bleeding(1.6%)were observed in the ESD group.When we only considered lesions that were≤10 mm,the median procedure time in the GF-ER group was still shorter than that in the ESD group(4.0 min vs 35.0 min,P<0.01).There were no adverse events in the GF-ER group,although 1 case of perforation(1.6%)were observed in the ESD group.CONCLUSION These findings suggest that GF-ER may be an effective therapeutic option for small lesions in the GC of the stomach’s U and M regions.展开更多
Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori)plays an important role in gastric carcinogenesis,as the majority of gastric cancers develop from H.pylori-infected gastric mucosa.The rate of early gastric cancer diagnosis has increased ...Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori)plays an important role in gastric carcinogenesis,as the majority of gastric cancers develop from H.pylori-infected gastric mucosa.The rate of early gastric cancer diagnosis has increased in Japan and Korea,where H.pylori infection and gastric cancer are highly prevalent.Early intestinal-type gastric cancer without concomitant lymph node metastasis is usually treated by endoscopic resection.Secondary metachronous gastric cancers often develop because atrophic mucosa left untreated after endoscopic treatment confers a high risk of gastric cancer.The efficacy of H.pylori eradication for the prevention of metachronous gastric cancer remains controversial.However,in patients who undergo endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer,H.pylori eradication is recommended to suppress or delay metachronous gastric cancer.Careful and regularly scheduled endoscopy should be performed to detect minute metachronous gastric cancer after endoscopic resection.展开更多
BACKGROUND Esophageal schwannomas are uncommon esophageal submucosal benign tumors and are usually treated with surgery.CASE SUMMARY Here,we report three cases of middle/lower thoracic esophageal schwannoma treated su...BACKGROUND Esophageal schwannomas are uncommon esophageal submucosal benign tumors and are usually treated with surgery.CASE SUMMARY Here,we report three cases of middle/lower thoracic esophageal schwannoma treated successfully with endoscopic resection.These lesions were misdiagnosed as leiomyoma on preoperative imaging.During the endoscopic resection of such tumors,there is a risk of esophageal perforation due to their deep location.If possible,submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection should be used.CONCLUSION For larger schwannomas,endoscopy combined with thoracoscopy can be considered for en bloc resection.We performed a mini literature review in order to present the current status of diagnosis and treatment for esophageal schwannoma.展开更多
BACKGROUND There are some studies investigating the relationship between antithrombotic medication and postoperative bleeding after endoscopic resection(ER)with controversial results.AIM To perform a meta-analysis eva...BACKGROUND There are some studies investigating the relationship between antithrombotic medication and postoperative bleeding after endoscopic resection(ER)with controversial results.AIM To perform a meta-analysis evaluating the effects of antithrombotic therapy on postoperative bleeding after ER.METHODS A systematic search was conducted on PubMed,Web of Science,Cochrane Library.The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to evaluate the quality of studies.Stata 12.0 was used for statistical analysis.The odds ratio(OR)and 95%CI were calculated and heterogeneity was quantified using Cochran’s Q test and I2.RESULTS Total 66 studies were included in the meta-analysis.Pooled data suggested that antithrombotic therapy was significantly associated with postoperative bleeding(OR=2.302,95%CI:2.057-2.577,P=0.000)after ER.The risk of postoperative bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection,endoscopic mucosal resection and polypectomy in the antithrombotic group was higher than the nonantithrombotic group(OR=2.439,95%CI:1.916-3.105;OR=2.688,95%CI:1.098-6.582;OR=2.112,95%CI:1.434-3.112).CONCLUSION The risk of postoperative bleeding after ER correlated with the types and management of antithrombotic agents by our meta-analysis.展开更多
Magnifying endoscopy is a useful technique to differentiate neoplasia from non-neoplastic lesions. Data regarding the clinical utility of magnifying endoscopy for neoplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease(...Magnifying endoscopy is a useful technique to differentiate neoplasia from non-neoplastic lesions. Data regarding the clinical utility of magnifying endoscopy for neoplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease(IBD) has been emerging.While Kudo’s pit pattern types Ⅲ-Ⅴ are findings suggestive of neoplasia in non-IBD patients, these pit patterns are predictive of IBD-associated neoplasia as well.However, active chronic inflammatory processes, particularly regenerative changes, can mimic neoplastic pit patterns and may affect a meticulous evaluation of pit pattern diagnosis in patients with IBD. The clinical evidence regarding the utility of magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging or endocytoscopy has also been evolving in regard to the diagnosis of IBD-associated neoplasia. These advanced endoscopic techniques are promising for multiple reasons;not only for making an accurate diagnosis of neoplasia, but also in determining if endoscopic resection is appropriate for such lesions in patients with IBD. In this review, we discuss the diagnostic accuracy and limitations of magnifying endoscopy in assessing IBD-associated neoplasia and examine the feasibility and outcomes of endoscopic resection for these lesions.展开更多
BACKGROUND Gastric cancer,a prevalent malignancy,poses a severe threat to the health of residents in China.Timely intervention in early stages can extend patients’survival.AIM To analyze clinical characteristics of p...BACKGROUND Gastric cancer,a prevalent malignancy,poses a severe threat to the health of residents in China.Timely intervention in early stages can extend patients’survival.AIM To analyze clinical characteristics of patients with early gastric cancer and efficacy and risk of complications associated with endoscopic resection.METHODS This study included 175 patients with early gastric cancer treated at our hospital,with no restrictions on sex or age.General data,pathological information,and endoscopic biopsy results were obtained.The clinical characteristics of early gastric cancer were analyzed,and endoscopic resection was performed.Postoperative efficacy and incidence of complications were monitored.Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 26.0 and GraphPad Prism 8.0 software.RESULTS A total of 175 patients with early gastric cancer were included,with 75.43%(n=132)males and 24.57%(n=43)females.38.29%(n=67)and 35.43%(n=62)of patients had a history of smoking and alcohol consumption,respectively.Comorbidities included diabetes(8.57%,n=15),coronary heart disease(10.29%,n=18),and hypertension(43.43%,n=76),which was highly prevalent.A history of abdominal surgery and family history of digestive system cancer accounted for 21.14%and 17.14%,respectively.The most common lesion location was the antral part of the stomach(52.00%,n=91),followed by the gastric angle,body,and fundus.The pathological types were predominantly high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia(28.00%,n=49)and well-differentiated adenocarcinoma(26.86%,n=47),followed by moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma,high-moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma,and moderate-lowly differentiated adenocarcinoma.89.14%of the patients had intestinal metaplasia and 85.14%had atrophy.After endoscopic resection,re-examination revealed that 13 patients had cancer cells at the tissue margin,with a positive margin rate of 7.43%.Postoperative complications included no cases of gastrointestinal obstruction,but incisional infection(2.86%,n=5),gastric perforation(1.14%,n=2),and gastric bleeding(4%,n=7)were present,with an overall incidence of 8.00%.CONCLUSION Analysis of the clinical characteristics indicated that early gastric cancer is more prevalent in males with a history of hypertension,with lesions most commonly occurring in the antral region of the stomach.The pathological types are often high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and well-differentiated adenocarcinoma,with over 85%of patients having comorbid intestinal metaplasia and atrophy.Despite endoscopic resection,a positive margin rate persisted,indicating a probability of residual cancer at the margins.Postoperative complications,such as gastrointestinal obstruction,incisional infection,gastric perforation,and gastric bleeding can occur and require timely symptomatic treatment.展开更多
BACKGROUND Endoscopic resection approaches,including endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD),submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection(STER)and endoscopic fullthickness resection(EFTR),have been widely used for the trea...BACKGROUND Endoscopic resection approaches,including endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD),submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection(STER)and endoscopic fullthickness resection(EFTR),have been widely used for the treatment of submucosal tumors(SMTs)located in the upper gastrointestinal tract.However,compared to SMTs located in the esophagus or stomach,endoscopic resection of SMTs from the esophagogastric junction(EGJ)is much more difficult because of the sharp angle and narrow lumen of the EGJ.SMTs originating from the muscularis propria(MP)in the EGJ,especially those that grow extraluminally and adhere closely to the serosa,make endoscopic resection even more difficult.AIM To investigate the predictors of difficult endoscopic resection for SMTs from the MP layer at the EGJ.METHODS A total of 90 patients with SMTs from the MP layer at the EGJ were included in the present study.The difficulty of endoscopic resection was defined as a long procedure time,failure of en bloc resection and intraoperative bleeding.Clinicopathological,endoscopic and follow-up data were collected and analyzed.Statistical analysis of independent risks for piecemeal resection,long operative time,and intraoperative bleeding were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses.RESULTS According to the location and growth pattern of the tumor,44 patients underwent STER,14 patients underwent EFTR,and the remaining 32 patients received a standard ESD procedure.The tumor size was 20.0 mm(range 5.0–100.0 mm).Fourty-seven out of 90 lesions(52.2%)were regularly shaped.The overall en bloc resection rate was 84.4%.The operation time was 43 min(range 16–126 min).The intraoperative bleeding rate was 18.9%.There were no adverse events that required therapeutic intervention during or after the procedures.The surgical approach had no significant correlation with en bloc resection,long operative time or intraoperative bleeding.Large tumor size(≥30 mm)and irregular tumor shape were independent predictors for piecemeal resection(OR:7.346,P=0.032 and OR:18.004,P=0.029,respectively),long operative time(≥60 min)(OR:47.330,P=0.000 and OR:6.863,P=0.034,respectively)and intraoperative bleeding(OR:20.631,P=0.002 and OR:19.020,P=0.021,respectively).CONCLUSION Endoscopic resection is an effective treatment for SMTs in the MP layer at the EGJ.Tumors with large size and irregular shape were independent predictors for difficult endoscopic resection.展开更多
BACKGROUND Although premalignant duodenal lesions such as adenomas are uncommon,the incidences of these lesions have increased in recent times,and thus,the demand for minimally invasive treatments such as endoscopic r...BACKGROUND Although premalignant duodenal lesions such as adenomas are uncommon,the incidences of these lesions have increased in recent times,and thus,the demand for minimally invasive treatments such as endoscopic resection(ER)has also increased.However,ER in the duodenum is more challenging than ER in other locations of the gastrointestinal tract.AIM To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ER for superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors(SNADETs)METHODS We performed a retrospective observational study on 56 consecutive patients(58 lesions)diagnosed with SNADETs that underwent ER from January 2011 to December 2020 at Yeungnam University Hospital.Patient demographics,lesion characteristics,and procedural and technical data were collected,and clinical outcomes,including procedure-related complications,completeness of resection,and recurrence were analyzed.RESULTS Median patient age was 57 years[range,26–77,30(53.6%)men].Endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)was performed on 57 lesions(98.3%)and snare polypectomy on one(1.7%).Lesions consisted of 52 adenomas with low-grade dysplasia(89.7%),3 adenomas with high-grade dysplasia(5.2%),and 3 intramucosal adenocarcinomas(5.2%).There were 16 cases of intraprocedural bleeding(27.6%)and 1 case of delayed bleeding(1.7%),and all these 17 cases were successfully managed endoscopically.No perforation or procedure-related death occurred.Larger lesion size was associated with an increased risk of EMR-related bleeding(P=0.033).During a median follow-up period of 23 mo(range 6–100 mo),no local recurrence occurred,despite the fact one-third of the patients(19 lesions,32.8%)underwent piecemeal resection and 3 patients(3 lesions,5.2%)that underwent en bloc resection had a pathologically determined positive lateral margin.No patient died from a primary duodenal neoplasm.CONCLUSION The majority of SNADETs can be safely and curatively resected by EMR,and thus,based on consideration of the high incidence of fatal complications attributable to ESD,we conclude EMR,including piecemeal resection,should be considered the treatment of first choice for SNADETs.展开更多
文摘Gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs)are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract and arise from the interstitial cells of Cajal.They predominantly affect individuals between 50 and 70 years of age and often carry malignant potential despite being frequently asymptomatic.The stomach and small intestine are the most common locations,while involvement of the esophagus,colon,or rectum is relatively rare.GISTs are often discovered incidentally during endoscopic or radiologic evaluations,and the diagnosis is confirmed through tissue biopsy and immunohistochemical staining,particularly for KIT(CD117),DOG1,and PDGFRA.In the past decade,laparoscopic resection has been considered the standard treatment for localized GISTs smaller than 5 cm.However,recent advances in endoscopic technology have led to a growing role for endoscopic resection as a safe and effective treatment option for selected nonmetastatic GISTs.Endoscopic techniques such as endoscopic submucosal dissection,endoscopic submucosal excavation,submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection,and endoscopic full-thickness resection have demonstrated favorable outcomes,including high complete resection(R0)rates,shorter hospital stays,and quicker recovery compared to traditional surgery.The selection of an appropriate resection method depends on tumor size,location,depth of invasion,and proximity to vital structures.Endoscopic ultrasound has become an essential tool for preprocedural assessment,providing detailed information on tumor characteristics and helping to guide management decisions.While endoscopic resection is a promising minimally invasive approach,it should be performed by skilled endoscopists with appropriate training due to the technical complexity and risk of complications such as bleeding or perforation.This review summarizes recent developments in endoscopic resection of GISTs,with a focus on indications,procedural safety,clinical outcomes,and recommendations for optimal patient selection and procedural planning.
文摘While rare,esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs)have higher mali-gnant potential and are typically diagnosed at larger sizes compared to gastric GISTs.However,well-defined guidelines for their optimal management remain lacking.Most esophageal GISTs are surgically managed with enucleation,while esophagectomy is reserved for larger tumors.Recent advances in endoscopic techniques,such as endoscopic submucosal dissection and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection(ER),have allowed for endoscopic removal of submucosal esophageal lesions,including GISTs.Xu et al reported on the clinical and on-cological outcomes of 32 patients with esophageal GISTs treated with ER.The study demonstrated high en bloc resection rates and favorable 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival.However,it primarily focused on small,inci-dentally detected GISTs,with 75%of cases classified as very low or low risk according to the National Institutes of Health criteria.The authors favored the submucosal tunneling ER technique despite its procedural challenges in the upper esophagus.In this editorial,we briefly discuss the advantages and limitations of endoscopic techniques compared to surgical approaches.We also emphasize the need to establish specific management criteria for submucosal esophageal lesions to guide clinical practice.
基金Supported by Nanchang High-Level Scientific and Technological Innovation Talents‘Double Hundred Plan’Project,China,No.2022-312.
文摘Rectal neuroendocrine tumor(rNET)is an indolent malignancy often detected during colonoscopy screening.The incidence of rNET has increased approximately 10-fold over the past 30 years.Most rNETs detected during screening endoscopy are small,measuring<10 mm.Current guidelines recommend endoscopic resection for small,well-differentiated rNET using modified endoscopic submucosal resection(mEMR)or endoscopic submucosal dissection.However,the optimal endoscopic treatment method remains uncertain.This paper summarizes the evidence on mEMR with submucosal stretching,mEMR without submucosal stretching,endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic full-thickness resection.Given that rNETs often exhibit submucosal invasion,achieving adequate resection depth is crucial to ensure histological complete resection.mEMR with submucosal stretching appears favorable due to its high rate of histological complete resection,safety and convenience.Risk factors associated with lymph node and distant metastases are also discussed.A treatment algorithm is proposed to facilitate clinical decision-making.
文摘Oesophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumours are rare,anatomically challenging lesions with higher surgical morbidity than their gastric counterparts.Emerging endoscopic resection techniques such as endoscopic submucosal dissection and submucosal tunnelling endoscopic resection show much promise for the management of patients who are not fit for,or wish to avoid the morbidity of,major surgical resection.These techniques require careful patient selection and advanced technical skills.We build on the recent review of such techniques by Vogli et al.Current evidence is limited to small case series with heterogeneity in patient selection,tumor size,and outcomes.Notably,long-term oncological data remain sparse,and complications such as bleeding or perforation may be life-threatening in patients unfit for surgical rescue.Nonetheless,endoscopic approaches have many potential advantages to offer such as preserved quality of life and definitive management of unfit patients.
文摘In this letter,a commentary on the article by Xu et al has been provided.Gastrointestinal stomal tumours(GISTs)are rare tumours that originate commonly in stomach(60%-70%)and small intestine(30%-40%).The course of treatment especially oesophageal GIST is very complex and hard to diagnose because of limited availability of pathological and clinical data.Endoscopic resection(ER)is a minimally invasive approach for removing tumours from the oesophagus and digestive system that does not require open surgery and is especially successful for very small and low-risk GIST.A retrospective exami-nation of 32 patients treated with ER between 2012 and 2023 was conducted to analyse clinical and pathological characteristics,effectiveness of therapy,and long-term prognosis.The findings demonstrate en bloc resection was achieved in 96.9%of cases with an R0 resection rate of 75%with a median size of tumour was approximately 2.12 cm.Post-surgery complication like hydrothorax,post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome occurred in about 25%of cases which later go resolved by conservative treatment.Recurrence of GIST was approximately 9.4%primarily in high-risk cases.ER should be widely adopted in clinical practise preferably for managing low-risk oesophageal GIST because of its high success rate,low recurrence rates and excellent survival results,ensuring better patient prognosis.
文摘BACKGROUND Rectal neuroendocrine tumors(NETs)smaller than 10 mm and well-differentiated tumors are generally considered to have a low risk of lymph node and distant metastasis,making them suitable for endoscopic resection.In contrast,tumors≥20 mm in size typically require surgical resection.However,the optimal management of intermediate-sized(10-15 mm)rectal NETs remains controversial.AIM To compare the clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection of rectal NETs<1 cm and those 1-1.5 cm in size.METHODS A retrospective study was conducted on 1056 patients with rectal NETs treated at the Samsung Medical Center between January 2005 and June 2021.After propensity score matching(1:10)for age,sex,and type of endoscopic resection,225 patients with tumors<1 cm in size and 27 patients with tumors 1-1.5 cm in size were analyzed.RESULTS Surgical resection was more frequent in the 1-1.5 cm group(37.2%)than in the<1 cm group(10.7%)(P<0.01).Endoscopic submucosal dissection was also more commonly performed in the 1-1.5 cm group(48.1%vs 18.5%,P<0.01).Negative resection margins were achieved in 97.2%of the patients,with no significant difference between the groups(P=0.22).No lymphovascular invasion was observed.During a median follow-up of 54 months,no recurrence occurred in the 1-1.5 cm group,while one case of metachronous recurrence was noted in the<1 cm group(P=1.00).There was no significant difference in recurrence-free survival(P=0.48).CONCLUSION Endoscopic resection of 1-1.5 cm grade 1 rectal NETs yielded comparable outcomes to those<1 cm in size,suggesting its feasibility as a treatment.
文摘Esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs)are exceedingly rare,often detected incidentally due to their asymptomatic nature.Historically,esophagec-tomy or enucleation has been the standard treatment,but these procedures carry significant morbidity.The retrospective study by Xu et al provides compelling evidence that endoscopic resection(ER)is a viable,minimally invasive alternative for low-risk esophageal GISTs,demonstrating a high en bloc resection rate(96.9%)and favorable long-term oncologic outcomes,including a 5-year overall survival rate of 100%and disease-free survival of 90.6%.These results challenge the con-ventional surgical paradigm and highlight the need for a paradigm shift towards endoscopic approaches in carefully selected patients.However,several critical questions remain unanswered:What are the precise selection criteria for ER candidacy?How does ER compare to traditional surgical methods in terms of recurrence risk and long-term functional outcomes?Could neoadjuvant therapy enhance the feasibility of ER for larger lesions?As endoscopic techniques continue to evolve,interdisciplinary collaboration among gastroenterologists,oncologists,and surgeons will be crucial to refining treatment algorithms and optimizing patient outcomes.Future prospective studies and randomized trials are warranted to solidify the role of ER as the standard of care for esophageal GISTs.
文摘Xu et al retrospectively assessed endoscopic resection(ER)for esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors(E-GISTs)and reported excellent 5-year survival rates.Although ER shows promise as a minimally invasive procedure,the 75%R0 resection rate with recurrence observed even after R0 resection warrants further discussion.We highlight the need for careful patient selection based on tumor size,location,and risk,considering endoscopic and thoracoscopic approaches.Future studies should refine ER techniques,optimize patient selection,and establish long-term follow-up to guide E-GIST management.
文摘BACKGROUND Ulcerative colitis(UC)increases the risk of colorectal dysplasia.While colectomy was once standard,advances in polypectomy,endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR),endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD),and endoscopic full-thickness resection(EFTR)now allow organ-sparing management in selected cases.AIM To summarize current evidence on the feasibility,safety,and outcomes of these techniques in UC-associated neoplasia.METHODS A scoping review was conducted using PubMed and EMBASE(1975-May 2025)with the search:(“endoscopic submucosal dissection”/exp OR“endoscopic mucosal resection”OR“full thickness resection”OR“polypectomy”)AND(“ulcerative colitis”/exp OR“ulcerative colitis”OR“pouch”).Screening followed PRISMA guidelines.Eligible studies included those reporting outcomes,feasibility,or novel techniques in the endoscopic management of UC-associated dysplasia.RESULTS Of 1075 identified records,754 were screened after duplicate removal,and 48 studies were included.Polypectomy was safe and effective for well-demarcated,lifting lesions without adjacent dysplasia.EMR has excellent outcomes for small,polypoid,or right-sided lesions that demonstrated adequate lifting.ESD is ind icated for flat,large,non-polypoid,or fibrotic lesions,particularly in the left colon.ESD achieved en bloc resection in 88%-100%and R0 resection in 73%-96%of cases.The overall complication rate with ESD was approximately 2%-10%,primarily bleeding or perforation.Local recurrence occurred in 0%-6.8%,and metachronous lesions developed in up to 31%of cases over follow-up durations of up to 15 years.Surgical intervention after ESD was required in 10%-20%of patients,typically for non-curative resection or new lesions.Submucosal fibrosis,a common obstacle in UC,limited lifting and increased procedural difficulty.Adjunctive strategies-such as water pressure-assisted dissection,pocket-creation method,self-assembling peptide injectables,and traction systems-enhanced technical success.EFTR,though limited to case series,was effective for non-lifting or anatomically complex lesions,particularly in post-surgical or pouch anatomy,but carried higher procedural risk including rare but serious adverse events.CONCLUSION Endoscopic resection offers a spectrum of curative,minimally invasive options for managing dysplasia in UC.EMR remains appropriate for simple,lifting lesions,while ESD and EFTR broaden the therapeutic landscape for complex or fibrotic pathology.Lesion morphology,lifting characteristics,and operator experience should guide technique selection.Long-term outcomes are favorable with appropriate surveillance,though the risk of metachronous neoplasia necessitates continued monitoring.
文摘In this editorial,we provide commentary on a recently published study by Zhao et al in the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.The study discusses the clinical characteristics of patients undergoing endoscopic resection for gastric cancers.We feel it is important to engage our endoscopy community in a discussion on the current evidence in the literature on the necessary number of cases for training in endoluminal surgery techniques,particularly endoscopic submucosal dissection.This includes the latest recommendations from the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy,as well as a summary of key studies on the learning curve for these techniques.Additionally,we explore the impact of an endo-scopist’s specialty on endoscopy outcomes,drawing from current evidence in the literature to shape our perspective in this evolving field.
文摘BACKGROUND In endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)and endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD),submucosal lifting agents such as crystalloid-oil emulsion solution(COES)are used for improved effect.Starch-based polysaccharide solution(SPS),which in powder form acts as effective hemostatic agent,are now available as an alternative lifting agent.AIM To compare SPS to COES outcomes as lifting agents in colonic EMR and ESD.METHODS This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent colonic EMR or ESD and received submucosal injection of either SPS or COES at a single academic center from March 2021 to November 2023.A total of 79 patients were included in the COES group and 99 patients in the SPS group from chart review.Intraprocedural bleeding was defined as bleeding during a procedure requiring hemostatic intervention.Adverse events included were perforation or post-procedure gastrointestinal bleed within the first 30-day period.Data were analyzed using t-test and χ^(2) test.RESULTS Successful resection was achieved in all 178 patients.Average lesion size in SPS group was 2.6 cm vs 2.4 cm in COES group.Average procedure time was 22 minutes shorter in the SPS group(P<0.05).Intraprocedural bleeding was 24.1%more frequent in COES group(P<0.01).The 30-day adverse events were 9.37%more frequent in the COES group(P<0.01).En bloc resection was achieved 22.2%more frequently in patients receiving SPS submucosal injection(P<0.01).CONCLUSION SPS colonic submucosal injection appears to be beneficial over COES,as it is associated with lower intraprocedural bleeding,less adverse events,shorter procedures,and more frequent en bloc resections.
文摘BACKGROUND Colorectal laterally spreading tumors(LSTs)are best treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection or endoscopic mucosal resection.AIM To analyze the clinicopathological and endoscopic profiles of colorectal LSTs,determine predictive factors for high-grade dysplasia(HGD)/carcinoma(CA),submucosal invasion,and complications.METHODS We retrospectively assessed the endoscopic and histological characteristics of 375 colorectal LSTs at our hospital between January 2016 and December 2023.We performed univariate and multivariate analysis to identify risk factors associated with HGD/CA,submucosal invasion and complications.RESULTS The numbers of granular(LST-G)and non-granular LST(LST-NG)were 260 and 115,respectively.The rates of low-grade dysplasia and HGD/CA were 60.3%and 39.7%,respectively.Multivariate analysis indicated that a tumor size≥30 mm[odds ratio(OR)=1.934,P=0.032],LST granular nodular mixed type(OR=2.100,P=0.005),and LST non-granular pseudo depressed type(NG-PD)(OR=3.016,P=0.015)were independent risk factors significantly associated with higher odds of HGD/CA.NG-PD(OR=6.506,P=0.001),tumor size(20-29 mm)(OR=2.631,P=0.036)and tumor size≥30 mm(OR=3.449,P=0.016)were associated with increased odds of submucosal invasion.Tumor size≥30 mm(OR=4.888,P=0.003)was a particularly important predictor of complications.A nomogram model demonstrated a satisfactory fit,with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.716(95%confidence interval:0.653-0.780),indicating strong predictive performance.CONCLUSION The novel nomogram incorporating tumor size,location,and morphology predicted HGD/CA during endoscopic resection for LSTs.NG-PD lesions larger than 20 mm were more likely to invade the submucosa.Tumor size≥30 mm was an important predictor of complications.
文摘BACKGROUND Endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)is widely accepted for early gastric cancer(EGC)without lymph node metastasis,although ESD is challenging,even for small lesions,in the greater curvature(GC)of the upper(U)and middle(M)thirds of the stomach.Grasping forceps-assisted endoscopic resection(GF-ER)is a type of endoscopic mucosal resection that is performed via a double-channel endoscope.AIM To investigate the safety and efficacy of GF-ER vs ESD in the GC of the stomach’s U and M regions.METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 506 patients who underwent ER of 522 EGC lesions in the stomach’s U and M regions in three institutions between January 2016 and May 2020.Nine lesions from eight patients who underwent GF-ER for EGC(the GF-ER group)were compared to 63 lesions from 63 patients who underwent ESD(the ESD group).We also performed a subgroup analysis of small lesions(≤10 mm)in 6 patients(7 lesions)from the GF-ER group and 20 patients(20 lesions)from the ESD group.RESULTS There were no statistically significant differences between the GF-ER and ESD groups in the en bloc resection rates(100%vs 100%)and the R0 resection rates(100%vs 98.4%).The median procedure time in the GF-ER group was shorter than that in the ESD group(4.0 min vs 55.0 min,P<0.01).There were no adverse events in the GF-ER group,although five perforations(8.0%)and 1 case of postoperative bleeding(1.6%)were observed in the ESD group.When we only considered lesions that were≤10 mm,the median procedure time in the GF-ER group was still shorter than that in the ESD group(4.0 min vs 35.0 min,P<0.01).There were no adverse events in the GF-ER group,although 1 case of perforation(1.6%)were observed in the ESD group.CONCLUSION These findings suggest that GF-ER may be an effective therapeutic option for small lesions in the GC of the stomach’s U and M regions.
文摘Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori)plays an important role in gastric carcinogenesis,as the majority of gastric cancers develop from H.pylori-infected gastric mucosa.The rate of early gastric cancer diagnosis has increased in Japan and Korea,where H.pylori infection and gastric cancer are highly prevalent.Early intestinal-type gastric cancer without concomitant lymph node metastasis is usually treated by endoscopic resection.Secondary metachronous gastric cancers often develop because atrophic mucosa left untreated after endoscopic treatment confers a high risk of gastric cancer.The efficacy of H.pylori eradication for the prevention of metachronous gastric cancer remains controversial.However,in patients who undergo endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer,H.pylori eradication is recommended to suppress or delay metachronous gastric cancer.Careful and regularly scheduled endoscopy should be performed to detect minute metachronous gastric cancer after endoscopic resection.
基金Supported by The Shandong Key Research and Development Program,No.2016GSF201004and The Jinan Science and Technology Plan Project,No.201705055.
文摘BACKGROUND Esophageal schwannomas are uncommon esophageal submucosal benign tumors and are usually treated with surgery.CASE SUMMARY Here,we report three cases of middle/lower thoracic esophageal schwannoma treated successfully with endoscopic resection.These lesions were misdiagnosed as leiomyoma on preoperative imaging.During the endoscopic resection of such tumors,there is a risk of esophageal perforation due to their deep location.If possible,submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection should be used.CONCLUSION For larger schwannomas,endoscopy combined with thoracoscopy can be considered for en bloc resection.We performed a mini literature review in order to present the current status of diagnosis and treatment for esophageal schwannoma.
基金Liaoning Science and Technology Foundation,No.20170541052.
文摘BACKGROUND There are some studies investigating the relationship between antithrombotic medication and postoperative bleeding after endoscopic resection(ER)with controversial results.AIM To perform a meta-analysis evaluating the effects of antithrombotic therapy on postoperative bleeding after ER.METHODS A systematic search was conducted on PubMed,Web of Science,Cochrane Library.The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to evaluate the quality of studies.Stata 12.0 was used for statistical analysis.The odds ratio(OR)and 95%CI were calculated and heterogeneity was quantified using Cochran’s Q test and I2.RESULTS Total 66 studies were included in the meta-analysis.Pooled data suggested that antithrombotic therapy was significantly associated with postoperative bleeding(OR=2.302,95%CI:2.057-2.577,P=0.000)after ER.The risk of postoperative bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection,endoscopic mucosal resection and polypectomy in the antithrombotic group was higher than the nonantithrombotic group(OR=2.439,95%CI:1.916-3.105;OR=2.688,95%CI:1.098-6.582;OR=2.112,95%CI:1.434-3.112).CONCLUSION The risk of postoperative bleeding after ER correlated with the types and management of antithrombotic agents by our meta-analysis.
文摘Magnifying endoscopy is a useful technique to differentiate neoplasia from non-neoplastic lesions. Data regarding the clinical utility of magnifying endoscopy for neoplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease(IBD) has been emerging.While Kudo’s pit pattern types Ⅲ-Ⅴ are findings suggestive of neoplasia in non-IBD patients, these pit patterns are predictive of IBD-associated neoplasia as well.However, active chronic inflammatory processes, particularly regenerative changes, can mimic neoplastic pit patterns and may affect a meticulous evaluation of pit pattern diagnosis in patients with IBD. The clinical evidence regarding the utility of magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging or endocytoscopy has also been evolving in regard to the diagnosis of IBD-associated neoplasia. These advanced endoscopic techniques are promising for multiple reasons;not only for making an accurate diagnosis of neoplasia, but also in determining if endoscopic resection is appropriate for such lesions in patients with IBD. In this review, we discuss the diagnostic accuracy and limitations of magnifying endoscopy in assessing IBD-associated neoplasia and examine the feasibility and outcomes of endoscopic resection for these lesions.
文摘BACKGROUND Gastric cancer,a prevalent malignancy,poses a severe threat to the health of residents in China.Timely intervention in early stages can extend patients’survival.AIM To analyze clinical characteristics of patients with early gastric cancer and efficacy and risk of complications associated with endoscopic resection.METHODS This study included 175 patients with early gastric cancer treated at our hospital,with no restrictions on sex or age.General data,pathological information,and endoscopic biopsy results were obtained.The clinical characteristics of early gastric cancer were analyzed,and endoscopic resection was performed.Postoperative efficacy and incidence of complications were monitored.Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 26.0 and GraphPad Prism 8.0 software.RESULTS A total of 175 patients with early gastric cancer were included,with 75.43%(n=132)males and 24.57%(n=43)females.38.29%(n=67)and 35.43%(n=62)of patients had a history of smoking and alcohol consumption,respectively.Comorbidities included diabetes(8.57%,n=15),coronary heart disease(10.29%,n=18),and hypertension(43.43%,n=76),which was highly prevalent.A history of abdominal surgery and family history of digestive system cancer accounted for 21.14%and 17.14%,respectively.The most common lesion location was the antral part of the stomach(52.00%,n=91),followed by the gastric angle,body,and fundus.The pathological types were predominantly high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia(28.00%,n=49)and well-differentiated adenocarcinoma(26.86%,n=47),followed by moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma,high-moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma,and moderate-lowly differentiated adenocarcinoma.89.14%of the patients had intestinal metaplasia and 85.14%had atrophy.After endoscopic resection,re-examination revealed that 13 patients had cancer cells at the tissue margin,with a positive margin rate of 7.43%.Postoperative complications included no cases of gastrointestinal obstruction,but incisional infection(2.86%,n=5),gastric perforation(1.14%,n=2),and gastric bleeding(4%,n=7)were present,with an overall incidence of 8.00%.CONCLUSION Analysis of the clinical characteristics indicated that early gastric cancer is more prevalent in males with a history of hypertension,with lesions most commonly occurring in the antral region of the stomach.The pathological types are often high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and well-differentiated adenocarcinoma,with over 85%of patients having comorbid intestinal metaplasia and atrophy.Despite endoscopic resection,a positive margin rate persisted,indicating a probability of residual cancer at the margins.Postoperative complications,such as gastrointestinal obstruction,incisional infection,gastric perforation,and gastric bleeding can occur and require timely symptomatic treatment.
基金Supported by Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality,China,No.19411951505.
文摘BACKGROUND Endoscopic resection approaches,including endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD),submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection(STER)and endoscopic fullthickness resection(EFTR),have been widely used for the treatment of submucosal tumors(SMTs)located in the upper gastrointestinal tract.However,compared to SMTs located in the esophagus or stomach,endoscopic resection of SMTs from the esophagogastric junction(EGJ)is much more difficult because of the sharp angle and narrow lumen of the EGJ.SMTs originating from the muscularis propria(MP)in the EGJ,especially those that grow extraluminally and adhere closely to the serosa,make endoscopic resection even more difficult.AIM To investigate the predictors of difficult endoscopic resection for SMTs from the MP layer at the EGJ.METHODS A total of 90 patients with SMTs from the MP layer at the EGJ were included in the present study.The difficulty of endoscopic resection was defined as a long procedure time,failure of en bloc resection and intraoperative bleeding.Clinicopathological,endoscopic and follow-up data were collected and analyzed.Statistical analysis of independent risks for piecemeal resection,long operative time,and intraoperative bleeding were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses.RESULTS According to the location and growth pattern of the tumor,44 patients underwent STER,14 patients underwent EFTR,and the remaining 32 patients received a standard ESD procedure.The tumor size was 20.0 mm(range 5.0–100.0 mm).Fourty-seven out of 90 lesions(52.2%)were regularly shaped.The overall en bloc resection rate was 84.4%.The operation time was 43 min(range 16–126 min).The intraoperative bleeding rate was 18.9%.There were no adverse events that required therapeutic intervention during or after the procedures.The surgical approach had no significant correlation with en bloc resection,long operative time or intraoperative bleeding.Large tumor size(≥30 mm)and irregular tumor shape were independent predictors for piecemeal resection(OR:7.346,P=0.032 and OR:18.004,P=0.029,respectively),long operative time(≥60 min)(OR:47.330,P=0.000 and OR:6.863,P=0.034,respectively)and intraoperative bleeding(OR:20.631,P=0.002 and OR:19.020,P=0.021,respectively).CONCLUSION Endoscopic resection is an effective treatment for SMTs in the MP layer at the EGJ.Tumors with large size and irregular shape were independent predictors for difficult endoscopic resection.
文摘BACKGROUND Although premalignant duodenal lesions such as adenomas are uncommon,the incidences of these lesions have increased in recent times,and thus,the demand for minimally invasive treatments such as endoscopic resection(ER)has also increased.However,ER in the duodenum is more challenging than ER in other locations of the gastrointestinal tract.AIM To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ER for superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors(SNADETs)METHODS We performed a retrospective observational study on 56 consecutive patients(58 lesions)diagnosed with SNADETs that underwent ER from January 2011 to December 2020 at Yeungnam University Hospital.Patient demographics,lesion characteristics,and procedural and technical data were collected,and clinical outcomes,including procedure-related complications,completeness of resection,and recurrence were analyzed.RESULTS Median patient age was 57 years[range,26–77,30(53.6%)men].Endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)was performed on 57 lesions(98.3%)and snare polypectomy on one(1.7%).Lesions consisted of 52 adenomas with low-grade dysplasia(89.7%),3 adenomas with high-grade dysplasia(5.2%),and 3 intramucosal adenocarcinomas(5.2%).There were 16 cases of intraprocedural bleeding(27.6%)and 1 case of delayed bleeding(1.7%),and all these 17 cases were successfully managed endoscopically.No perforation or procedure-related death occurred.Larger lesion size was associated with an increased risk of EMR-related bleeding(P=0.033).During a median follow-up period of 23 mo(range 6–100 mo),no local recurrence occurred,despite the fact one-third of the patients(19 lesions,32.8%)underwent piecemeal resection and 3 patients(3 lesions,5.2%)that underwent en bloc resection had a pathologically determined positive lateral margin.No patient died from a primary duodenal neoplasm.CONCLUSION The majority of SNADETs can be safely and curatively resected by EMR,and thus,based on consideration of the high incidence of fatal complications attributable to ESD,we conclude EMR,including piecemeal resection,should be considered the treatment of first choice for SNADETs.
