Objective: To explore and analyze the role of severe ultrasound in early fluid resuscitation of septic shock patients. Methods: In this study, 80 patients with septic shock were selected and randomly divided into two ...Objective: To explore and analyze the role of severe ultrasound in early fluid resuscitation of septic shock patients. Methods: In this study, 80 patients with septic shock were selected and randomly divided into two groups from January 2020 to December 2021. 40 patients in the control group were treated with conventional fluid resuscitation, and 40 patients in the research group were treated with early fluid resuscitation guided by severe ultrasound. The related indexes of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results: There was no significant difference in hemodynamics between the two groups before treatment (P > 0.05). The hemodynamics of the study group after treatment was better than that of the control group (P 0.05). There was no significant difference in immune function between the two groups before treatment (P > 0.05). The immune function of the study group after treatment was better than that of the control group (P 0.05). There was no significant difference in inflammatory factors between the two groups before treatment (P > 0.05). The inflammatory factors in the study group after treatment were better than those in the control group (P 0.05). Compared with the control group, the patients in the study group had less fluid input, shorter use time of ventilator and shorter hospitalization time in ICU (P 0.05). Conclusion: For patients with septic shock, early fluid resuscitation guided by severe ultrasound can effectively regulate the hemodynamics, improve the immune function and inflammatory factors of patients, shorten the use time of ventilator and hospitalization time in ICU, and the clinical value obtained is clear.展开更多
文摘Objective: To explore and analyze the role of severe ultrasound in early fluid resuscitation of septic shock patients. Methods: In this study, 80 patients with septic shock were selected and randomly divided into two groups from January 2020 to December 2021. 40 patients in the control group were treated with conventional fluid resuscitation, and 40 patients in the research group were treated with early fluid resuscitation guided by severe ultrasound. The related indexes of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results: There was no significant difference in hemodynamics between the two groups before treatment (P > 0.05). The hemodynamics of the study group after treatment was better than that of the control group (P 0.05). There was no significant difference in immune function between the two groups before treatment (P > 0.05). The immune function of the study group after treatment was better than that of the control group (P 0.05). There was no significant difference in inflammatory factors between the two groups before treatment (P > 0.05). The inflammatory factors in the study group after treatment were better than those in the control group (P 0.05). Compared with the control group, the patients in the study group had less fluid input, shorter use time of ventilator and shorter hospitalization time in ICU (P 0.05). Conclusion: For patients with septic shock, early fluid resuscitation guided by severe ultrasound can effectively regulate the hemodynamics, improve the immune function and inflammatory factors of patients, shorten the use time of ventilator and hospitalization time in ICU, and the clinical value obtained is clear.
