The issue of this study continues the analysis of persuasive truth （the ＂truth＂ of beliefs）, a problem debated by us inseveral articles already published, especially in two of them： Doxastic Dialectics （1999） a...The issue of this study continues the analysis of persuasive truth （the ＂truth＂ of beliefs）, a problem debated by us inseveral articles already published, especially in two of them： Doxastic Dialectics （1999） and The Probable and theProblem （2010）. In this new ＂chapter,＂ our intention is to develop more details from the perspective of subjectivity,which has a grounding role in doxastic dialectics. Doxa＇s axiomatic mechanism tries to temper the subjectivedimension of persuasive truth, by submitting the doxastic proofs to the control of the oppositional principle（=antithetic ＂reasoning＂）. Doxastic thinking discovers dialectically its own ratio （=measure）, progressivelyincreasing the relevance of the listening capacity. In the text that follows, the concept of listening is used in a largerthan sensitive sense, being equivalent to condition of receptivity.展开更多
文摘The issue of this study continues the analysis of persuasive truth （the ＂truth＂ of beliefs）, a problem debated by us inseveral articles already published, especially in two of them： Doxastic Dialectics （1999） and The Probable and theProblem （2010）. In this new ＂chapter,＂ our intention is to develop more details from the perspective of subjectivity,which has a grounding role in doxastic dialectics. Doxa＇s axiomatic mechanism tries to temper the subjectivedimension of persuasive truth, by submitting the doxastic proofs to the control of the oppositional principle（=antithetic ＂reasoning＂）. Doxastic thinking discovers dialectically its own ratio （=measure）, progressivelyincreasing the relevance of the listening capacity. In the text that follows, the concept of listening is used in a largerthan sensitive sense, being equivalent to condition of receptivity.
