The Declaration of Competing Interest statements were not included in the published version of the following articles that appeared in previous issues of Water Science and Engineering.The appropriate Declaration Compe...The Declaration of Competing Interest statements were not included in the published version of the following articles that appeared in previous issues of Water Science and Engineering.The appropriate Declaration Competing Interest statements,provided by authors,are included below.展开更多
The Declaration of Competing Interest statements were not included in the published version of the following articles that appeared in previous issues of Water Science and Engineering.The appropriate Declaration Compe...The Declaration of Competing Interest statements were not included in the published version of the following articles that appeared in previous issues of Water Science and Engineering.The appropriate Declaration Competing Interest statements,provided by authors,are included below.展开更多
The Declaration of Competing Interest statements were not included in the published version of the following articles that appeared in previous issues of Water Science and Engineering.The appropriate Declaration of Co...The Declaration of Competing Interest statements were not included in the published version of the following articles that appeared in previous issues of Water Science and Engineering.The appropriate Declaration of Competing Interest statements,provided by authors,are included below.展开更多
The Declaration of Competing Interest statements were not included in the published version of the following articles that appeared in previous issues of Water Science and Engineering.The appropriate Declaration Compe...The Declaration of Competing Interest statements were not included in the published version of the following articles that appeared in previous issues of Water Science and Engineering.The appropriate Declaration Competing Interest statements,provided by authors,are included below.展开更多
The Declaration of Competing Interest statements were not included in the published version of the following articles that appeared in previous issues of Water Science and Engineering.The appropriate Declaration of Co...The Declaration of Competing Interest statements were not included in the published version of the following articles that appeared in previous issues of Water Science and Engineering.The appropriate Declaration of Competing Interest statements,provided by authors,are included below.展开更多
The World Medical Association’s Declaration of Helsinki(DoH)serves as a key document of ethical guidance advocating principles of medical research involving human participants.Since its inception in 1964,the DoH has ...The World Medical Association’s Declaration of Helsinki(DoH)serves as a key document of ethical guidance advocating principles of medical research involving human participants.Since its inception in 1964,the DoH has undergone several revisions,reflecting a dynamic evolution in our understanding of research ethics,spurred by gaps identified within the document,harms discovered,challenges identified during ongoing research activities,scientific advancements and societal shifts in values.The DoH addresses a challenge and a conflict that may arise between two key aspects of medical research:On one hand,the fundamental obligation of physicians to do no harm,and on the other,the essential need to ensure the efficacy and safety of medical interventions by testing them on human research participants or healthy volunteers.With each revision,increasing emphasis is given to distributive justice and beneficence and not only to patient autonomy.Despite being a comprehensive and concise document,occasional criticism is reported,such as with regards to the impracticability of obtaining informed consent amongst other challenges.This essay will examine the key changes across the DoH's iterations,highlighting the progressive strengthening of participant protection and the evolving relationship between research,societal benefit,and individual rights.展开更多
Interpreting the Universal Declaration of Human Rights from political,juridical and philosophical perspectives is es-sential for promoting the guiding principles of the Declaration,build-ing consensus on human rights,...Interpreting the Universal Declaration of Human Rights from political,juridical and philosophical perspectives is es-sential for promoting the guiding principles of the Declaration,build-ing consensus on human rights,and advancing human rights practice in the new historical context.To conduct an academic,systematic in-terpretation of the Declaration that conforms to the trends of the times and answers the fundamental questions of the world,it is necessary to find a new research paradigm.The common values of humanity,namely peace,development,equity,justice,democracy and freedom,put forward by Xi Jinping,general secretary of the Communist Party of China(CPC)Central Committee,provide the most explanatory and penetrating scientific paradigm for reaching the issue.This paper an-alyzes and reflects on the views,value foundation and principled(con-tractual)consensus of human rights in the Declaration,and narrates and foresees the far-reaching significance of the three global initia-tives(namely,the Global Development Initiative,the Global Security Initiative,and the Global Civilization Initiative)with the common val-ues of humanity as the soul in advancing the modernization of global human rights governance and building a new form of human rights civilization.展开更多
On December 4,2023,the China Society for Human Rights Studies hosted a seminar in Beijing commemorating the 75^(th) Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.Participants discussed topics such as the si...On December 4,2023,the China Society for Human Rights Studies hosted a seminar in Beijing commemorating the 75^(th) Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.Participants discussed topics such as the significance of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,China’s theories and practices in respecting and safeguarding human rights,the three global initiatives and global human rights governance,human rights protection in the digital age,and telling Chinese stories of human rights in the new era.The discussions led to a broad consensus and achieved positive results.展开更多
目的调查国内医学论文中涉及动物实验报告的规范现状,以提升医学科研论文的报告透明度。方法本研究以中国知网数据库(CNKI)中北大核心收录期刊为数据来源,采用预先确定的文献检索策略,筛选2019年和2022年发表的文献。对纳入文献中涉及...目的调查国内医学论文中涉及动物实验报告的规范现状,以提升医学科研论文的报告透明度。方法本研究以中国知网数据库(CNKI)中北大核心收录期刊为数据来源,采用预先确定的文献检索策略,筛选2019年和2022年发表的文献。对纳入文献中涉及《动物研究:体内实验报告》(Animal research:reporting of in vivo experiments,ARRIVE)指南关键10条中的6个项目(研究设计、样本量、随机化、盲法、统计方法和实验动物资料)以及推荐11条中的3个项目(摘要、伦理声明和利益冲突声明)共计22条主要信息的报告率进行统计分析。结果共纳入文献共4818篇,未发现任何一篇文献全面报告了本研究所调查的22条相关信息。2019年和2022年发表的绝大多数论文均报告了对照组,报告率分别为99.8%(2461/2467)和99.7%(2343/2351),样本量的报告率分别为79.2%(1954/2467)和77.2%(1815/2351),所有论文均未报告样本量的计算方法和依据,随机化方法报告率约为20%,盲法报告率约为1%;2022年对统计学方法的报告(96.4%)比2019年略有增加(91.8%);2019年和2022年对动物来源(93.8%vs.93.7%,P>0.05)、品种/品系(99.1%vs.99.2%,P=0.514)、性别(94.1%vs.92.7%,P=0.044)、年龄(58.1%vs.70.6%,P<0.001)、体质量(84.4%vs.81.9%,P=0.020)、健康证明(66.0%vs.75.5%,P<0.001)等实验动物资料信息的报告程度存在不同的差异。2019年和2022年文献报告动物伦理审查(15.8%vs.38.9%)或描述遵守的动物伦理原则(9.8%vs.21.3%)、利益冲突声明(2.3%vs.10.6%)、摘要中准确报告动物相关信息(9.16%vs.8.13%)程度均较低。其中,与2019年相比较,2022年动物伦理和利益冲突声明报告程度增加(P<0.001)。结论虽然自ARRIVE 2.0发布以来,大多数项目清单报告透明度明显改善。然而,随机化方法、盲法、动物伦理以及利益冲突的报告程度仍需进一步提升,这些是未来的重点努力方向。展开更多
文摘The Declaration of Competing Interest statements were not included in the published version of the following articles that appeared in previous issues of Water Science and Engineering.The appropriate Declaration Competing Interest statements,provided by authors,are included below.
文摘The Declaration of Competing Interest statements were not included in the published version of the following articles that appeared in previous issues of Water Science and Engineering.The appropriate Declaration Competing Interest statements,provided by authors,are included below.
文摘The Declaration of Competing Interest statements were not included in the published version of the following articles that appeared in previous issues of Water Science and Engineering.The appropriate Declaration of Competing Interest statements,provided by authors,are included below.
文摘The Declaration of Competing Interest statements were not included in the published version of the following articles that appeared in previous issues of Water Science and Engineering.The appropriate Declaration Competing Interest statements,provided by authors,are included below.
文摘The Declaration of Competing Interest statements were not included in the published version of the following articles that appeared in previous issues of Water Science and Engineering.The appropriate Declaration of Competing Interest statements,provided by authors,are included below.
基金acknowledge Dr Thirumoorthy S/O Thamotharampillai for his inputs that were incorporated into the writing of this manuscript.
文摘The World Medical Association’s Declaration of Helsinki(DoH)serves as a key document of ethical guidance advocating principles of medical research involving human participants.Since its inception in 1964,the DoH has undergone several revisions,reflecting a dynamic evolution in our understanding of research ethics,spurred by gaps identified within the document,harms discovered,challenges identified during ongoing research activities,scientific advancements and societal shifts in values.The DoH addresses a challenge and a conflict that may arise between two key aspects of medical research:On one hand,the fundamental obligation of physicians to do no harm,and on the other,the essential need to ensure the efficacy and safety of medical interventions by testing them on human research participants or healthy volunteers.With each revision,increasing emphasis is given to distributive justice and beneficence and not only to patient autonomy.Despite being a comprehensive and concise document,occasional criticism is reported,such as with regards to the impracticability of obtaining informed consent amongst other challenges.This essay will examine the key changes across the DoH's iterations,highlighting the progressive strengthening of participant protection and the evolving relationship between research,societal benefit,and individual rights.
基金the major special project of the Ministry of Education for Philosophy and Social Science Research,“Research on the Basic Theory and Core Essence of Xi Jinping Thought on the Rule of Law”(Project Approv-al Number 2022JZDZ001).
文摘Interpreting the Universal Declaration of Human Rights from political,juridical and philosophical perspectives is es-sential for promoting the guiding principles of the Declaration,build-ing consensus on human rights,and advancing human rights practice in the new historical context.To conduct an academic,systematic in-terpretation of the Declaration that conforms to the trends of the times and answers the fundamental questions of the world,it is necessary to find a new research paradigm.The common values of humanity,namely peace,development,equity,justice,democracy and freedom,put forward by Xi Jinping,general secretary of the Communist Party of China(CPC)Central Committee,provide the most explanatory and penetrating scientific paradigm for reaching the issue.This paper an-alyzes and reflects on the views,value foundation and principled(con-tractual)consensus of human rights in the Declaration,and narrates and foresees the far-reaching significance of the three global initia-tives(namely,the Global Development Initiative,the Global Security Initiative,and the Global Civilization Initiative)with the common val-ues of humanity as the soul in advancing the modernization of global human rights governance and building a new form of human rights civilization.
文摘On December 4,2023,the China Society for Human Rights Studies hosted a seminar in Beijing commemorating the 75^(th) Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.Participants discussed topics such as the significance of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,China’s theories and practices in respecting and safeguarding human rights,the three global initiatives and global human rights governance,human rights protection in the digital age,and telling Chinese stories of human rights in the new era.The discussions led to a broad consensus and achieved positive results.
文摘目的调查国内医学论文中涉及动物实验报告的规范现状,以提升医学科研论文的报告透明度。方法本研究以中国知网数据库(CNKI)中北大核心收录期刊为数据来源,采用预先确定的文献检索策略,筛选2019年和2022年发表的文献。对纳入文献中涉及《动物研究:体内实验报告》(Animal research:reporting of in vivo experiments,ARRIVE)指南关键10条中的6个项目(研究设计、样本量、随机化、盲法、统计方法和实验动物资料)以及推荐11条中的3个项目(摘要、伦理声明和利益冲突声明)共计22条主要信息的报告率进行统计分析。结果共纳入文献共4818篇,未发现任何一篇文献全面报告了本研究所调查的22条相关信息。2019年和2022年发表的绝大多数论文均报告了对照组,报告率分别为99.8%(2461/2467)和99.7%(2343/2351),样本量的报告率分别为79.2%(1954/2467)和77.2%(1815/2351),所有论文均未报告样本量的计算方法和依据,随机化方法报告率约为20%,盲法报告率约为1%;2022年对统计学方法的报告(96.4%)比2019年略有增加(91.8%);2019年和2022年对动物来源(93.8%vs.93.7%,P>0.05)、品种/品系(99.1%vs.99.2%,P=0.514)、性别(94.1%vs.92.7%,P=0.044)、年龄(58.1%vs.70.6%,P<0.001)、体质量(84.4%vs.81.9%,P=0.020)、健康证明(66.0%vs.75.5%,P<0.001)等实验动物资料信息的报告程度存在不同的差异。2019年和2022年文献报告动物伦理审查(15.8%vs.38.9%)或描述遵守的动物伦理原则(9.8%vs.21.3%)、利益冲突声明(2.3%vs.10.6%)、摘要中准确报告动物相关信息(9.16%vs.8.13%)程度均较低。其中,与2019年相比较,2022年动物伦理和利益冲突声明报告程度增加(P<0.001)。结论虽然自ARRIVE 2.0发布以来,大多数项目清单报告透明度明显改善。然而,随机化方法、盲法、动物伦理以及利益冲突的报告程度仍需进一步提升,这些是未来的重点努力方向。
