This paper examines the emerging paradigm of the“Carbon Digital Twin”as a response to the global“measurement crisis”in climate governance.Traditional methods such as LCA and IOA are increasingly inadequate in addr...This paper examines the emerging paradigm of the“Carbon Digital Twin”as a response to the global“measurement crisis”in climate governance.Traditional methods such as LCA and IOA are increasingly inadequate in addressing the demands of dynamic,data-intensive carbon gover-nance.The Carbon Digital Twin integrates real-time sensing,AI-driven cognitive analysis,and blockchain-based trust mechanisms to provide granular,predictive,and verifiable carbon account-ing.However,this paradigm shift raises tensions between techno-scientific legitimacy and legal-procedural legitimacy,challenging the authority of institutions like the WTO.Comparative analysis of the EU’s CBAM,the US IRA,and China’s state-led model reveals the fragmentation of green trade governance into competing techno-economic blocs.The paper highlights key dilemmas,in-cluding the“carbon paradox”of AI’s own footprint and risks of environmental data injustice,while proposing a hybrid governance framework to balance technological efficiency with demo-cratic accountability and global equity.展开更多
This study examines the emerging tensions between digital transformation and environmental sustainability in the global fashion industry from the perspective of digital resource governance.As artifcial intelligence,vi...This study examines the emerging tensions between digital transformation and environmental sustainability in the global fashion industry from the perspective of digital resource governance.As artifcial intelligence,virtual sampling,and data-driven platforms increasingly reshape apparel production and consumption,the material and ecological costs of digitization have become impossible to ignore.Drawing on normative analysis and comparative institutional analysis,the paper conceptualizes Digital Environmental Governance(DEG)as a critical sub-feld of digital resource governance,focusing on the environmental externalities of digital infrastructures embedded in fashion systems.Through comparative examination of governance practices in the European Union,China,and the Global South,the study reveals divergent yet complementary governance paradigms,ranging from rule-based regulation to project-oriented planning and frugal digital innovation.The paper further proposes a three-dimensional ethical reconstruction framework encompassing environmental responsibility,social inclusion,and intergenerational justice.By integrating governance theory with costume and culture studies,this research contributes a culturally grounded and ecologically oriented perspective on the future of digital fashion governance.展开更多
With the deepening of global digital transformation,digital resources have become key elements in reshaping economic and social structures,but their material footprint and energy use intensify ecological pressure and ...With the deepening of global digital transformation,digital resources have become key elements in reshaping economic and social structures,but their material footprint and energy use intensify ecological pressure and ethical risks such as algorithmic opacity,data divides,and intergenerational injustice.This paper examines“green orientation and ethical reconstruction in digital resource governance”at theoretical,instrumental,and institutional levels.Theoretically,it uses the tension between Ecological Modernization Theory and the Jevons Paradox to argue that digital environmental governance must shift from growth logic to ecological rationality.Instrumentally,it analyzes Carbon-Aware Computing,Digital Product Passports(DPP),and ISO/IEC 30134 indicators as a lifecycle-based green governance toolkit for digital infrastructure.Institutionally,it compares the European Union’s rule-oriented governance with China’s engineering-oriented governance and incorporates frugal digital innovation in the Global South to outline diversified governance paths.The paper then proposes a digital ethics framework integrating environmental responsibility,social inclusion,and intergenerational justice,and argues that future digital governance should move beyond a single efficiency paradigm toward composite governance centered on ecological integrity and social justice.展开更多
文摘This paper examines the emerging paradigm of the“Carbon Digital Twin”as a response to the global“measurement crisis”in climate governance.Traditional methods such as LCA and IOA are increasingly inadequate in addressing the demands of dynamic,data-intensive carbon gover-nance.The Carbon Digital Twin integrates real-time sensing,AI-driven cognitive analysis,and blockchain-based trust mechanisms to provide granular,predictive,and verifiable carbon account-ing.However,this paradigm shift raises tensions between techno-scientific legitimacy and legal-procedural legitimacy,challenging the authority of institutions like the WTO.Comparative analysis of the EU’s CBAM,the US IRA,and China’s state-led model reveals the fragmentation of green trade governance into competing techno-economic blocs.The paper highlights key dilemmas,in-cluding the“carbon paradox”of AI’s own footprint and risks of environmental data injustice,while proposing a hybrid governance framework to balance technological efficiency with demo-cratic accountability and global equity.
文摘This study examines the emerging tensions between digital transformation and environmental sustainability in the global fashion industry from the perspective of digital resource governance.As artifcial intelligence,virtual sampling,and data-driven platforms increasingly reshape apparel production and consumption,the material and ecological costs of digitization have become impossible to ignore.Drawing on normative analysis and comparative institutional analysis,the paper conceptualizes Digital Environmental Governance(DEG)as a critical sub-feld of digital resource governance,focusing on the environmental externalities of digital infrastructures embedded in fashion systems.Through comparative examination of governance practices in the European Union,China,and the Global South,the study reveals divergent yet complementary governance paradigms,ranging from rule-based regulation to project-oriented planning and frugal digital innovation.The paper further proposes a three-dimensional ethical reconstruction framework encompassing environmental responsibility,social inclusion,and intergenerational justice.By integrating governance theory with costume and culture studies,this research contributes a culturally grounded and ecologically oriented perspective on the future of digital fashion governance.
文摘With the deepening of global digital transformation,digital resources have become key elements in reshaping economic and social structures,but their material footprint and energy use intensify ecological pressure and ethical risks such as algorithmic opacity,data divides,and intergenerational injustice.This paper examines“green orientation and ethical reconstruction in digital resource governance”at theoretical,instrumental,and institutional levels.Theoretically,it uses the tension between Ecological Modernization Theory and the Jevons Paradox to argue that digital environmental governance must shift from growth logic to ecological rationality.Instrumentally,it analyzes Carbon-Aware Computing,Digital Product Passports(DPP),and ISO/IEC 30134 indicators as a lifecycle-based green governance toolkit for digital infrastructure.Institutionally,it compares the European Union’s rule-oriented governance with China’s engineering-oriented governance and incorporates frugal digital innovation in the Global South to outline diversified governance paths.The paper then proposes a digital ethics framework integrating environmental responsibility,social inclusion,and intergenerational justice,and argues that future digital governance should move beyond a single efficiency paradigm toward composite governance centered on ecological integrity and social justice.
