Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) resultsf rom the detrimental effect of frequent right ventricular pacing.^([1]) The diagnosis relies on a combination of pacing-associated ventricular dyschrony manifested with ECG...Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) resultsf rom the detrimental effect of frequent right ventricular pacing.^([1]) The diagnosis relies on a combination of pacing-associated ventricular dyschrony manifested with ECG wide LBBB-pattern QRS duration and clinical assessment, imaging studies. Conduction system pacing (CSP), such as His bundle pacing (HBP)and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP), may help to prevent PICM,^([2]) but the criteria for optimal patient selection remain inadequately defined.展开更多
The deleterious effects of long-term right ventricular pacing necessitated the search for alternative pacing sites which could prevent or alleviate pacinginduced cardiomyopathy.Until recently,biventricular pacing(BiVP...The deleterious effects of long-term right ventricular pacing necessitated the search for alternative pacing sites which could prevent or alleviate pacinginduced cardiomyopathy.Until recently,biventricular pacing(BiVP)was the only modality which could mitigate or prevent pacing induced dysfunction.Further,BiVP could resynchronize the baseline electromechanical dssynchrony in heart failure and improve outcomes.However,the high non-response rate of around 20%-30%remains a major limitation.This non-response has been largely attributable to the direct non-physiological stimulation of the left ventricular myocardium bypassing the conduction system.To overcome this limitation,the concept of conduction system pacing(CSP)came up.Despite initial success of the first CSP via His bundle pacing(HBP),certain drawbacks including lead instability and dislodgements,steep learning curve and rapid battery depletion on many occasions prevented its widespread use for cardiac resynchronization therapy(CRT).Subsequently,CSP via left bundle branch-area pacing(LBBP)was developed in 2018,which over the last few years has shown efficacy comparable to BiVP-CRT in small observational studies.Further,its safety has also been well established and is largely free of the pitfalls of the HBP-CRT.In the recent metanalysis by Yasmin et al,comprising of 6 studies with 389 participants,LBBPCRT was superior to BiVP-CRT in terms of QRS duration,left ventricular ejection fraction,cardiac chamber dimensions,lead thresholds,and functional status amongst heart failure patients with left bundle branch block.However,there are important limitations of the study including the small overall numbers,inclusion of only a single small randomized controlled trial(RCT)and a small follow-up duration.Further,the entire study population analyzed was from China which makes generalizability a concern.Despite the concerns,the meta-analysis adds to the growing body of evidence demonstrating the efficacy of LBBP-CRT.At this stage,one must acknowledge that the fact that still our opinions on this technique are largely based on observational data and there is a dire need for larger RCTs to ascertain the position of LBBPCRT in management of heart failure patients with left bundle branch block.展开更多
The deleterious effects of long term right ventricular pacing are increasingly being recognized today.Current clinical practice favors the implantation of dual-chamber permanent pacemaker which maintains atrioventricu...The deleterious effects of long term right ventricular pacing are increasingly being recognized today.Current clinical practice favors the implantation of dual-chamber permanent pacemaker which maintains atrioventricular synchrony and is associated with better quality of life.However,despite the popular belief and common sense surrounding the superiority of dual-chamber pacing over single chamber pacing,the same has never been conclusively verified in clinical trials.Some observational evidence however,does exists which supports the improved cardiac hemodynamics,lower the rate of atrial fibrillation,heart failure and stroke in dual-chamber pacing compared to single-chamber pacing.In the index study by Haque et al,right ventricular pacing,particularly in ventricular paced,ven-tricular sensed,inhibited response and rate responsive pacemaker adversely im-pacted the left ventricular functions over 9-months compared to dual pacing,dual sensing,dual responsive and rate responsive pacemaker.Although there are key limitations of this study,these findings does support a growing body of evidence reinstating the superiority of dual chamber pacing compared to single chamber pacing.展开更多
Left bundle branch pacing(LBBP)emerged as a new physiological pacing strategy during the past several years.Recent observational studies have demonstrated the advantages of LBBP,including a high success rate,stable pa...Left bundle branch pacing(LBBP)emerged as a new physiological pacing strategy during the past several years.Recent observational studies have demonstrated the advantages of LBBP,including a high success rate,stable pacing parameters,and excellent clinical benefits.Widespread adoption of LBBP will depend on improvements in device/lead technology and further verification of its efficacy in large randomized clinical trials.In this review,we summarize re-cent advancements in LBBP,including the definition and evaluation of left bundle branch capture,LBBP applications,and future directions in this growing field.展开更多
文摘Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) resultsf rom the detrimental effect of frequent right ventricular pacing.^([1]) The diagnosis relies on a combination of pacing-associated ventricular dyschrony manifested with ECG wide LBBB-pattern QRS duration and clinical assessment, imaging studies. Conduction system pacing (CSP), such as His bundle pacing (HBP)and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP), may help to prevent PICM,^([2]) but the criteria for optimal patient selection remain inadequately defined.
文摘The deleterious effects of long-term right ventricular pacing necessitated the search for alternative pacing sites which could prevent or alleviate pacinginduced cardiomyopathy.Until recently,biventricular pacing(BiVP)was the only modality which could mitigate or prevent pacing induced dysfunction.Further,BiVP could resynchronize the baseline electromechanical dssynchrony in heart failure and improve outcomes.However,the high non-response rate of around 20%-30%remains a major limitation.This non-response has been largely attributable to the direct non-physiological stimulation of the left ventricular myocardium bypassing the conduction system.To overcome this limitation,the concept of conduction system pacing(CSP)came up.Despite initial success of the first CSP via His bundle pacing(HBP),certain drawbacks including lead instability and dislodgements,steep learning curve and rapid battery depletion on many occasions prevented its widespread use for cardiac resynchronization therapy(CRT).Subsequently,CSP via left bundle branch-area pacing(LBBP)was developed in 2018,which over the last few years has shown efficacy comparable to BiVP-CRT in small observational studies.Further,its safety has also been well established and is largely free of the pitfalls of the HBP-CRT.In the recent metanalysis by Yasmin et al,comprising of 6 studies with 389 participants,LBBPCRT was superior to BiVP-CRT in terms of QRS duration,left ventricular ejection fraction,cardiac chamber dimensions,lead thresholds,and functional status amongst heart failure patients with left bundle branch block.However,there are important limitations of the study including the small overall numbers,inclusion of only a single small randomized controlled trial(RCT)and a small follow-up duration.Further,the entire study population analyzed was from China which makes generalizability a concern.Despite the concerns,the meta-analysis adds to the growing body of evidence demonstrating the efficacy of LBBP-CRT.At this stage,one must acknowledge that the fact that still our opinions on this technique are largely based on observational data and there is a dire need for larger RCTs to ascertain the position of LBBPCRT in management of heart failure patients with left bundle branch block.
文摘The deleterious effects of long term right ventricular pacing are increasingly being recognized today.Current clinical practice favors the implantation of dual-chamber permanent pacemaker which maintains atrioventricular synchrony and is associated with better quality of life.However,despite the popular belief and common sense surrounding the superiority of dual-chamber pacing over single chamber pacing,the same has never been conclusively verified in clinical trials.Some observational evidence however,does exists which supports the improved cardiac hemodynamics,lower the rate of atrial fibrillation,heart failure and stroke in dual-chamber pacing compared to single-chamber pacing.In the index study by Haque et al,right ventricular pacing,particularly in ventricular paced,ven-tricular sensed,inhibited response and rate responsive pacemaker adversely im-pacted the left ventricular functions over 9-months compared to dual pacing,dual sensing,dual responsive and rate responsive pacemaker.Although there are key limitations of this study,these findings does support a growing body of evidence reinstating the superiority of dual chamber pacing compared to single chamber pacing.
基金This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(82070521)Clinical Competence Improvement Project of Jiangsu Province Hospital(JSPH-MA-2020-3)Project on New Technology of Jiangsu Province(JX233C202103).
文摘Left bundle branch pacing(LBBP)emerged as a new physiological pacing strategy during the past several years.Recent observational studies have demonstrated the advantages of LBBP,including a high success rate,stable pacing parameters,and excellent clinical benefits.Widespread adoption of LBBP will depend on improvements in device/lead technology and further verification of its efficacy in large randomized clinical trials.In this review,we summarize re-cent advancements in LBBP,including the definition and evaluation of left bundle branch capture,LBBP applications,and future directions in this growing field.
