In order to accurately model compliant mechanism utilizing plate flexures, qualitative planar stress （Young＇s modulus） and planar strain （plate modulus） assumptions are not feasible. This paper investigates a qua...In order to accurately model compliant mechanism utilizing plate flexures, qualitative planar stress （Young＇s modulus） and planar strain （plate modulus） assumptions are not feasible. This paper investigates a quantitative equivalent modulus using nonlinear finite element analysis （FEA） to reflect coupled factors in affecting the modelling accuracy of two typical distrib- uted-compliance mechanisms. It has been shown that all parameters have influences on the equivalent modulus with different degrees; that the presence of large load-stiffening effect makes the equivalent modulus significantly deviate from the planar assumptions in two ideal scenarios; and that a plate modulus assumption is more reasonable for a very large out-of-plane thickness if the beam length is large.展开更多
文摘In order to accurately model compliant mechanism utilizing plate flexures, qualitative planar stress （Young＇s modulus） and planar strain （plate modulus） assumptions are not feasible. This paper investigates a quantitative equivalent modulus using nonlinear finite element analysis （FEA） to reflect coupled factors in affecting the modelling accuracy of two typical distrib- uted-compliance mechanisms. It has been shown that all parameters have influences on the equivalent modulus with different degrees; that the presence of large load-stiffening effect makes the equivalent modulus significantly deviate from the planar assumptions in two ideal scenarios; and that a plate modulus assumption is more reasonable for a very large out-of-plane thickness if the beam length is large.
