期刊文献+
共找到5篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Intelligent Task Offloading and Collaborative Computation in Multi-UAV-Enabled Mobile Edge Computing 被引量:7
1
作者 Jingming Xia Peng Wang +1 位作者 Bin Li Zesong Fei 《China Communications》 SCIE CSCD 2022年第4期244-256,共13页
This article establishes a three-tier mobile edge computing(MEC) network, which takes into account the cooperation between unmanned aerial vehicles(UAVs). In this MEC network, we aim to minimize the processing delay o... This article establishes a three-tier mobile edge computing(MEC) network, which takes into account the cooperation between unmanned aerial vehicles(UAVs). In this MEC network, we aim to minimize the processing delay of tasks by jointly optimizing the deployment of UAVs and offloading decisions,while meeting the computing capacity constraint of UAVs. However, the resulting optimization problem is nonconvex, which cannot be solved by general optimization tools in an effective and efficient way. To this end, we propose a two-layer optimization algorithm to tackle the non-convexity of the problem by capitalizing on alternating optimization. In the upper level algorithm, we rely on differential evolution(DE) learning algorithm to solve the deployment of the UAVs. In the lower level algorithm, we exploit distributed deep neural network(DDNN) to generate offloading decisions. Numerical results demonstrate that the two-layer optimization algorithm can effectively obtain the near-optimal deployment of UAVs and offloading strategy with low complexity. 展开更多
关键词 mobile edge computing MULTI-UAV collaborative cloud and edge computing deep neural network differential evolution
在线阅读 下载PDF
Efficient and Cost-Effective Vehicle Detection in Foggy Weather for Edge/Fog-Enabled Traffic Surveillance and Collision Avoidance Systems 被引量:2
2
作者 Naeem Raza Muhammad Asif Habib +3 位作者 Mudassar Ahmad Qaisar Abbas Mutlaq BAldajani Muhammad Ahsan Latif 《Computers, Materials & Continua》 SCIE EI 2024年第10期911-931,共21页
Vision-based vehicle detection in adverse weather conditions such as fog,haze,and mist is a challenging research area in the fields of autonomous vehicles,collision avoidance,and Internet of Things(IoT)-enabled edge/f... Vision-based vehicle detection in adverse weather conditions such as fog,haze,and mist is a challenging research area in the fields of autonomous vehicles,collision avoidance,and Internet of Things(IoT)-enabled edge/fog computing traffic surveillance and monitoring systems.Efficient and cost-effective vehicle detection at high accuracy and speed in foggy weather is essential to avoiding road traffic collisions in real-time.To evaluate vision-based vehicle detection performance in foggy weather conditions,state-of-the-art Vehicle Detection in Adverse Weather Nature(DAWN)and Foggy Driving(FD)datasets are self-annotated using the YOLO LABEL tool and customized to four vehicle detection classes:cars,buses,motorcycles,and trucks.The state-of-the-art single-stage deep learning algorithms YOLO-V5,and YOLO-V8 are considered for the task of vehicle detection.Furthermore,YOLO-V5s is enhanced by introducing attention modules Convolutional Block Attention Module(CBAM),Normalized-based Attention Module(NAM),and Simple Attention Module(SimAM)after the SPPF module as well as YOLO-V5l with BiFPN.Their vehicle detection accuracy parameters and running speed is validated on cloud(Google Colab)and edge(local)systems.The mAP50 score of YOLO-V5n is 72.60%,YOLOV5s is 75.20%,YOLO-V5m is 73.40%,and YOLO-V5l is 77.30%;and YOLO-V8n is 60.20%,YOLO-V8s is 73.50%,YOLO-V8m is 73.80%,and YOLO-V8l is 72.60%on DAWN dataset.The mAP50 score of YOLO-V5n is 43.90%,YOLO-V5s is 40.10%,YOLO-V5m is 49.70%,and YOLO-V5l is 57.30%;and YOLO-V8n is 41.60%,YOLO-V8s is 46.90%,YOLO-V8m is 42.90%,and YOLO-V8l is 44.80%on FD dataset.The vehicle detection speed of YOLOV5n is 59 Frame Per Seconds(FPS),YOLO-V5s is 47 FPS,YOLO-V5m is 38 FPS,and YOLO-V5l is 30 FPS;and YOLO-V8n is 185 FPS,YOLO-V8s is 109 FPS,YOLO-V8m is 72 FPS,and YOLO-V8l is 63 FPS on DAWN dataset.The vehicle detection speed of YOLO-V5n is 26 FPS,YOLO-V5s is 24 FPS,YOLO-V5m is 22 FPS,and YOLO-V5l is 17 FPS;and YOLO-V8n is 313 FPS,YOLO-V8s is 182 FPS,YOLO-V8m is 99 FPS,and YOLO-V8l is 60 FPS on FD dataset.YOLO-V5s,YOLO-V5s variants and YOLO-V5l_BiFPN,and YOLO-V8 algorithms are efficient and cost-effective solution for real-time vision-based vehicle detection in foggy weather. 展开更多
关键词 Vehicle detection YOLO-V5 YOLO-V5s variants YOLO-V8 DAWN dataset foggy driving dataset IoT cloud/edge/fog computing
在线阅读 下载PDF
Post-Cloud Computing Paradigms: A Survey and Comparison 被引量:4
3
作者 Yuezhi Zhou Di Zhang Naixue Xiong 《Tsinghua Science and Technology》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2017年第6期714-732,共19页
With the rapid development of pervasive intelligent devices and ubiquitous network technologies, new network applications are emerging, such as the Internet of Things, smart cities, smart grids, virtual/augmented real... With the rapid development of pervasive intelligent devices and ubiquitous network technologies, new network applications are emerging, such as the Internet of Things, smart cities, smart grids, virtual/augmented reality, and unmanned vehicles. Cloud computing, which is characterized by centralized computation and storage,is having difficulty meeting the needs of these developing technologies and applications. In recent years, a variety of network computing paradigms, such as fog computing, mobile edge computing, and dew computing, have been proposed by the industrial and academic communities. Although they employ different terminologies, their basic concept is to extend cloud computing and move the computing infrastructure from remote data centers to edge routers, base stations, and local servers located closer to users, thereby overcoming the bottlenecks experienced by cloud computing and providing better performance and user experience. In this paper, we systematically summarize and analyze the post-cloud computing paradigms that have been proposed in recent years. First, we summarize the main bottlenecks of technology and application that cloud computing encounters. Next, we analyze and summarize several post-cloud computing paradigms, including fog computing, mobile edge computing, and dew computing.Then, we discuss the development opportunities of post-cloud computing via several examples. Finally, we note the future development prospects of post-cloud computing. 展开更多
关键词 cloud computing fog computing edge computing mobile edge computing dew computing
原文传递
Mobility Management in Small Cell Cluster of Cellular Network 被引量:1
4
作者 Adeel Rafiq Muhammad Afaq +1 位作者 Khizar Abbas Wang-Cheol Song 《Computers, Materials & Continua》 SCIE EI 2021年第10期627-645,共19页
The installation of small cells in a 5G network extends the maximum coverage and provides high availability.However,this approach increases the handover overhead in the Core Network(CN)due to frequent handoffs.The var... The installation of small cells in a 5G network extends the maximum coverage and provides high availability.However,this approach increases the handover overhead in the Core Network(CN)due to frequent handoffs.The variation of user density and movement inside a region of small cells also increases the handover overhead in CN.However,the present 5G system cannot reduce the handover overhead in CN under such circumstances because it relies on a traditionally rigid and complex hierarchical sequence for a handover procedure.Recently,Not Only Stack(NO Stack)architecture has been introduced for Radio Access Network(RAN)to reduce the signaling during handover.This paper proposes a system based on NO Stack architecture and solves the aforementioned problem by adding a dedicated local mobility controller to the edge cloud for each cluster.The dedicated cluster controller manages the user mobility locally inside a cluster and also maintains the forwarding data of a mobile user locally.To reduce the latency for X2-based handover requests,an edge cloud infrastructure has been also developed to provide high-computing for dedicated controllers at the edge of a cellular network.The proposed system is also compared with the traditional 3GPP architecture and other works in the context of overhead and delay caused by X2-based handover requests during user mobility.Simulated results show that the inclusion of a dedicated local controller for small clusters together with the implementation of NO Stack framework reduces the significant amount of overhead of X2-based handover requests at CN. 展开更多
关键词 Radio access network mobility management edge cloud computing X2-based handover
在线阅读 下载PDF
Distributed trusted demand response bidding mechanism empowered by blockchain
5
作者 Lei Wang Tong Li +3 位作者 Chao Yang Jiang Chen Yang Liu Shuai Ren 《Intelligent and Converged Networks》 EI 2024年第3期181-191,共11页
In the demand response process involving multi-agent participation,multiple parties’interests are involved and response execution status supervision is required.Traditional centralized demand response systems lack tr... In the demand response process involving multi-agent participation,multiple parties’interests are involved and response execution status supervision is required.Traditional centralized demand response systems lack trust attributes.At the same time,traditional centralized cloud management can no longer support massive terminal services,resulting in delays in demand response services.We build a distributed trusted demand response architecture based on blockchain,illustrating the information interaction process in the demand bidding process and container-based edge-side heterogeneous resource management.We also propose a demand bidding algorithm that takes into account both the day-ahead market and the intraday market,aiming to maximize the aggregator’s benefits.In addition,a virtual resource management algorithm to support demand response tasks is also proposed to optimize computing resource allocation and meet business latency requirements.Simulation results demonstrate that compared with only cloud computing or edge computing,the solution we proposed can reduce response delay by more than 39% for the sample system.Energy cost is saved by about 10.25%during container scheduling. 展开更多
关键词 demand response blockchain edge and cloud computing demand bidding virtual resource management
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部