The Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines(CJNM,ISSN 2095-6975),founded in 2003 and sponsored by China Pharmaceutical University,is a peer-reviewed journal published monthly in print by Science Press and online by Elsev...The Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines(CJNM,ISSN 2095-6975),founded in 2003 and sponsored by China Pharmaceutical University,is a peer-reviewed journal published monthly in print by Science Press and online by Elsevier.CJNM is currently indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded(SCIE),MEDLINE,BIOSIS Previews,BIOSIS Toxicology,CAB Abstracts.展开更多
Purpose:For a set of 1,561 Open Access(OA)and non-OA journals in business and economics,this study evaluates the relationships between four citation metrics-five-year Impact Factor(5IF),CiteScore,Article Influence(AI)...Purpose:For a set of 1,561 Open Access(OA)and non-OA journals in business and economics,this study evaluates the relationships between four citation metrics-five-year Impact Factor(5IF),CiteScore,Article Influence(AI)score,and SCImago Journal Rank(SJR)-and the journal ratings assigned by expert reviewers.We expect that the OA journals will have especially high citation impact relative to their perceived quality(reputation).Design/methodology/approach:Regression is used to estimate the ratings assigned by expert reviewers for the 2021 CABS(Chartered Association of Business Schools)journal assessment exercise.The independent variables are the four citation metrics,evaluated separately,and a dummy variable representing the OA/non-OA status of each journal.Findings:Regardless of the citation metric used,OA journals in business and economics have especially high citation impact relative to their perceived quality(reputation).That is,they have especially low perceived quality(reputation)relative to their citation impact.Research limitations:These results are specific to the CABS journal ratings and the four citation metrics.However,there is strong evidence that CABS is closely related to several other expert ratings,and that 5IF,CiteScore,AI,and SJR are representative of the other citation metrics that might have been chosen.Practical implications:There are at least two possible explanations for these results:(1)expert evaluators are biased against OA journals,and(2)OA journals have especially high citation impact due to their increased accessibility.Although this study does not allow us to determine which of these explanations are supported,the results suggest that authors should consider publishing in OA journals whenever overall readership and citation impact are more important than journal reputation within a particular field.Moreover,the OA coefficients provide a useful indicator of the extent to which anti-OA bias(or the citation advantage of OA journals)is diminishing over time.Originality/value:This is apparently the first study to investigate the impact of OA status on the relationships between expert journal ratings and journal citation metrics.展开更多
Clarivate and Elsevier have recently released the 2024 Journal Citation Reports(JCR)and CiteScore,respectively.We are delighted to share the exciting news that Chinese Medicine and Culture(CMC)has achieved its first i...Clarivate and Elsevier have recently released the 2024 Journal Citation Reports(JCR)and CiteScore,respectively.We are delighted to share the exciting news that Chinese Medicine and Culture(CMC)has achieved its first impact factor(IF)of 0.5!It ranks in Q2 in the category of History&Philosophy of Science,and in Q4 in the category of Integrative&Complementary Medicine,marking a major breakthrough!展开更多
We tried to collect all publications based on Scopus for 24 years in English for the keyword Wollastonite.We analyzed the most popular journals,top authors,top-cited papers,and the role of top countries in the world o...We tried to collect all publications based on Scopus for 24 years in English for the keyword Wollastonite.We analyzed the most popular journals,top authors,top-cited papers,and the role of top countries in the world on the usage of Wollastonite in construction.Moreover,a comprehensive examination of literature and patent data pertaining to the production and utilisation of wollastonite and materials derived from wollastonite was conducted.We then consolidated and presented our findings about Wollastonite's characteristics.We demonstrated the theoretical possibility of using recycled wollastonite in some areas of cement-based construction materials and product manufacture.Our research results shows that the number of available articles on Wollastonite-mineral as a fibre and aggregate is less than that on other areas.In addition,the research enables us to discover potential deficiencies in the utilization of Wollastonite in situations where there is currently no available published literature.展开更多
Purpose:Citations can be used in evaluative bibliometrics to measure the impact of papers.However,citation analysis can be extended by a multi-dimensional perspective on citation impact which is intended to receive mo...Purpose:Citations can be used in evaluative bibliometrics to measure the impact of papers.However,citation analysis can be extended by a multi-dimensional perspective on citation impact which is intended to receive more specific information about the kind of received impact.Design/methodology/approach:Bornmann,Wray,and Haunschild(2019)introduced citation concept analysis(CCA)for capturing the importance and usefulness certain concepts have in subsequent research.The method is based on the analysis of citances-the contexts of citations in citing papers.This study applies the method by investigating the impact of various concepts introduced in the oeuvre of the world-leading French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu.Findings:We found that the most cited concepts are‘social capital’(with about 34%of the citances in the citing papers),‘cultural capital’,and‘habitus’(both with about 24%).On the other hand,the concepts‘doxa’and‘reflexivity’score only about 1%each.Research limitations:The formulation of search terms for identifying the concepts in the data and the citation context coverage are the most important limitations of the study.Practical implications:The results of this explorative study reflect the historical development of Bourdieu’s thought and its interface with different fields of study.Originality/value:The study demonstrates the high explanatory power of the CCA method.展开更多
On behalf of the Editorial Board of Deep Underground Science and Engineering(DUSE),we sincerely thank all reviewers for your dedicated service in 2025.Your timely,thoughtful,and expert reviews have been essential to u...On behalf of the Editorial Board of Deep Underground Science and Engineering(DUSE),we sincerely thank all reviewers for your dedicated service in 2025.Your timely,thoughtful,and expert reviews have been essential to upholding the quality and integrity of the journal.With your support and contributions,DUSE has achieved a major milestone this year—receiving its first Impact Factor of 5.0,ranking 13th out of 65 journals in its category,and earning Q1 status in the Journal Citation Reports(JCR).展开更多
Purpose:This study analyzes the profiles of elite Brazilian researchers,recognized through the prestigious CNPq productivity scholarships.By identifying distinct researcher clusters,the study sheds light on different ...Purpose:This study analyzes the profiles of elite Brazilian researchers,recognized through the prestigious CNPq productivity scholarships.By identifying distinct researcher clusters,the study sheds light on different academic strategies,levels of productivity,and academic contributions within the Brazilian higher education system.Design/methodology/approach:The research analyzes a comprehensive dataset of 14,003 researchers,employing principal component analysis(PCA)followed by cluster analysis to group researchers based on their academic attributes.The clusters reflect diverse aspects of research productivity,graduate supervisions,and publication patterns.Findings:The analysis reveals the existence of three distinct researcher profiles(the Advanced Supervisors,the Book Publishers/Organizers,and the Generalists).The study also highlights the characteristics of highcaliber scientists,representing the upper echelon of Brazilian researchers in terms of productivity and impact.Research limitations:Although the study provides a robust analysis of the Brazilian system,the results reflect specific characteristics of the Brazilian academic context.Furthermore,the analysis was restricted to normalized annual data,which may overlook temporal variations in researcher productivity.Pratical implications:The findings provide valuable insights for policy makers,funding agencies(such as CNPq),and university administrators who aim to develop tailored support programs for different researcher profiles.Originality/value:The cluster-based profiling offers a novel perspective on how different academic trajectories coexist within a national science system,offering lessons for other emerging economies.展开更多
Purpose:This study examines why papers with high CD indices(measuring research disruptiveness)increasingly show reduced citation impact and investigates whether this represents genuine impact reduction or methodologic...Purpose:This study examines why papers with high CD indices(measuring research disruptiveness)increasingly show reduced citation impact and investigates whether this represents genuine impact reduction or methodological artifacts.Design/methodology/approach:We analyzed 29 million papers(1950-2016)using Poisson regression to examine relationships between the CD index and citation count,with controls for fields,team size,and reference count.Findings:Papers with high CD indices showed reduced citation impact over time.However,when controlling for increasing reference counts in papers,this relationship reversed,revealing a positive association.Papers with more references exhibit lower CD indices owing to the index’s sensitivity to the reference count,while achieving higher citation counts.Alternative innovation metrics consistently show positive correlations with citation impact.Research limitations:The approach may not adequately capture the reduced citation impact of highly disruptive papers with fewer references.The analysis is limited to journal articles and shows correlation rather than causality.Practical implications:The apparent undervaluation of disruptive research stems from methodological artifacts in the CD index calculation driven by evolving reference patterns.Researchers should control for the reference count when using this metric.Originality/value:This study reveals that bias against disruptive research is specific to the CD index’s calculation methodology,identifying reference behavior as the key factor affecting the relationship between disruption metrics and citation impact.展开更多
Purpose:Citation-based assessments of countries’research capabilities often misrepresent their ability to achieve breakthrough advancements.These assessments commonly classify Japan as a developing country,which cont...Purpose:Citation-based assessments of countries’research capabilities often misrepresent their ability to achieve breakthrough advancements.These assessments commonly classify Japan as a developing country,which contradicts its prominent scientific standing.The purpose of this study is to investigate the underlying causes of such inaccurate assessments and to propose methods for conducting more reliable evaluations.Design/methodology/approach:The study evaluates the effectiveness of top-percentile citation metrics as indicators of breakthrough research.Using case studies of selected countries and research topics,the study examines how deviations from lognormal citation distributions impact the accuracy of these percentile indicators.A similar analysis is conducted using university data from the Leiden Ranking to investigate citation distribution deviations at the institutional level.Findings:The study finds that inflated lower tails in citation distributions lead to undervaluation of research capabilities in advanced technological countries,as captured by some percentile indicators.Conversely,research-intensive universities exhibit the opposite trend:a reduced lower tail relative to the upper tail,which causes percentile indicators to overestimate their actual research capacity.Research limitations:The descriptions are mathematical facts that are self-evident.Practical implications:The ratios between the number of papers in the global top 10%and 1%by citation count to the total number of papers are commonly used to describe research performance.However,due to variations in citation patterns across countries and institutions with reference to the global pattern,these ratios can be misleading and lose their value as research indicators.Originality/value:Size-independent research performance indicators,obtained as the ratios between paper counts in top percentiles and the total numbers of publications,are widely used by public and private institutions.This study demonstrates that the use of these ratios for research evaluations and country rankings can be highly misleading.展开更多
The author regrets that the paper titled“Gauging scholars’acceptance of Open Access journals by examining the relationship between perceived quality and citation impact”(DOI:10.2478/jdis-2025-0002),as published,con...The author regrets that the paper titled“Gauging scholars’acceptance of Open Access journals by examining the relationship between perceived quality and citation impact”(DOI:10.2478/jdis-2025-0002),as published,contains errors in four of the table captions.For Tables 12-15,“CABS business journals”should read“CABS economics journals.”The tables do have the correct values for the economics journals,and the findings reported in the text do not need revision.The author apologizes for any inconvenience.展开更多
Journal of Iron and Steel Research International,sponsored by China Iron and Steel Research Institute Group,is an academic journal which provides an international medium for publication of original research articles,r...Journal of Iron and Steel Research International,sponsored by China Iron and Steel Research Institute Group,is an academic journal which provides an international medium for publication of original research articles,reviews and letters in the fields of metallurgy and metallic materials.It has been covered by Science Citation Index(SCI)and Engineering Index(EI)since 1996 and 2016,respectively.展开更多
Journal of Iron and Steel Research International,sponsored by China Iron and Steel Research Institute Group,is an academic journal which provides an international medium for publication of original research articles,r...Journal of Iron and Steel Research International,sponsored by China Iron and Steel Research Institute Group,is an academic journal which provides an international medium for publication of original research articles,reviews and letters in the fields of metallurgy and metallic materials.It has been covered by Science Citation Index(SCI)and Engineering Index(EI)since 1996 and 2016,respectively.展开更多
Correction to:Nuclear Science and Techniques(2024)35:162 https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-024-01514-1 In this article,the citation information for Figures 6 and 7 was published incorrectly.The correct citations should r...Correction to:Nuclear Science and Techniques(2024)35:162 https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-024-01514-1 In this article,the citation information for Figures 6 and 7 was published incorrectly.The correct citations should read as follows:In the sentence beginning‘the curve of Eq.17 is plotted…..’in this article,the text‘as shown in Fig.7a’should have read‘as shown in Fig.6a’.展开更多
Background:Facelift procedures represent a critical area of aesthetic and reconstructive surgery that addresses the physical and psychological impacts of facial aging.Advancements in techniques and technologies over t...Background:Facelift procedures represent a critical area of aesthetic and reconstructive surgery that addresses the physical and psychological impacts of facial aging.Advancements in techniques and technologies over time have transformed the field,making it essential to assess the evolution of research trends.This study performed a bibliometric analysis of facelift research by examining the top 50 most cited publications to evaluate their contributions,thematic evolution,and collaborative networks.Methods:The Scopus database was used to identify relevant publications.A total of 50 documents were selected,comprising 47 articles and 3 reviews published across 16 academic sources.The inclusion criteria focused on publications with substantial relevance to facelift research;this ensured comprehensive coverage of the topic.Key performance indicators(for the authors)such as the number of papers,total citations,h-index,g-index,m-index,HG composite,and Q2 index were calculated.Citation analysis and collaborative network mapping were conducted to identify the leading contributors,including authors,universities,countries,and sources.Results:The findings indicated an annual growth rate of 1.34%,with an average document age of 29.4 years and an average citation count per document of 134.9.The analysis identified the top authors and their collaborative networks,along with key contributions from various universities,countries,and sources.The thematic evolution of facelift research was examined across these 50 papers;this revealed important trends and shifts within the field.Conclusion:This bibliometric analysis offers valuable insights into the development and influence of facelift research over a 52-year span.It highlights significant contributors and outlines thematic shifts,providing directions for future research and collaboration in this field.展开更多
Journal of Iron and Steel Research International,sponsored by China Iron and Steel Research Institute Group,is an academic journal which provides an international medium for publication of original research articles,r...Journal of Iron and Steel Research International,sponsored by China Iron and Steel Research Institute Group,is an academic journal which provides an international medium for publication of original research articles,reviews and letters in the fields of metallurgy and metallic materials.It has been covered by Science Citation Index(SCI)and Engineering Index(EI)since 1996 and 2016,respectively.展开更多
文摘The Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines(CJNM,ISSN 2095-6975),founded in 2003 and sponsored by China Pharmaceutical University,is a peer-reviewed journal published monthly in print by Science Press and online by Elsevier.CJNM is currently indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded(SCIE),MEDLINE,BIOSIS Previews,BIOSIS Toxicology,CAB Abstracts.
文摘Purpose:For a set of 1,561 Open Access(OA)and non-OA journals in business and economics,this study evaluates the relationships between four citation metrics-five-year Impact Factor(5IF),CiteScore,Article Influence(AI)score,and SCImago Journal Rank(SJR)-and the journal ratings assigned by expert reviewers.We expect that the OA journals will have especially high citation impact relative to their perceived quality(reputation).Design/methodology/approach:Regression is used to estimate the ratings assigned by expert reviewers for the 2021 CABS(Chartered Association of Business Schools)journal assessment exercise.The independent variables are the four citation metrics,evaluated separately,and a dummy variable representing the OA/non-OA status of each journal.Findings:Regardless of the citation metric used,OA journals in business and economics have especially high citation impact relative to their perceived quality(reputation).That is,they have especially low perceived quality(reputation)relative to their citation impact.Research limitations:These results are specific to the CABS journal ratings and the four citation metrics.However,there is strong evidence that CABS is closely related to several other expert ratings,and that 5IF,CiteScore,AI,and SJR are representative of the other citation metrics that might have been chosen.Practical implications:There are at least two possible explanations for these results:(1)expert evaluators are biased against OA journals,and(2)OA journals have especially high citation impact due to their increased accessibility.Although this study does not allow us to determine which of these explanations are supported,the results suggest that authors should consider publishing in OA journals whenever overall readership and citation impact are more important than journal reputation within a particular field.Moreover,the OA coefficients provide a useful indicator of the extent to which anti-OA bias(or the citation advantage of OA journals)is diminishing over time.Originality/value:This is apparently the first study to investigate the impact of OA status on the relationships between expert journal ratings and journal citation metrics.
文摘Clarivate and Elsevier have recently released the 2024 Journal Citation Reports(JCR)and CiteScore,respectively.We are delighted to share the exciting news that Chinese Medicine and Culture(CMC)has achieved its first impact factor(IF)of 0.5!It ranks in Q2 in the category of History&Philosophy of Science,and in Q4 in the category of Integrative&Complementary Medicine,marking a major breakthrough!
基金Funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.51978545)。
文摘We tried to collect all publications based on Scopus for 24 years in English for the keyword Wollastonite.We analyzed the most popular journals,top authors,top-cited papers,and the role of top countries in the world on the usage of Wollastonite in construction.Moreover,a comprehensive examination of literature and patent data pertaining to the production and utilisation of wollastonite and materials derived from wollastonite was conducted.We then consolidated and presented our findings about Wollastonite's characteristics.We demonstrated the theoretical possibility of using recycled wollastonite in some areas of cement-based construction materials and product manufacture.Our research results shows that the number of available articles on Wollastonite-mineral as a fibre and aggregate is less than that on other areas.In addition,the research enables us to discover potential deficiencies in the utilization of Wollastonite in situations where there is currently no available published literature.
文摘Purpose:Citations can be used in evaluative bibliometrics to measure the impact of papers.However,citation analysis can be extended by a multi-dimensional perspective on citation impact which is intended to receive more specific information about the kind of received impact.Design/methodology/approach:Bornmann,Wray,and Haunschild(2019)introduced citation concept analysis(CCA)for capturing the importance and usefulness certain concepts have in subsequent research.The method is based on the analysis of citances-the contexts of citations in citing papers.This study applies the method by investigating the impact of various concepts introduced in the oeuvre of the world-leading French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu.Findings:We found that the most cited concepts are‘social capital’(with about 34%of the citances in the citing papers),‘cultural capital’,and‘habitus’(both with about 24%).On the other hand,the concepts‘doxa’and‘reflexivity’score only about 1%each.Research limitations:The formulation of search terms for identifying the concepts in the data and the citation context coverage are the most important limitations of the study.Practical implications:The results of this explorative study reflect the historical development of Bourdieu’s thought and its interface with different fields of study.Originality/value:The study demonstrates the high explanatory power of the CCA method.
文摘On behalf of the Editorial Board of Deep Underground Science and Engineering(DUSE),we sincerely thank all reviewers for your dedicated service in 2025.Your timely,thoughtful,and expert reviews have been essential to upholding the quality and integrity of the journal.With your support and contributions,DUSE has achieved a major milestone this year—receiving its first Impact Factor of 5.0,ranking 13th out of 65 journals in its category,and earning Q1 status in the Journal Citation Reports(JCR).
文摘Purpose:This study analyzes the profiles of elite Brazilian researchers,recognized through the prestigious CNPq productivity scholarships.By identifying distinct researcher clusters,the study sheds light on different academic strategies,levels of productivity,and academic contributions within the Brazilian higher education system.Design/methodology/approach:The research analyzes a comprehensive dataset of 14,003 researchers,employing principal component analysis(PCA)followed by cluster analysis to group researchers based on their academic attributes.The clusters reflect diverse aspects of research productivity,graduate supervisions,and publication patterns.Findings:The analysis reveals the existence of three distinct researcher profiles(the Advanced Supervisors,the Book Publishers/Organizers,and the Generalists).The study also highlights the characteristics of highcaliber scientists,representing the upper echelon of Brazilian researchers in terms of productivity and impact.Research limitations:Although the study provides a robust analysis of the Brazilian system,the results reflect specific characteristics of the Brazilian academic context.Furthermore,the analysis was restricted to normalized annual data,which may overlook temporal variations in researcher productivity.Pratical implications:The findings provide valuable insights for policy makers,funding agencies(such as CNPq),and university administrators who aim to develop tailored support programs for different researcher profiles.Originality/value:The cluster-based profiling offers a novel perspective on how different academic trajectories coexist within a national science system,offering lessons for other emerging economies.
基金supported by the Basic Research Program for Young Students(Doctoral Students)of the National Natural Science Foundation of China(#724B2015)。
文摘Purpose:This study examines why papers with high CD indices(measuring research disruptiveness)increasingly show reduced citation impact and investigates whether this represents genuine impact reduction or methodological artifacts.Design/methodology/approach:We analyzed 29 million papers(1950-2016)using Poisson regression to examine relationships between the CD index and citation count,with controls for fields,team size,and reference count.Findings:Papers with high CD indices showed reduced citation impact over time.However,when controlling for increasing reference counts in papers,this relationship reversed,revealing a positive association.Papers with more references exhibit lower CD indices owing to the index’s sensitivity to the reference count,while achieving higher citation counts.Alternative innovation metrics consistently show positive correlations with citation impact.Research limitations:The approach may not adequately capture the reduced citation impact of highly disruptive papers with fewer references.The analysis is limited to journal articles and shows correlation rather than causality.Practical implications:The apparent undervaluation of disruptive research stems from methodological artifacts in the CD index calculation driven by evolving reference patterns.Researchers should control for the reference count when using this metric.Originality/value:This study reveals that bias against disruptive research is specific to the CD index’s calculation methodology,identifying reference behavior as the key factor affecting the relationship between disruption metrics and citation impact.
文摘Purpose:Citation-based assessments of countries’research capabilities often misrepresent their ability to achieve breakthrough advancements.These assessments commonly classify Japan as a developing country,which contradicts its prominent scientific standing.The purpose of this study is to investigate the underlying causes of such inaccurate assessments and to propose methods for conducting more reliable evaluations.Design/methodology/approach:The study evaluates the effectiveness of top-percentile citation metrics as indicators of breakthrough research.Using case studies of selected countries and research topics,the study examines how deviations from lognormal citation distributions impact the accuracy of these percentile indicators.A similar analysis is conducted using university data from the Leiden Ranking to investigate citation distribution deviations at the institutional level.Findings:The study finds that inflated lower tails in citation distributions lead to undervaluation of research capabilities in advanced technological countries,as captured by some percentile indicators.Conversely,research-intensive universities exhibit the opposite trend:a reduced lower tail relative to the upper tail,which causes percentile indicators to overestimate their actual research capacity.Research limitations:The descriptions are mathematical facts that are self-evident.Practical implications:The ratios between the number of papers in the global top 10%and 1%by citation count to the total number of papers are commonly used to describe research performance.However,due to variations in citation patterns across countries and institutions with reference to the global pattern,these ratios can be misleading and lose their value as research indicators.Originality/value:Size-independent research performance indicators,obtained as the ratios between paper counts in top percentiles and the total numbers of publications,are widely used by public and private institutions.This study demonstrates that the use of these ratios for research evaluations and country rankings can be highly misleading.
文摘The author regrets that the paper titled“Gauging scholars’acceptance of Open Access journals by examining the relationship between perceived quality and citation impact”(DOI:10.2478/jdis-2025-0002),as published,contains errors in four of the table captions.For Tables 12-15,“CABS business journals”should read“CABS economics journals.”The tables do have the correct values for the economics journals,and the findings reported in the text do not need revision.The author apologizes for any inconvenience.
文摘Journal of Iron and Steel Research International,sponsored by China Iron and Steel Research Institute Group,is an academic journal which provides an international medium for publication of original research articles,reviews and letters in the fields of metallurgy and metallic materials.It has been covered by Science Citation Index(SCI)and Engineering Index(EI)since 1996 and 2016,respectively.
文摘Journal of Iron and Steel Research International,sponsored by China Iron and Steel Research Institute Group,is an academic journal which provides an international medium for publication of original research articles,reviews and letters in the fields of metallurgy and metallic materials.It has been covered by Science Citation Index(SCI)and Engineering Index(EI)since 1996 and 2016,respectively.
文摘Correction to:Nuclear Science and Techniques(2024)35:162 https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-024-01514-1 In this article,the citation information for Figures 6 and 7 was published incorrectly.The correct citations should read as follows:In the sentence beginning‘the curve of Eq.17 is plotted…..’in this article,the text‘as shown in Fig.7a’should have read‘as shown in Fig.6a’.
文摘Background:Facelift procedures represent a critical area of aesthetic and reconstructive surgery that addresses the physical and psychological impacts of facial aging.Advancements in techniques and technologies over time have transformed the field,making it essential to assess the evolution of research trends.This study performed a bibliometric analysis of facelift research by examining the top 50 most cited publications to evaluate their contributions,thematic evolution,and collaborative networks.Methods:The Scopus database was used to identify relevant publications.A total of 50 documents were selected,comprising 47 articles and 3 reviews published across 16 academic sources.The inclusion criteria focused on publications with substantial relevance to facelift research;this ensured comprehensive coverage of the topic.Key performance indicators(for the authors)such as the number of papers,total citations,h-index,g-index,m-index,HG composite,and Q2 index were calculated.Citation analysis and collaborative network mapping were conducted to identify the leading contributors,including authors,universities,countries,and sources.Results:The findings indicated an annual growth rate of 1.34%,with an average document age of 29.4 years and an average citation count per document of 134.9.The analysis identified the top authors and their collaborative networks,along with key contributions from various universities,countries,and sources.The thematic evolution of facelift research was examined across these 50 papers;this revealed important trends and shifts within the field.Conclusion:This bibliometric analysis offers valuable insights into the development and influence of facelift research over a 52-year span.It highlights significant contributors and outlines thematic shifts,providing directions for future research and collaboration in this field.
文摘Journal of Iron and Steel Research International,sponsored by China Iron and Steel Research Institute Group,is an academic journal which provides an international medium for publication of original research articles,reviews and letters in the fields of metallurgy and metallic materials.It has been covered by Science Citation Index(SCI)and Engineering Index(EI)since 1996 and 2016,respectively.
