Rare earths and other critical minerals are widely used in clean energy,semiconductors and other advanced industries,as well as in the defense sector.They are often described as the“gold of the 21st century”and the...Rare earths and other critical minerals are widely used in clean energy,semiconductors and other advanced industries,as well as in the defense sector.They are often described as the“gold of the 21st century”and the“vitamins of industry.”As the United States steps up its containment of China,the Trump administration places great emphasis on critical minerals security.展开更多
Artificial Intelligence(AI),as a strategic technology leading the new round of scientific and technological revolution and industrial transformation,is reshaping the global power dynamics.Major countries are accelerat...Artificial Intelligence(AI),as a strategic technology leading the new round of scientific and technological revolution and industrial transformation,is reshaping the global power dynamics.Major countries are accelerating their strategic deployment around technological innovation,standard-setting,and rule-building,making technology increasingly intertwined with geopolitics.Since the U.S.released Preparing for the Future of Artificial Intelligence in 2016,it has integrated AI into its national strategic system and continuously upgraded it,aiming to maintain its dominance in the global competition.Meanwhile,the internal and external tensions of the U.S.AI strategy have become increasingly prominent,profoundly influencing its global strategy and future trajectory.展开更多
As the hegemonic country in the world system, U. S. national strategy is global and multi-directional. Since September 11, 2001, America has made series of adjustments in its global strategy, including adjustment in s...As the hegemonic country in the world system, U. S. national strategy is global and multi-directional. Since September 11, 2001, America has made series of adjustments in its global strategy, including adjustment in security focus and change of security means. Come what may, since America has become the superpower in the world system, its national strategy has always been between offensive and integration. In a sense, current American strategy is the combination of the two. Although different government would tilt toward one direction, none展开更多
Deterrence and coercion are two kinds of strategies,the latter being more aggressive than the former.The U.S.Asia-Pacific Rebalancing strategy is an important diplomatic legacy of Obama's administration.For the is...Deterrence and coercion are two kinds of strategies,the latter being more aggressive than the former.The U.S.Asia-Pacific Rebalancing strategy is an important diplomatic legacy of Obama's administration.For the issues involving the Diaoyu Islands,the South China Sea,cyber security,DPRK's nuclear program,and Iran's nuclear program,the U.S.has carried out military deterrence and non-force coercion against China.But generally,these are low-level coercive measures and distinct from the severe economic sanction and diplomatic isolation imposed by the U.S.on Russia,Syria,DPRK and Iran in recent years.Concerning issues where the U.S.and China hold distinct views,there would be less strategic leeway for the two countries.If the U.S.is to strengthen deterrence and coercion towards China,China can respond more actively and effectively,but it will be more difficult to build a new model of China-U.S.major-country relationship.展开更多
Since the start of the 1990s when Shanghai started to blaze a new trail for the development of a huge metropolis through carrying out a development strategy of "opening and developing Pudong" and "build...Since the start of the 1990s when Shanghai started to blaze a new trail for the development of a huge metropolis through carrying out a development strategy of "opening and developing Pudong" and "building up an international economic, financial and trading centre in Shanghai", the city has展开更多
The redefinition of the U.S.policy toward China since Barack Obama’s election has been based on a compromise between elements of hard power(military,economy) and soft power(influence,dialogue,persuasion).This new pos...The redefinition of the U.S.policy toward China since Barack Obama’s election has been based on a compromise between elements of hard power(military,economy) and soft power(influence,dialogue,persuasion).This new posture has been defined by several experts and policymakers as a"smart policy".However,considering the rise of China and its implications both at economic and political levels,what is the real margin of Washington in its relation with Beijing,and what are the long term implications of the smart policy? If the China policy is a priority for the Obama administration,the challenges for Washington are particularly sensitive, considering the consequences of a failure in implementing comprehensive China-U.S.relations.展开更多
文摘Rare earths and other critical minerals are widely used in clean energy,semiconductors and other advanced industries,as well as in the defense sector.They are often described as the“gold of the 21st century”and the“vitamins of industry.”As the United States steps up its containment of China,the Trump administration places great emphasis on critical minerals security.
文摘Artificial Intelligence(AI),as a strategic technology leading the new round of scientific and technological revolution and industrial transformation,is reshaping the global power dynamics.Major countries are accelerating their strategic deployment around technological innovation,standard-setting,and rule-building,making technology increasingly intertwined with geopolitics.Since the U.S.released Preparing for the Future of Artificial Intelligence in 2016,it has integrated AI into its national strategic system and continuously upgraded it,aiming to maintain its dominance in the global competition.Meanwhile,the internal and external tensions of the U.S.AI strategy have become increasingly prominent,profoundly influencing its global strategy and future trajectory.
文摘As the hegemonic country in the world system, U. S. national strategy is global and multi-directional. Since September 11, 2001, America has made series of adjustments in its global strategy, including adjustment in security focus and change of security means. Come what may, since America has become the superpower in the world system, its national strategy has always been between offensive and integration. In a sense, current American strategy is the combination of the two. Although different government would tilt toward one direction, none
文摘Deterrence and coercion are two kinds of strategies,the latter being more aggressive than the former.The U.S.Asia-Pacific Rebalancing strategy is an important diplomatic legacy of Obama's administration.For the issues involving the Diaoyu Islands,the South China Sea,cyber security,DPRK's nuclear program,and Iran's nuclear program,the U.S.has carried out military deterrence and non-force coercion against China.But generally,these are low-level coercive measures and distinct from the severe economic sanction and diplomatic isolation imposed by the U.S.on Russia,Syria,DPRK and Iran in recent years.Concerning issues where the U.S.and China hold distinct views,there would be less strategic leeway for the two countries.If the U.S.is to strengthen deterrence and coercion towards China,China can respond more actively and effectively,but it will be more difficult to build a new model of China-U.S.major-country relationship.
文摘Since the start of the 1990s when Shanghai started to blaze a new trail for the development of a huge metropolis through carrying out a development strategy of "opening and developing Pudong" and "building up an international economic, financial and trading centre in Shanghai", the city has
文摘The redefinition of the U.S.policy toward China since Barack Obama’s election has been based on a compromise between elements of hard power(military,economy) and soft power(influence,dialogue,persuasion).This new posture has been defined by several experts and policymakers as a"smart policy".However,considering the rise of China and its implications both at economic and political levels,what is the real margin of Washington in its relation with Beijing,and what are the long term implications of the smart policy? If the China policy is a priority for the Obama administration,the challenges for Washington are particularly sensitive, considering the consequences of a failure in implementing comprehensive China-U.S.relations.
