BACKGROUND Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction has a center of origin within 5 cm of the esophagogastric junction.Surgical resection remains the main treatment.A transthoracic approach is recommended for Si...BACKGROUND Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction has a center of origin within 5 cm of the esophagogastric junction.Surgical resection remains the main treatment.A transthoracic approach is recommended for Siewert I adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction and a transabdominal approach is recommended for Siewert III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.However,there is a need to determine the optimal surgical approach for Siewert II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction to improve lung function and the prognosis of patients.AIM To investigate and compare the surgical effects,postoperative changes in pulmonary function,and prognoses of two approaches to treating combined esophagogastric cancer.METHODS One hundred and thirty-eight patients with combined esophagogastric cancer treated by general and thoracic surgeries in our hospital were selected.They were divided into group A comprising 70 patients(transabdominal approach)and group B comprising 68 patients(transthoracic approach)based on the surgical approach.The indexes related to surgical trauma,number of removed lymph nodes,indexes of lung function before and after surgery,survival rate,and survival duration of the two groups were compared 3 years after surgery.RESULTS The duration of surgery,length of hospital stay,and postoperative drainage duration of the patients in group A were shorter than those of the patients in group B,and the volume of blood loss caused by surgery was lower for group A than for group B(P<0.05).At the one-month postoperative review,the first second,maximum ventilation volume,forceful lung volume,and lung volume values were higher for group A than for group B(P<0.05).Preoperatively,the QLQ-OES18 scale scores of the patients in group A were higher than those in group B on re-evaluation at 3 mo postoperatively(P<0.05).The surgical complication rate of the patients in group A was 10.00%,which was lower than that of patients in group B,which was 23.53%(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Transabdominal and transthoracic surgical approaches are comparable in treating combined esophagogastric cancer;however,the former results in lesser surgical trauma,milder changes in pulmonary function,and fewer complications.展开更多
Retrorectal or presacral tumors are rare lesions located in the presacral area and considered as being derived from multiple embryological remnants.These tumors are classified as congenital,neurogenic,osseous,inflamma...Retrorectal or presacral tumors are rare lesions located in the presacral area and considered as being derived from multiple embryological remnants.These tumors are classified as congenital,neurogenic,osseous,inflammatory,or miscellaneous.The most common among these are congenital benign lesions that present with non-specific symptoms,such as lower back pain and change in bowel habit.Although congenital and developmental tumors occur in younger patients,the median age of presentation is reported to be 45 years.Magnetic resonance imaging plays a crucial role in treatment management through accurate diagnosis of the lesion,the evaluation of invasion to adjacent structures,and the decision of appropriate surgical approach.The usefulness of preoperative biopsy is still debated;currently,it is only indicated for solid or heterogeneous tumors if it will alter the treatment management.Surgical resection with clear margins is considered the optimal treatment;described approaches are transabdominal,perineal,combined abdominoperineal,and minimally invasive.Benign retrorectal tumors have favorable long-term outcomes with a low incidence of recurrence,whereas malignant tumors have a potential for distant organ metastasis in addition to local recurrence.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction has a center of origin within 5 cm of the esophagogastric junction.Surgical resection remains the main treatment.A transthoracic approach is recommended for Siewert I adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction and a transabdominal approach is recommended for Siewert III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.However,there is a need to determine the optimal surgical approach for Siewert II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction to improve lung function and the prognosis of patients.AIM To investigate and compare the surgical effects,postoperative changes in pulmonary function,and prognoses of two approaches to treating combined esophagogastric cancer.METHODS One hundred and thirty-eight patients with combined esophagogastric cancer treated by general and thoracic surgeries in our hospital were selected.They were divided into group A comprising 70 patients(transabdominal approach)and group B comprising 68 patients(transthoracic approach)based on the surgical approach.The indexes related to surgical trauma,number of removed lymph nodes,indexes of lung function before and after surgery,survival rate,and survival duration of the two groups were compared 3 years after surgery.RESULTS The duration of surgery,length of hospital stay,and postoperative drainage duration of the patients in group A were shorter than those of the patients in group B,and the volume of blood loss caused by surgery was lower for group A than for group B(P<0.05).At the one-month postoperative review,the first second,maximum ventilation volume,forceful lung volume,and lung volume values were higher for group A than for group B(P<0.05).Preoperatively,the QLQ-OES18 scale scores of the patients in group A were higher than those in group B on re-evaluation at 3 mo postoperatively(P<0.05).The surgical complication rate of the patients in group A was 10.00%,which was lower than that of patients in group B,which was 23.53%(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Transabdominal and transthoracic surgical approaches are comparable in treating combined esophagogastric cancer;however,the former results in lesser surgical trauma,milder changes in pulmonary function,and fewer complications.
文摘Retrorectal or presacral tumors are rare lesions located in the presacral area and considered as being derived from multiple embryological remnants.These tumors are classified as congenital,neurogenic,osseous,inflammatory,or miscellaneous.The most common among these are congenital benign lesions that present with non-specific symptoms,such as lower back pain and change in bowel habit.Although congenital and developmental tumors occur in younger patients,the median age of presentation is reported to be 45 years.Magnetic resonance imaging plays a crucial role in treatment management through accurate diagnosis of the lesion,the evaluation of invasion to adjacent structures,and the decision of appropriate surgical approach.The usefulness of preoperative biopsy is still debated;currently,it is only indicated for solid or heterogeneous tumors if it will alter the treatment management.Surgical resection with clear margins is considered the optimal treatment;described approaches are transabdominal,perineal,combined abdominoperineal,and minimally invasive.Benign retrorectal tumors have favorable long-term outcomes with a low incidence of recurrence,whereas malignant tumors have a potential for distant organ metastasis in addition to local recurrence.
