Objective: to analyze the content of evidence-based nursing in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction complicated with arrhythmia, and to explore the clinical effect of patients and the impact on hospitalization...Objective: to analyze the content of evidence-based nursing in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction complicated with arrhythmia, and to explore the clinical effect of patients and the impact on hospitalization time. Methods: the research sample was 40 patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated with arrhythmia. The sampling time period was from January 2019 to September 2021, and then they were divided into groups. The group names were called the control group and the experimental group. Random lottery method;in the clinical treatment stage, provide them with different nursing care, the main intervention plans are: routine nursing (n=20 cases, control group patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated with arrhythmia), evidence-based nursing (n=20 cases, experimental group, patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated with arrhythmia), and compared the curative effect, the specific contents include: nursing efficiency (significantly effective, improved, ineffective), quality of life (physical function score, role function score, cognitive function score, emotional function score, social function score), complication rate (ventricular fibrillation, tachycardia, severe arrhythmia), clinical indicators (time in bed, length of hospital stay), nursing satisfaction (very satisfied, satisfied, moderately satisfied, dissatisfied). Results: (1) regarding the total effective rate of nursing, the experimental group (95.00%, 19/20) VS the control group (70.00%, 14/20), the evaluation data was high, P<0.05;(2) regarding the quality of life, more specific scores of the control group and the experimental group were significantly different. In terms of physical function, role function, cognitive function, emotional function, and social function, the experimental group after nursing had higher data, P<0.50;(3) comparison of the control group and the experimental group. The incidence of complications, time in bed, and length of stay in the data were lower, P<0.05;(4) in terms of satisfaction, compared with the control group after routine nursing, the experimental group after evidence-based nursing had higher data, P<0.05. Conclusion: evidence-based nursing intervention mode not only has a good effect on the improvement of clinical symptoms and cardiac function, but also improves the total effective rate, quality of life, satisfaction, shortens bed rest time and hospitalization time, and can treat acute myocardial infarction complicated by heart rhythm. Complications in abnormal patients can be effectively prevented, and the incidence rate can be reduced, and the safety value is high, so it can be recommended and used.展开更多
文摘Objective: to analyze the content of evidence-based nursing in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction complicated with arrhythmia, and to explore the clinical effect of patients and the impact on hospitalization time. Methods: the research sample was 40 patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated with arrhythmia. The sampling time period was from January 2019 to September 2021, and then they were divided into groups. The group names were called the control group and the experimental group. Random lottery method;in the clinical treatment stage, provide them with different nursing care, the main intervention plans are: routine nursing (n=20 cases, control group patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated with arrhythmia), evidence-based nursing (n=20 cases, experimental group, patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated with arrhythmia), and compared the curative effect, the specific contents include: nursing efficiency (significantly effective, improved, ineffective), quality of life (physical function score, role function score, cognitive function score, emotional function score, social function score), complication rate (ventricular fibrillation, tachycardia, severe arrhythmia), clinical indicators (time in bed, length of hospital stay), nursing satisfaction (very satisfied, satisfied, moderately satisfied, dissatisfied). Results: (1) regarding the total effective rate of nursing, the experimental group (95.00%, 19/20) VS the control group (70.00%, 14/20), the evaluation data was high, P<0.05;(2) regarding the quality of life, more specific scores of the control group and the experimental group were significantly different. In terms of physical function, role function, cognitive function, emotional function, and social function, the experimental group after nursing had higher data, P<0.50;(3) comparison of the control group and the experimental group. The incidence of complications, time in bed, and length of stay in the data were lower, P<0.05;(4) in terms of satisfaction, compared with the control group after routine nursing, the experimental group after evidence-based nursing had higher data, P<0.05. Conclusion: evidence-based nursing intervention mode not only has a good effect on the improvement of clinical symptoms and cardiac function, but also improves the total effective rate, quality of life, satisfaction, shortens bed rest time and hospitalization time, and can treat acute myocardial infarction complicated by heart rhythm. Complications in abnormal patients can be effectively prevented, and the incidence rate can be reduced, and the safety value is high, so it can be recommended and used.
