Summary： Human sperm DNA is an important genetic and epigenetic material, whose chromatin structure differs from that of somatic cells. As such, conventional methods for DNA extraction of somatic cells may not be sui...Summary： Human sperm DNA is an important genetic and epigenetic material, whose chromatin structure differs from that of somatic cells. As such, conventional methods for DNA extraction of somatic cells may not be suitable for obtaining sperm DNA. In this study, we evaluated and compared three sperm DNA extraction techniques, namely, modified guanidinium thiocyanate method （method A）, traditional phenol-chloroform method （method B）, and TianGen kit method （method C）. Spectrophotometry and agarose gel electrophoresis analyses showed that method A produced DNA with higher quantity and purity than those of methods B and C （P〈0.01）. PCR results revealed that method A was more reliable in amplifying DEAD-box polypeptide 4 （DDX4） and copy number variations （CNVs） than methods B and C, which generated false-positive errors. The results of sperm DNA methylation assay further indicated that methods A and B were effective, and the former yielded higher quantitative accuracy. In conclusion, the modified guanidinium thiocyanate method provided high quality and reli- able results and could be an optimal technique for extracting sperm DNA for methylation assay.展开更多
基金supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.81370755)
文摘Summary： Human sperm DNA is an important genetic and epigenetic material, whose chromatin structure differs from that of somatic cells. As such, conventional methods for DNA extraction of somatic cells may not be suitable for obtaining sperm DNA. In this study, we evaluated and compared three sperm DNA extraction techniques, namely, modified guanidinium thiocyanate method （method A）, traditional phenol-chloroform method （method B）, and TianGen kit method （method C）. Spectrophotometry and agarose gel electrophoresis analyses showed that method A produced DNA with higher quantity and purity than those of methods B and C （P〈0.01）. PCR results revealed that method A was more reliable in amplifying DEAD-box polypeptide 4 （DDX4） and copy number variations （CNVs） than methods B and C, which generated false-positive errors. The results of sperm DNA methylation assay further indicated that methods A and B were effective, and the former yielded higher quantitative accuracy. In conclusion, the modified guanidinium thiocyanate method provided high quality and reli- able results and could be an optimal technique for extracting sperm DNA for methylation assay.
