Twenty-three recommendations were summarized by the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery(ERAS)society for liver surgery.The aim was to validate the protocol especially with regard to adherence and the impact on morbidity.M...Twenty-three recommendations were summarized by the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery(ERAS)society for liver surgery.The aim was to validate the protocol especially with regard to adherence and the impact on morbidity.Methods:Using the ERAS Interactive Audit System(EIAS),ERAS items were evaluated in patients undergoing liver resection.Over a period of 26 months,304 patients were prospectively enrolled in an observational study(DRKS00017229).Of those,51 patients(non-ERAS)were enrolled before and 253 patients(ERAS)after the implementation of the ERAS protocol.Perioperative adherence and complications were compared between the two groups.Results:Overall adherence increased from 45.2%in the non-ERAS group to 62.7%in the ERAS group(P<0.001).This was associated with significant improvements in the preoperative and postoperative phase(P<0.001),rather than in the outpatient and intraoperative phase(both P>0.05).Overall complications decreased from 41.2%(n=21)in the non-ERAS group to 26.5%(n=67)in the ERAS group(P=0.0423),which was mainly due to the reduction of grade 1-2 complications from 17.6%(n=9)to 7.6%(n=19)(P=0.0322).As for patients undergoing open surgery,implementation of ERAS lead to a reduction of overall complications in patients scheduled for minimally invasive liver surgery(MILS)(P=0.036).Conclusions:Implementation of the ERAS protocol for liver surgery according to the ERAS guidelines of the ERAS Society reduced Clavien-Dindo grade 1-2 complications particularly in patients who underwent MILS.The ERAS guidelines are beneficial for the outcome,while adherence to the various items has not yet been satisfactorily defined.展开更多
文摘Twenty-three recommendations were summarized by the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery(ERAS)society for liver surgery.The aim was to validate the protocol especially with regard to adherence and the impact on morbidity.Methods:Using the ERAS Interactive Audit System(EIAS),ERAS items were evaluated in patients undergoing liver resection.Over a period of 26 months,304 patients were prospectively enrolled in an observational study(DRKS00017229).Of those,51 patients(non-ERAS)were enrolled before and 253 patients(ERAS)after the implementation of the ERAS protocol.Perioperative adherence and complications were compared between the two groups.Results:Overall adherence increased from 45.2%in the non-ERAS group to 62.7%in the ERAS group(P<0.001).This was associated with significant improvements in the preoperative and postoperative phase(P<0.001),rather than in the outpatient and intraoperative phase(both P>0.05).Overall complications decreased from 41.2%(n=21)in the non-ERAS group to 26.5%(n=67)in the ERAS group(P=0.0423),which was mainly due to the reduction of grade 1-2 complications from 17.6%(n=9)to 7.6%(n=19)(P=0.0322).As for patients undergoing open surgery,implementation of ERAS lead to a reduction of overall complications in patients scheduled for minimally invasive liver surgery(MILS)(P=0.036).Conclusions:Implementation of the ERAS protocol for liver surgery according to the ERAS guidelines of the ERAS Society reduced Clavien-Dindo grade 1-2 complications particularly in patients who underwent MILS.The ERAS guidelines are beneficial for the outcome,while adherence to the various items has not yet been satisfactorily defined.
