With the global economy and the intensification of market competition, more and more enterprises in the same industry to establish a new alliance---competitive strategic alliance. Competitive strategic alliance is not...With the global economy and the intensification of market competition, more and more enterprises in the same industry to establish a new alliance---competitive strategic alliance. Competitive strategic alliance is not only in the strategic choice of the existence of a potential to create value, but also the existence of synergy. Competition and cooperation between the two conflicting complex logic relations coexist in the competitive strategic alliances （CSA）. Therefore maintaining the relative stability of alliance is the premise and necessary condition of alliance to success. In this paper, on the basis of the literature review, we discuss the significance and principles of improving CSA＇s stability; in the way of case analysis and expert interviews construct the hierarchy analysis model of improving CSA＇s stability; and then further put forward a series of measures which can maintain the CSA＇s stability, such as strengthen the ability of technological innovation, protection and development of the core ability of the enterprise, to develop a coherent strategy alliance target, choose a suitable alliance partner, coordinate the corporate culture between partners, establish alliance risk prevention mechanism, and so on. It will provide theoretical support and practical guidance to relevant departments and relevant personnel in policy decision-making and problem-solving展开更多
The report to the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China pointed out that our world,our times and history are changing in unprecedented ways.On the one hand,the historical trends of peace,development,c...The report to the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China pointed out that our world,our times and history are changing in unprecedented ways.On the one hand,the historical trends of peace,development,cooperation and mutual benefit are unstoppable.The will of the people and the general trends of current times will eventually lead to a bright future for humanity.On the other hand,hegemonic,high-handed and bullying acts such as using strength to intimidate the weak,taking from others by force or subterfuge,and playing zero-sum games are inflicting grave harm.The deficit in peace,development,security and governance is growing.All of this poses unprecedented challenges for human society.1 With the accelerating evolution of the international landscape and the intensification of strategic competition among major powers,global governance is facing unprecedented complexity and challenges.展开更多
Climate change is a core issue on which China and the United States(US)are relatively willing to cooperate.Compared with Barack Obama,Joe Biden has incorporated additional elements of climate governance into the compe...Climate change is a core issue on which China and the United States(US)are relatively willing to cooperate.Compared with Barack Obama,Joe Biden has incorporated additional elements of climate governance into the competitive track.His administration has attached increased importance to reciprocity and uniformity in sharing responsibilities,relied heavily on coercion and inducement as methods for advancing relevant policy agendas,and focused on the clean technology sector in a bid to decouple from China.The competitive logic of the climate policy pursued by the Biden administration has spotlighted its objectives:to seek leadership in global climate governance,to serve America's value-oriented diplomacy by manipulating ideologies in the realm of climate governance,and to sustain a relative dominant position in the climate governance system.To a certain extent,the competitive measures by the Biden administration have shaped the external environment of China's development and its participation in global climate governance.However,they can hardly achieve the core objective of serving America's strategic competition against China.Such a competitive climate policy will destabilize the strategic relationship between China and the US,impeding breakthroughs that resemble the Paris Agreement in the multilateral climate process.展开更多
In recent discourse,terms such as"China-US trade war"and MChina-US strategic competitionMhave flooded the media,often misleading the public and obscuring factual distinctions.The so-called"strategy"...In recent discourse,terms such as"China-US trade war"and MChina-US strategic competitionMhave flooded the media,often misleading the public and obscuring factual distinctions.The so-called"strategy"in this context implicitly aligns with hegemonic agendas,while the rhetoric of“competition”—relies on the flawed premise of an inevitable rivalry for global dominance.However,the reality diverges sharply from this framing.China has consistently pursued normal development rooted in free trade principles and the WTO's multilateral trading system.Conversely,the US has repeatedly undermined these very foundations-sabotaging free trade norms and multilateral rules while implementing strategic measures to suppress China's growth.The relationship between China and the US is not a contest for hegemony.展开更多
As an important part in unique resources and capability of enterprises, organizational routines, on one hand, promote the success of enterprises, on the other hand, influence the future development of enterprises. Esp...As an important part in unique resources and capability of enterprises, organizational routines, on one hand, promote the success of enterprises, on the other hand, influence the future development of enterprises. Especially, organizational routines have the influences on the two factors of building up dynamic competitive advantages-strategic change and strategic flexibility and further influence the establishment of dynamic competitive advantages. This paper involves detailed analysis on the influences of organizational routines and on the approaches of establishing dynamic competitive advantages and puts forward the relevant countermeasures.展开更多
Since the 1990s, organizational environments in China have taken an unprecedented, unrelenting and largely unpredictable change, competitive advantage has increasingly depended on core employees, conventional and rigi...Since the 1990s, organizational environments in China have taken an unprecedented, unrelenting and largely unpredictable change, competitive advantage has increasingly depended on core employees, conventional and rigid employment modes have been confronted with a serious challenge. In contrast to pervious work in employment relationship, this paper explores how to achieve and maintain sustainable competitive advantage through differential management of employees in a business climate characterized by increasingly fierce competition and diverse human resources. On the assumption that human capital is idiosyncratic and according to a two dimensional matrix of strategic value and firm-specificity of human capital, the paper establishes a binary matrix model and develops a classification of four types of workers： firm-specific core employees, generic key employees, generic ancillary employees, and idiosyncratic allied employees. Each is viewed as playing a different strategic role in organization and should be developed and supported by different employment modes： commitment management based on skill, productivity management based on job, compliance management based on short-term contact, and collaboration management based on alliance, in order to facilitate employment relationship management in congruence with other HR practices and enterprise strategy for winning sustainable competitive advantage.展开更多
文摘With the global economy and the intensification of market competition, more and more enterprises in the same industry to establish a new alliance---competitive strategic alliance. Competitive strategic alliance is not only in the strategic choice of the existence of a potential to create value, but also the existence of synergy. Competition and cooperation between the two conflicting complex logic relations coexist in the competitive strategic alliances （CSA）. Therefore maintaining the relative stability of alliance is the premise and necessary condition of alliance to success. In this paper, on the basis of the literature review, we discuss the significance and principles of improving CSA＇s stability; in the way of case analysis and expert interviews construct the hierarchy analysis model of improving CSA＇s stability; and then further put forward a series of measures which can maintain the CSA＇s stability, such as strengthen the ability of technological innovation, protection and development of the core ability of the enterprise, to develop a coherent strategy alliance target, choose a suitable alliance partner, coordinate the corporate culture between partners, establish alliance risk prevention mechanism, and so on. It will provide theoretical support and practical guidance to relevant departments and relevant personnel in policy decision-making and problem-solving
文摘The report to the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China pointed out that our world,our times and history are changing in unprecedented ways.On the one hand,the historical trends of peace,development,cooperation and mutual benefit are unstoppable.The will of the people and the general trends of current times will eventually lead to a bright future for humanity.On the other hand,hegemonic,high-handed and bullying acts such as using strength to intimidate the weak,taking from others by force or subterfuge,and playing zero-sum games are inflicting grave harm.The deficit in peace,development,security and governance is growing.All of this poses unprecedented challenges for human society.1 With the accelerating evolution of the international landscape and the intensification of strategic competition among major powers,global governance is facing unprecedented complexity and challenges.
文摘Climate change is a core issue on which China and the United States(US)are relatively willing to cooperate.Compared with Barack Obama,Joe Biden has incorporated additional elements of climate governance into the competitive track.His administration has attached increased importance to reciprocity and uniformity in sharing responsibilities,relied heavily on coercion and inducement as methods for advancing relevant policy agendas,and focused on the clean technology sector in a bid to decouple from China.The competitive logic of the climate policy pursued by the Biden administration has spotlighted its objectives:to seek leadership in global climate governance,to serve America's value-oriented diplomacy by manipulating ideologies in the realm of climate governance,and to sustain a relative dominant position in the climate governance system.To a certain extent,the competitive measures by the Biden administration have shaped the external environment of China's development and its participation in global climate governance.However,they can hardly achieve the core objective of serving America's strategic competition against China.Such a competitive climate policy will destabilize the strategic relationship between China and the US,impeding breakthroughs that resemble the Paris Agreement in the multilateral climate process.
文摘In recent discourse,terms such as"China-US trade war"and MChina-US strategic competitionMhave flooded the media,often misleading the public and obscuring factual distinctions.The so-called"strategy"in this context implicitly aligns with hegemonic agendas,while the rhetoric of“competition”—relies on the flawed premise of an inevitable rivalry for global dominance.However,the reality diverges sharply from this framing.China has consistently pursued normal development rooted in free trade principles and the WTO's multilateral trading system.Conversely,the US has repeatedly undermined these very foundations-sabotaging free trade norms and multilateral rules while implementing strategic measures to suppress China's growth.The relationship between China and the US is not a contest for hegemony.
文摘As an important part in unique resources and capability of enterprises, organizational routines, on one hand, promote the success of enterprises, on the other hand, influence the future development of enterprises. Especially, organizational routines have the influences on the two factors of building up dynamic competitive advantages-strategic change and strategic flexibility and further influence the establishment of dynamic competitive advantages. This paper involves detailed analysis on the influences of organizational routines and on the approaches of establishing dynamic competitive advantages and puts forward the relevant countermeasures.
基金This paper is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China （No. 70302004）.
文摘Since the 1990s, organizational environments in China have taken an unprecedented, unrelenting and largely unpredictable change, competitive advantage has increasingly depended on core employees, conventional and rigid employment modes have been confronted with a serious challenge. In contrast to pervious work in employment relationship, this paper explores how to achieve and maintain sustainable competitive advantage through differential management of employees in a business climate characterized by increasingly fierce competition and diverse human resources. On the assumption that human capital is idiosyncratic and according to a two dimensional matrix of strategic value and firm-specificity of human capital, the paper establishes a binary matrix model and develops a classification of four types of workers： firm-specific core employees, generic key employees, generic ancillary employees, and idiosyncratic allied employees. Each is viewed as playing a different strategic role in organization and should be developed and supported by different employment modes： commitment management based on skill, productivity management based on job, compliance management based on short-term contact, and collaboration management based on alliance, in order to facilitate employment relationship management in congruence with other HR practices and enterprise strategy for winning sustainable competitive advantage.
