Due to the high risk of morbidity and mortality associated with surgical resection in this tract,endoscopic resection(ER)has taken the place of surgical resection as the first line treatment for non-ampullary duodenal...Due to the high risk of morbidity and mortality associated with surgical resection in this tract,endoscopic resection(ER)has taken the place of surgical resection as the first line treatment for non-ampullary duodenal adenomas.However,due to the anatomical characteristics of this area,which enhance the risk of post-ER problems,ER in the duodenum is particularly difficult.Due to a lack of data,no ER technique for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumours(SNADETs)has yet been backed by strong,high-quality evidence;yet,traditional hot snare-based techniques are still regarded as the standard treatment.Despite having a favourable efficiency profile,adverse events during duodenal hot snare polypectomy(HSP)and hot endoscopic mucosal resection,such as delayed bleeding and perforation,have been reported to be frequent.These events are primarily caused by electrocautery-induced damage.Thus,ER techniques with a better safety profile are needed to overcome these shortcomings.Cold snare polypectomy,which has already been shown as a safer,equally effective pro-cedure compared to HSP for treatment of small colorectal polyps,is being increasingly evaluated as a potential therapeutic option for non-ampullary duodenal adenomas.The aim of this review is to report and discuss the early outcomes of the first experiences with cold snaring for SNADETs.展开更多
BACKGROUND Cold snare polypectomy(CSP)is comparatively safe and effective for removing polyps less than 10 mm in size with lower rates of postpolypectomy syndrome and delayed postpolypectomy bleeding compared with hot...BACKGROUND Cold snare polypectomy(CSP)is comparatively safe and effective for removing polyps less than 10 mm in size with lower rates of postpolypectomy syndrome and delayed postpolypectomy bleeding compared with hot snare polypectomy(HSP).Recently,CSP is also expanded for removing polyps larger than 10 mm in size.AIM To compare the efficiency and safety of CSP and HSP in the management of 10-19 mm non-pedunculated colorectal polyps.METHODS A total of 1686 inpatients with at least one 10-19 mm non-pedunculated colorectal polyp,who underwent CSP(study group,n=843)or HSP(control group,n=843)at our Digestive Endoscopy Center between February 2020 and February 2024 were enrolled.The outcome measures including complete resection rate,intraoperative bleeding rate,and healthcare expenses such as procedure time and treatment cost were compared between the CSP vs HSP groups.RESULTS No statistically significant intergroup difference was observed in histological complete resection rates(P>0.05).Polyp resection time in the study group(76.5±23.6 seconds)was notably shorter than that in the control group(91.24±32.06 seconds;P<0.05).The immediate intraoperative bleeding rate was significantly higher in the study group than in the control group(12.7%vs 4.9%,P<0.05).No instances of delayed bleeding or perforation were documented in either group.Hospitalization duration was significantly reduced in the study group(2.42±0.61 days)compared to the control group(3.21±1.02 days;P<0.05).CONCLUSION For 10-19 mm non-pedunculated colorectal polyps,CSP demonstrates operational efficiency advantages over HSP in terms of procedure time,treatment cost,and length of hospital stay.Both techniques demonstrate robust safety profiles;however,CSP is associated with a higher intraoperative bleeding rate.Clinical decision-making should incorporate individualized assessment of these factors.展开更多
The minireview titled“Modern endoscopist’s toolbox:Innovations in foreign body removal”by Shahid and published in the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy provided a clear and comprehensive overview of endos...The minireview titled“Modern endoscopist’s toolbox:Innovations in foreign body removal”by Shahid and published in the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy provided a clear and comprehensive overview of endoscopic management of gastrointestinal foreign bodies.It will serve as a valuable resource for endoscopists involved in the diagnosis and treatment of such cases.Several key and controversial aspects of patient management were highlighted in a meaningful way,including the importance of thorough medical history-taking,appropriate use of radiological imaging,and the selection of suitable endoscopic extraction techniques.An individualized,multidisciplinary approach is essential for diagnosis and treatment.While current guidelines offer significant support,they cannot replace the judgment of an experienced endoscopist working with a well-trained team.展开更多
Foreign body ingestion is a common gastrointestinal emergency,particularly in children,who account for 80%of cases.While most ingested objects pass spontan-eously,around 20%require medical intervention.In adults,incid...Foreign body ingestion is a common gastrointestinal emergency,particularly in children,who account for 80%of cases.While most ingested objects pass spontan-eously,around 20%require medical intervention.In adults,incidents often occur accidentally during meals,leading to impactions,especially in individuals with underlying esophageal conditions.Endoscopy remains the gold standard for foreign body retrieval,with a success rate exceeding 95%.The type,shape,and location of the foreign body determine the clinical presentation and management approach.Sharp objects,batteries,and large items pose the highest risk of complications,including perforation,obstruction,and chemical injury.Prompt endoscopic removal is guided by established protocols,with emergent inter-vention required for complete esophageal obstruction and high-risk objects.Various retrieval devices,including forceps,snares,baskets,and overtubes,are used based on the nature of the foreign body.Technological advancements,such as artificial intelligence-assisted imaging and endoscopic ultrasound,are impro-ving diagnostic precision and procedural outcomes.Despite these advances,foreign body ingestion can still lead to severe complications if not managed in a timely manner.Public awareness,preventive measures,and rapid medical res-ponse are essential in reducing morbidity and mortality associated with foreign body ingestion.展开更多
BACKGROUND Colorectal polypectomy is fundamental to the prevention of colorectal cancer,utilizing several endoscopic techniques.Robust comparative data regarding the efficacy and safety of these modalities in clinical...BACKGROUND Colorectal polypectomy is fundamental to the prevention of colorectal cancer,utilizing several endoscopic techniques.Robust comparative data regarding the efficacy and safety of these modalities in clinical practice are limited.AIM To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of three endoscopic polypectomy techniques,namely,high-frequency electroresection(HFE),cold snare polypectomy(CSP),and endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR),for the treatment of colonic polyps.METHODS This single-center retrospective cohort study included adults who underwent endoscopic resection of pathologically confirmed colorectal polyps at Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University between January 2015 and December 2023.Patients were grouped by technique:HFE(n=107),CSP(n=106),and EMR(n=108).Standardized preoperative,intraoperative,and postoperative protocols were applied.Outcome measures included resection status(en bloc,R0,R1,and Rx),adverse events(immediate/delayed bleeding,perforation,and post-polypectomy coagulation syndrome),postoperative pain(visual analog scale at 1,3,and 5 hours),and 12-month recurrence rate.RESULTS Baseline demographics and polyp characteristics,except for polyp diameter,were comparable among groups.CSP achieved the highest en bloc resection rate,whereas HFE had a higher R0 resection rate.Polyp diameter was largest in the EMR group.Procedure duration was shortest with HFE.Adverse reactions were more frequent with HFE,particularly post-polypectomy bleeding and delayed perforation,whereas CSP demonstrated a superior safety profile and the lowest incidence of complications.Postoperative pain diminished in all groups over time but was consistently low for CSP and EMR.Recurrence rates were significantly higher in the EMR group vs CSP group,with HFE showing intermediate recurrence.CONCLUSION CSP offers the best safety profile and lowest recurrence rate among patients undergoing endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps,whereas HFE confers a high R0 resection rate but increased risk of adverse events.EMR remains essential for large polyps despite elevated recurrence.Technique selection should be tailored according to polyp characteristics and patient risk factors to optimize outcomes.展开更多
BACKGROUND Endoscopic cold snare resection(CSP)can enhance postoperative recovery and minimize bleeding risk in patients with 5-15 mm colorectal polyps.However,more detailed evaluations are required to assess their ad...BACKGROUND Endoscopic cold snare resection(CSP)can enhance postoperative recovery and minimize bleeding risk in patients with 5-15 mm colorectal polyps.However,more detailed evaluations are required to assess their advantages over conventional methods.AIM To evaluate the effects of endoscopic CSP on postoperative recovery and bleeding risk in patients with 5-15 mm colorectal polyps.METHODS This randomized controlled study included 193 patients(mean age:57.91±5.41 years;97 men and 96 women)with 5-15 mm colorectal polyps treated at Dongyang People's Hospital between March and June 2023.The patients were randomly assigned to the experimental group(n=100),who underwent CSP,and the control group(n=93),who underwent conventional endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR).Operation time,hospital stay,dietary status,and bleeding rate within 3 days were compared.RESULTS The CSP group had significantly shorter operation times(15.02±2.44 minutes vs 18.78±5.48 minutes,P<0.001)and hospital stays(3.11±1.08 days vs 4.89±1.35 days,P<0.001)than the EMR group.The fasting rate on the day of surgery was also lower in the CSP group(P<0.05).The complete resection rates were similar between groups(98.00%vs 94.62%,P=0.210),and no perforations occurred in either group.The 3-day postoperative bleeding rate was slightly lower in the CSP group(2.00%)than in the EMR group(6.45%),although this difference was not statistically significant(P=0.234),indicating limited clinical relevance.CONCLUSION CSP was safe and efficient for removing 5-15 mm colorectal polyps,offering faster recovery and comparable safety to EMR.The procedural efficiency of CSP supports its broad clinical application.展开更多
BACKGROUND Although substantial evidence supports the advantages of cold snare polypectomy(CSP)in terms of polypectomy efficacy and reduced postoperative adverse events,few studies have examined the cost differences b...BACKGROUND Although substantial evidence supports the advantages of cold snare polypectomy(CSP)in terms of polypectomy efficacy and reduced postoperative adverse events,few studies have examined the cost differences between CSP and traditional endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)for the treatment of intestinal polyps.AIM To compare the efficacy-cost of EMR and CSP in the treatment of intestinal polyps.METHODS A total of 100 patients with intestinal polyps were included in the retrospective data of our hospital from April 2022 to May 2023.According to the treatment methods,they were divided into EMR(n=46)group and CSP(n=54)group.The baseline data of the two groups were balanced by 1:1 propensity score matching(PSM),and the cost-effectiveness analysis was performed on the two groups after matching.The recurrence rate of the two groups of patients was followed up for 1 year,and they were divided into recurrence group and non-recurrence group according to whether they recurred.Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to screen out the influencing factors affecting the recurrence of intestinal polyps after endoscopic resection.RESULTS Significant disparities were observed in the number of polyps and smoking background between the two groups before PSM(P<0.05).Following PSM,the number of polyps and smoking history were well balanced between the EMR and CSP groups.The direct cost incurred by the CSP group was markedly higher than that incurred by the EMR group.Concurrently,the cost-effectiveness ratio in the CSP group was substantially reduced when juxtaposed with that in the EMR group(P<0.05).Upon completion of the 1-year follow-up,the rate of recurrence after endoscopic intestinal polypectomy was 38.00%.Multivariate methods revealed that age≥60 years,male sex,number of polyps≥3,and pathological type of adenoma were risk factors for recurrence after endoscopic intestinal polypectomy(all P<0.05).CONCLUSION CSP was more cost-effective for the treatment of intestinal polyps.An age≥60 years,male sex,having a number of polyps≥3,and pathological type of adenoma are independent influencing factors for recurrence.展开更多
BACKGROUND Colonic diverticular bleeding(CDB)is a leading cause of lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage that has a high risk of recurrence.The endoscopic clipping and endoscopic band ligation(EBL)methods are widely used ...BACKGROUND Colonic diverticular bleeding(CDB)is a leading cause of lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage that has a high risk of recurrence.The endoscopic clipping and endoscopic band ligation(EBL)methods are widely used for hemostasis in patients with CDB.Endoscopic detachable snare ligation(EDSL)has also become an increasingly common treatment option.The data remain inconsistent regarding the comparative efficacy of these endoscopic therapies in achieving initial hemostasis and reduction of early and late rebleeding rates.AIM To study the effectiveness and complications of endoscopic clipping,EBL,and EDSL for CDB.METHODS We conducted a systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE,Scopus,Web of Science,Embase,Google Scholar,and the Cochrane database for clinical trials to find studies that reported CDB and endoscopic clipping,EBL,or EDSL as treatment methods.The pooled estimates of initial hemostasis,early and late rebleeding,and the need for transarterial embolization or surgery between these groups were calculated.RESULTS We analyzed 28 studies with 5224 patients.Of these,4526 had active CDB and required one of the three endoscopic interventions.The pooled prevalence of early rebleeding was 23.5%,10.7%,and 10.6%in the endoscopic clipping,EBL,and EDSL groups,respectively.Patients who underwent endoscopic clipping had a significantly higher rate of early rebleeding compared to those who received EBL[odds ratio(OR)=3.76(95%CI:2.13-6.63)]and EDSL(OR=3.30,95%CI:1.28-8.53).There was no difference in the initial hemostasis between the three groups.The pooled prevalence of late rebleeding was 27.2%in the clipping,followed by 13.8%in the EBL and 2.7%in the EDSL group.Compared to 2.6%in the EBL group,4.0%of patients who received endoscopic clipping subsequently underwent surgery or transarterial embolization.These results were consistent in the network meta-analysis.Based on the ranking of the indirect comparison of modalities,the snare technique was better at achieving initial hemostasis and had a lower late rebleeding rate.CONCLUSION The findings of this direct and indirect pairwise comparison suggest that EDSL is superior to endoscopic clipping and EBL in achieving initial hemostasis and lowering the rate of late rebleeding in patients with CDB.展开更多
文摘Due to the high risk of morbidity and mortality associated with surgical resection in this tract,endoscopic resection(ER)has taken the place of surgical resection as the first line treatment for non-ampullary duodenal adenomas.However,due to the anatomical characteristics of this area,which enhance the risk of post-ER problems,ER in the duodenum is particularly difficult.Due to a lack of data,no ER technique for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumours(SNADETs)has yet been backed by strong,high-quality evidence;yet,traditional hot snare-based techniques are still regarded as the standard treatment.Despite having a favourable efficiency profile,adverse events during duodenal hot snare polypectomy(HSP)and hot endoscopic mucosal resection,such as delayed bleeding and perforation,have been reported to be frequent.These events are primarily caused by electrocautery-induced damage.Thus,ER techniques with a better safety profile are needed to overcome these shortcomings.Cold snare polypectomy,which has already been shown as a safer,equally effective pro-cedure compared to HSP for treatment of small colorectal polyps,is being increasingly evaluated as a potential therapeutic option for non-ampullary duodenal adenomas.The aim of this review is to report and discuss the early outcomes of the first experiences with cold snaring for SNADETs.
文摘BACKGROUND Cold snare polypectomy(CSP)is comparatively safe and effective for removing polyps less than 10 mm in size with lower rates of postpolypectomy syndrome and delayed postpolypectomy bleeding compared with hot snare polypectomy(HSP).Recently,CSP is also expanded for removing polyps larger than 10 mm in size.AIM To compare the efficiency and safety of CSP and HSP in the management of 10-19 mm non-pedunculated colorectal polyps.METHODS A total of 1686 inpatients with at least one 10-19 mm non-pedunculated colorectal polyp,who underwent CSP(study group,n=843)or HSP(control group,n=843)at our Digestive Endoscopy Center between February 2020 and February 2024 were enrolled.The outcome measures including complete resection rate,intraoperative bleeding rate,and healthcare expenses such as procedure time and treatment cost were compared between the CSP vs HSP groups.RESULTS No statistically significant intergroup difference was observed in histological complete resection rates(P>0.05).Polyp resection time in the study group(76.5±23.6 seconds)was notably shorter than that in the control group(91.24±32.06 seconds;P<0.05).The immediate intraoperative bleeding rate was significantly higher in the study group than in the control group(12.7%vs 4.9%,P<0.05).No instances of delayed bleeding or perforation were documented in either group.Hospitalization duration was significantly reduced in the study group(2.42±0.61 days)compared to the control group(3.21±1.02 days;P<0.05).CONCLUSION For 10-19 mm non-pedunculated colorectal polyps,CSP demonstrates operational efficiency advantages over HSP in terms of procedure time,treatment cost,and length of hospital stay.Both techniques demonstrate robust safety profiles;however,CSP is associated with a higher intraoperative bleeding rate.Clinical decision-making should incorporate individualized assessment of these factors.
基金Supported by Ministry of Science,Technological Development and Innovations,Republic of Serbia,No.451-03-66/2024-03/200110.
文摘The minireview titled“Modern endoscopist’s toolbox:Innovations in foreign body removal”by Shahid and published in the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy provided a clear and comprehensive overview of endoscopic management of gastrointestinal foreign bodies.It will serve as a valuable resource for endoscopists involved in the diagnosis and treatment of such cases.Several key and controversial aspects of patient management were highlighted in a meaningful way,including the importance of thorough medical history-taking,appropriate use of radiological imaging,and the selection of suitable endoscopic extraction techniques.An individualized,multidisciplinary approach is essential for diagnosis and treatment.While current guidelines offer significant support,they cannot replace the judgment of an experienced endoscopist working with a well-trained team.
文摘Foreign body ingestion is a common gastrointestinal emergency,particularly in children,who account for 80%of cases.While most ingested objects pass spontan-eously,around 20%require medical intervention.In adults,incidents often occur accidentally during meals,leading to impactions,especially in individuals with underlying esophageal conditions.Endoscopy remains the gold standard for foreign body retrieval,with a success rate exceeding 95%.The type,shape,and location of the foreign body determine the clinical presentation and management approach.Sharp objects,batteries,and large items pose the highest risk of complications,including perforation,obstruction,and chemical injury.Prompt endoscopic removal is guided by established protocols,with emergent inter-vention required for complete esophageal obstruction and high-risk objects.Various retrieval devices,including forceps,snares,baskets,and overtubes,are used based on the nature of the foreign body.Technological advancements,such as artificial intelligence-assisted imaging and endoscopic ultrasound,are impro-ving diagnostic precision and procedural outcomes.Despite these advances,foreign body ingestion can still lead to severe complications if not managed in a timely manner.Public awareness,preventive measures,and rapid medical res-ponse are essential in reducing morbidity and mortality associated with foreign body ingestion.
文摘BACKGROUND Colorectal polypectomy is fundamental to the prevention of colorectal cancer,utilizing several endoscopic techniques.Robust comparative data regarding the efficacy and safety of these modalities in clinical practice are limited.AIM To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of three endoscopic polypectomy techniques,namely,high-frequency electroresection(HFE),cold snare polypectomy(CSP),and endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR),for the treatment of colonic polyps.METHODS This single-center retrospective cohort study included adults who underwent endoscopic resection of pathologically confirmed colorectal polyps at Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University between January 2015 and December 2023.Patients were grouped by technique:HFE(n=107),CSP(n=106),and EMR(n=108).Standardized preoperative,intraoperative,and postoperative protocols were applied.Outcome measures included resection status(en bloc,R0,R1,and Rx),adverse events(immediate/delayed bleeding,perforation,and post-polypectomy coagulation syndrome),postoperative pain(visual analog scale at 1,3,and 5 hours),and 12-month recurrence rate.RESULTS Baseline demographics and polyp characteristics,except for polyp diameter,were comparable among groups.CSP achieved the highest en bloc resection rate,whereas HFE had a higher R0 resection rate.Polyp diameter was largest in the EMR group.Procedure duration was shortest with HFE.Adverse reactions were more frequent with HFE,particularly post-polypectomy bleeding and delayed perforation,whereas CSP demonstrated a superior safety profile and the lowest incidence of complications.Postoperative pain diminished in all groups over time but was consistently low for CSP and EMR.Recurrence rates were significantly higher in the EMR group vs CSP group,with HFE showing intermediate recurrence.CONCLUSION CSP offers the best safety profile and lowest recurrence rate among patients undergoing endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps,whereas HFE confers a high R0 resection rate but increased risk of adverse events.EMR remains essential for large polyps despite elevated recurrence.Technique selection should be tailored according to polyp characteristics and patient risk factors to optimize outcomes.
文摘BACKGROUND Endoscopic cold snare resection(CSP)can enhance postoperative recovery and minimize bleeding risk in patients with 5-15 mm colorectal polyps.However,more detailed evaluations are required to assess their advantages over conventional methods.AIM To evaluate the effects of endoscopic CSP on postoperative recovery and bleeding risk in patients with 5-15 mm colorectal polyps.METHODS This randomized controlled study included 193 patients(mean age:57.91±5.41 years;97 men and 96 women)with 5-15 mm colorectal polyps treated at Dongyang People's Hospital between March and June 2023.The patients were randomly assigned to the experimental group(n=100),who underwent CSP,and the control group(n=93),who underwent conventional endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR).Operation time,hospital stay,dietary status,and bleeding rate within 3 days were compared.RESULTS The CSP group had significantly shorter operation times(15.02±2.44 minutes vs 18.78±5.48 minutes,P<0.001)and hospital stays(3.11±1.08 days vs 4.89±1.35 days,P<0.001)than the EMR group.The fasting rate on the day of surgery was also lower in the CSP group(P<0.05).The complete resection rates were similar between groups(98.00%vs 94.62%,P=0.210),and no perforations occurred in either group.The 3-day postoperative bleeding rate was slightly lower in the CSP group(2.00%)than in the EMR group(6.45%),although this difference was not statistically significant(P=0.234),indicating limited clinical relevance.CONCLUSION CSP was safe and efficient for removing 5-15 mm colorectal polyps,offering faster recovery and comparable safety to EMR.The procedural efficiency of CSP supports its broad clinical application.
文摘BACKGROUND Although substantial evidence supports the advantages of cold snare polypectomy(CSP)in terms of polypectomy efficacy and reduced postoperative adverse events,few studies have examined the cost differences between CSP and traditional endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)for the treatment of intestinal polyps.AIM To compare the efficacy-cost of EMR and CSP in the treatment of intestinal polyps.METHODS A total of 100 patients with intestinal polyps were included in the retrospective data of our hospital from April 2022 to May 2023.According to the treatment methods,they were divided into EMR(n=46)group and CSP(n=54)group.The baseline data of the two groups were balanced by 1:1 propensity score matching(PSM),and the cost-effectiveness analysis was performed on the two groups after matching.The recurrence rate of the two groups of patients was followed up for 1 year,and they were divided into recurrence group and non-recurrence group according to whether they recurred.Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to screen out the influencing factors affecting the recurrence of intestinal polyps after endoscopic resection.RESULTS Significant disparities were observed in the number of polyps and smoking background between the two groups before PSM(P<0.05).Following PSM,the number of polyps and smoking history were well balanced between the EMR and CSP groups.The direct cost incurred by the CSP group was markedly higher than that incurred by the EMR group.Concurrently,the cost-effectiveness ratio in the CSP group was substantially reduced when juxtaposed with that in the EMR group(P<0.05).Upon completion of the 1-year follow-up,the rate of recurrence after endoscopic intestinal polypectomy was 38.00%.Multivariate methods revealed that age≥60 years,male sex,number of polyps≥3,and pathological type of adenoma were risk factors for recurrence after endoscopic intestinal polypectomy(all P<0.05).CONCLUSION CSP was more cost-effective for the treatment of intestinal polyps.An age≥60 years,male sex,having a number of polyps≥3,and pathological type of adenoma are independent influencing factors for recurrence.
文摘BACKGROUND Colonic diverticular bleeding(CDB)is a leading cause of lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage that has a high risk of recurrence.The endoscopic clipping and endoscopic band ligation(EBL)methods are widely used for hemostasis in patients with CDB.Endoscopic detachable snare ligation(EDSL)has also become an increasingly common treatment option.The data remain inconsistent regarding the comparative efficacy of these endoscopic therapies in achieving initial hemostasis and reduction of early and late rebleeding rates.AIM To study the effectiveness and complications of endoscopic clipping,EBL,and EDSL for CDB.METHODS We conducted a systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE,Scopus,Web of Science,Embase,Google Scholar,and the Cochrane database for clinical trials to find studies that reported CDB and endoscopic clipping,EBL,or EDSL as treatment methods.The pooled estimates of initial hemostasis,early and late rebleeding,and the need for transarterial embolization or surgery between these groups were calculated.RESULTS We analyzed 28 studies with 5224 patients.Of these,4526 had active CDB and required one of the three endoscopic interventions.The pooled prevalence of early rebleeding was 23.5%,10.7%,and 10.6%in the endoscopic clipping,EBL,and EDSL groups,respectively.Patients who underwent endoscopic clipping had a significantly higher rate of early rebleeding compared to those who received EBL[odds ratio(OR)=3.76(95%CI:2.13-6.63)]and EDSL(OR=3.30,95%CI:1.28-8.53).There was no difference in the initial hemostasis between the three groups.The pooled prevalence of late rebleeding was 27.2%in the clipping,followed by 13.8%in the EBL and 2.7%in the EDSL group.Compared to 2.6%in the EBL group,4.0%of patients who received endoscopic clipping subsequently underwent surgery or transarterial embolization.These results were consistent in the network meta-analysis.Based on the ranking of the indirect comparison of modalities,the snare technique was better at achieving initial hemostasis and had a lower late rebleeding rate.CONCLUSION The findings of this direct and indirect pairwise comparison suggest that EDSL is superior to endoscopic clipping and EBL in achieving initial hemostasis and lowering the rate of late rebleeding in patients with CDB.
基金This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30170302 39470238+3 种基金 39070323 39860249)the Climbing Project of Ministry of Science and Technology of China (No. P8505) the National Basic Research Priorities Programmeof China (No. G19999054000) and the Basic Research Program of Shanghai Municipal Commission for Science and Technology (No.O2JC14011).
