目的研究ApoE基因多态性在脑电图慢波患者中的分布及其对慢波始发年龄的影响。方法简易智能量表(MMSE)>24分且无脑梗死史者进行脑电图检查,出现慢波的患者进入研究组,同时收集健康对照,采集每例研究对象的基本信息与血液,使用PCR法测...目的研究ApoE基因多态性在脑电图慢波患者中的分布及其对慢波始发年龄的影响。方法简易智能量表(MMSE)>24分且无脑梗死史者进行脑电图检查,出现慢波的患者进入研究组,同时收集健康对照,采集每例研究对象的基本信息与血液,使用PCR法测定Apo E基因多态性。采用χ~2检验比较研究组和对照组之间各基因型的分布差异,使用方差分析比较研究组各基因型间脑电图慢波出现年龄的差异。结果研究组ε4基因型频率51.78%(58/112)和ε4等位基因频率36.16%(81/224)明显高于对照组的16.08%(18/112)和10.71%(24/224)(均P<0.05)。研究组ε2和ε3基因型频率11.61%(13/112)和36.61%(41/112)及其等位基因频率9.38%(21/224)和54.46%(122/224)显著低于相应的对照组(均P<0.05)。研究组Apo Eε4基因型的脑电图慢波出现年龄[(64.07±5.57)岁]明显小于ε2[(70.69±8.29)岁]和ε3型[(67.73±6.10)岁](均P<0.05)。结论 Apo Eε4基因型与脑电图慢波相关,且该基因型慢波始发年龄有年轻化的趋势。展开更多
In this article,we set out to reconcile a general conceptualization of disaster temporalities by drawing on the epitome example of a creeping disaster,namely famine.Our argument is driven by the recognition that slowl...In this article,we set out to reconcile a general conceptualization of disaster temporalities by drawing on the epitome example of a creeping disaster,namely famine.Our argument is driven by the recognition that slowly manifesting disaster impacts pose distinct challenges for decision makers and researchers while there is a tendency for the disaster literature to overlook the role of disaster onset dynamics.More specifically and as a starting point,we identify four key themes that merit particular attention when dealing with creeping disasters:(1)our understanding of disaster as a phenomenon;(2)measurement and operationalization;(3)early warning and response;and(4)disaster management and termination.By integrating conceptual discussions of disaster with famine scholarship—a phenomenon often excluded from mainstream disaster research—this article provides fresh perspectives on disaster science as well as a number of implications for how we think about disaster risk reduction.展开更多
文摘目的研究ApoE基因多态性在脑电图慢波患者中的分布及其对慢波始发年龄的影响。方法简易智能量表(MMSE)>24分且无脑梗死史者进行脑电图检查,出现慢波的患者进入研究组,同时收集健康对照,采集每例研究对象的基本信息与血液,使用PCR法测定Apo E基因多态性。采用χ~2检验比较研究组和对照组之间各基因型的分布差异,使用方差分析比较研究组各基因型间脑电图慢波出现年龄的差异。结果研究组ε4基因型频率51.78%(58/112)和ε4等位基因频率36.16%(81/224)明显高于对照组的16.08%(18/112)和10.71%(24/224)(均P<0.05)。研究组ε2和ε3基因型频率11.61%(13/112)和36.61%(41/112)及其等位基因频率9.38%(21/224)和54.46%(122/224)显著低于相应的对照组(均P<0.05)。研究组Apo Eε4基因型的脑电图慢波出现年龄[(64.07±5.57)岁]明显小于ε2[(70.69±8.29)岁]和ε3型[(67.73±6.10)岁](均P<0.05)。结论 Apo Eε4基因型与脑电图慢波相关,且该基因型慢波始发年龄有年轻化的趋势。
基金funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant Agreement No.897656。
文摘In this article,we set out to reconcile a general conceptualization of disaster temporalities by drawing on the epitome example of a creeping disaster,namely famine.Our argument is driven by the recognition that slowly manifesting disaster impacts pose distinct challenges for decision makers and researchers while there is a tendency for the disaster literature to overlook the role of disaster onset dynamics.More specifically and as a starting point,we identify four key themes that merit particular attention when dealing with creeping disasters:(1)our understanding of disaster as a phenomenon;(2)measurement and operationalization;(3)early warning and response;and(4)disaster management and termination.By integrating conceptual discussions of disaster with famine scholarship—a phenomenon often excluded from mainstream disaster research—this article provides fresh perspectives on disaster science as well as a number of implications for how we think about disaster risk reduction.
