Quentin Skinner＇s work since his turn to rhetoric has not been extensively discussed. My thesis is that with this turn Skinner has invented another novelty in the study of political thought, by including the analysis...Quentin Skinner＇s work since his turn to rhetoric has not been extensively discussed. My thesis is that with this turn Skinner has invented another novelty in the study of political thought, by including the analysis of the rhetoric of debating pro et contra among political agents as sources of political thought. The exemplary institution for such debates is the Westminster Parliament, and Skinner extends the analysis of the rhetorical culture of English Renaissance to studies on parliamentary debates. Here I am first comparing Skinner＇s The Foundations of Modern Political Thought and Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes in their relationship to rhetoric. Subsequently I discuss Skinner＇s comments on English parliamentary debates, including his recommendation to read Hobbes＇s Leviathan ＂as a speech in Parliament.＂ Reason and Rhetoric has inspired valuable studies on English Renaissance political rhetoric, shortly discussed here. For the understanding of the distinct parliamentary variety of deliberative rhetoric, I refer to the formation of a specific parliamentary procedure and to procedural tracts from sixteenth- and seventeenth-century Westminster, which among others create a parliamentary vocabulary and rules for conducting and regulating parliamentary debates. The parliamentary procedure institutionalizes the principle of in utramque partem disputare, central in Skinner＇s rhetorical studies. By this manner we can re-activate the link between political thought and parliamentary studies as well as explicate a dissensual alternative to Jiirgen Habermas＇s views on the political thought studies and parliamentary debates.展开更多
一、19世纪耳科学现状在19世纪前半叶，从事耳科学的临床医师大多学艺不精。正如梅尼埃（Prosper Meniere）在1861年的论文中指出的那样“这些庸医的积极治疗给患者造成的伤害比得到的好处还多”。当时曾有一位所谓的著名“耳科医生”Jo...一、19世纪耳科学现状在19世纪前半叶，从事耳科学的临床医师大多学艺不精。正如梅尼埃（Prosper Meniere）在1861年的论文中指出的那样“这些庸医的积极治疗给患者造成的伤害比得到的好处还多”。当时曾有一位所谓的著名“耳科医生”John Harrison Curtis，他没有经过正式的医学训练，仅在海军担任过配药师。可在当时的伦敦，Curtis不仅拥有私人诊所，建立了耳科疾病门诊部，更在1845年发展成为皇家耳科医院为许多贵族看病，展开更多
文摘Quentin Skinner＇s work since his turn to rhetoric has not been extensively discussed. My thesis is that with this turn Skinner has invented another novelty in the study of political thought, by including the analysis of the rhetoric of debating pro et contra among political agents as sources of political thought. The exemplary institution for such debates is the Westminster Parliament, and Skinner extends the analysis of the rhetorical culture of English Renaissance to studies on parliamentary debates. Here I am first comparing Skinner＇s The Foundations of Modern Political Thought and Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes in their relationship to rhetoric. Subsequently I discuss Skinner＇s comments on English parliamentary debates, including his recommendation to read Hobbes＇s Leviathan ＂as a speech in Parliament.＂ Reason and Rhetoric has inspired valuable studies on English Renaissance political rhetoric, shortly discussed here. For the understanding of the distinct parliamentary variety of deliberative rhetoric, I refer to the formation of a specific parliamentary procedure and to procedural tracts from sixteenth- and seventeenth-century Westminster, which among others create a parliamentary vocabulary and rules for conducting and regulating parliamentary debates. The parliamentary procedure institutionalizes the principle of in utramque partem disputare, central in Skinner＇s rhetorical studies. By this manner we can re-activate the link between political thought and parliamentary studies as well as explicate a dissensual alternative to Jiirgen Habermas＇s views on the political thought studies and parliamentary debates.
文摘一、19世纪耳科学现状在19世纪前半叶，从事耳科学的临床医师大多学艺不精。正如梅尼埃（Prosper Meniere）在1861年的论文中指出的那样“这些庸医的积极治疗给患者造成的伤害比得到的好处还多”。当时曾有一位所谓的著名“耳科医生”John Harrison Curtis，他没有经过正式的医学训练，仅在海军担任过配药师。可在当时的伦敦，Curtis不仅拥有私人诊所，建立了耳科疾病门诊部，更在1845年发展成为皇家耳科医院为许多贵族看病，
