Single-incision laparoscopic surgery(SILS),or laparoendoscopic single-site surgery,was launched to minimize incisional traumatic effects in the 1990s.Minor SILS,such as cholecystectomies,have been gaining in popularit...Single-incision laparoscopic surgery(SILS),or laparoendoscopic single-site surgery,was launched to minimize incisional traumatic effects in the 1990s.Minor SILS,such as cholecystectomies,have been gaining in popularity over the past few decades.Its application in complicated hepatopancreatobiliary(HPB)surgeries,however,has made slow progress due to instrumental and technical limitations,costs,and safety concerns.While minimally invasive abdominal surgery is pushing the boundaries,advanced laparoscopic HPB surgeries have been shown to be comparable to open operations in terms of patient and oncologic safety,including hepatectomies,distal pancreatectomies(DP),and pancreaticoduodenectomies(PD).In contrast,advanced SILS for HPB malignancy has only been reported in a few small case series.Most of the procedures involved minor liver resections and DP;major hepatectomies were rarely described.Singleincision laparoscopic PD has not yet been reported.We herein review the published SILS for HPB cancer in the literature and our three-year experience focusing on the technical aspects.展开更多
BACKGROUND Gastric cancer surgery has advanced with minimally invasive techniques.This study compares outcomes between single-incision laparoscopic surgery plus one port(SILS+1)and conventional laparoscopic surgery(CL...BACKGROUND Gastric cancer surgery has advanced with minimally invasive techniques.This study compares outcomes between single-incision laparoscopic surgery plus one port(SILS+1)and conventional laparoscopic surgery(CLS)in treating gastric cancer.AIM To explore the curative effect of SILS+1 and CLS on gastric cancer and their influences on prognosis.METHODS A total of 93 patients with gastric cancer undergoing radical gastrectomy in the hospital were retrospectively analyzed between September 2019 and September 2022.According to different surgical methods,they were divided into SILS+1 group(n=56)and CLS group(n=37).The perioperative indexes,pain degree[visual analogue scale(VAS)]and stress response[C-reactive protein(CRP),white blood cell count(WBC)]in the two groups were compared.The postoperative complications,recurrence rate and mortality at 1 year after surgery were recorded.RESULTS Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the SILS+1 group(76.53±8.12 mL)compared to the CLS group(108.67±12.34 mL,P<0.001),and the total incision length was also significantly shorter in the SILS+1 group(5.29±1.01 cm vs 9.45±2.34 cm,P<0.001).SILS+1 patients experienced faster recovery,with shorter times to first flatus(1.94±0.43 days vs 3.23±0.88 days,P<0.001)and ambulation(2.76±0.58 days vs 4.10±0.97 days,P<0.001).Postoperative pain,as measured by VAS scores,was significantly lower in the SILS+1 group on postoperative days 1,2,and 3(P<0.001).Additionally,stress markers(CRP and WBC)were significantly lower in the SILS+1 group on the first postoperative day(CRP:6.41±1.63 mg/L vs 7.82±1.88 mg/L,P<0.001;WBC:6.34±1.50×109/L vs 7.09±1.61×109/L,P=0.024).The complication rate in the SILS+1 group was also significantly lower than in the CLS group(8.93%vs 27.03%,P=0.020).However,there was no significant difference in recurrence rates between the two groups after one year(3.57%vs 8.11%,P>0.05).CONCLUSION SILS+1 and CLS have the comparable lymph node clearance effect in patients with gastric cancer.However,SILS+1 is more beneficial to reduce intraoperative blood loss,relieve pain,alleviate stress response,reduce the incidence of complications and promote rapid postoperative recovery.展开更多
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery(SILS), or laparoendoscopic single-site surgery, has been employed in various fields to minimize traumatic effects over the last two decades. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecyste...Single-incision laparoscopic surgery(SILS), or laparoendoscopic single-site surgery, has been employed in various fields to minimize traumatic effects over the last two decades. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy(SILC) has been the most frequently studied SILS to date. Hundreds of studies on SILC have failed to present conclusive results. Most randomized controlled trials(RCTs) have been small in scale and have been conducted under ideal operative conditions. The role of SILC in complicated scenarios remains uncertain. As common bile duct exploration(CBDE) methods have been used for more than one hundred years, laparoscopic CBDE(LCBDE) has emerged as an effective, demanding, and infrequent technique employed during the laparoscopic era. Likewise, laparoscopic biliary-enteric anastomosis is difficult to carry out, with only a few studies have been published on the approach. The application of SILS to CBDE and biliary-enteric anastomosis is extremely rare, and such innovative procedures are only carried out by a number of specialized groups across the globe. Herein we present a thorough and detailed analysis of SILC in terms of operative techniques, training and learning curves, safety and efficacy levels, recovery trends, and costs by reviewing RCTs conducted over the past three years and two recently updated meta-analyses. All existing literature on single-incision LCBDE and singleincision laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy has been reviewed to describe these two demanding techniques.展开更多
AIM: To determine the effect of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy(SILC) for colorectal cancer on short-term clinical and oncological outcomes by comparison with multiport conventional laparoscopic colectomy(CLC)....AIM: To determine the effect of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy(SILC) for colorectal cancer on short-term clinical and oncological outcomes by comparison with multiport conventional laparoscopic colectomy(CLC).METHODS: A systematic review was performed using MEDLINE for the time period of 2008 to December 2014 to retrieve all relevant literature. The search terms were "laparoscopy", "single incision", "single port", "single site", "SILS", "LESS" and "colorectal cancer". Publications were included if they were randomized controlled trials, case-matched controlled studies, or comparative studies, in which patients underwent single-incision(SILS or LESS) laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Studies were excluded if they were non-comparative, or not including surgery involving the colon or rectum. A total of 15 studies with 589 patients who underwent SILC for colorectal cancer were selected.RESULTS: No significant differences between the groups were noted in terms of mortality or morbidity. The benefit of the SILC approach included reduction in conversion rate to laparotomy, but there were no significant differences in other short-term clinical outcomes between the groups. Satisfactory oncological surgical quality was also demonstrated for SILC for the treatment of colorectal cancer with a similar average lymph node harvest and proximal and distal resection margin length as multiport CLC.CONCLUSION: SILC can be performed safely with similar short-term clinical and oncological outcomes as multiport CLC.展开更多
Sister Mary Joseph’s nodule(SMJN)is a rare umbilical nodule that develops secondary to metastatic cancer.Primary malignancies are located in the abdomen or pelvis.Patients with SMJN have a poor prognosis.An 83-year-o...Sister Mary Joseph’s nodule(SMJN)is a rare umbilical nodule that develops secondary to metastatic cancer.Primary malignancies are located in the abdomen or pelvis.Patients with SMJN have a poor prognosis.An 83-year-old woman presented to our hospital with a1-month history of a rapidly enlarging umbilical mass.Endoscopic findings revealed advanced transverse colon cancer.computer tomography and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography revealed tumors of the transverse colon,umbilicus,right inguinal lymph nodes,and left lung.The feeding arteries and drainage veins for the SMJN were the inferior epigastric vessels.Imaging findings of the left lung tumor allowed for identification of the primary lung cancer,and a diagnosis of advanced transverse colon cancer with SMJN and primary lung cancer was made.The patient underwent local resection of the SMNJ and subsequent single-site laparoscopic surgery involving right hemicolectomy and paracolic lymph node dissection.Intra-abdominal dissemination to the mesocolon was confirmed during surgery.Histopathologically,the transverse colon cancer was confirmed to be moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma.We suspect that SMJN may occur via a hematogenous pathway.Although chemotherapy for colon cancer and thoracoscopic surgery for the primary lung cancer were scheduled,the patient and her family desired home hospice.Seven months after surgery,she died of rapidly growing lung cancer.展开更多
The year 2025 marked a significantmilestone for Laparoscopic,Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery(LERS)—we have awarded our first Impact Factor of 2.0 released by the Journal Citation Reports from Clarivate Analytics,which...The year 2025 marked a significantmilestone for Laparoscopic,Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery(LERS)—we have awarded our first Impact Factor of 2.0 released by the Journal Citation Reports from Clarivate Analytics,which ranks in the second quartile in the surgery category.This remarkable achievement,which reflects LERS’s steadily increasing influencein the area of surgery,would not be possible without the peer reviewer’s invaluable contributions.On behalf of the Editorial Board and Editorial Office,we would express our sincere appreciation to the following reviewers,who reviewed at least one paper with rigorous and insightful comments.We sincerely hope to engage further with them,either as esteemed reviewers or outstanding authors,in 2026 and beyond.展开更多
Objective:Sepsis exhibits remarkable heterogeneity in disease progression trajectories,and accurate identificationof distinct trajectory-based phenotypes is critical for implementing personalized therapeutic strategie...Objective:Sepsis exhibits remarkable heterogeneity in disease progression trajectories,and accurate identificationof distinct trajectory-based phenotypes is critical for implementing personalized therapeutic strategies and prognostic assessment.However,trajectory clustering analysis of time-series clinical data poses substantial methodological challenges for researchers.This study provides a comprehensive tutorial framework demonstrating six trajectory modeling approaches integrated with proteomic analysis to guide researchers in identifying sepsis subtypes after laparoscopic surgery.Methods:This study employs simulated longitudinal data from 300 septic patients after laparoscopic surgery to demonstrate six trajectory modeling methods(group-based trajectory modeling,latent growth mixture modeling,latent transition analysis,time-varying effect modeling,K-means for longitudinal data,agglomerative hierarchical clustering)for identifying associations between predefinedsequential organ failure assessment trajectories and 25 proteomic biomarkers.Clustering performance was evaluated via multiple metrics,and a biomarker discovery pipeline integrating principal component analysis,random forests,feature selection,and receiver operating characteristic analysis was developed.Results:The six methods demonstrated varying performance in identifying trajectory structures,with each approach exhibiting distinct analytical characteristics.The performance metrics revealed differences across methods,which may inform context-specificmethod selection and interpretation strategies.Conclusion:This study illustrates practical implementations of trajectory modeling approaches under controlled conditions,facilitating informed method selection for clinical researchers.The inclusion of complete R code and integrated proteomics workflows offers a reproducible analytical framework connecting temporal pattern recognition to biomarker discovery.Beyond sepsis,this pipeline-oriented approach may be adapted to diverse clinical scenarios requiring longitudinal disease characterization and precision medicine applications.The comparative analysis reveals that each method has distinct strengths,providing a practical guide for clinical researchers in selecting appropriate methods based on their specificstudy goals and data characteristics.展开更多
Objective:To analyze the impact of nursing interventions based on quantitative assessment using the Kano model on the quality of rehabilitation in patients with early-stage ovarian cancer following laparoscopic radica...Objective:To analyze the impact of nursing interventions based on quantitative assessment using the Kano model on the quality of rehabilitation in patients with early-stage ovarian cancer following laparoscopic radical surgery.Methods:A prospective clinical study was conducted involving 96 patients with newly diagnosed early-stage ovarian cancer who underwent laparoscopic radical surgery from December 2023 to December 2025.Patients were randomly assigned to groups using a random number table method before surgery.After surgery,the control group(n=48)received routine quantitative assessment nursing interventions,while the observation group(n=48)received nursing interventions based on quantitative assessment using the Kano model.Both groups received continuous nursing care until discharge.Differences between the groups were compared in terms of negative emotions,quality of life scores before and after postoperative intervention,postoperative recovery indicators,and nursing satisfaction evaluations on the day of discharge.Results:After intervention,the observation group had lower scores on the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale(SAS)and Self-Rating Depression Scale(SDS),as well as shorter recovery times for gastrointestinal function and food intake,and a shorter hospital stay compared to the control group.Additionally,the observation group had higher scores on the Quality-of-Life Instrument for Cancer Patients-Ovarian Cancer(QLICP-OV)than the control group,with statistically significant differences(p<0.05).The overall satisfaction with nursing care in the observation group was also higher than that in the control group,with a statistically significant difference(p<0.05).Conclusion:Implementing quantitative evaluation nursing interventions based on the Kano model for patients with early-stage ovarian cancer after laparoscopic radical surgery can,by addressing their postoperative basic health,disease awareness,and other intervention content needs to a comprehensive degree,actively promote postoperative recovery and improve their mental health and quality of life.展开更多
We found the qualitative study by Xu et al.on how patients feel about laparoscopic incisions under enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS)protocols to be very interesting.1 Xu et al.carried out a qualitative study on pa...We found the qualitative study by Xu et al.on how patients feel about laparoscopic incisions under enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS)protocols to be very interesting.1 Xu et al.carried out a qualitative study on patient experience with laparoscopic incisions under an ERAS protocol to highlight the problem of psychosocial and aesthetic concerns,which are often overlooked when planning surgical operations.This study,which involved semistructured interviews with sixteen people,aimed to narrow perioperative education and the decision-making process for incision site selection,thus making the processes more focused on patient priorities.The study is based on a timely but under-researched subject area;however,it is possible to outline four possible areas of improvement that would allow the study to be more transparent and,at the same time,more applicable to clinical practice.展开更多
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic surgery,with the advantage of less trauma,has been predominantly performed to treat pediatric inguinal hernia.However,the traditional three-port laparoscopic surgery remains extremely traumatic...BACKGROUND Laparoscopic surgery,with the advantage of less trauma,has been predominantly performed to treat pediatric inguinal hernia.However,the traditional three-port laparoscopic surgery remains extremely traumatic for children,whereas singleport laparoscopic surgery causes less damage to children than traditional laparoscopy.However,single-port laparoscopic surgery is more challenging;thus,studies on the effect of its application in pediatric inguinal hernia remain relatively limited.AIM To analyze the association of single-incision laparoscopic herniorrhaphy needle treatment with surgical outcomes,postoperative complications,and serum inflammation in pediatric inguinal hernia.METHODS This retrospective study included 113 pediatric patients with inguinal hernia who underwent surgery at the Children’s Hospital,Capital Institute of Pediatrics,from April 2022 to May 2023.Participants were categorized into the observation group(single-incision laparoscopic herniorrhaphy needle,n=60)and the control group(two-port laparoscopic surgery,n=53).Comparative analyses involved surgical duration,intraoperative blood loss,and length of hospital stay.C-reactive protein(CRP)and white blood cell count(WBC)levels were measured preoperatively and 24 hours postoperatively.Postoperative pain was evaluated with the face,legs,activity,cry,and Consolability scale.Further,the incidence of complications,recurrence,and reoperation rates was assessed.Logistic regression was employed to determine independent risk factors related to poor prognosis.RESULTS The observation group demonstrated significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss and shorter hospitalization compared to the control group(P<0.05).Both groups demonstrated increased CRP and WBC levels postoperatively,but the observation group exhibited significantly lower levels(P<0.05).Further,pain scores at 24 hours postoperatively were significantly lower in the observation group(P<0.05).Additionally,the observation group experienced fewer adverse events,recurrence rates,and reoperations compared to the control group(P<0.05).Logistic regression analysis determined increased postoperative stress markers and surgical technique as independent predictors of recurrence(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Single-incision laparoscopic herniorrhaphy needle treatment for pediatric inguinal hernia exhibits significant efficacy,effectively reduces postoperative complications,ensures a more concealed surgical incision,and promotes faster postoperative recovery than conventional two-port laparoscopy.This approach merits wider application.展开更多
A pancreas surgeon’s constant goal is to do"less damage,more radical".Currently,a small number of highly trained surgeons opt for single-incision laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy(SILPD)or single-incisio...A pancreas surgeon’s constant goal is to do"less damage,more radical".Currently,a small number of highly trained surgeons opt for single-incision laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy(SILPD)or single-incision plus one-port LPD(SILPD+1)to minimize post-operative pain,improve convalescence,and provide a more pleas-ing cosmetic outcome[1,2].Additionally,some skilled surgeons have claimed that laparoscopic duodenum-preserving complete pancreatic head resections(LDPPHR)result in less trauma and en-hanced quality of life[3,4].However,LDPPHR is still challenging because of its lengthy learning curve and"sword-fighting"impact.Additionally,there has not been any global reporting on the suit-ability of single-incision plus one-port DPPHR with pancreaticogas-trostomy(SILDPPHR-T+1)in place of SILPD+1.This study aimed to illustrate the SILDPPHR-T+1 procedure specifics for a patient with pancreatic head intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm(IPMN)(main pancreatic duct type)(MD-IPMN).展开更多
A number of clinical trials have demonstrated that the laparoscopic approach for colorectal cancer resection provides the same oncologic results as open surgery along with all clinical benefits of minimally invasive s...A number of clinical trials have demonstrated that the laparoscopic approach for colorectal cancer resection provides the same oncologic results as open surgery along with all clinical benefits of minimally invasive surgery. During the last years, a great effort has been made to research for minimizing parietal trauma, yet for cosmetic reasons and in order to further reduce surgery-related pain and morbidity. New techniques, such as natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and single-incision laparoscopy (SIL) have been developed in order to reach the goal of “scarless” surgery. Although NOTES may seem not fully suitable or safe for advanced procedures, such as colectomies, SIL is currently regarded as the next major advance in the progress of minimally invasive surgical approaches to colorectal disease that is more feasible in generalized use. The small incision through the umbilicus allows surgeons to use familiar standard laparoscopic instruments and thus, perform even complex procedures which require extraction of large surgical specimens or intestinal anastomosis. The cosmetic result from SIL is also better because the only incision is made through the umbilicus which can hide the wound effectively after operation. However, SIL raises a number of specific new challenges compared with the laparoscopic conventional approach. A reduced capacity for triangulation, the repeated conflicts between the shafts of the instruments and the difficulties to achieve a correct exposure of the operative field are the most claimed issues. The use therefore of this new approach for complex colorectal procedures might understandingly be viewed as difficult to implement, especially for oncologic cases.展开更多
More than 20 years have passed since the first report of laparoscopic colectomy in 1991. Thereafter, laparoscopic surgery for the management of colorectal diseases has been widely accepted as a prevailing option becau...More than 20 years have passed since the first report of laparoscopic colectomy in 1991. Thereafter, laparoscopic surgery for the management of colorectal diseases has been widely accepted as a prevailing option because of improved cosmetic outcomes, less postoperative pain, and shorter hospital stay in comparison with open surgery. To further the principle of minimally invasive surgery, two new approaches have been developed in this rapidly evolving field. The first is the totally laparoscopic approach. Currently most of standard techniques inevitably involve an abdominalincision for retrieval of the specimen and preparation for anastomosis, which might compromise the benefits of laparoscopic surgery. The totally laparoscopic approach dispenses with this incision by combining completely intraperitoneal anastomosis with retrieval of the specimen via a natural orifice, such as the anus or the vagina. Our new and reliable technique for intraperitoneal anastomosis is also described in detail in this article. The second is the single-incision approach. While three to six ports are needed in standard laparoscopic surgery, the single-incision approach uses the umbilicus as the sole access to the abdominal cavity. All of the laparoscopic procedures are performed entirely through the umbilicus, in which the surgical scar eventually becomes hidden, achieving virtually scarless surgery. This article reviews the current status of these two approaches and discusses the future of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal diseases.展开更多
Robotic inguinal hernia repair remains in the early stages of implementation,and its potential advantages over the laparoscopic approach are still a matter of debate.This narrative review aims to summarize the finding...Robotic inguinal hernia repair remains in the early stages of implementation,and its potential advantages over the laparoscopic approach are still a matter of debate.This narrative review aims to summarize the findingsof major systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials and explore variables not adequately addressed in those studies.The literature review indicates that robotic inguinal hernia repair is associated with longer operative times but has improved ergonomics compared with laparoscopy.It is a safe procedure that results in a reduced inflammatory response,similar complication rates,and no significantdifference in acute postoperative pain.Although it involves higher direct costs,its cost-effectiveness remains unclear owing to a lack of analysis including indirect costs.Ongoing controversy continues regarding long-term benefits.The most recent systematic review pointed towards lower recurrence rates with robotic surgery,although randomized controlled trials have not validated this finding.Data on chronic pain are currently insufficientto draw firmconclusions.Further studies are needed to assess its use in complex cases and the role of novel techniques.展开更多
BACKGROUND Currently,very few studies have examined the analgesic effectiveness and safety of dexmedetomidine-assisted intravenous-inhalation combined general anesthesia in laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for ...BACKGROUND Currently,very few studies have examined the analgesic effectiveness and safety of dexmedetomidine-assisted intravenous-inhalation combined general anesthesia in laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for inguinal hernia.AIM To investigate the analgesic effect and safety of dexmedetomidine-assisted intravenous-inhalation combined general anesthesia in laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for inguinal hernia.METHODS In this retrospective study,94 patients scheduled for laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for inguinal hernia,admitted to Yiwu Central Hospital between May 2022 and May 2023,were divided into a control group(inhalation combined general anesthesia)and a treatment group(dexmedetomidine-assisted intrave-nous-inhalation combined general anesthesia).Perioperative indicators,analgesic effect,preoperative and postoperative 24-hours blood pressure(BP)and heart rate(HR),stress indicators,immune function levels,and adverse reactions were com-pared between the two groups.RESULTS Baseline data,including age,hernia location,place of residence,weight,monthly income,education level,and underlying diseases,were not significantly different between the two groups,indicating comparability(P>0.05).No significant difference was found in operation time and anesthesia time between the two groups(P>0.05).However,the treatment group exhibited a shorter postoperative urinary catheter removal time and hospital stay than the control group(P<0.05).Preoperatively,no significant differences were found in the visual analog scale(VAS)scores between the two groups(P>0.05).However,at 12,18,and 24 hours postoper-atively,the treatment group had significantly lower VAS scores than the control group(P<0.05).Although no significant differences in preoperative hemodynamic indicators were found between the two groups(P>0.05),both groups experienced some extent of changes in postoperative HR,diastolic BP(DBP),and systolic BP(SBP).Nevertheless,the treatment group showed smaller changes in HR,DBP,and SBP than the control group(P<0.05).Preoperative immune function indicators showed no significant differences between the two groups(P>0.05).However,postoperatively,the treatment group demonstrated higher levels of CD3+,CD4+,and CD4+/CD8+and lower levels of CD8+than the control group(P<0.05).The rates of adverse reactions were 6.38%and 23.40%in the treatment and control groups,respectively,revealing a significant difference(χ2=5.371,P=0.020).CONCLUSION Dexmedetomidine-assisted intravenous-inhalation combined general anesthesia can promote early recovery of patients undergoing laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for inguinal hernia.It ensures stable blood flow,improves postoperative analgesic effects,reduces postoperative pain intensity,alleviates stress response,improves immune function,facilitates anesthesia recovery,and enhances safety.展开更多
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic hepatectomy(LH)has been applied in the treatment of hepatolithiasisa in patients with a history of biliary surgery and has already achieved good clinical outcomes.However,reoperative LH(rLH)inc...BACKGROUND Laparoscopic hepatectomy(LH)has been applied in the treatment of hepatolithiasisa in patients with a history of biliary surgery and has already achieved good clinical outcomes.However,reoperative LH(rLH)includes multiple procedures,and the no studies have examined the clinical value of individual laparoscopic procedures.AIM To evaluate the safety and feasibility of each rLH procedure for hepatolithiasisa in patients with a history of biliary surgery.METHODS Patients with previous biliary surgery who underwent reoperative hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis were studied.Liver resection procedures were divided into three categories:(1)Laparoscopic/open left lateral sectionectomy[reoperative laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy(rLLLS)/reoperative open left lateral sectionectomy(rOLLS)];(2)Laparoscopic/open left hemihepatectomy[reoperative laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy(rLLH)/reoperative open left hemihepatectomy(rOLH)];and(3)Laparoscopic/open complex hepatectomy[reoperative laparoscopic complex hepatectomy(rLCH)/reoperative open complex hepate ctomy(rOCH)].The clinical outcomes were compared between the rLLLS,rLLH,and rLCH groups,and subgroup analyses were performed for the rLLLS/rOLLS,rLLH/rOLH,and rLCH/rOCH subgroups.RESULTS A total of 185 patients were studied,including 101 rLH patients(40 rLLLS,50 rLLH,and 11 rLCH)and 84 reoperative open hepatectomy(40 rOLLS,33 rOLH,and 11 rOCH).Among the three types of rLH procedure,rLLLS required the shortest operation time(240.0 minutes vs 325.0 minutes vs 350.0 minutes,P=0.001)and the lowest blood transfusion rate(10.0%vs 22.0%vs 54.5%,P=0.005),followed by rLLH.The rLCH had the highest conversion rate(P<0.05)and postoperative intensive care unit stay rate(P=0.001).Most clinical outcomes in rLLLS and rLLH were superior or similar to those in the corresponding open surgery,while there were no differences in all outcomes between the rLCH and rOCH subgroups.CONCLUSION The rLH is safe for hepatolithiasis patients with a history of biliary surgery.The rLLLS and rLLH can be recommended for these patients,whereas rLCH should be applied with caution.展开更多
BACKGROUND Elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery are at high risk for hypothermia-related complications.This study explores the efficacy of periop-erative composite insulation intervention...BACKGROUND Elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery are at high risk for hypothermia-related complications.This study explores the efficacy of periop-erative composite insulation interventions in maintaining normothermia and reducing postoperative risks in this vulnerable group.AIM To evaluate the efficacy of perioperative composite insulation in older patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.METHODS We selected 100 older patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer at Huzhou Central Hospital from September 2023 to April 2024.Using a random number table,patients were divided into a control group and inter-vention group of 50 patients each.After returning to the regular ward,the con-ventional group received traditional insulation intervention measures,while the intervention group received composite insulation nursing intervention.We ob-served and recorded postoperative blood pressure and heart rate changes,as well as postoperative anesthesia recovery time and incidence of complications.RESULTS The statistical results showed significant differences(P<0.05)in heart rate changes and systolic blood pressure between the two groups.There was a sig-nificant change in heart rate between the groups immediately after surgery and at 15 and 30 minutes after surgery(P<0.05).The heart rate and systolic blood pressure of the intervention group were significantly lower than those of the control group at 15 and 30 minutes after surgery(P<0.05).The rewarming time of the intervention group was shorter than that of the control group,and the overall incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower than that of the control group(P<0.05).CONCLUSION For elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery,a composite insulation intervention during the perioperative period can maintain body temperature,reduce postoperative stress,and significantly reduce the incidence of hypothermia and related complications.展开更多
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery is a rapidly evolving field as a bridge between traditional laparoscopic surgery and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.We report one of the initial clinical experienc...Single-incision laparoscopic surgery is a rapidly evolving field as a bridge between traditional laparoscopic surgery and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.We report one of the initial clinical experiences in Japan with this new technique.Four cases of gallbladder diseases were selected for this new technique.A single curved intra-umbilical 25-mm incision was made by pulling out the umbilicus.A 12-mm trocar was placed through an open approach,and the abdominal cavity was explored with a 10-mm semiflexible laparoscope.Two 5-mm ports were inserted laterally from the laparoscope port.A 2-mm mini-loop retractor was inserted to retract the fundus of the gallbladder.Dissection was performed using an electric cautery hook and an Endograsper roticulator.There were two women and two men with a mean age of 50.5 years(range:40-61 years).All procedures were completed successfully without any perioperative complications.In all cases,there was no need to extend the skin incision.Average operative time was 88.8 min.Postoperative follow-up didnot reveal any umbili-cal wound complication.Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is feasible and a promising alternative method as scarless abdominal surgery for the treatment of some patients with gallbladder disease.展开更多
AIM:To compare the clinical outcome of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy(SILC)and three-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy(3ILC)for acute cholecystitis.METHODS:From July 2009 to September 2012,136patient...AIM:To compare the clinical outcome of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy(SILC)and three-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy(3ILC)for acute cholecystitis.METHODS:From July 2009 to September 2012,136patients underwent SILC or 3ILC for acute cholecystitis at a tertiary referral hospital.One experienced surgeon performed every procedure using 5 or 10 mm 30-degree laparoscopes,straight instruments,and conventional ports.Five patients with perforated gallbladder and diffuse peritonitis and 23 patients with mild acute cholecystitis were excluded.The remaining 108 patients were divided into complicated and uncomplicated groups according to pathologic findings.Patient demography,clinical data,operative results and complications were recorded and analyzed.RESULTS:Fifty patients with gangrenous cholecystitis,gallbladder empyema,or hydrops were classified as the complicated group,and 58 patients with acute cholecystitis were classified as the uncomplicated group.Twenty-three(46.0%)of the patients in the complicated group(n=50)and 39(67.2%)of the patients in the uncomplicated group(n=58)underwent SILC;all others underwent 3ILC.The postoperative length of hospital stay(PLOS)was significantly shorter in the SILC subgroups than the 3ILC subgroups(3.5±1.1 d vs 4.6±1.3 d,P<0.01 in the complicated group;2.9±1.1 d vs 3.7±1.4 d,P<0.05 in the uncomplicated group).The maximum body temperature recorded at day 1 and at day 2 following the procedure was lower in the SILC subgroups,but the difference reached statistical significance only in the uncomplicated group(37.41±0.56℃vs 37.80±0.72℃,P<0.05 on postoperative day 1;37.10±0.43℃vs 37.57±0.54℃,P<0.01 on postoperative day 2).The operative time,estimated blood loss,postoperative narcotic use,total length of hospital stay,conversion rates,and complication rates were similar in both SILC and 3ILC subgroups.The complicated group had longer operative time(122.2±35.0 min vs 106.6±43.6 min,P<0.05),longer PLOS(4.1±1.3 d vs 3.2±1.2 d,P<0.001),and higher conversion rates(36.0%vs 19.0%,P<0.05)compared with the uncomplicated group.CONCLUSION:SILC is safe and efficacious for patients with acute cholecystitis.The main benefit is a faster recovery than that achieved with 3ILC.展开更多
AIM: To investigate the learning curve of transumbilical suture-suspension single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC). METHODS: The clinical data of 180 consecutive transumbilical suture-suspension SILCs perf...AIM: To investigate the learning curve of transumbilical suture-suspension single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC). METHODS: The clinical data of 180 consecutive transumbilical suture-suspension SILCs performed by a team in our department during the period from August 2009 to March 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into nine groups according to operation dates, and each group included 20 patients operated on consecutively in each time period. The surgical outcome was assessed by comparing operation time, blood loss during operation, and complications between groups in order to evaluate the improvement in technique.RESULTS: A total of 180 SILCs were successfully performed by five doctors. The average operation time was 53.58 ± 30.08 min (range: 20.00-160.00 min) and average blood loss was 12.70 ± 11.60 mL (range: 0.00-100.00 mL). None of the patients were converted to laparotomy or multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. There were no major complications such as hemorrhage or biliary system injury during surgery. Eight postoperative complications occurred mainly in the first three groups (n = 6), and included ecchymosis around the umbilical incision (n = 7) which resolved without special treatment, and one case of delayed bile leakage in group 8, which was treated by ultrasound-guided puncture and drainage. There were no differences in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications and length of postoperative hospital stay among the groups. Bonferroni's test showed that the operation time in group 1 was significantly longer than that in the other groups (F = 7.257, P = 0.000). The majority of patients in each group were discharged within 2 d, with an average postoperative hospital stay of 1.9 ± 1.2 d. CONCLUSION: Following scientific principles and standard procedures, a team experienced in multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy can master the technique of SILC after 20 cases.展开更多
文摘Single-incision laparoscopic surgery(SILS),or laparoendoscopic single-site surgery,was launched to minimize incisional traumatic effects in the 1990s.Minor SILS,such as cholecystectomies,have been gaining in popularity over the past few decades.Its application in complicated hepatopancreatobiliary(HPB)surgeries,however,has made slow progress due to instrumental and technical limitations,costs,and safety concerns.While minimally invasive abdominal surgery is pushing the boundaries,advanced laparoscopic HPB surgeries have been shown to be comparable to open operations in terms of patient and oncologic safety,including hepatectomies,distal pancreatectomies(DP),and pancreaticoduodenectomies(PD).In contrast,advanced SILS for HPB malignancy has only been reported in a few small case series.Most of the procedures involved minor liver resections and DP;major hepatectomies were rarely described.Singleincision laparoscopic PD has not yet been reported.We herein review the published SILS for HPB cancer in the literature and our three-year experience focusing on the technical aspects.
文摘BACKGROUND Gastric cancer surgery has advanced with minimally invasive techniques.This study compares outcomes between single-incision laparoscopic surgery plus one port(SILS+1)and conventional laparoscopic surgery(CLS)in treating gastric cancer.AIM To explore the curative effect of SILS+1 and CLS on gastric cancer and their influences on prognosis.METHODS A total of 93 patients with gastric cancer undergoing radical gastrectomy in the hospital were retrospectively analyzed between September 2019 and September 2022.According to different surgical methods,they were divided into SILS+1 group(n=56)and CLS group(n=37).The perioperative indexes,pain degree[visual analogue scale(VAS)]and stress response[C-reactive protein(CRP),white blood cell count(WBC)]in the two groups were compared.The postoperative complications,recurrence rate and mortality at 1 year after surgery were recorded.RESULTS Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the SILS+1 group(76.53±8.12 mL)compared to the CLS group(108.67±12.34 mL,P<0.001),and the total incision length was also significantly shorter in the SILS+1 group(5.29±1.01 cm vs 9.45±2.34 cm,P<0.001).SILS+1 patients experienced faster recovery,with shorter times to first flatus(1.94±0.43 days vs 3.23±0.88 days,P<0.001)and ambulation(2.76±0.58 days vs 4.10±0.97 days,P<0.001).Postoperative pain,as measured by VAS scores,was significantly lower in the SILS+1 group on postoperative days 1,2,and 3(P<0.001).Additionally,stress markers(CRP and WBC)were significantly lower in the SILS+1 group on the first postoperative day(CRP:6.41±1.63 mg/L vs 7.82±1.88 mg/L,P<0.001;WBC:6.34±1.50×109/L vs 7.09±1.61×109/L,P=0.024).The complication rate in the SILS+1 group was also significantly lower than in the CLS group(8.93%vs 27.03%,P=0.020).However,there was no significant difference in recurrence rates between the two groups after one year(3.57%vs 8.11%,P>0.05).CONCLUSION SILS+1 and CLS have the comparable lymph node clearance effect in patients with gastric cancer.However,SILS+1 is more beneficial to reduce intraoperative blood loss,relieve pain,alleviate stress response,reduce the incidence of complications and promote rapid postoperative recovery.
文摘Single-incision laparoscopic surgery(SILS), or laparoendoscopic single-site surgery, has been employed in various fields to minimize traumatic effects over the last two decades. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy(SILC) has been the most frequently studied SILS to date. Hundreds of studies on SILC have failed to present conclusive results. Most randomized controlled trials(RCTs) have been small in scale and have been conducted under ideal operative conditions. The role of SILC in complicated scenarios remains uncertain. As common bile duct exploration(CBDE) methods have been used for more than one hundred years, laparoscopic CBDE(LCBDE) has emerged as an effective, demanding, and infrequent technique employed during the laparoscopic era. Likewise, laparoscopic biliary-enteric anastomosis is difficult to carry out, with only a few studies have been published on the approach. The application of SILS to CBDE and biliary-enteric anastomosis is extremely rare, and such innovative procedures are only carried out by a number of specialized groups across the globe. Herein we present a thorough and detailed analysis of SILC in terms of operative techniques, training and learning curves, safety and efficacy levels, recovery trends, and costs by reviewing RCTs conducted over the past three years and two recently updated meta-analyses. All existing literature on single-incision LCBDE and singleincision laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy has been reviewed to describe these two demanding techniques.
文摘AIM: To determine the effect of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy(SILC) for colorectal cancer on short-term clinical and oncological outcomes by comparison with multiport conventional laparoscopic colectomy(CLC).METHODS: A systematic review was performed using MEDLINE for the time period of 2008 to December 2014 to retrieve all relevant literature. The search terms were "laparoscopy", "single incision", "single port", "single site", "SILS", "LESS" and "colorectal cancer". Publications were included if they were randomized controlled trials, case-matched controlled studies, or comparative studies, in which patients underwent single-incision(SILS or LESS) laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Studies were excluded if they were non-comparative, or not including surgery involving the colon or rectum. A total of 15 studies with 589 patients who underwent SILC for colorectal cancer were selected.RESULTS: No significant differences between the groups were noted in terms of mortality or morbidity. The benefit of the SILC approach included reduction in conversion rate to laparotomy, but there were no significant differences in other short-term clinical outcomes between the groups. Satisfactory oncological surgical quality was also demonstrated for SILC for the treatment of colorectal cancer with a similar average lymph node harvest and proximal and distal resection margin length as multiport CLC.CONCLUSION: SILC can be performed safely with similar short-term clinical and oncological outcomes as multiport CLC.
文摘Sister Mary Joseph’s nodule(SMJN)is a rare umbilical nodule that develops secondary to metastatic cancer.Primary malignancies are located in the abdomen or pelvis.Patients with SMJN have a poor prognosis.An 83-year-old woman presented to our hospital with a1-month history of a rapidly enlarging umbilical mass.Endoscopic findings revealed advanced transverse colon cancer.computer tomography and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography revealed tumors of the transverse colon,umbilicus,right inguinal lymph nodes,and left lung.The feeding arteries and drainage veins for the SMJN were the inferior epigastric vessels.Imaging findings of the left lung tumor allowed for identification of the primary lung cancer,and a diagnosis of advanced transverse colon cancer with SMJN and primary lung cancer was made.The patient underwent local resection of the SMNJ and subsequent single-site laparoscopic surgery involving right hemicolectomy and paracolic lymph node dissection.Intra-abdominal dissemination to the mesocolon was confirmed during surgery.Histopathologically,the transverse colon cancer was confirmed to be moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma.We suspect that SMJN may occur via a hematogenous pathway.Although chemotherapy for colon cancer and thoracoscopic surgery for the primary lung cancer were scheduled,the patient and her family desired home hospice.Seven months after surgery,she died of rapidly growing lung cancer.
文摘The year 2025 marked a significantmilestone for Laparoscopic,Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery(LERS)—we have awarded our first Impact Factor of 2.0 released by the Journal Citation Reports from Clarivate Analytics,which ranks in the second quartile in the surgery category.This remarkable achievement,which reflects LERS’s steadily increasing influencein the area of surgery,would not be possible without the peer reviewer’s invaluable contributions.On behalf of the Editorial Board and Editorial Office,we would express our sincere appreciation to the following reviewers,who reviewed at least one paper with rigorous and insightful comments.We sincerely hope to engage further with them,either as esteemed reviewers or outstanding authors,in 2026 and beyond.
基金funding from the China National Key Research and Development Program(No.2023YFC3603104)the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Nos.82472243 and 82272180)+6 种基金the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(No.226-2025-00024)the Huadong Medicine Joint Funds of the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China(No.LHDMD24H150001)the Key Research&Development Project of Zhejiang Province(No.2024C03240)a collaborative scientific project co-established by the Science and Technology Department of the National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine and the Zhejiang Provincial Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine(No.GZY-ZJ-KJ-24082)he General Health Science and Technology Program of Zhejiang Province(No.2024KY1099)the Project of Zhejiang University Longquan Innovation Center(No.ZJDXLQCXZCJBGS2024016)Wu Jieping Medical Foundation Special Research Grant(No.320.6750.2024-23-07).
文摘Objective:Sepsis exhibits remarkable heterogeneity in disease progression trajectories,and accurate identificationof distinct trajectory-based phenotypes is critical for implementing personalized therapeutic strategies and prognostic assessment.However,trajectory clustering analysis of time-series clinical data poses substantial methodological challenges for researchers.This study provides a comprehensive tutorial framework demonstrating six trajectory modeling approaches integrated with proteomic analysis to guide researchers in identifying sepsis subtypes after laparoscopic surgery.Methods:This study employs simulated longitudinal data from 300 septic patients after laparoscopic surgery to demonstrate six trajectory modeling methods(group-based trajectory modeling,latent growth mixture modeling,latent transition analysis,time-varying effect modeling,K-means for longitudinal data,agglomerative hierarchical clustering)for identifying associations between predefinedsequential organ failure assessment trajectories and 25 proteomic biomarkers.Clustering performance was evaluated via multiple metrics,and a biomarker discovery pipeline integrating principal component analysis,random forests,feature selection,and receiver operating characteristic analysis was developed.Results:The six methods demonstrated varying performance in identifying trajectory structures,with each approach exhibiting distinct analytical characteristics.The performance metrics revealed differences across methods,which may inform context-specificmethod selection and interpretation strategies.Conclusion:This study illustrates practical implementations of trajectory modeling approaches under controlled conditions,facilitating informed method selection for clinical researchers.The inclusion of complete R code and integrated proteomics workflows offers a reproducible analytical framework connecting temporal pattern recognition to biomarker discovery.Beyond sepsis,this pipeline-oriented approach may be adapted to diverse clinical scenarios requiring longitudinal disease characterization and precision medicine applications.The comparative analysis reveals that each method has distinct strengths,providing a practical guide for clinical researchers in selecting appropriate methods based on their specificstudy goals and data characteristics.
文摘Objective:To analyze the impact of nursing interventions based on quantitative assessment using the Kano model on the quality of rehabilitation in patients with early-stage ovarian cancer following laparoscopic radical surgery.Methods:A prospective clinical study was conducted involving 96 patients with newly diagnosed early-stage ovarian cancer who underwent laparoscopic radical surgery from December 2023 to December 2025.Patients were randomly assigned to groups using a random number table method before surgery.After surgery,the control group(n=48)received routine quantitative assessment nursing interventions,while the observation group(n=48)received nursing interventions based on quantitative assessment using the Kano model.Both groups received continuous nursing care until discharge.Differences between the groups were compared in terms of negative emotions,quality of life scores before and after postoperative intervention,postoperative recovery indicators,and nursing satisfaction evaluations on the day of discharge.Results:After intervention,the observation group had lower scores on the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale(SAS)and Self-Rating Depression Scale(SDS),as well as shorter recovery times for gastrointestinal function and food intake,and a shorter hospital stay compared to the control group.Additionally,the observation group had higher scores on the Quality-of-Life Instrument for Cancer Patients-Ovarian Cancer(QLICP-OV)than the control group,with statistically significant differences(p<0.05).The overall satisfaction with nursing care in the observation group was also higher than that in the control group,with a statistically significant difference(p<0.05).Conclusion:Implementing quantitative evaluation nursing interventions based on the Kano model for patients with early-stage ovarian cancer after laparoscopic radical surgery can,by addressing their postoperative basic health,disease awareness,and other intervention content needs to a comprehensive degree,actively promote postoperative recovery and improve their mental health and quality of life.
文摘We found the qualitative study by Xu et al.on how patients feel about laparoscopic incisions under enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS)protocols to be very interesting.1 Xu et al.carried out a qualitative study on patient experience with laparoscopic incisions under an ERAS protocol to highlight the problem of psychosocial and aesthetic concerns,which are often overlooked when planning surgical operations.This study,which involved semistructured interviews with sixteen people,aimed to narrow perioperative education and the decision-making process for incision site selection,thus making the processes more focused on patient priorities.The study is based on a timely but under-researched subject area;however,it is possible to outline four possible areas of improvement that would allow the study to be more transparent and,at the same time,more applicable to clinical practice.
基金Supported by Research Unit of Minimally Invasive Pediatric Surgery on Diagnosis and Treatment,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,No.2021RU016.
文摘BACKGROUND Laparoscopic surgery,with the advantage of less trauma,has been predominantly performed to treat pediatric inguinal hernia.However,the traditional three-port laparoscopic surgery remains extremely traumatic for children,whereas singleport laparoscopic surgery causes less damage to children than traditional laparoscopy.However,single-port laparoscopic surgery is more challenging;thus,studies on the effect of its application in pediatric inguinal hernia remain relatively limited.AIM To analyze the association of single-incision laparoscopic herniorrhaphy needle treatment with surgical outcomes,postoperative complications,and serum inflammation in pediatric inguinal hernia.METHODS This retrospective study included 113 pediatric patients with inguinal hernia who underwent surgery at the Children’s Hospital,Capital Institute of Pediatrics,from April 2022 to May 2023.Participants were categorized into the observation group(single-incision laparoscopic herniorrhaphy needle,n=60)and the control group(two-port laparoscopic surgery,n=53).Comparative analyses involved surgical duration,intraoperative blood loss,and length of hospital stay.C-reactive protein(CRP)and white blood cell count(WBC)levels were measured preoperatively and 24 hours postoperatively.Postoperative pain was evaluated with the face,legs,activity,cry,and Consolability scale.Further,the incidence of complications,recurrence,and reoperation rates was assessed.Logistic regression was employed to determine independent risk factors related to poor prognosis.RESULTS The observation group demonstrated significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss and shorter hospitalization compared to the control group(P<0.05).Both groups demonstrated increased CRP and WBC levels postoperatively,but the observation group exhibited significantly lower levels(P<0.05).Further,pain scores at 24 hours postoperatively were significantly lower in the observation group(P<0.05).Additionally,the observation group experienced fewer adverse events,recurrence rates,and reoperations compared to the control group(P<0.05).Logistic regression analysis determined increased postoperative stress markers and surgical technique as independent predictors of recurrence(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Single-incision laparoscopic herniorrhaphy needle treatment for pediatric inguinal hernia exhibits significant efficacy,effectively reduces postoperative complications,ensures a more concealed surgical incision,and promotes faster postoperative recovery than conventional two-port laparoscopy.This approach merits wider application.
基金supported by grants from the National Natu-ral Science Foundation of China(81302161 and 82003103)the Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province(2021YFS0375 and 2020YJ0450).
文摘A pancreas surgeon’s constant goal is to do"less damage,more radical".Currently,a small number of highly trained surgeons opt for single-incision laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy(SILPD)or single-incision plus one-port LPD(SILPD+1)to minimize post-operative pain,improve convalescence,and provide a more pleas-ing cosmetic outcome[1,2].Additionally,some skilled surgeons have claimed that laparoscopic duodenum-preserving complete pancreatic head resections(LDPPHR)result in less trauma and en-hanced quality of life[3,4].However,LDPPHR is still challenging because of its lengthy learning curve and"sword-fighting"impact.Additionally,there has not been any global reporting on the suit-ability of single-incision plus one-port DPPHR with pancreaticogas-trostomy(SILDPPHR-T+1)in place of SILPD+1.This study aimed to illustrate the SILDPPHR-T+1 procedure specifics for a patient with pancreatic head intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm(IPMN)(main pancreatic duct type)(MD-IPMN).
文摘A number of clinical trials have demonstrated that the laparoscopic approach for colorectal cancer resection provides the same oncologic results as open surgery along with all clinical benefits of minimally invasive surgery. During the last years, a great effort has been made to research for minimizing parietal trauma, yet for cosmetic reasons and in order to further reduce surgery-related pain and morbidity. New techniques, such as natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and single-incision laparoscopy (SIL) have been developed in order to reach the goal of “scarless” surgery. Although NOTES may seem not fully suitable or safe for advanced procedures, such as colectomies, SIL is currently regarded as the next major advance in the progress of minimally invasive surgical approaches to colorectal disease that is more feasible in generalized use. The small incision through the umbilicus allows surgeons to use familiar standard laparoscopic instruments and thus, perform even complex procedures which require extraction of large surgical specimens or intestinal anastomosis. The cosmetic result from SIL is also better because the only incision is made through the umbilicus which can hide the wound effectively after operation. However, SIL raises a number of specific new challenges compared with the laparoscopic conventional approach. A reduced capacity for triangulation, the repeated conflicts between the shafts of the instruments and the difficulties to achieve a correct exposure of the operative field are the most claimed issues. The use therefore of this new approach for complex colorectal procedures might understandingly be viewed as difficult to implement, especially for oncologic cases.
文摘More than 20 years have passed since the first report of laparoscopic colectomy in 1991. Thereafter, laparoscopic surgery for the management of colorectal diseases has been widely accepted as a prevailing option because of improved cosmetic outcomes, less postoperative pain, and shorter hospital stay in comparison with open surgery. To further the principle of minimally invasive surgery, two new approaches have been developed in this rapidly evolving field. The first is the totally laparoscopic approach. Currently most of standard techniques inevitably involve an abdominalincision for retrieval of the specimen and preparation for anastomosis, which might compromise the benefits of laparoscopic surgery. The totally laparoscopic approach dispenses with this incision by combining completely intraperitoneal anastomosis with retrieval of the specimen via a natural orifice, such as the anus or the vagina. Our new and reliable technique for intraperitoneal anastomosis is also described in detail in this article. The second is the single-incision approach. While three to six ports are needed in standard laparoscopic surgery, the single-incision approach uses the umbilicus as the sole access to the abdominal cavity. All of the laparoscopic procedures are performed entirely through the umbilicus, in which the surgical scar eventually becomes hidden, achieving virtually scarless surgery. This article reviews the current status of these two approaches and discusses the future of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal diseases.
文摘Robotic inguinal hernia repair remains in the early stages of implementation,and its potential advantages over the laparoscopic approach are still a matter of debate.This narrative review aims to summarize the findingsof major systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials and explore variables not adequately addressed in those studies.The literature review indicates that robotic inguinal hernia repair is associated with longer operative times but has improved ergonomics compared with laparoscopy.It is a safe procedure that results in a reduced inflammatory response,similar complication rates,and no significantdifference in acute postoperative pain.Although it involves higher direct costs,its cost-effectiveness remains unclear owing to a lack of analysis including indirect costs.Ongoing controversy continues regarding long-term benefits.The most recent systematic review pointed towards lower recurrence rates with robotic surgery,although randomized controlled trials have not validated this finding.Data on chronic pain are currently insufficientto draw firmconclusions.Further studies are needed to assess its use in complex cases and the role of novel techniques.
文摘BACKGROUND Currently,very few studies have examined the analgesic effectiveness and safety of dexmedetomidine-assisted intravenous-inhalation combined general anesthesia in laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for inguinal hernia.AIM To investigate the analgesic effect and safety of dexmedetomidine-assisted intravenous-inhalation combined general anesthesia in laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for inguinal hernia.METHODS In this retrospective study,94 patients scheduled for laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for inguinal hernia,admitted to Yiwu Central Hospital between May 2022 and May 2023,were divided into a control group(inhalation combined general anesthesia)and a treatment group(dexmedetomidine-assisted intrave-nous-inhalation combined general anesthesia).Perioperative indicators,analgesic effect,preoperative and postoperative 24-hours blood pressure(BP)and heart rate(HR),stress indicators,immune function levels,and adverse reactions were com-pared between the two groups.RESULTS Baseline data,including age,hernia location,place of residence,weight,monthly income,education level,and underlying diseases,were not significantly different between the two groups,indicating comparability(P>0.05).No significant difference was found in operation time and anesthesia time between the two groups(P>0.05).However,the treatment group exhibited a shorter postoperative urinary catheter removal time and hospital stay than the control group(P<0.05).Preoperatively,no significant differences were found in the visual analog scale(VAS)scores between the two groups(P>0.05).However,at 12,18,and 24 hours postoper-atively,the treatment group had significantly lower VAS scores than the control group(P<0.05).Although no significant differences in preoperative hemodynamic indicators were found between the two groups(P>0.05),both groups experienced some extent of changes in postoperative HR,diastolic BP(DBP),and systolic BP(SBP).Nevertheless,the treatment group showed smaller changes in HR,DBP,and SBP than the control group(P<0.05).Preoperative immune function indicators showed no significant differences between the two groups(P>0.05).However,postoperatively,the treatment group demonstrated higher levels of CD3+,CD4+,and CD4+/CD8+and lower levels of CD8+than the control group(P<0.05).The rates of adverse reactions were 6.38%and 23.40%in the treatment and control groups,respectively,revealing a significant difference(χ2=5.371,P=0.020).CONCLUSION Dexmedetomidine-assisted intravenous-inhalation combined general anesthesia can promote early recovery of patients undergoing laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for inguinal hernia.It ensures stable blood flow,improves postoperative analgesic effects,reduces postoperative pain intensity,alleviates stress response,improves immune function,facilitates anesthesia recovery,and enhances safety.
基金Supported by The Key Research and Development Program of Anhui Province of China,No.1804h08020273The Key Research Project of Health Commission of Anhui Province of China,No.AHWJ2022a016.
文摘BACKGROUND Laparoscopic hepatectomy(LH)has been applied in the treatment of hepatolithiasisa in patients with a history of biliary surgery and has already achieved good clinical outcomes.However,reoperative LH(rLH)includes multiple procedures,and the no studies have examined the clinical value of individual laparoscopic procedures.AIM To evaluate the safety and feasibility of each rLH procedure for hepatolithiasisa in patients with a history of biliary surgery.METHODS Patients with previous biliary surgery who underwent reoperative hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis were studied.Liver resection procedures were divided into three categories:(1)Laparoscopic/open left lateral sectionectomy[reoperative laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy(rLLLS)/reoperative open left lateral sectionectomy(rOLLS)];(2)Laparoscopic/open left hemihepatectomy[reoperative laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy(rLLH)/reoperative open left hemihepatectomy(rOLH)];and(3)Laparoscopic/open complex hepatectomy[reoperative laparoscopic complex hepatectomy(rLCH)/reoperative open complex hepate ctomy(rOCH)].The clinical outcomes were compared between the rLLLS,rLLH,and rLCH groups,and subgroup analyses were performed for the rLLLS/rOLLS,rLLH/rOLH,and rLCH/rOCH subgroups.RESULTS A total of 185 patients were studied,including 101 rLH patients(40 rLLLS,50 rLLH,and 11 rLCH)and 84 reoperative open hepatectomy(40 rOLLS,33 rOLH,and 11 rOCH).Among the three types of rLH procedure,rLLLS required the shortest operation time(240.0 minutes vs 325.0 minutes vs 350.0 minutes,P=0.001)and the lowest blood transfusion rate(10.0%vs 22.0%vs 54.5%,P=0.005),followed by rLLH.The rLCH had the highest conversion rate(P<0.05)and postoperative intensive care unit stay rate(P=0.001).Most clinical outcomes in rLLLS and rLLH were superior or similar to those in the corresponding open surgery,while there were no differences in all outcomes between the rLCH and rOCH subgroups.CONCLUSION The rLH is safe for hepatolithiasis patients with a history of biliary surgery.The rLLLS and rLLH can be recommended for these patients,whereas rLCH should be applied with caution.
文摘BACKGROUND Elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery are at high risk for hypothermia-related complications.This study explores the efficacy of periop-erative composite insulation interventions in maintaining normothermia and reducing postoperative risks in this vulnerable group.AIM To evaluate the efficacy of perioperative composite insulation in older patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.METHODS We selected 100 older patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer at Huzhou Central Hospital from September 2023 to April 2024.Using a random number table,patients were divided into a control group and inter-vention group of 50 patients each.After returning to the regular ward,the con-ventional group received traditional insulation intervention measures,while the intervention group received composite insulation nursing intervention.We ob-served and recorded postoperative blood pressure and heart rate changes,as well as postoperative anesthesia recovery time and incidence of complications.RESULTS The statistical results showed significant differences(P<0.05)in heart rate changes and systolic blood pressure between the two groups.There was a sig-nificant change in heart rate between the groups immediately after surgery and at 15 and 30 minutes after surgery(P<0.05).The heart rate and systolic blood pressure of the intervention group were significantly lower than those of the control group at 15 and 30 minutes after surgery(P<0.05).The rewarming time of the intervention group was shorter than that of the control group,and the overall incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower than that of the control group(P<0.05).CONCLUSION For elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery,a composite insulation intervention during the perioperative period can maintain body temperature,reduce postoperative stress,and significantly reduce the incidence of hypothermia and related complications.
文摘Single-incision laparoscopic surgery is a rapidly evolving field as a bridge between traditional laparoscopic surgery and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.We report one of the initial clinical experiences in Japan with this new technique.Four cases of gallbladder diseases were selected for this new technique.A single curved intra-umbilical 25-mm incision was made by pulling out the umbilicus.A 12-mm trocar was placed through an open approach,and the abdominal cavity was explored with a 10-mm semiflexible laparoscope.Two 5-mm ports were inserted laterally from the laparoscope port.A 2-mm mini-loop retractor was inserted to retract the fundus of the gallbladder.Dissection was performed using an electric cautery hook and an Endograsper roticulator.There were two women and two men with a mean age of 50.5 years(range:40-61 years).All procedures were completed successfully without any perioperative complications.In all cases,there was no need to extend the skin incision.Average operative time was 88.8 min.Postoperative follow-up didnot reveal any umbili-cal wound complication.Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is feasible and a promising alternative method as scarless abdominal surgery for the treatment of some patients with gallbladder disease.
文摘AIM:To compare the clinical outcome of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy(SILC)and three-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy(3ILC)for acute cholecystitis.METHODS:From July 2009 to September 2012,136patients underwent SILC or 3ILC for acute cholecystitis at a tertiary referral hospital.One experienced surgeon performed every procedure using 5 or 10 mm 30-degree laparoscopes,straight instruments,and conventional ports.Five patients with perforated gallbladder and diffuse peritonitis and 23 patients with mild acute cholecystitis were excluded.The remaining 108 patients were divided into complicated and uncomplicated groups according to pathologic findings.Patient demography,clinical data,operative results and complications were recorded and analyzed.RESULTS:Fifty patients with gangrenous cholecystitis,gallbladder empyema,or hydrops were classified as the complicated group,and 58 patients with acute cholecystitis were classified as the uncomplicated group.Twenty-three(46.0%)of the patients in the complicated group(n=50)and 39(67.2%)of the patients in the uncomplicated group(n=58)underwent SILC;all others underwent 3ILC.The postoperative length of hospital stay(PLOS)was significantly shorter in the SILC subgroups than the 3ILC subgroups(3.5±1.1 d vs 4.6±1.3 d,P<0.01 in the complicated group;2.9±1.1 d vs 3.7±1.4 d,P<0.05 in the uncomplicated group).The maximum body temperature recorded at day 1 and at day 2 following the procedure was lower in the SILC subgroups,but the difference reached statistical significance only in the uncomplicated group(37.41±0.56℃vs 37.80±0.72℃,P<0.05 on postoperative day 1;37.10±0.43℃vs 37.57±0.54℃,P<0.01 on postoperative day 2).The operative time,estimated blood loss,postoperative narcotic use,total length of hospital stay,conversion rates,and complication rates were similar in both SILC and 3ILC subgroups.The complicated group had longer operative time(122.2±35.0 min vs 106.6±43.6 min,P<0.05),longer PLOS(4.1±1.3 d vs 3.2±1.2 d,P<0.001),and higher conversion rates(36.0%vs 19.0%,P<0.05)compared with the uncomplicated group.CONCLUSION:SILC is safe and efficacious for patients with acute cholecystitis.The main benefit is a faster recovery than that achieved with 3ILC.
基金Supported by Science and Technology Projects of Haizhu District of Guangzhou, China, No. 2012-cg-26
文摘AIM: To investigate the learning curve of transumbilical suture-suspension single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC). METHODS: The clinical data of 180 consecutive transumbilical suture-suspension SILCs performed by a team in our department during the period from August 2009 to March 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into nine groups according to operation dates, and each group included 20 patients operated on consecutively in each time period. The surgical outcome was assessed by comparing operation time, blood loss during operation, and complications between groups in order to evaluate the improvement in technique.RESULTS: A total of 180 SILCs were successfully performed by five doctors. The average operation time was 53.58 ± 30.08 min (range: 20.00-160.00 min) and average blood loss was 12.70 ± 11.60 mL (range: 0.00-100.00 mL). None of the patients were converted to laparotomy or multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. There were no major complications such as hemorrhage or biliary system injury during surgery. Eight postoperative complications occurred mainly in the first three groups (n = 6), and included ecchymosis around the umbilical incision (n = 7) which resolved without special treatment, and one case of delayed bile leakage in group 8, which was treated by ultrasound-guided puncture and drainage. There were no differences in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications and length of postoperative hospital stay among the groups. Bonferroni's test showed that the operation time in group 1 was significantly longer than that in the other groups (F = 7.257, P = 0.000). The majority of patients in each group were discharged within 2 d, with an average postoperative hospital stay of 1.9 ± 1.2 d. CONCLUSION: Following scientific principles and standard procedures, a team experienced in multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy can master the technique of SILC after 20 cases.
