GaN powder of nanometer scale was prepared by metal organic chemical vapor deposition using diethylgallium azide as precursor. The resulting powder was characterized by XRD and TEM. It has been found that the particle...GaN powder of nanometer scale was prepared by metal organic chemical vapor deposition using diethylgallium azide as precursor. The resulting powder was characterized by XRD and TEM. It has been found that the particle size of the powder obtained is affected by the deposition temperature, and the fine crystals formed in temperature range 500 similar to 650 degrees C were hexagonal.展开更多
BACKGROUND In the field of clinical intestinal preparation,compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution(SF-PEG)is a commonly used intestinal cleaner.However,practice has shown that using only a single polyethylen...BACKGROUND In the field of clinical intestinal preparation,compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution(SF-PEG)is a commonly used intestinal cleaner.However,practice has shown that using only a single polyethylene glycol formulation often fails to achieve the desired intestinal preparation effect.Linalotide has a unique mechanism of action,which can effectively enhance the secretion of small intestinal fluid and promote intestinal peristalsis.The combination of linaclotide and SF-PEG may provide a better solution for intestinal preparation and improve the quality of intestinal cleaning.Therefore,exploring the application value and clinical efficacy of linaclotide capsules combined with SF-PEG in intestinal preparation is of great clinical significance.AIM To explore the effects of the combination of linaclotide capsules and SF-PEG,including its efficacy in intestinal preparation and patient tolerance.METHODS To investigate the differences in the effectiveness of different bowel preparation plans in colonoscopy,this article conducted a comprehensive and detailed retrospective analysis of the medical records of patients who underwent colonoscopy from January 2023 to December 2023.In this study,116 patients were accurately divided into three groups based on the different intestinal preparation drugs used before colonoscopy.Among them,group A consisted of 29 patients who underwent intestinal preparation using 3 liters of SF-PEG combined with linaclotide;group B consists of 50 patients who underwent intestinal preparation using 3 liters of SF-PEG;group C consisted of 37 patients who underwent intestinal preparation using a combination of 2-liter SF-PEC and linaclotide.Subsequently,this article evaluated the quality of intestinal preparation in these three groups of patients,using the Boston bowel preparation scale(BBPS)as a quantitative indicator,while comparing multiple indicators such as intestinal preparation completion rate and detection of positive lesions,providing a strong basis for optimizing clinical intestinal preparation plans.RESULTS No statistically significant differences were found in BBPS scores(7.75±1.23,7.69±1.14,and 7.66±1.31;P=0.240),bowel preparation completion rates(96.55%,90.00%,and 97.30%;P=0.293),adenoma detection rates(20.69%,38.00%,and 32.43%;P=0.281),polyp detection rates(34.48%,50.00%,37.84%;P=0.326),insertion time(6.03±4.34,6.12±3.60,and 5.33±2.42;P=0.584),and patient satisfaction rates(89.66%,84.00%,and 97.30%;P=0.398)among the three groups.However,statistically significant differences were observed in withdrawal time(7.45±2.91,9.02±3.54,and 6.86±2.66;P=0.027)and adverse reaction rates(6.90%,20.00%,and 2.70%;P=0.029)among the three groups.Multiple comparisons showed that group C had significantly lower withdrawal time and adverse reaction rates than group B(P=0.013,P=0.016).CONCLUSION Linaclotide capsules show a trend in improving bowel preparation quality and reducing the dosage of SF-PEG.展开更多
AIM To compare the efficacy of fixed-time split dose and split dose of an oral sodium picosulfate for bowel preparation.METHODS This is study was prospective, randomized controlled study performed at a single Institut...AIM To compare the efficacy of fixed-time split dose and split dose of an oral sodium picosulfate for bowel preparation.METHODS This is study was prospective, randomized controlled study performed at a single Institution(2013-058). A total of 204 subjects were assigned to receive one of two sodium picosulfate regimens(i.e., fixed-time split or split) prior to colonoscopy. Main outcome measurements were bowel preparation quality and subject tolerability.RESULTS There was no statistical difference between the fixedtime split dose regimen group and the split dose regimen group(Ottawa score mean 2.57 ± 1.91 vs 2.80 ± 2.51, P = 0.457). Cecal intubation time and physician's satisfaction of inspection were not significantly different between the two groups(P = 0.428, P = 0.489). On subgroup analysis, for afternoon procedures, the fixed-time split dose regimen was equally effective as compared with the split dose regimen(Ottawa score mean 2.56 ± 1.78 vs 2.59 ± 2.27, P = 0.932). There was no difference in tolerability or compliance between the two groups. Nausea was 21.2% in the fixed-time split dose group and 14.3% in the split dose group(P = 0.136). Vomiting was 7.1% and 2.9%(P = 0.164), abdominal discomfort 7.1% and 4.8%(P = 0.484), dizziness 1% and 4.8%(P = 0.113), cold sweating 1% and 0%(P = 0.302) and palpitation 0% and 1%(P = 0.330), respectively. Sleep disturbance was two(2%) patients in the fixed-time split dose group and zero(0%) patient in the split dose preparation(P = 0.143) group.CONCLUSION A fixed-time split dose regimen with sodium picosulfate is not inferior to a split dose regimen for bowel preparation and equally effective for afternoon colonoscopy.展开更多
Objective To investigate the correlationship between an artificial intelligence-based e-Boston bowel preparation scale(e-BBPS)system score and the adenoma miss rate.Methods Colonoscopy images of 4373 patients at the E...Objective To investigate the correlationship between an artificial intelligence-based e-Boston bowel preparation scale(e-BBPS)system score and the adenoma miss rate.Methods Colonoscopy images of 4373 patients at the Endoscopy Center of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from December 21,2017 to December 31,2019 were collected for model training.Patients who underwent colonoscopy at the Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from October 8,2021 to November 9,2022 were prospectively included.Patient's bowel preparation was evaluated by the e-BBPS system and endoscopists based on BBPS score.If both the endoscopists and e-BPPS system believed that the bowel preparationwas sufficient,the patient immediately proceeded to a second colonoscopy.Otherwise,the patientunderwent bowe1lpreparatioan gain.TThe differences in adenoma and polyp miss rate between the qualified group(e-BBPS system score≤3)and the unqualified group(e-BBPS system score>3)were compared.Results The adenoma miss rate in the qualified group was significantly lower than that in the unqualified group[26.72%(62/232)VS 42.53%(37/87),X^(2)=7.384,P=0.007,0R=2.029(95%CI:1.212-3.396)],and the polyp miss rate in the qualified group was significantly lower than that in the unqualified group[27.28%(195/702)VS41.24%(113/274),X^(2)=16.539,P<0.001,0R=1.825(95%CI:1.363-2.443)].Conclusion The deep learning-based e-BBPS system demonstrates accuracy and reliability in bowel preparation assessment,offering potential to standardize the process of evaluating bowel preparation and reduce missed lesions.展开更多
文摘GaN powder of nanometer scale was prepared by metal organic chemical vapor deposition using diethylgallium azide as precursor. The resulting powder was characterized by XRD and TEM. It has been found that the particle size of the powder obtained is affected by the deposition temperature, and the fine crystals formed in temperature range 500 similar to 650 degrees C were hexagonal.
基金Supported by the Science and Technology Program of Rui’an,No.MS2023030.
文摘BACKGROUND In the field of clinical intestinal preparation,compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution(SF-PEG)is a commonly used intestinal cleaner.However,practice has shown that using only a single polyethylene glycol formulation often fails to achieve the desired intestinal preparation effect.Linalotide has a unique mechanism of action,which can effectively enhance the secretion of small intestinal fluid and promote intestinal peristalsis.The combination of linaclotide and SF-PEG may provide a better solution for intestinal preparation and improve the quality of intestinal cleaning.Therefore,exploring the application value and clinical efficacy of linaclotide capsules combined with SF-PEG in intestinal preparation is of great clinical significance.AIM To explore the effects of the combination of linaclotide capsules and SF-PEG,including its efficacy in intestinal preparation and patient tolerance.METHODS To investigate the differences in the effectiveness of different bowel preparation plans in colonoscopy,this article conducted a comprehensive and detailed retrospective analysis of the medical records of patients who underwent colonoscopy from January 2023 to December 2023.In this study,116 patients were accurately divided into three groups based on the different intestinal preparation drugs used before colonoscopy.Among them,group A consisted of 29 patients who underwent intestinal preparation using 3 liters of SF-PEG combined with linaclotide;group B consists of 50 patients who underwent intestinal preparation using 3 liters of SF-PEG;group C consisted of 37 patients who underwent intestinal preparation using a combination of 2-liter SF-PEC and linaclotide.Subsequently,this article evaluated the quality of intestinal preparation in these three groups of patients,using the Boston bowel preparation scale(BBPS)as a quantitative indicator,while comparing multiple indicators such as intestinal preparation completion rate and detection of positive lesions,providing a strong basis for optimizing clinical intestinal preparation plans.RESULTS No statistically significant differences were found in BBPS scores(7.75±1.23,7.69±1.14,and 7.66±1.31;P=0.240),bowel preparation completion rates(96.55%,90.00%,and 97.30%;P=0.293),adenoma detection rates(20.69%,38.00%,and 32.43%;P=0.281),polyp detection rates(34.48%,50.00%,37.84%;P=0.326),insertion time(6.03±4.34,6.12±3.60,and 5.33±2.42;P=0.584),and patient satisfaction rates(89.66%,84.00%,and 97.30%;P=0.398)among the three groups.However,statistically significant differences were observed in withdrawal time(7.45±2.91,9.02±3.54,and 6.86±2.66;P=0.027)and adverse reaction rates(6.90%,20.00%,and 2.70%;P=0.029)among the three groups.Multiple comparisons showed that group C had significantly lower withdrawal time and adverse reaction rates than group B(P=0.013,P=0.016).CONCLUSION Linaclotide capsules show a trend in improving bowel preparation quality and reducing the dosage of SF-PEG.
文摘AIM To compare the efficacy of fixed-time split dose and split dose of an oral sodium picosulfate for bowel preparation.METHODS This is study was prospective, randomized controlled study performed at a single Institution(2013-058). A total of 204 subjects were assigned to receive one of two sodium picosulfate regimens(i.e., fixed-time split or split) prior to colonoscopy. Main outcome measurements were bowel preparation quality and subject tolerability.RESULTS There was no statistical difference between the fixedtime split dose regimen group and the split dose regimen group(Ottawa score mean 2.57 ± 1.91 vs 2.80 ± 2.51, P = 0.457). Cecal intubation time and physician's satisfaction of inspection were not significantly different between the two groups(P = 0.428, P = 0.489). On subgroup analysis, for afternoon procedures, the fixed-time split dose regimen was equally effective as compared with the split dose regimen(Ottawa score mean 2.56 ± 1.78 vs 2.59 ± 2.27, P = 0.932). There was no difference in tolerability or compliance between the two groups. Nausea was 21.2% in the fixed-time split dose group and 14.3% in the split dose group(P = 0.136). Vomiting was 7.1% and 2.9%(P = 0.164), abdominal discomfort 7.1% and 4.8%(P = 0.484), dizziness 1% and 4.8%(P = 0.113), cold sweating 1% and 0%(P = 0.302) and palpitation 0% and 1%(P = 0.330), respectively. Sleep disturbance was two(2%) patients in the fixed-time split dose group and zero(0%) patient in the split dose preparation(P = 0.143) group.CONCLUSION A fixed-time split dose regimen with sodium picosulfate is not inferior to a split dose regimen for bowel preparation and equally effective for afternoon colonoscopy.
文摘Objective To investigate the correlationship between an artificial intelligence-based e-Boston bowel preparation scale(e-BBPS)system score and the adenoma miss rate.Methods Colonoscopy images of 4373 patients at the Endoscopy Center of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from December 21,2017 to December 31,2019 were collected for model training.Patients who underwent colonoscopy at the Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from October 8,2021 to November 9,2022 were prospectively included.Patient's bowel preparation was evaluated by the e-BBPS system and endoscopists based on BBPS score.If both the endoscopists and e-BPPS system believed that the bowel preparationwas sufficient,the patient immediately proceeded to a second colonoscopy.Otherwise,the patientunderwent bowe1lpreparatioan gain.TThe differences in adenoma and polyp miss rate between the qualified group(e-BBPS system score≤3)and the unqualified group(e-BBPS system score>3)were compared.Results The adenoma miss rate in the qualified group was significantly lower than that in the unqualified group[26.72%(62/232)VS 42.53%(37/87),X^(2)=7.384,P=0.007,0R=2.029(95%CI:1.212-3.396)],and the polyp miss rate in the qualified group was significantly lower than that in the unqualified group[27.28%(195/702)VS41.24%(113/274),X^(2)=16.539,P<0.001,0R=1.825(95%CI:1.363-2.443)].Conclusion The deep learning-based e-BBPS system demonstrates accuracy and reliability in bowel preparation assessment,offering potential to standardize the process of evaluating bowel preparation and reduce missed lesions.
