期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
惰性、凝神与沉默——尼古拉·普桑《里纳尔多与阿米达》的三重奥秘 被引量:1
1
作者 王欣 《文艺理论研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2023年第3期42-49,共8页
“沉睡”作为绘画中的重要母题,对它的表达与理解成为一个疑难。尼古拉·普桑的《里纳尔多与阿米达》揭示了沉睡图像的三重奥秘。基于对无差别之爱的寻求,“惰性身体”彰显肉体的还原,进入非时间维度。普桑的沉睡图像表明一种以镜... “沉睡”作为绘画中的重要母题,对它的表达与理解成为一个疑难。尼古拉·普桑的《里纳尔多与阿米达》揭示了沉睡图像的三重奥秘。基于对无差别之爱的寻求,“惰性身体”彰显肉体的还原,进入非时间维度。普桑的沉睡图像表明一种以镜式结构所引发的心灵时间,开启“凝神”效果,指向情感进程的无限性。最后,《里纳尔多与阿米达》的内在主旨是:作为拓扑结构的“沉默”得以揭示。至此,沉睡母题出离图像性边界,通往艺术性领域。 展开更多
关键词 尼古拉·普桑 《里纳尔多与阿米达》 沉睡 奥秘
在线阅读 下载PDF
Synaesthetic Without Sensitivity?The Body as a Technological Construction
2
作者 Zarko Paic 《Journal of Philosophy Study》 2019年第6期333-354,共22页
Since technology transformed itself into something uncanny what determines human civilization from modern times,nature has already transformed into a pure technological creation.The time of contemporary art correspond... Since technology transformed itself into something uncanny what determines human civilization from modern times,nature has already transformed into a pure technological creation.The time of contemporary art corresponds to everything that quantum mechanics has set up based on the new understanding of the universe.From artworks of John Cage,Samuel Beckett,and Maurice Blanchot to performative-conceptual artworks of Stelarc and Ken Rinaldo,we are permanently witnessing the inability to return to the“aesthetics of stability”of the world.The whole circuit within cybernetic self-development,self-turn around,and self-organization of technosphere is reduced to three key theoretical concepts and paradigms of contemporary research in the field of A-intelligence,A-emotion,and A-intuition.Those are(1)contingency;(2)singularity;and(3)emergent chaos.Unlike technique that belongs to the mechanical perception of nature as a machine of organic world reproduction,a technology that in the modern era enters the field of semi-automatic and automatic mode of machine operation,in the age of technosphere,we are faced with the transfer to telepresence spaces(Marvin Minsky)and tele-existence(Susumu Tachi).Information transfer and manage remote systems by means of code become the condition of possibility of interaction in the technical world.If the question of ontology has been focused on the object and its idea of autonomy,then it is obvious that it could not be“the one”facility with which it dealt concerning the metaphysics of subjectivity from Descartes to psychoanalysis.It is an object or thing that thinks in a completely distinctive way,unlike human thought.For that reason,instead of the“embodiment”,it carries out the function of“embeddement”. 展开更多
关键词 synaesthetic BODY technosphere Stelarc rinaldo SINGULARITY INTERACTION
在线阅读 下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部