Rectal neuroendocrine tumor(rNET)is an indolent malignancy often detected during colonoscopy screening.The incidence of rNET has increased approximately 10-fold over the past 30 years.Most rNETs detected during screen...Rectal neuroendocrine tumor(rNET)is an indolent malignancy often detected during colonoscopy screening.The incidence of rNET has increased approximately 10-fold over the past 30 years.Most rNETs detected during screening endoscopy are small,measuring<10 mm.Current guidelines recommend endoscopic resection for small,well-differentiated rNET using modified endoscopic submucosal resection(mEMR)or endoscopic submucosal dissection.However,the optimal endoscopic treatment method remains uncertain.This paper summarizes the evidence on mEMR with submucosal stretching,mEMR without submucosal stretching,endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic full-thickness resection.Given that rNETs often exhibit submucosal invasion,achieving adequate resection depth is crucial to ensure histological complete resection.mEMR with submucosal stretching appears favorable due to its high rate of histological complete resection,safety and convenience.Risk factors associated with lymph node and distant metastases are also discussed.A treatment algorithm is proposed to facilitate clinical decision-making.展开更多
BACKGROUND Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection(UEMR)has been shown to be a good treatment option for the management of nonpedunculated polyps≥10 mm since its introduction.However,there is a paucity of randomized ...BACKGROUND Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection(UEMR)has been shown to be a good treatment option for the management of nonpedunculated polyps≥10 mm since its introduction.However,there is a paucity of randomized controlled trials(RCTs)in Asia.AIM To compare the efficacy and safety of UEMR with those of conventional EMR(CEMR)in treating nonpedunculated colorectal lesions.METHODS We carried out this RCT at a tertiary hospital from October 2022 to July 2024.Patients with nonpedunculated colorectal neoplasms ranging from 10 mm to 30 mm in size were randomly assigned to either the UEMR or CEMR group.The primary outcome was the curative resection(R0)rate.The secondary outcomes included en bloc resection,procedure time,adverse events,and the number of clips used for defect closure.RESULTS A total of 260 patients with 260 lesions(130 in each UEMR and CEMR group)were recruited.The median age was 58(27-85)years,the male/female ratio was 1.74,and the median lesion size was 20(10-30 mm)mm.Compared with CEMR,UEMR was associated with a significantly greater curative resection(R0)rate(98.4%vs 90.3%;P=0.007),greater en bloc resection rate(100%vs 94.6%;P=0.014),shorter procedure time(65 vs 185 seconds;P<0.001),lower rate of bleeding complications(1.5%vs 10%;P=0.003),and fewer clips used(2 vs 3;P<0.001).No perforations were observed in either group.CONCLUSION Compared with CEMR,UEMR has a higher R0 rate,greater en bloc resection rate,shorter procedure time,fewer bleeding complications,and clips used in the management of nonpedunculated colorectal neoplasms.展开更多
BACKGROUND Recently,several endoscopic techniques have been used to improve the R0 resection rate of rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms(R-NENs).However,none of these methods can achieve 100%complete resection(CR),particu...BACKGROUND Recently,several endoscopic techniques have been used to improve the R0 resection rate of rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms(R-NENs).However,none of these methods can achieve 100%complete resection(CR),particularly in the vertical direction.Endoscopic full-thickness resection(EFTR)has proven to be an effective method for the treatment of submucosal tumors but is seldom utilized in the eradication of R-NENs.AIM To review cases of R-NENs removed using EFTR and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this technique.METHODS This retrospective cohort study enrolled 160 patients with pathologically confirmed R-NENs,including 132 who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)and 28 who underwent EFTR.Lesions were categorized as<1 cm,1-2 cm,and>2 cm in size.CR rate,en bloc resection rate,operation time,and complications were evaluated.Subgroup analyses and follow-up were also performed.RESULTS EFTR achieved 100%CR rates for lesions<1 cm and 1-2 cm,compared with 67.0%and 50.0%,respectively,in the ESD group.En bloc resection and successful removal of the R-NENs were achieved in all patients.Meanwhile,EFTR showed performance comparable to ESD in terms of operation time,hospitalization cost,and postoperative adverse events,except for a one-day longer hospital stay.We also analyzed the invasion depth of R-NENs based on full-thickness specimens.The data showed that 80%of lesions(<1 cm)and 85.7%of lesions(1-2 cm)had invaded the SM3 level or deeper at the time of resection.For ESD specimens,46.6%(<1 cm)and 89.3%(1-2 cm)of lesions had infiltrated more than 2000μm beneath the muscularis mucosae.CONCLUSION EFTR has shown superior performance in the resection of small R-NENs compared with that of ESD.展开更多
Liver transplantation represents a complex surgical procedure and serves as a curative treatment for patients presenting an acute or chronic end-stage liver disease, or carefully selected liver malignancy. A significa...Liver transplantation represents a complex surgical procedure and serves as a curative treatment for patients presenting an acute or chronic end-stage liver disease, or carefully selected liver malignancy. A significant gap still exists between the number of available donor organs and potential recipients. The use of an otherwise-wasted resected liver lobe from patients with benign liver tumors is a new, albeit small, option to alleviate the allograft shortage. This review provides evidence that resected liver lobes may be used successfully in liver transplantation.展开更多
BACKGROUND Ulcerative colitis(UC)increases the risk of colorectal dysplasia.While colectomy was once standard,advances in polypectomy,endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR),endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD),and endosco...BACKGROUND Ulcerative colitis(UC)increases the risk of colorectal dysplasia.While colectomy was once standard,advances in polypectomy,endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR),endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD),and endoscopic full-thickness resection(EFTR)now allow organ-sparing management in selected cases.AIM To summarize current evidence on the feasibility,safety,and outcomes of these techniques in UC-associated neoplasia.METHODS A scoping review was conducted using PubMed and EMBASE(1975-May 2025)with the search:(“endoscopic submucosal dissection”/exp OR“endoscopic mucosal resection”OR“full thickness resection”OR“polypectomy”)AND(“ulcerative colitis”/exp OR“ulcerative colitis”OR“pouch”).Screening followed PRISMA guidelines.Eligible studies included those reporting outcomes,feasibility,or novel techniques in the endoscopic management of UC-associated dysplasia.RESULTS Of 1075 identified records,754 were screened after duplicate removal,and 48 studies were included.Polypectomy was safe and effective for well-demarcated,lifting lesions without adjacent dysplasia.EMR has excellent outcomes for small,polypoid,or right-sided lesions that demonstrated adequate lifting.ESD is ind icated for flat,large,non-polypoid,or fibrotic lesions,particularly in the left colon.ESD achieved en bloc resection in 88%-100%and R0 resection in 73%-96%of cases.The overall complication rate with ESD was approximately 2%-10%,primarily bleeding or perforation.Local recurrence occurred in 0%-6.8%,and metachronous lesions developed in up to 31%of cases over follow-up durations of up to 15 years.Surgical intervention after ESD was required in 10%-20%of patients,typically for non-curative resection or new lesions.Submucosal fibrosis,a common obstacle in UC,limited lifting and increased procedural difficulty.Adjunctive strategies-such as water pressure-assisted dissection,pocket-creation method,self-assembling peptide injectables,and traction systems-enhanced technical success.EFTR,though limited to case series,was effective for non-lifting or anatomically complex lesions,particularly in post-surgical or pouch anatomy,but carried higher procedural risk including rare but serious adverse events.CONCLUSION Endoscopic resection offers a spectrum of curative,minimally invasive options for managing dysplasia in UC.EMR remains appropriate for simple,lifting lesions,while ESD and EFTR broaden the therapeutic landscape for complex or fibrotic pathology.Lesion morphology,lifting characteristics,and operator experience should guide technique selection.Long-term outcomes are favorable with appropriate surveillance,though the risk of metachronous neoplasia necessitates continued monitoring.展开更多
While rare,esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs)have higher mali-gnant potential and are typically diagnosed at larger sizes compared to gastric GISTs.However,well-defined guidelines for their optimal mana...While rare,esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs)have higher mali-gnant potential and are typically diagnosed at larger sizes compared to gastric GISTs.However,well-defined guidelines for their optimal management remain lacking.Most esophageal GISTs are surgically managed with enucleation,while esophagectomy is reserved for larger tumors.Recent advances in endoscopic techniques,such as endoscopic submucosal dissection and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection(ER),have allowed for endoscopic removal of submucosal esophageal lesions,including GISTs.Xu et al reported on the clinical and on-cological outcomes of 32 patients with esophageal GISTs treated with ER.The study demonstrated high en bloc resection rates and favorable 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival.However,it primarily focused on small,inci-dentally detected GISTs,with 75%of cases classified as very low or low risk according to the National Institutes of Health criteria.The authors favored the submucosal tunneling ER technique despite its procedural challenges in the upper esophagus.In this editorial,we briefly discuss the advantages and limitations of endoscopic techniques compared to surgical approaches.We also emphasize the need to establish specific management criteria for submucosal esophageal lesions to guide clinical practice.展开更多
BACKGROUND Endoscopic full-thickness resection(EFTR)is increasingly used for treating gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs)in the stomach.AIM To compare the efficacy,tolerability,and clinical outcomes of EFTR vs surg...BACKGROUND Endoscopic full-thickness resection(EFTR)is increasingly used for treating gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs)in the stomach.AIM To compare the efficacy,tolerability,and clinical outcomes of EFTR vs surgical resection(SR)for gastric GISTs.METHODS We collected clinical data from patients diagnosed with GISTs who underwent either EFTR or SR at our hospital from October 2011 to July 2024.Patients were matched in a 1:1 ratio based on baseline characteristics and tumor clinical-pathological features using propensity score matching.We analyzed perioperative outcomes and follow-up data.The primary outcome measure was progressionfree survival(PFS).RESULTS Out of 912 patients,573 met the inclusion criteria.After matching,each group included 95 patients.The EFTR group demonstrated statistically significant advantages over the SR group in average operative time(P<0.001),length of hospital stay(P<0.001),time to resume liquid diet(P<0.001),incidence of adverse events(P=0.031),and hospitalization costs(P<0.001).The en bloc resection rate was significantly different,with SR group at 100%and EFTR group at 93.7%(P=0.038).The median follow-up was 2451.50 days.Recurrence occurred in 3 patients in the EFTR group and 4 patients in the SR group,with no statistically significant difference(P=1.000).Factors associated with PFS included age,tumor size,high-risk category in the modified National Institutes of Health(NIH)risk score,and resection status.Resection status was identified as an independent prognostic factor for PFS(P=0.0173,hazard ratios=0.0179,95%CI:0.000655-0.491).Notably,there was no statistically significant difference in PFS between the two groups.CONCLUSION This study is a non-inferiority design.The EFTR group significantly outperformed the SR group in terms of operative time,length of hospital stay,time to resume a liquid diet,incidence of adverse events,and hospitalization costs,demonstrating its higher economic efficiency and better tolerability.Additionally,although the en bloc resection rate was lower in the EFTR group compared to the SR group,there were no significant differences in tumor recurrence rates and progression-free survival between the two groups.This study found no statistical difference in the primary endpoint of postoperative recurrence rates between the two groups.However,due to sample size limitations,this result requires further validation in larger-scale studies.The current results should be viewed as exploratory evidence.展开更多
Xu et al retrospectively assessed endoscopic resection(ER)for esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors(E-GISTs)and reported excellent 5-year survival rates.Although ER shows promise as a minimally invasive procedure...Xu et al retrospectively assessed endoscopic resection(ER)for esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors(E-GISTs)and reported excellent 5-year survival rates.Although ER shows promise as a minimally invasive procedure,the 75%R0 resection rate with recurrence observed even after R0 resection warrants further discussion.We highlight the need for careful patient selection based on tumor size,location,and risk,considering endoscopic and thoracoscopic approaches.Future studies should refine ER techniques,optimize patient selection,and establish long-term follow-up to guide E-GIST management.展开更多
BACKGROUND Ultra-low rectal cancer(ULRC),defined as a lesion located within 5 cm of the anal verge,poses considerable clinical challenges because the treatment decision must balance oncological eradication with preser...BACKGROUND Ultra-low rectal cancer(ULRC),defined as a lesion located within 5 cm of the anal verge,poses considerable clinical challenges because the treatment decision must balance oncological eradication with preservation of anal function.Historically,abdominoperineal resection(APR)has served as a standard approach for tumor eradication in these patients,but a permanent stoma significantly reduces patients'quality of life.In contrast,intersphincteric resection(ISR)can maintain anal function,thereby improving quality of life;however,the debate surrounding short-term postoperative complications and long-term prognosis has not been fully resolved.Therefore,large-scale multicenter retrospective cohort studies are crucial to address this issue and provide more reliable data.AIM To address a persistent debate in ULRC management,we compared ISR and APR outcomes through rigorous methodology.METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing surgery at three centers in China between 2012 and 2023 was performed with propensity score matching(PSM).RESULTS A total of 803 patients(435 in the ISR group and 368 in the APR group)met the inclusion criteria,with 289 comprising each of the two groups after PSM.Over a median follow-up of 47.2 months,the absolute 5-year overall survival(OS)improved by 6.7%with ISR(80.8%vs 74.1%,P=0.032).Cox regression analysis confirmed ISR(HR=0.554,95%CI:0.371-0.828,P=0.004)as an independent protective factor for OS and reduced local recurrence(9.5%vs 12.9%,P=0.019).With respect to short-term complications,despite higher anastomotic leakage rates(11.4%vs 1.0%),ISR significantly reduced total complications(29.4%vs 42.2%,P=0.001)and hospitalization duration(9.8 days vs 12.9 days,P<0.001).Moreover,incision infection,urinary retention,circumferential resection margins,and hospitalization time were greater in the APR group(P<0.05).CONCLUSION The long-term prognosis of ULRC treated with ISR is excellent,with no increase in overall surgical complications or hospital stay duration,indicating that ISR is a feasible alternative to APR for managing ULRC.展开更多
Various approaches to laparoscopic anatomic liver resection have been described.In this paper,the authors present a technique that utilizes the ventral avascular areas above the inferior vena cava.While many liver sur...Various approaches to laparoscopic anatomic liver resection have been described.In this paper,the authors present a technique that utilizes the ventral avascular areas above the inferior vena cava.While many liver surgeons partially adopt this elements of this method,few employ it to the full extent outlined here.Main-taining low central venous pressure during anesthesia is critical to this approach,as demonstrated by the operative images showing collapsed hepatic veins.This technique is particularly advantageous when the patient’s body mass index is low,the tumor is small(or large but deeply embedded within the liver parenchy-ma),and the overlying liver tissue is not excessively bulky or heavy.Nonetheless,following the conventional course along the Glissonean pedicle can be beneficial.The authors demonstrate notable skill in completing these procedures laparosco-pically.However,concerns over margin positivity and tumor recurrence remain,and follow up studies are needed to further validate the approach.展开更多
Objective:To explore the clinical feasibility and safety of modified endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors(R-NETs).Methods:Seventy cases of R-NETs treated with endoscopic mucosal resection in o...Objective:To explore the clinical feasibility and safety of modified endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors(R-NETs).Methods:Seventy cases of R-NETs treated with endoscopic mucosal resection in our hospital between April 2022 and March 2024 were selected and divided into the control group and the observation group using the mean score method,each with 35 cases.In the control group,traditional endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)was performed,and in the observation group,modified EMR(endoscopic mucosal resection with ligation apparatus[EMR-L])was performed.The operation time,hospitalization time,operation cost,and related complication rate of the two groups of patients were compared.Results:The operation time(20.36±1.46 min)and hospital stay(3.37±0.51 d)of patients in the observation group were shorter than those of the control group(31.44±2.65 min and 4.73±0.49 d).The cost of the operation in the observation group(7,695.85±1,521.42 yuan)was lower than that of the control group(8,418.62±1219.30 yuan),and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The total incidence of postoperative related complications in the observation group was observed to be 11.42%,which was significantly lower than that of 31.42%in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:The application of modified EMR in R-NETs is remarkable,which can not only effectively shorten the operation time and hospital stay,but also further reduce the risk of related complications,and indirectly save a large amount of hospital costs;thus,it is recommended to be promoted and applied clinically.展开更多
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic liver resection(LLR)can be challenging due to the difficulty of establishing a retrohepatic tunnel under laparoscopy.Dissecting the third hepatic hilum before parenchymal transection often lead...BACKGROUND Laparoscopic liver resection(LLR)can be challenging due to the difficulty of establishing a retrohepatic tunnel under laparoscopy.Dissecting the third hepatic hilum before parenchymal transection often leads to significant liver mobilization,tumor compression,and bleeding from the short hepatic veins(SHVs).This study introduces a novel technique utilizing the ventral avascular area of the inferior vena cava(IVC),allowing SHVs to be addressed after parenchymal transection,thereby reducing surgical complexity and improving outcomes in in situ LLR.AIM To introduce and evaluate a novel LLR technique using the ventral avascular area of the IVC and compare its short-term outcomes with conventional methods.METHODS The clinical cohort data of patients with pathologically confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who underwent conventional LLR and novel LLR between July 2021 and July 2023 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were retrospectively analyzed.In novel LLR,we initially separated the caudate lobe from the IVC using dissecting forceps along the ventral avascular area of the IVC.Then,we transected the parenchyma of the left and right caudate lobes from the caudal side to the cephalic side using the avascular area as a marker.Subsequently,we addressed the SHVs and finally dissected the root of the right hepatic vein or left hepatic vein.The short-term postoperative outcomes and oncological results of the two approaches were evaluated and compared.RESULTS A total of 256 patients were included,with 150(58.59%)undergoing conventional LLR and 106(41.41%)undergoing novel LLR.The novel technique resulted in significantly larger tumor resections(6.47±2.96 cm vs 4.01±2.33 cm,P<0.001),shorter operative times(199.57±60.37 minutes vs 262.33±83.90 minutes,P<0.001),less intraoperative blood loss(206.92±37.09 mL vs 363.34±131.27 mL,P<0.001),and greater resection volume(345.11±31.40 mL vs 264.38±31.98 mL,P<0.001)compared to conventional LLR.CONCLUSION This novel technique enhances liver resection outcomes by reducing intraoperative complications such as bleeding and tumor compression.It facilitates a safer,in situ removal of complex liver tumors,even in challenging anatomical locations.Compared to conventional methods,this technique offers significant advantages,including reduced operative time,blood loss,and improved overall surgical efficiency.展开更多
BACKGROUND Gastric cancer(GC)is a prevalent tumor in the digestive system,with around one million new cases reported annually,ranking it as the third most common malignancy.Reducing pain is a key research focus.This s...BACKGROUND Gastric cancer(GC)is a prevalent tumor in the digestive system,with around one million new cases reported annually,ranking it as the third most common malignancy.Reducing pain is a key research focus.This study evaluates the effect of nalbuphine on the analgesic effect and the expression of pain factors in patients after radical resection.AIM To provide a reference for postoperative analgesia methods.METHODS One hundred eight patients with GC,admitted between January 2022 and June 2024,underwent radical gastrectomy.They received a controlled analgesia pump and a transverse abdominis muscle plane block,divided into two groups of 54 patients in each group.The control group received sufentanil,while the observation group received nalbuphine as an analgesic.Postoperative analgesic effects,pain factor expression,and adverse effects were compared.RESULTS The resting pain and activity pain scores in the observation group at 6,12,24 and 48 hours were significantly lower than those in the control group.Additionally,the number of presses and consumption of the observation group at 48 hours were lower than those of the control group;and the response rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group(P<0.05).The prostaglandin E2,substance P,and serotonin levels 24 hours after the observation group were lower than those in the control group,and the incidence of adverse reactions was 5.56%lower than 22.22%in the control group(P<0.05).CONCLUSION The findings suggest that nalbuphine enhances postoperative multimodal analgesia in patients with radical GC,effectively improving postoperative analgesic effect,relieving postoperative resting and active pain,and reducing postoperative pain factor expression,demonstrating its potential for clinical application.展开更多
Oesophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumours are rare,anatomically challenging lesions with higher surgical morbidity than their gastric counterparts.Emerging endoscopic resection techniques such as endoscopic submuco...Oesophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumours are rare,anatomically challenging lesions with higher surgical morbidity than their gastric counterparts.Emerging endoscopic resection techniques such as endoscopic submucosal dissection and submucosal tunnelling endoscopic resection show much promise for the management of patients who are not fit for,or wish to avoid the morbidity of,major surgical resection.These techniques require careful patient selection and advanced technical skills.We build on the recent review of such techniques by Vogli et al.Current evidence is limited to small case series with heterogeneity in patient selection,tumor size,and outcomes.Notably,long-term oncological data remain sparse,and complications such as bleeding or perforation may be life-threatening in patients unfit for surgical rescue.Nonetheless,endoscopic approaches have many potential advantages to offer such as preserved quality of life and definitive management of unfit patients.展开更多
BACKGROUND Rectal schwannoma(RS)is a rare subtype of schwannoma that presents diagnostic challenges owing to its clinical rarity.The absence of typical symptoms,specific signs,and distinctive radiographic findings oft...BACKGROUND Rectal schwannoma(RS)is a rare subtype of schwannoma that presents diagnostic challenges owing to its clinical rarity.The absence of typical symptoms,specific signs,and distinctive radiographic findings often hinders clinicians from reaching a definitive diagnosis before surgical intervention.Herein,we report a case of RS who underwent complete resection through endoscopic full-thickness resection(EFTR)and discuss the clinical,imaging,and pathological features for differential diagnosis.CASE SUMMARY A 71-year-old Chinese woman presented to our outpatient clinic with a 4-year history of a rectal mucosal mass for a follow-up surveillance colonoscopy.A neurogenic tumor with extraluminal growth was considered based on the imaging findings.Resection was required,and an EFTR was performed.On endoscopic exploration,a smooth surface extruding mass was identified at the rectum.The patient was discharged 48 hours after the operation without infection or bleeding.Based on the pathological and immunohistochemical findings of the resected mass,a rectal benign schwannoma was diagnosed.The patient did not undergo any adjuvant therapy.Nearly one year later,a follow-up surveillance colonoscopy and an abdominal and pelvic plain plus enhancement scan were performed,and no tumor recurrence or metastasis was noted.CONCLUSION EFTR is safe and effective for resecting gastrointestinal stromal tumors,especially those with extraluminal growth and no lymph node involvement.展开更多
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer(CRC)frequently metastasizes to the liver,significantly compromising patient survival.While surgical resection improves outcomes for resectable cases,many patients have limited therapeutic ...BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer(CRC)frequently metastasizes to the liver,significantly compromising patient survival.While surgical resection improves outcomes for resectable cases,many patients have limited therapeutic options.AIM To evaluate the role of laparoscopic ultrasound in resection and ablation of colorectal liver metastases(CRLM).METHODS Between June 2018 and June 2020,300 patients with CRC and liver metastases were admitted to our hospital.They were divided into two groups(150 cases each)based on treatment method:The control group(ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid enhanced magnetic resonance imaging)and the observation group[contrast-enhanced ultrasound with Sonazoid(S-CEUS)].RESULTS The study group demonstrated better efficacy(P<0.05),fewer adverse events(P<0.05),and better survival outcomes compared to the control group(1-year:80%vs 62%;3-year:54%vs 33%;5-year:32%vs 18%;median survival:48 months vs 30 months;hazard ratio=0.63,95%CI:0.48-0.83,P<0.001).Although Karnofsky Performance Status scores improved in both groups,the scores were significantly higher in the observation group(P<0.05).Multivariate analysis confirmed intraoperative S-CEUS and tumor differentiation as independent prognostic factors(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Laparoscopic ultrasound-guided resection/ablation improved outcomes in CRLM,reducing complications and enhancing survival.Intraoperative S-CEUS was an independent prognostic factor,supporting its clinical value.展开更多
For the treatment method of esophageal subepithelial lesions originating from the muscularis propria,conventional endoscopic resection techniques are timeconsuming and lack efficacy for small subepithelial lesions ori...For the treatment method of esophageal subepithelial lesions originating from the muscularis propria,conventional endoscopic resection techniques are timeconsuming and lack efficacy for small subepithelial lesions originating from the muscularis propria.Lu et al presented an exploration of the effectiveness and safety of ligation-assisted endoscopic submucosal resection,aiming to provide a minimally invasive method for treatment.We discussed and analyzed this study from the aspects of sample screening,clinical pathological characteristics,casecontrol analysis,and follow-up data.展开更多
BACKGROUND Gastroesophageal junction(GEJ)or gastrointestinal stromal tumor(GIST)are located in unfavorable parts of the stomach,due to the anatomical complexity of these regions,protecting the cardia while ensuring R0...BACKGROUND Gastroesophageal junction(GEJ)or gastrointestinal stromal tumor(GIST)are located in unfavorable parts of the stomach,due to the anatomical complexity of these regions,protecting the cardia while ensuring R0 resection is a major challenge for surgeons.CASE SUMMARY Two cases of GEJ stromal tumors were reported.Abdominal computed tomography scans revealed that both tumors were located at the GEJ,close to the posterior wall,with one tumor measuring greater than 5 cm.Both patients successfully underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic wedge resection of the stomach.The surgeries achieved R0 resection while preserving the cardia sphincter and maximizing gastric tissue preservation.Postoperatively,no symptoms such as gastroesophageal reflux or cardia stenosis were observed.Case 1:Postoperative pathology:GIST.Immunohistochemical results:Tumor cells were positive for CD34,CD117,and DOG1,and negative for SMA,desmin,S-100,and SDHB(normal expression).The Ki-67 proliferation index was approximately 5%.Case 2:Postoperative pathology:GIST.Immunohistochemical results:Tumor cells were positive for CD117(++),CD34(++),DOG1(+++),and focal positivity for SMA.Negative for desmin,S-100(few cells positive),and SDHB(preserved expression).The Ki-67 proliferation index was approximately 10%.CONCLUSION The gastric tube-guided robotic-assisted laparoscopic resection is a safe and effective method for tumor resection while preserving the cardia,and it is worth further promotion in clinical practice.展开更多
In this editorial,we provide commentary on a recently published study by Zhao et al in the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.The study discusses the clinical characteristics of patients undergoing endoscopic ...In this editorial,we provide commentary on a recently published study by Zhao et al in the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.The study discusses the clinical characteristics of patients undergoing endoscopic resection for gastric cancers.We feel it is important to engage our endoscopy community in a discussion on the current evidence in the literature on the necessary number of cases for training in endoluminal surgery techniques,particularly endoscopic submucosal dissection.This includes the latest recommendations from the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy,as well as a summary of key studies on the learning curve for these techniques.Additionally,we explore the impact of an endo-scopist’s specialty on endoscopy outcomes,drawing from current evidence in the literature to shape our perspective in this evolving field.展开更多
BACKGROUND Thermal ablation(TA),including radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation,is a commonly used curative treatment for single small hepatocellular carcinoma(sHCC).The relative advantages of TA and surgical...BACKGROUND Thermal ablation(TA),including radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation,is a commonly used curative treatment for single small hepatocellular carcinoma(sHCC).The relative advantages of TA and surgical resection(SR)in terms of long-term survival remain controversial.AIM To compare their long-term efficacy in this patient population.METHODS This population-based retrospective cohort study included 257 patients who received a first diagnosis of single sHCC and underwent SR or TA from January 2012 to September 2017.The primary endpoints were overall survival(OS)and recurrence-free survival(RFS).RESULTS The average follow-up duration was 11.4 years.The 1-,3-,5-,and 10-year OS rates were 95.8%,86.0%,82.5%,and 74.2%in the SR group vs 97.4%,85.8%,78.6%,and 65.6%in the TA group,with the median OS not yet reached.The 1-,3-,5-,and 10-year RFS rates were 79.8%,59.6%,46.2%,and 24.7%in the SR group vs 83.9%,61.5%,47.9%,and 41.2%in the TA group,with median RFS values of 3.95 and 4.63 years,respectively.No significant differences in OS or RFS were observed overall(OS:P=0.244;RFS:P=0.180),but in patients≤60 years,TA led to a higher RFS than SR(P=0.021).Multivariate analysis identified age,tumor differentiation grade,and Child-Pugh classification as independent risk factors for OS,whereas age and differentiation grade were significant risk factors for RFS.CONCLUSION In patients with single sHCC,SR,and TA offered comparable long-term efficacy.However,TA showed superior RFS in patients≤60 years,suggesting that TA may be a reasonable option for younger patients,pending confirmation by prospective studies.展开更多
基金Supported by Nanchang High-Level Scientific and Technological Innovation Talents‘Double Hundred Plan’Project,China,No.2022-312.
文摘Rectal neuroendocrine tumor(rNET)is an indolent malignancy often detected during colonoscopy screening.The incidence of rNET has increased approximately 10-fold over the past 30 years.Most rNETs detected during screening endoscopy are small,measuring<10 mm.Current guidelines recommend endoscopic resection for small,well-differentiated rNET using modified endoscopic submucosal resection(mEMR)or endoscopic submucosal dissection.However,the optimal endoscopic treatment method remains uncertain.This paper summarizes the evidence on mEMR with submucosal stretching,mEMR without submucosal stretching,endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic full-thickness resection.Given that rNETs often exhibit submucosal invasion,achieving adequate resection depth is crucial to ensure histological complete resection.mEMR with submucosal stretching appears favorable due to its high rate of histological complete resection,safety and convenience.Risk factors associated with lymph node and distant metastases are also discussed.A treatment algorithm is proposed to facilitate clinical decision-making.
文摘BACKGROUND Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection(UEMR)has been shown to be a good treatment option for the management of nonpedunculated polyps≥10 mm since its introduction.However,there is a paucity of randomized controlled trials(RCTs)in Asia.AIM To compare the efficacy and safety of UEMR with those of conventional EMR(CEMR)in treating nonpedunculated colorectal lesions.METHODS We carried out this RCT at a tertiary hospital from October 2022 to July 2024.Patients with nonpedunculated colorectal neoplasms ranging from 10 mm to 30 mm in size were randomly assigned to either the UEMR or CEMR group.The primary outcome was the curative resection(R0)rate.The secondary outcomes included en bloc resection,procedure time,adverse events,and the number of clips used for defect closure.RESULTS A total of 260 patients with 260 lesions(130 in each UEMR and CEMR group)were recruited.The median age was 58(27-85)years,the male/female ratio was 1.74,and the median lesion size was 20(10-30 mm)mm.Compared with CEMR,UEMR was associated with a significantly greater curative resection(R0)rate(98.4%vs 90.3%;P=0.007),greater en bloc resection rate(100%vs 94.6%;P=0.014),shorter procedure time(65 vs 185 seconds;P<0.001),lower rate of bleeding complications(1.5%vs 10%;P=0.003),and fewer clips used(2 vs 3;P<0.001).No perforations were observed in either group.CONCLUSION Compared with CEMR,UEMR has a higher R0 rate,greater en bloc resection rate,shorter procedure time,fewer bleeding complications,and clips used in the management of nonpedunculated colorectal neoplasms.
基金Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.82004298Jiangsu Graduate Research and Practice Innovation Program,China,No.KYCX23_2090.
文摘BACKGROUND Recently,several endoscopic techniques have been used to improve the R0 resection rate of rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms(R-NENs).However,none of these methods can achieve 100%complete resection(CR),particularly in the vertical direction.Endoscopic full-thickness resection(EFTR)has proven to be an effective method for the treatment of submucosal tumors but is seldom utilized in the eradication of R-NENs.AIM To review cases of R-NENs removed using EFTR and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this technique.METHODS This retrospective cohort study enrolled 160 patients with pathologically confirmed R-NENs,including 132 who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)and 28 who underwent EFTR.Lesions were categorized as<1 cm,1-2 cm,and>2 cm in size.CR rate,en bloc resection rate,operation time,and complications were evaluated.Subgroup analyses and follow-up were also performed.RESULTS EFTR achieved 100%CR rates for lesions<1 cm and 1-2 cm,compared with 67.0%and 50.0%,respectively,in the ESD group.En bloc resection and successful removal of the R-NENs were achieved in all patients.Meanwhile,EFTR showed performance comparable to ESD in terms of operation time,hospitalization cost,and postoperative adverse events,except for a one-day longer hospital stay.We also analyzed the invasion depth of R-NENs based on full-thickness specimens.The data showed that 80%of lesions(<1 cm)and 85.7%of lesions(1-2 cm)had invaded the SM3 level or deeper at the time of resection.For ESD specimens,46.6%(<1 cm)and 89.3%(1-2 cm)of lesions had infiltrated more than 2000μm beneath the muscularis mucosae.CONCLUSION EFTR has shown superior performance in the resection of small R-NENs compared with that of ESD.
基金supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82150 0 04)the National Municipal Key Clinical Specialtythe Clinical Research Project for Major Diseases in Municipal Hospitals (SHDC2020CR1022B)。
文摘Liver transplantation represents a complex surgical procedure and serves as a curative treatment for patients presenting an acute or chronic end-stage liver disease, or carefully selected liver malignancy. A significant gap still exists between the number of available donor organs and potential recipients. The use of an otherwise-wasted resected liver lobe from patients with benign liver tumors is a new, albeit small, option to alleviate the allograft shortage. This review provides evidence that resected liver lobes may be used successfully in liver transplantation.
文摘BACKGROUND Ulcerative colitis(UC)increases the risk of colorectal dysplasia.While colectomy was once standard,advances in polypectomy,endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR),endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD),and endoscopic full-thickness resection(EFTR)now allow organ-sparing management in selected cases.AIM To summarize current evidence on the feasibility,safety,and outcomes of these techniques in UC-associated neoplasia.METHODS A scoping review was conducted using PubMed and EMBASE(1975-May 2025)with the search:(“endoscopic submucosal dissection”/exp OR“endoscopic mucosal resection”OR“full thickness resection”OR“polypectomy”)AND(“ulcerative colitis”/exp OR“ulcerative colitis”OR“pouch”).Screening followed PRISMA guidelines.Eligible studies included those reporting outcomes,feasibility,or novel techniques in the endoscopic management of UC-associated dysplasia.RESULTS Of 1075 identified records,754 were screened after duplicate removal,and 48 studies were included.Polypectomy was safe and effective for well-demarcated,lifting lesions without adjacent dysplasia.EMR has excellent outcomes for small,polypoid,or right-sided lesions that demonstrated adequate lifting.ESD is ind icated for flat,large,non-polypoid,or fibrotic lesions,particularly in the left colon.ESD achieved en bloc resection in 88%-100%and R0 resection in 73%-96%of cases.The overall complication rate with ESD was approximately 2%-10%,primarily bleeding or perforation.Local recurrence occurred in 0%-6.8%,and metachronous lesions developed in up to 31%of cases over follow-up durations of up to 15 years.Surgical intervention after ESD was required in 10%-20%of patients,typically for non-curative resection or new lesions.Submucosal fibrosis,a common obstacle in UC,limited lifting and increased procedural difficulty.Adjunctive strategies-such as water pressure-assisted dissection,pocket-creation method,self-assembling peptide injectables,and traction systems-enhanced technical success.EFTR,though limited to case series,was effective for non-lifting or anatomically complex lesions,particularly in post-surgical or pouch anatomy,but carried higher procedural risk including rare but serious adverse events.CONCLUSION Endoscopic resection offers a spectrum of curative,minimally invasive options for managing dysplasia in UC.EMR remains appropriate for simple,lifting lesions,while ESD and EFTR broaden the therapeutic landscape for complex or fibrotic pathology.Lesion morphology,lifting characteristics,and operator experience should guide technique selection.Long-term outcomes are favorable with appropriate surveillance,though the risk of metachronous neoplasia necessitates continued monitoring.
文摘While rare,esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs)have higher mali-gnant potential and are typically diagnosed at larger sizes compared to gastric GISTs.However,well-defined guidelines for their optimal management remain lacking.Most esophageal GISTs are surgically managed with enucleation,while esophagectomy is reserved for larger tumors.Recent advances in endoscopic techniques,such as endoscopic submucosal dissection and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection(ER),have allowed for endoscopic removal of submucosal esophageal lesions,including GISTs.Xu et al reported on the clinical and on-cological outcomes of 32 patients with esophageal GISTs treated with ER.The study demonstrated high en bloc resection rates and favorable 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival.However,it primarily focused on small,inci-dentally detected GISTs,with 75%of cases classified as very low or low risk according to the National Institutes of Health criteria.The authors favored the submucosal tunneling ER technique despite its procedural challenges in the upper esophagus.In this editorial,we briefly discuss the advantages and limitations of endoscopic techniques compared to surgical approaches.We also emphasize the need to establish specific management criteria for submucosal esophageal lesions to guide clinical practice.
文摘BACKGROUND Endoscopic full-thickness resection(EFTR)is increasingly used for treating gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs)in the stomach.AIM To compare the efficacy,tolerability,and clinical outcomes of EFTR vs surgical resection(SR)for gastric GISTs.METHODS We collected clinical data from patients diagnosed with GISTs who underwent either EFTR or SR at our hospital from October 2011 to July 2024.Patients were matched in a 1:1 ratio based on baseline characteristics and tumor clinical-pathological features using propensity score matching.We analyzed perioperative outcomes and follow-up data.The primary outcome measure was progressionfree survival(PFS).RESULTS Out of 912 patients,573 met the inclusion criteria.After matching,each group included 95 patients.The EFTR group demonstrated statistically significant advantages over the SR group in average operative time(P<0.001),length of hospital stay(P<0.001),time to resume liquid diet(P<0.001),incidence of adverse events(P=0.031),and hospitalization costs(P<0.001).The en bloc resection rate was significantly different,with SR group at 100%and EFTR group at 93.7%(P=0.038).The median follow-up was 2451.50 days.Recurrence occurred in 3 patients in the EFTR group and 4 patients in the SR group,with no statistically significant difference(P=1.000).Factors associated with PFS included age,tumor size,high-risk category in the modified National Institutes of Health(NIH)risk score,and resection status.Resection status was identified as an independent prognostic factor for PFS(P=0.0173,hazard ratios=0.0179,95%CI:0.000655-0.491).Notably,there was no statistically significant difference in PFS between the two groups.CONCLUSION This study is a non-inferiority design.The EFTR group significantly outperformed the SR group in terms of operative time,length of hospital stay,time to resume a liquid diet,incidence of adverse events,and hospitalization costs,demonstrating its higher economic efficiency and better tolerability.Additionally,although the en bloc resection rate was lower in the EFTR group compared to the SR group,there were no significant differences in tumor recurrence rates and progression-free survival between the two groups.This study found no statistical difference in the primary endpoint of postoperative recurrence rates between the two groups.However,due to sample size limitations,this result requires further validation in larger-scale studies.The current results should be viewed as exploratory evidence.
文摘Xu et al retrospectively assessed endoscopic resection(ER)for esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors(E-GISTs)and reported excellent 5-year survival rates.Although ER shows promise as a minimally invasive procedure,the 75%R0 resection rate with recurrence observed even after R0 resection warrants further discussion.We highlight the need for careful patient selection based on tumor size,location,and risk,considering endoscopic and thoracoscopic approaches.Future studies should refine ER techniques,optimize patient selection,and establish long-term follow-up to guide E-GIST management.
基金Supported by Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province,No.2023J011819.
文摘BACKGROUND Ultra-low rectal cancer(ULRC),defined as a lesion located within 5 cm of the anal verge,poses considerable clinical challenges because the treatment decision must balance oncological eradication with preservation of anal function.Historically,abdominoperineal resection(APR)has served as a standard approach for tumor eradication in these patients,but a permanent stoma significantly reduces patients'quality of life.In contrast,intersphincteric resection(ISR)can maintain anal function,thereby improving quality of life;however,the debate surrounding short-term postoperative complications and long-term prognosis has not been fully resolved.Therefore,large-scale multicenter retrospective cohort studies are crucial to address this issue and provide more reliable data.AIM To address a persistent debate in ULRC management,we compared ISR and APR outcomes through rigorous methodology.METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing surgery at three centers in China between 2012 and 2023 was performed with propensity score matching(PSM).RESULTS A total of 803 patients(435 in the ISR group and 368 in the APR group)met the inclusion criteria,with 289 comprising each of the two groups after PSM.Over a median follow-up of 47.2 months,the absolute 5-year overall survival(OS)improved by 6.7%with ISR(80.8%vs 74.1%,P=0.032).Cox regression analysis confirmed ISR(HR=0.554,95%CI:0.371-0.828,P=0.004)as an independent protective factor for OS and reduced local recurrence(9.5%vs 12.9%,P=0.019).With respect to short-term complications,despite higher anastomotic leakage rates(11.4%vs 1.0%),ISR significantly reduced total complications(29.4%vs 42.2%,P=0.001)and hospitalization duration(9.8 days vs 12.9 days,P<0.001).Moreover,incision infection,urinary retention,circumferential resection margins,and hospitalization time were greater in the APR group(P<0.05).CONCLUSION The long-term prognosis of ULRC treated with ISR is excellent,with no increase in overall surgical complications or hospital stay duration,indicating that ISR is a feasible alternative to APR for managing ULRC.
文摘Various approaches to laparoscopic anatomic liver resection have been described.In this paper,the authors present a technique that utilizes the ventral avascular areas above the inferior vena cava.While many liver surgeons partially adopt this elements of this method,few employ it to the full extent outlined here.Main-taining low central venous pressure during anesthesia is critical to this approach,as demonstrated by the operative images showing collapsed hepatic veins.This technique is particularly advantageous when the patient’s body mass index is low,the tumor is small(or large but deeply embedded within the liver parenchy-ma),and the overlying liver tissue is not excessively bulky or heavy.Nonetheless,following the conventional course along the Glissonean pedicle can be beneficial.The authors demonstrate notable skill in completing these procedures laparosco-pically.However,concerns over margin positivity and tumor recurrence remain,and follow up studies are needed to further validate the approach.
基金Clinical Study on Endoscopic Resection of Colorectal Submucosal Tumors Using Underwater Combined with Metal Clip-Assisted Snare,China(Grant No.2441ZF271)。
文摘Objective:To explore the clinical feasibility and safety of modified endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors(R-NETs).Methods:Seventy cases of R-NETs treated with endoscopic mucosal resection in our hospital between April 2022 and March 2024 were selected and divided into the control group and the observation group using the mean score method,each with 35 cases.In the control group,traditional endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)was performed,and in the observation group,modified EMR(endoscopic mucosal resection with ligation apparatus[EMR-L])was performed.The operation time,hospitalization time,operation cost,and related complication rate of the two groups of patients were compared.Results:The operation time(20.36±1.46 min)and hospital stay(3.37±0.51 d)of patients in the observation group were shorter than those of the control group(31.44±2.65 min and 4.73±0.49 d).The cost of the operation in the observation group(7,695.85±1,521.42 yuan)was lower than that of the control group(8,418.62±1219.30 yuan),and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The total incidence of postoperative related complications in the observation group was observed to be 11.42%,which was significantly lower than that of 31.42%in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:The application of modified EMR in R-NETs is remarkable,which can not only effectively shorten the operation time and hospital stay,but also further reduce the risk of related complications,and indirectly save a large amount of hospital costs;thus,it is recommended to be promoted and applied clinically.
基金Supported by the General Project of the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing,No.cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0604.
文摘BACKGROUND Laparoscopic liver resection(LLR)can be challenging due to the difficulty of establishing a retrohepatic tunnel under laparoscopy.Dissecting the third hepatic hilum before parenchymal transection often leads to significant liver mobilization,tumor compression,and bleeding from the short hepatic veins(SHVs).This study introduces a novel technique utilizing the ventral avascular area of the inferior vena cava(IVC),allowing SHVs to be addressed after parenchymal transection,thereby reducing surgical complexity and improving outcomes in in situ LLR.AIM To introduce and evaluate a novel LLR technique using the ventral avascular area of the IVC and compare its short-term outcomes with conventional methods.METHODS The clinical cohort data of patients with pathologically confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who underwent conventional LLR and novel LLR between July 2021 and July 2023 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were retrospectively analyzed.In novel LLR,we initially separated the caudate lobe from the IVC using dissecting forceps along the ventral avascular area of the IVC.Then,we transected the parenchyma of the left and right caudate lobes from the caudal side to the cephalic side using the avascular area as a marker.Subsequently,we addressed the SHVs and finally dissected the root of the right hepatic vein or left hepatic vein.The short-term postoperative outcomes and oncological results of the two approaches were evaluated and compared.RESULTS A total of 256 patients were included,with 150(58.59%)undergoing conventional LLR and 106(41.41%)undergoing novel LLR.The novel technique resulted in significantly larger tumor resections(6.47±2.96 cm vs 4.01±2.33 cm,P<0.001),shorter operative times(199.57±60.37 minutes vs 262.33±83.90 minutes,P<0.001),less intraoperative blood loss(206.92±37.09 mL vs 363.34±131.27 mL,P<0.001),and greater resection volume(345.11±31.40 mL vs 264.38±31.98 mL,P<0.001)compared to conventional LLR.CONCLUSION This novel technique enhances liver resection outcomes by reducing intraoperative complications such as bleeding and tumor compression.It facilitates a safer,in situ removal of complex liver tumors,even in challenging anatomical locations.Compared to conventional methods,this technique offers significant advantages,including reduced operative time,blood loss,and improved overall surgical efficiency.
文摘BACKGROUND Gastric cancer(GC)is a prevalent tumor in the digestive system,with around one million new cases reported annually,ranking it as the third most common malignancy.Reducing pain is a key research focus.This study evaluates the effect of nalbuphine on the analgesic effect and the expression of pain factors in patients after radical resection.AIM To provide a reference for postoperative analgesia methods.METHODS One hundred eight patients with GC,admitted between January 2022 and June 2024,underwent radical gastrectomy.They received a controlled analgesia pump and a transverse abdominis muscle plane block,divided into two groups of 54 patients in each group.The control group received sufentanil,while the observation group received nalbuphine as an analgesic.Postoperative analgesic effects,pain factor expression,and adverse effects were compared.RESULTS The resting pain and activity pain scores in the observation group at 6,12,24 and 48 hours were significantly lower than those in the control group.Additionally,the number of presses and consumption of the observation group at 48 hours were lower than those of the control group;and the response rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group(P<0.05).The prostaglandin E2,substance P,and serotonin levels 24 hours after the observation group were lower than those in the control group,and the incidence of adverse reactions was 5.56%lower than 22.22%in the control group(P<0.05).CONCLUSION The findings suggest that nalbuphine enhances postoperative multimodal analgesia in patients with radical GC,effectively improving postoperative analgesic effect,relieving postoperative resting and active pain,and reducing postoperative pain factor expression,demonstrating its potential for clinical application.
文摘Oesophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumours are rare,anatomically challenging lesions with higher surgical morbidity than their gastric counterparts.Emerging endoscopic resection techniques such as endoscopic submucosal dissection and submucosal tunnelling endoscopic resection show much promise for the management of patients who are not fit for,or wish to avoid the morbidity of,major surgical resection.These techniques require careful patient selection and advanced technical skills.We build on the recent review of such techniques by Vogli et al.Current evidence is limited to small case series with heterogeneity in patient selection,tumor size,and outcomes.Notably,long-term oncological data remain sparse,and complications such as bleeding or perforation may be life-threatening in patients unfit for surgical rescue.Nonetheless,endoscopic approaches have many potential advantages to offer such as preserved quality of life and definitive management of unfit patients.
基金Supported by Chengdu Key Technology Innovation R&D Projects(In the Field of Population Health)in the 2023,No.2022-YF05-02120-SN.
文摘BACKGROUND Rectal schwannoma(RS)is a rare subtype of schwannoma that presents diagnostic challenges owing to its clinical rarity.The absence of typical symptoms,specific signs,and distinctive radiographic findings often hinders clinicians from reaching a definitive diagnosis before surgical intervention.Herein,we report a case of RS who underwent complete resection through endoscopic full-thickness resection(EFTR)and discuss the clinical,imaging,and pathological features for differential diagnosis.CASE SUMMARY A 71-year-old Chinese woman presented to our outpatient clinic with a 4-year history of a rectal mucosal mass for a follow-up surveillance colonoscopy.A neurogenic tumor with extraluminal growth was considered based on the imaging findings.Resection was required,and an EFTR was performed.On endoscopic exploration,a smooth surface extruding mass was identified at the rectum.The patient was discharged 48 hours after the operation without infection or bleeding.Based on the pathological and immunohistochemical findings of the resected mass,a rectal benign schwannoma was diagnosed.The patient did not undergo any adjuvant therapy.Nearly one year later,a follow-up surveillance colonoscopy and an abdominal and pelvic plain plus enhancement scan were performed,and no tumor recurrence or metastasis was noted.CONCLUSION EFTR is safe and effective for resecting gastrointestinal stromal tumors,especially those with extraluminal growth and no lymph node involvement.
基金Supported by National Clinical Key Specialty Major Research Project of Hunan Provincial Health Commission in 2023,No.Z2023165.
文摘BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer(CRC)frequently metastasizes to the liver,significantly compromising patient survival.While surgical resection improves outcomes for resectable cases,many patients have limited therapeutic options.AIM To evaluate the role of laparoscopic ultrasound in resection and ablation of colorectal liver metastases(CRLM).METHODS Between June 2018 and June 2020,300 patients with CRC and liver metastases were admitted to our hospital.They were divided into two groups(150 cases each)based on treatment method:The control group(ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid enhanced magnetic resonance imaging)and the observation group[contrast-enhanced ultrasound with Sonazoid(S-CEUS)].RESULTS The study group demonstrated better efficacy(P<0.05),fewer adverse events(P<0.05),and better survival outcomes compared to the control group(1-year:80%vs 62%;3-year:54%vs 33%;5-year:32%vs 18%;median survival:48 months vs 30 months;hazard ratio=0.63,95%CI:0.48-0.83,P<0.001).Although Karnofsky Performance Status scores improved in both groups,the scores were significantly higher in the observation group(P<0.05).Multivariate analysis confirmed intraoperative S-CEUS and tumor differentiation as independent prognostic factors(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Laparoscopic ultrasound-guided resection/ablation improved outcomes in CRLM,reducing complications and enhancing survival.Intraoperative S-CEUS was an independent prognostic factor,supporting its clinical value.
文摘For the treatment method of esophageal subepithelial lesions originating from the muscularis propria,conventional endoscopic resection techniques are timeconsuming and lack efficacy for small subepithelial lesions originating from the muscularis propria.Lu et al presented an exploration of the effectiveness and safety of ligation-assisted endoscopic submucosal resection,aiming to provide a minimally invasive method for treatment.We discussed and analyzed this study from the aspects of sample screening,clinical pathological characteristics,casecontrol analysis,and follow-up data.
基金Supported by Jiangsu Provincial Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine,No.MS2023017 and No.SLJ0311the Jiangsu Provincial Health Commission,No.ZDXK202251.
文摘BACKGROUND Gastroesophageal junction(GEJ)or gastrointestinal stromal tumor(GIST)are located in unfavorable parts of the stomach,due to the anatomical complexity of these regions,protecting the cardia while ensuring R0 resection is a major challenge for surgeons.CASE SUMMARY Two cases of GEJ stromal tumors were reported.Abdominal computed tomography scans revealed that both tumors were located at the GEJ,close to the posterior wall,with one tumor measuring greater than 5 cm.Both patients successfully underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic wedge resection of the stomach.The surgeries achieved R0 resection while preserving the cardia sphincter and maximizing gastric tissue preservation.Postoperatively,no symptoms such as gastroesophageal reflux or cardia stenosis were observed.Case 1:Postoperative pathology:GIST.Immunohistochemical results:Tumor cells were positive for CD34,CD117,and DOG1,and negative for SMA,desmin,S-100,and SDHB(normal expression).The Ki-67 proliferation index was approximately 5%.Case 2:Postoperative pathology:GIST.Immunohistochemical results:Tumor cells were positive for CD117(++),CD34(++),DOG1(+++),and focal positivity for SMA.Negative for desmin,S-100(few cells positive),and SDHB(preserved expression).The Ki-67 proliferation index was approximately 10%.CONCLUSION The gastric tube-guided robotic-assisted laparoscopic resection is a safe and effective method for tumor resection while preserving the cardia,and it is worth further promotion in clinical practice.
文摘In this editorial,we provide commentary on a recently published study by Zhao et al in the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.The study discusses the clinical characteristics of patients undergoing endoscopic resection for gastric cancers.We feel it is important to engage our endoscopy community in a discussion on the current evidence in the literature on the necessary number of cases for training in endoluminal surgery techniques,particularly endoscopic submucosal dissection.This includes the latest recommendations from the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy,as well as a summary of key studies on the learning curve for these techniques.Additionally,we explore the impact of an endo-scopist’s specialty on endoscopy outcomes,drawing from current evidence in the literature to shape our perspective in this evolving field.
文摘BACKGROUND Thermal ablation(TA),including radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation,is a commonly used curative treatment for single small hepatocellular carcinoma(sHCC).The relative advantages of TA and surgical resection(SR)in terms of long-term survival remain controversial.AIM To compare their long-term efficacy in this patient population.METHODS This population-based retrospective cohort study included 257 patients who received a first diagnosis of single sHCC and underwent SR or TA from January 2012 to September 2017.The primary endpoints were overall survival(OS)and recurrence-free survival(RFS).RESULTS The average follow-up duration was 11.4 years.The 1-,3-,5-,and 10-year OS rates were 95.8%,86.0%,82.5%,and 74.2%in the SR group vs 97.4%,85.8%,78.6%,and 65.6%in the TA group,with the median OS not yet reached.The 1-,3-,5-,and 10-year RFS rates were 79.8%,59.6%,46.2%,and 24.7%in the SR group vs 83.9%,61.5%,47.9%,and 41.2%in the TA group,with median RFS values of 3.95 and 4.63 years,respectively.No significant differences in OS or RFS were observed overall(OS:P=0.244;RFS:P=0.180),but in patients≤60 years,TA led to a higher RFS than SR(P=0.021).Multivariate analysis identified age,tumor differentiation grade,and Child-Pugh classification as independent risk factors for OS,whereas age and differentiation grade were significant risk factors for RFS.CONCLUSION In patients with single sHCC,SR,and TA offered comparable long-term efficacy.However,TA showed superior RFS in patients≤60 years,suggesting that TA may be a reasonable option for younger patients,pending confirmation by prospective studies.
