Objective:The role of intraoperative radiation therapy(IORT)in the management of resectable pancreatic cancer(RPC)remains unclear.To date,the application of IORT using a low-energy X-ray source has not been extensivel...Objective:The role of intraoperative radiation therapy(IORT)in the management of resectable pancreatic cancer(RPC)remains unclear.To date,the application of IORT using a low-energy X-ray source has not been extensively investigated.Therefore,this study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IORT using a 50 kV X-ray source in treating RPC.Methods:Patients with RPC who underwent radical pancreatectomy and IORT were enrolled.The primary endpoint was time to treatment failure(TTF)survival,whereas the secondary endpoints were safety and overall survival(OS).Results:By November 2023,35 patients with RPC were treated according to the study protocol.The median TTF was 11.67 months,whereas the median OS for the cohort was 22.2 months.The local recurrence rate was 20%.The most common postoperative complication was pancreatic fistula.The incidence of delayed gastric emptying was 20%.Within 30 days after surgery,one patient experienced abdominal pain,another experienced vomiting,and one died because of abdominal infection and a grade C pancreatic fistula.Carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA)and D-dimer levels significantly correlated with TTF and OS in multivariate analyses.The carbohydrate antigen 19-9(CA19-9)level was another prognostic factor significantly associated with OS.Patients with low D-dimer and normal CA19-9 levels showed prolonged OS with an IORT dose≤15 Gy.Conclusions:This study supports use of IORT with a 50 kV X-ray source in treating RPC.IORT using a low-energy X-ray source was well-tolerated and feasible.Additionally,D-dimer,CEA,and CA19-9 levels may help identify patient profiles potentially benefitting from IORT.展开更多
We provide an editorial of recent findings on early recurrence(ER)in rectal cancer(RC),focusing on the study on ER of resectable RC by Tsai et al.The study established an 8-month recurrence-free survival cut-off for d...We provide an editorial of recent findings on early recurrence(ER)in rectal cancer(RC),focusing on the study on ER of resectable RC by Tsai et al.The study established an 8-month recurrence-free survival cut-off for differentiating ER from late recurrence,with implications for postrecurrence survival and overall survival.This offers not only a valuable timeframe for enhancing surveillance strategies in patients at higher risk,especially those who have undergone neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy(CRT),but also raises questions about its applicability across different populations.Furthermore,the article suggests that while CRT is very effective in reducing locoregional recurrence,this treatment alone may not fully address the overall risk of ER.The authors advocate for personalized risk assessment and intensive surveillance during the postoperative period to improve outcomes,particularly in the first year.Future research should focus on larger,multicenter studies and incorporate advanced diagnostic techniques with genetic and molecular biomarkers to enhance prediction and management of ER.The ultimate goal is to refine treatment and surveillance strategies to improve survival and quality of life for patients with RC.展开更多
Since its inception,localized pancreatic cancer has been identified as a systemic illness.Hence,to increase its survival rates,surgical resection followed by ad-juvant chemotherapy is used as a treatment option.A sign...Since its inception,localized pancreatic cancer has been identified as a systemic illness.Hence,to increase its survival rates,surgical resection followed by ad-juvant chemotherapy is used as a treatment option.A significant barrier,though,is the high morbidity and drawn-out recovery after extensive surgical resection,which may postpone or prohibit the prompt administration of adjuvant therapy.Thereby,acknowledging the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy in various digestive tract malignancies like rectal,gastric,and oesophagal cancers in en-hancing long-term survival and the likelihood of successful resection,researchers have turned their attention to exploring its potential benefits in the context of both resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer(RPC).According to recent data,neoadjuvant chemoradiation has major advantages for both resectable and borderline RPC.These advantages include increased surgical resection rates,longer survival times,decreased recurrence rates,and better overall disease control with a manageable toxicity profile.Despite its benefits,research is still being done to determine the best way to sequence and combine chemotherapy and radiation.Furthermore,studies have demonstrated the potential for cus-tomized therapy regimens based on the patient’s general health status and the tumor’s biological behavior to maximize the neoadjuvant approach.As progress continues,neoadjuvant chemoradiation is set to become a key component of treatment for both resectable and borderline RPC,providing a more efficient way to manage this deadly condition.While further development is required to fully grasp its potential in enhancing long-term patient outcomes,evidence supports its increasing usage in clinical practice.展开更多
BACKGROUND Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(ESCC)is one of the most common malignant tumors globally,with its incidence particularly high in East Asia.AIM To analyze the expression of the stem cell marker musashi-1 ...BACKGROUND Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(ESCC)is one of the most common malignant tumors globally,with its incidence particularly high in East Asia.AIM To analyze the expression of the stem cell marker musashi-1 in patients with resectable ESCC undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and its relationship with patient survival prognosis.METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 74 ESCC patients treated at our hospital from June 2020 to January 2022.All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical resection.Immunohistochemistry(IHC)was used to detect musashi-1 expression in tumor tissues.Based on the expression intensity,patients were divided into group A(n=30,IHC total score>2 indicating high expression)and group B(n=44,IHC total score 0-2 indicating low expression).The clinical pathological differences between groups A and B were compared.The treatment outcomes of both groups were compared.Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors affecting patient prognosis.Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used,and logrank tests were conducted to compare differences between groups.RESULTS There were statistically significant differences in tumor maximum diameter,T stage,N stage,clinical stage,pathological grade,lymphovascular invasion,and intraoperative blood loss between groups A and B(P<0.05).The disease control rate in group A(86.67%)was lower than that in group B(100.00%)(χ^(2)=3.868,P=0.049);the objective response rate in group A(33.33%)was lower than that in group B(70.45%)(χ^(2)=9.948,P=0.001).The proportion of tumor regression grade 3+4+5 grades in group A(80.00%)was higher than in group B(43.18%)(χ^(2)=9.933,P=0.001).Univariate analysis showed that tumor maximum diameter,T stage,N stage,clinical stage,pathological grade,and musashi-1 expression were associated with patient prognosis(P<0.05).Cox regression analysis model.The results indicated that T stage[hazard ratio(HR)=1.82,95%confidence interval(CI):2.14-7.37],N stage(HR=1.70,95%CI:1.12-2.36),clinical stage(HR=2.08,95%CI:1.36-3.85),pathological grade(HR=1.54,95%CI:1.07-2.41),and musashi-1 expression(HR=2.72,95%CI:2.03-4.11)were independent risk factors affecting patient prognosis(P<0.05).Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that the median overall survival in group A was 17 months,while in group B it was 28 months.Log-rank analysis revealed that the overall survival rate in group A was worse than in group B(χ^(2)=2.635,P=0.033).CONCLUSION The expression of musashi-1 is closely related to the treatment efficacy,prognosis,and survival of ESCC patients.It is expected to be a potential biomarker for evaluating the efficacy and survival prognosis of ESCC patients.展开更多
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma(ICC)poses a significant threat to human health owing to its high malignancy rate and poor prognosis.Sur-gery is the most effective treatment option for ICC.However,the prognosis remains...Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma(ICC)poses a significant threat to human health owing to its high malignancy rate and poor prognosis.Sur-gery is the most effective treatment option for ICC.However,the prognosis remains unfavorable even after surgical resection.Therefore,neo-adjuvant therapy has emerged as a potential treatment option for patients with ICC.Neoadjuvant therapy can improve patient prognosis by reducing the tumor size and eliminating tiny lesions that are not visible to the naked eye.Nevertheless,specific treatment options for neoad-juvant therapy are unavailable.This review summarizes the studies on neoadjuvant therapy for ICC in the last decade,including chemotherapy,radiotherapy,interventional therapy,targeted therapy,and immunotherapy,with the aim of providing suggestions for the selection of clinical treatment options for patients with ICC.Current reports suggest that chemotherapy is the most effective neoadjuvant treatment option.How-ever,radiotherapy and interventional therapies require further investigation to obtain conclusive recommendations.Although targeted thera-pies and immunotherapies have been studied less extensively,several ongoing clinical trials are investigating these promising approaches.展开更多
In the study by Wu et al,patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma were subjected to transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)as a conversion therapy in order to render their tumors suitable for resection.A nomo...In the study by Wu et al,patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma were subjected to transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)as a conversion therapy in order to render their tumors suitable for resection.A nomogram was devised and shown to be effective in predicting the survival of these patients.Generalization of the results,however,is questionable since the study subjects consisted of patients who had resection after TACE while excluding patients with the same disease but not suitable for TACE.Immunotherapy can be considered to be an option for conversion therapy.However,markers for determining responses to a conversion therapy and for guiding the decision between TACE and sequential immunotherapy have been lacking.The question of whether effective conversion therapy can truly enhance overall survival remains unanswered.展开更多
Colorectal cancer liver metastasis(CRLM)presents a clinical challenge,and optimizing treatment strategies is crucial for improving patient outcomes.Surgical resection,a key element in achieving prolonged survival,is o...Colorectal cancer liver metastasis(CRLM)presents a clinical challenge,and optimizing treatment strategies is crucial for improving patient outcomes.Surgical resection,a key element in achieving prolonged survival,is often linked to a heightened risk of recurrence.Acknowledging the potential benefits of preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy in managing resectable liver metastases,this approach has gained attention for its role in tumor downsizing,assessing biological behavior,and reducing the risk of postoperative recurrence.However,the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in initially resectable CRLM sparks ongoing debates.The balance between tumor reduction and the risk of hepatic injury,coupled with concerns about delaying surgery,necessitates a nuanced approach.This article explores recent research insights and draws upon the practical experiences at our center to address critical issues regarding considerations for initially resectable cases.Examining the criteria for patient selection and the judicious choice of neoadjuvant regimens are pivotal areas of discussion.Striking the right balance between maximizing treatment efficacy and minimizing adverse effects is imperative.The dynamic landscape of precision medicine is also reflected in the evolving role of gene testing,such as RAS/BRAF and PIK3CA,in tailoring neoadjuvant regimens.Furthermore,the review emphasizes the need for a multidisciplinary approach to navigate the comp-lexities of CRLM.Integrating technical expertise and biological insights is crucial in refining neoadjuvant strategies.The management of progression following neoadjuvant chemotherapy requires a tailored approach,acknowledging the diverse biological behaviors that may emerge.In conclusion,this review aims to provide a comprehensive perspective on the considerations,challenges,and advancements in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for initially resectable CRLM.By combining evidencebased insights with practical experiences,we aspire to contribute to the ongoing discourse on refining treatment paradigms for improved outcomes in patients with CRLM.展开更多
BACKGROUND The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy(ACT)for patients with no evidence of disease after pulmonary metastasis resection(PM)from colorectal cancer(CRC)remains controversial.AIM To assess the efficacy of ACT i...BACKGROUND The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy(ACT)for patients with no evidence of disease after pulmonary metastasis resection(PM)from colorectal cancer(CRC)remains controversial.AIM To assess the efficacy of ACT in patients after PM resection for CRC.METHODS This study included 96 patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy for CRC at a single institution between April 2008 and July 2023.The primary end-point was overall survival(OS);secondary endpoints included cancer-specific survival(CSS)and disease-free survival(DFS).An inverse probability of treat-ment-weighting(IPTW)analysis was conducted to address indication bias.Sur-vival outcomes compared using Kaplan-Meier curves,log-rank test,Cox regre-ssion and confirmed by propensity score-matching(PSM).RESULTS With a median follow-up of 27.5 months(range,18.3-50.4 months),the 5-year OS,CSS and DFS were 72.0%,74.4%and 51.3%,respectively.ACT had no significant effect on OS after PM resection from CRC[original cohort:P=0.08;IPTW:P=0.15].No differences were observed for CSS(P=0.12)and DFS(P=0.68)between the ACT and non-ACT groups.Multivariate analysis showed no association of ACT with better survival,while sublobar resection(HR=0.45;95%CI:0.20-1.00,P=0.049)and longer disease-free interval(HR=0.45;95%CI:0.20-0.98,P=0.044)were associated with improved survival.CONCLUSION ACT does not improve survival after PM resection for CRC.Further well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the optimal ACT regimen and duration.展开更多
Despite the fact that gastric cancer is decreasing in incidence in the United States,it remains one of the most commonly diagnosed and most fatal cancers worldwide.In localised disease,surgery remains the cornerstone ...Despite the fact that gastric cancer is decreasing in incidence in the United States,it remains one of the most commonly diagnosed and most fatal cancers worldwide.In localised disease,surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment.Nevertheless,the low overall survival rates at 5 years due to locoregional and distant recurrences has led to a large debate regarding the role of radiation therapy and chemotherapy in addition to curative resection.Recent data have shown that,even with improved surgical techniques,locoregional failure rates in these patients ranged between 57% and 88%.Failures were noted in the gastric bed,regional nodes,gastric remnant,anastomosis and duodenal stump,all of which can be encompassed in a regional radiation f ield,indicating the need of further locoregional treatment.In this article,a comprehensive literature review of the reliable medical databases of PubMed and Cochrane is made and we present all available information on the role of radiation therapy in the preoperative and postoperative setting of gastric cancer.Data reported show that in locally advanced gastric cancer the addition of radiation therapy post surgery has signif icantly improved diseasefree survival as well as overall survival.Moreover,in unresectable gastric cancer,the combination of radiation therapy with chemotherapy has significantly improvedmean and overall survival rates.The role of radiation therapy in patients with resectable gastric cancer is being further evaluated in ongoing phase Ⅲ trials.展开更多
Background: The regional chronomodulated hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is an effective regimen for the treatment of patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer, especially for th...Background: The regional chronomodulated hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is an effective regimen for the treatment of patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer, especially for the conversion into resectability. Aim: To demonstrate that chronomodulated HAI triplet chemotherapy according to OPTILIV protocol is well tolerated and displayed high antitumor activity in this heavily-pretreated patient. Case Presentation: A 54 years old patient from Russia was treated for a tumor in the ascending colon presented with 13 hepatic metastases ranging from 0.3 to 2.7 cm in diameter. He underwent a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, 12 cycles of FOLFIRINOX combined to bevacizumab for the last 5 cycles, resulting in a partial response according to CT scan. It was decided to perform a two-stage hepatectomy at Paul Brousse hospital: left partial hepatectomy allowed the excision of 9 lesions. Radio frequency ablation was performed in 2 nodular lesions. Afterwards, the patient received 5 cycles of chronomodulated triplet chemotherapy into the hepatic artery, according to the OPTILIV protocol design, yet without cetuximab, because of the KRAS mutation in the liver metastases, with a partial re-sponse. The patient could then undergo the second stage of the planned right hepatectomy, which turned out to be an R0 resection followed by receiving three courses of chronomodulated HAIC. Disease progression was documented after 3 months. Chronomodulated FOLFIRI chemotherapy was re-started intravenously, in combination with Aflibercept and it was associated with further disease progression. The genetic analysis of our patient’s cancer revealed a high level of MSI. The patient was included in the Phase 2 CheckMate-142 trial and received nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks within 3 months. Treatment was discontinued due to ineffectiveness. Then the patient underwent radiotherapy geared towards reduction of pain. Afterwards, the patient died from the disease progression 2 years after the beginning of treatment. Conclusion: In this article, the authors report a clinical case with chronomodulated HAIC as rescue therapy in a heavily pretreated patient with metastatic colorectal cancer, allowing to achieve an objective response despite prior progression on FOLFIRINOX (the same triplet chemo by IV route). This strategy permitted to overcome drug resistance and to perform further complete resection of the liver me-tastases with prolonged patient survival. Thus, chronomodulated HAI is useful in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer and de-serves to be further assessed prospectively in clinical trials chemotherapy.展开更多
Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer death in the United States. While surgical resection remains the only curative option, more than 80% of patients present with unresectable disease. Unfortunately...Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer death in the United States. While surgical resection remains the only curative option, more than 80% of patients present with unresectable disease. Unfortunately, even among those who undergo resection, the reported median survival is 15-23 mo, with a 5-year survival of approximately 20%. Disappointingly, over the past several decades, despite improvements in diagnostic imaging, surgical technique and chemotherapeutic options, only modest improvements in survival have been realized. Nevertheless, it remains clear that surgical resection is a prerequisite for achieving longterm survival and cure. There is now emerging consensus that a subgroup of patients, previously considered poor candidates for resection because of the relationship of their primary tumor to surrounding vasculature, may benefit from resection, particularly when preceded by neoadjuvant therapy. This stage of disease, termed borderline resectable pancreatic cancer, has become of increasing interest and is now the focus of a multiinstitutional clinical trial. Here we outline the history, progress, current treatment recommendations, and future directions for research in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.展开更多
Pancreatic cancer is difficult to diagnose at an early stage and generally has a poor prognosis. Surgical resection is the only potentially curative treatment for pancreatic carcinoma. To improve the prognosis of this...Pancreatic cancer is difficult to diagnose at an early stage and generally has a poor prognosis. Surgical resection is the only potentially curative treatment for pancreatic carcinoma. To improve the prognosis of this disease, it is essential to detect tumors at early stages, when they are resectable. The optimal approach to screening for early pancreatic neoplasia has not been established. The International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening Consortium has recently finalized several recommendations regarding the management of patients who are at an increased risk of familial pancreatic cancer. In addition, there have been notable advances in research on serum markers, tissue markers, gene signatures, and genomic targets of pancreatic cancer. To date, however, no biomarkers have been established in the clinical setting. Advancements in imaging modalities touch all aspects of the clinical management of pancreatic diseases, including the early detection of pancreatic masses, their characterization, and evaluations of tumor resectability. This article reviews strategies for screening high-risk groups, biomarkers, and current advances in imaging modalities for the early detection of resectable pancreatic cancer.展开更多
Background: The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable cholangiocarcinoma remains unclear due to the lack of randomized control studies. This study aimed to investigate the possible benefit of postoperative a...Background: The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable cholangiocarcinoma remains unclear due to the lack of randomized control studies. This study aimed to investigate the possible benefit of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable cholangiocarcinoma. Data sources: Relevant research articles published before 1 st March 2018 in Pub Med, Embase and the Cochrane library databases were retrieved. Published data were extracted and analyzed by RevMan 5.3, and the results were presented as hazard ratios(HRs) [95% confidence intervals(CI)] and forest plots. Results: One prospective and eighteen retrospective studies were included, with a total number of 11,458 patients, 4696 of whom received postoperative chemotherapy. There was a significant improvement of the overall survival(OS) for patients who underwent operation + adjuvant chemotherapy compared to those who underwent operation alone(HR = 0.61; P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses show that the postoperative chemotherapy group compared with operation alone group are indicated as follows: hilar cholangiocarcinoma group(HR = 0.60; P < 0.001), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma group(HR = 0.60; P < 0.001), R1 resection group(HR = 0.71; P = 0.04), LN-positive diagnosis group(HR = 0.58; P < 0.001), gemcitabine-based chemotherapy group(HR = 0.42; P < 0.001), distal cholangiocarcinoma group(HR = 0.48; P = 0.17), R0 resection group(HR = 0.69; P = 0.43), and 5-flurouracil-based chemotherapy group(HR = 0.90; P = 0.66), respectively. Conclusions: Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy can improve the OS in intrahepatic and hilar cholangiocarcinoma patients. However, distal cholangiocarcinoma patients gain no benefit from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Prospective randomized trials are warranted in order to define the standard chemotherapy regimen.展开更多
BACKGROUND： The treatment of borderline resectable pancreatic head cancer（BRPHC） is still controversial and challenging. The artery-first approaches are described to be the important options for the early determina...BACKGROUND： The treatment of borderline resectable pancreatic head cancer（BRPHC） is still controversial and challenging. The artery-first approaches are described to be the important options for the early determination. Whether these approaches can achieve an increase R0 rate, better bleeding control and increasing long-term survival for BRPHC are still controversial. We compared a previously reported technique, a modified artery-first approach（MAFA）, with conventional techniques for the surgical treatment of BRPHC.METHODS： A total of 117 patients with BRPHC undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy（PD） from January 2013 to June 2015 were included. They were divided into an MAFA group（n=78） and a conventional-technique group（n=39）. Background characteristics, operative data and complications were compared between the two groups.RESULTS： Mean operation time was significantly shorter in the MAFA group than that in the conventional-technique group（313 vs 384 min; P=0.014）; mean volume of intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the MAFA group than that in the conventional-technique group（534 vs 756 m L; P=0.043）; and mean rate of venous resection was significantly higher in the conventional-technique group than that in the MAFA group（61.5% vs 35.9%; P=0.014）. Pathologic data, early mortality and morbidity were not different significantly between the two groups.CONCLUSIONS： MAFA is safe, simple, less time-consuming, less intraoperative blood loss and less venous resection, and therefore, may become a standard surgical approach to PD for BRPHC with the superior mesenteric vein-portal vein involvement but without superior mesenteric artery invasion.展开更多
The treatments of resectable colorectal liver metastases（CRLM） are controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of hepatic resection（HR） and radiofrequency ablation（RFA） for treat...The treatments of resectable colorectal liver metastases（CRLM） are controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of hepatic resection（HR） and radiofrequency ablation（RFA） for treating resectable CRLM. Between January 2004 and May 2010, the enrolled patients were given hepatic resection（HR group; n=32） or percutaneous RFA（RFA group; n=21） as a first-line treatment for CRLM. All the tumors had a maximum diameter of 3.5 cm and all patients had five or less tumors. The patient background, tumor characteristics, cumulative survival rate and recurrence-free survival rate were assessed in both groups. There were significantly more patients with comorbidities in the RFA group than those in the HR group（17 in RFA group vs. 10 in HR group; P〈0.000）. The mean maximum tumor diameter in the HR group and RFA group was 2.25±0.68 and 1.89±0.62 cm（P=0.054）, and the mean number of tumors was 2.28±1.05 and 2.38±1.12（P=0.744）, respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5-year cumulative survival rates in the HR group were 87.5%, 53.1% and 31.3%, respectively, and those in the RFA group were 85.7%, 38.1% and 14.2%, respectively with the differences being not significant between the two groups（P=0.062）. The 1-, 3- and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates in the HR group were 90.6%, 56.3% and 28.1%, respectively, and those in the RFA group were 76.1%, 23.8% and 4.8%, respectively, with the differences being significant between the two groups（P=0.036）. In conclusion, as HR has greater efficacy than RFA in the treatment of resectable CRLM, we recommend it as the first option for this malignancy.展开更多
Background:Previous studies have demonstrated the prognostic significance of pathologic tumor response in pancreatic adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant therapy(NAT).The aim of this study was to determine the inciden...Background:Previous studies have demonstrated the prognostic significance of pathologic tumor response in pancreatic adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant therapy(NAT).The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of significant pathologic response to NAT in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer(BRPC),and association of NAT regimen and other clinico-pathologic characteristics with pathologic response.Methods:Patients with BRPC who underwent NAT and pancreatic resection between January 2012 and June 2017 were included.Pathologic response was assessed on a qualitative scale based on the College of American Pathologists grading system.Demographics and baseline characteristics,oncologic treatment,pathology,and survival outcomes were compared.Results:Seventy-one patients were included for analysis.Four patients had complete pathologic responses(tumor regression score 0),12 patients had marked responses(score 1),42 had moderate responses(score 2),and 13 had minimal responses(score 3).Patients with complete or marked responses were more likely to have received neoadjuvant gemcitabine chemoradiation(62.5%,38.1%,and 23.1%of the complete/marked,moderate,and minimal response groups,respectively;P=0.04).Of the complete/marked,moderate,and minimal response groups,margins were negative in 75.0%,78.6%,and 46.2%(P=0.16);node negative disease was observed in 87.5%,54.8%,and 15.4%(P<0.01);and median overall survival was 50.0 months,31.7 months,and 23.2 months(P=0.563).Of the four patients with pathologic complete responses,three were disease-free at 66.1,41.7 and 31.4 months,and one was deceased with metastatic liver disease at 16.9 months.Conclusions:A more pronounced pathologic tumor response to NAT in BRPC is correlated with node negative disease,but was not associated with a statistically significant survival benefit in this study.展开更多
The use of neoadjuvant therapies has played a major role for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancers(PCs). For this group of patients, preoperative chemotherapy or chemoradiation has increased th...The use of neoadjuvant therapies has played a major role for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancers(PCs). For this group of patients, preoperative chemotherapy or chemoradiation has increased the likelihood of surgery with negative resection margins and overall survival. On the other hand, for patients with resectable PC, the main rationale for neoadjuvant therapy is that the overall survival with current strategies is unsatisfactory. There is a consensus that we need new treatments to improve the overall survival and quality of life of patients with PC. However, without strong scientific evidence supporting the theoretical advantages of neoadjuvant therapies, these potential benefits might turn out not to be worth the risk of tumors progression while waiting for surgery. The focus of this paper is to provide the readers an overview of the most recent evidence on this subject.展开更多
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is the fourth leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States in both men and women, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5%. Surgical resection remains the only curative treatment...Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is the fourth leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States in both men and women, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5%. Surgical resection remains the only curative treatment, but most patients develop systemic recurrence within 2 years of surgery. Adjuvant treatment with chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy has been shown to improve overall survival, but the delivery of treatment remains problematic with up to 50% of patients not receiving postoperative treatment. Neoadjuvant therapy can provide benefits of eradication of micrometastasis and improved delivery of intended treatment. We have reviewed the findings from completed neoadjuvant clinical trials, and discussed the ongoing studies. Combinational cytotoxic chemotherapy such as fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin and gemcitabine plus nanoparticle albumin-bound(nab)-paclitaxel, active in the metastatic setting, are being studied in the neoadjuvant setting. In addition, novel targeted agents such as inhibitor of immune checkpoint are incorporated with cytotoxic chemotherapy in early-phase clinical trial. Furthermore we have explored the utility of biomarkers which can personalize treatment and select patients for target-driven therapy to improve treatment outcome. The treatment of resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma requires multidisciplinary approach and novel strategies including innovative trials to make progress.展开更多
Despite unquestionable progress has been made inresection of small and large hepatocellular carcinoma'(HCC),the dismal outcome of unresectable HCC remains a great challenge.Fortunately,the progress of multidiscipl...Despite unquestionable progress has been made inresection of small and large hepatocellular carcinoma'(HCC),the dismal outcome of unresectable HCC remains a great challenge.Fortunately,the progress of multidisciplinary approach,particularly with new treatment modalities,has provided a new hope for unresectable HCC.This paper reports 477 patients with surgically verified unresectable HCC treated by different modalities, sequential resection was done in 55 patients(11.5%)due to marked shrinkage of the tumor.Patients treated with hepatic artery ligation(HAL),cannulation with infusion (HAI)and plus intraarterial targeting therapy(131I-antiHCC Ferritin IgG,131I-antiHCC monoclonal antibody,or 131I-Lipiodol)has higher sequential resection rate(33. 0%,31/94)when compared with other combination treatment(HAL+HAI,HAL+HAI+radiotherapy,11.7% ,22/188),and single treatment group(Cryosurgery,HAL,or HAI,1.0%,2/195). The combination of targeting therapy played an important role to the increasing number of sequential resection during 1978 through 1992.The 5-year survival of the 55 patients with sequential resection was as nigh as 60.8%.By the end of June 1993,13 patients survived more than 5 years, the longest being 15 years.展开更多
基金supported by the Tianjin Science and Technology Commission key project(Grant No.21JCZDJC00980)Tianjin Science and Technology Commission project(Grant No.22ZXJBSY00030)Tianjin Health Research project(Grant No.TJWJ2022MS007)。
文摘Objective:The role of intraoperative radiation therapy(IORT)in the management of resectable pancreatic cancer(RPC)remains unclear.To date,the application of IORT using a low-energy X-ray source has not been extensively investigated.Therefore,this study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IORT using a 50 kV X-ray source in treating RPC.Methods:Patients with RPC who underwent radical pancreatectomy and IORT were enrolled.The primary endpoint was time to treatment failure(TTF)survival,whereas the secondary endpoints were safety and overall survival(OS).Results:By November 2023,35 patients with RPC were treated according to the study protocol.The median TTF was 11.67 months,whereas the median OS for the cohort was 22.2 months.The local recurrence rate was 20%.The most common postoperative complication was pancreatic fistula.The incidence of delayed gastric emptying was 20%.Within 30 days after surgery,one patient experienced abdominal pain,another experienced vomiting,and one died because of abdominal infection and a grade C pancreatic fistula.Carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA)and D-dimer levels significantly correlated with TTF and OS in multivariate analyses.The carbohydrate antigen 19-9(CA19-9)level was another prognostic factor significantly associated with OS.Patients with low D-dimer and normal CA19-9 levels showed prolonged OS with an IORT dose≤15 Gy.Conclusions:This study supports use of IORT with a 50 kV X-ray source in treating RPC.IORT using a low-energy X-ray source was well-tolerated and feasible.Additionally,D-dimer,CEA,and CA19-9 levels may help identify patient profiles potentially benefitting from IORT.
文摘We provide an editorial of recent findings on early recurrence(ER)in rectal cancer(RC),focusing on the study on ER of resectable RC by Tsai et al.The study established an 8-month recurrence-free survival cut-off for differentiating ER from late recurrence,with implications for postrecurrence survival and overall survival.This offers not only a valuable timeframe for enhancing surveillance strategies in patients at higher risk,especially those who have undergone neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy(CRT),but also raises questions about its applicability across different populations.Furthermore,the article suggests that while CRT is very effective in reducing locoregional recurrence,this treatment alone may not fully address the overall risk of ER.The authors advocate for personalized risk assessment and intensive surveillance during the postoperative period to improve outcomes,particularly in the first year.Future research should focus on larger,multicenter studies and incorporate advanced diagnostic techniques with genetic and molecular biomarkers to enhance prediction and management of ER.The ultimate goal is to refine treatment and surveillance strategies to improve survival and quality of life for patients with RC.
文摘Since its inception,localized pancreatic cancer has been identified as a systemic illness.Hence,to increase its survival rates,surgical resection followed by ad-juvant chemotherapy is used as a treatment option.A significant barrier,though,is the high morbidity and drawn-out recovery after extensive surgical resection,which may postpone or prohibit the prompt administration of adjuvant therapy.Thereby,acknowledging the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy in various digestive tract malignancies like rectal,gastric,and oesophagal cancers in en-hancing long-term survival and the likelihood of successful resection,researchers have turned their attention to exploring its potential benefits in the context of both resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer(RPC).According to recent data,neoadjuvant chemoradiation has major advantages for both resectable and borderline RPC.These advantages include increased surgical resection rates,longer survival times,decreased recurrence rates,and better overall disease control with a manageable toxicity profile.Despite its benefits,research is still being done to determine the best way to sequence and combine chemotherapy and radiation.Furthermore,studies have demonstrated the potential for cus-tomized therapy regimens based on the patient’s general health status and the tumor’s biological behavior to maximize the neoadjuvant approach.As progress continues,neoadjuvant chemoradiation is set to become a key component of treatment for both resectable and borderline RPC,providing a more efficient way to manage this deadly condition.While further development is required to fully grasp its potential in enhancing long-term patient outcomes,evidence supports its increasing usage in clinical practice.
文摘BACKGROUND Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(ESCC)is one of the most common malignant tumors globally,with its incidence particularly high in East Asia.AIM To analyze the expression of the stem cell marker musashi-1 in patients with resectable ESCC undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and its relationship with patient survival prognosis.METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 74 ESCC patients treated at our hospital from June 2020 to January 2022.All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical resection.Immunohistochemistry(IHC)was used to detect musashi-1 expression in tumor tissues.Based on the expression intensity,patients were divided into group A(n=30,IHC total score>2 indicating high expression)and group B(n=44,IHC total score 0-2 indicating low expression).The clinical pathological differences between groups A and B were compared.The treatment outcomes of both groups were compared.Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors affecting patient prognosis.Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used,and logrank tests were conducted to compare differences between groups.RESULTS There were statistically significant differences in tumor maximum diameter,T stage,N stage,clinical stage,pathological grade,lymphovascular invasion,and intraoperative blood loss between groups A and B(P<0.05).The disease control rate in group A(86.67%)was lower than that in group B(100.00%)(χ^(2)=3.868,P=0.049);the objective response rate in group A(33.33%)was lower than that in group B(70.45%)(χ^(2)=9.948,P=0.001).The proportion of tumor regression grade 3+4+5 grades in group A(80.00%)was higher than in group B(43.18%)(χ^(2)=9.933,P=0.001).Univariate analysis showed that tumor maximum diameter,T stage,N stage,clinical stage,pathological grade,and musashi-1 expression were associated with patient prognosis(P<0.05).Cox regression analysis model.The results indicated that T stage[hazard ratio(HR)=1.82,95%confidence interval(CI):2.14-7.37],N stage(HR=1.70,95%CI:1.12-2.36),clinical stage(HR=2.08,95%CI:1.36-3.85),pathological grade(HR=1.54,95%CI:1.07-2.41),and musashi-1 expression(HR=2.72,95%CI:2.03-4.11)were independent risk factors affecting patient prognosis(P<0.05).Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that the median overall survival in group A was 17 months,while in group B it was 28 months.Log-rank analysis revealed that the overall survival rate in group A was worse than in group B(χ^(2)=2.635,P=0.033).CONCLUSION The expression of musashi-1 is closely related to the treatment efficacy,prognosis,and survival of ESCC patients.It is expected to be a potential biomarker for evaluating the efficacy and survival prognosis of ESCC patients.
基金supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(grants 82373365 and 82173317)the Tianjin Key Medical Discipline Construction Project(TJYXZDXK-009A).
文摘Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma(ICC)poses a significant threat to human health owing to its high malignancy rate and poor prognosis.Sur-gery is the most effective treatment option for ICC.However,the prognosis remains unfavorable even after surgical resection.Therefore,neo-adjuvant therapy has emerged as a potential treatment option for patients with ICC.Neoadjuvant therapy can improve patient prognosis by reducing the tumor size and eliminating tiny lesions that are not visible to the naked eye.Nevertheless,specific treatment options for neoad-juvant therapy are unavailable.This review summarizes the studies on neoadjuvant therapy for ICC in the last decade,including chemotherapy,radiotherapy,interventional therapy,targeted therapy,and immunotherapy,with the aim of providing suggestions for the selection of clinical treatment options for patients with ICC.Current reports suggest that chemotherapy is the most effective neoadjuvant treatment option.How-ever,radiotherapy and interventional therapies require further investigation to obtain conclusive recommendations.Although targeted thera-pies and immunotherapies have been studied less extensively,several ongoing clinical trials are investigating these promising approaches.
文摘In the study by Wu et al,patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma were subjected to transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)as a conversion therapy in order to render their tumors suitable for resection.A nomogram was devised and shown to be effective in predicting the survival of these patients.Generalization of the results,however,is questionable since the study subjects consisted of patients who had resection after TACE while excluding patients with the same disease but not suitable for TACE.Immunotherapy can be considered to be an option for conversion therapy.However,markers for determining responses to a conversion therapy and for guiding the decision between TACE and sequential immunotherapy have been lacking.The question of whether effective conversion therapy can truly enhance overall survival remains unanswered.
文摘Colorectal cancer liver metastasis(CRLM)presents a clinical challenge,and optimizing treatment strategies is crucial for improving patient outcomes.Surgical resection,a key element in achieving prolonged survival,is often linked to a heightened risk of recurrence.Acknowledging the potential benefits of preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy in managing resectable liver metastases,this approach has gained attention for its role in tumor downsizing,assessing biological behavior,and reducing the risk of postoperative recurrence.However,the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in initially resectable CRLM sparks ongoing debates.The balance between tumor reduction and the risk of hepatic injury,coupled with concerns about delaying surgery,necessitates a nuanced approach.This article explores recent research insights and draws upon the practical experiences at our center to address critical issues regarding considerations for initially resectable cases.Examining the criteria for patient selection and the judicious choice of neoadjuvant regimens are pivotal areas of discussion.Striking the right balance between maximizing treatment efficacy and minimizing adverse effects is imperative.The dynamic landscape of precision medicine is also reflected in the evolving role of gene testing,such as RAS/BRAF and PIK3CA,in tailoring neoadjuvant regimens.Furthermore,the review emphasizes the need for a multidisciplinary approach to navigate the comp-lexities of CRLM.Integrating technical expertise and biological insights is crucial in refining neoadjuvant strategies.The management of progression following neoadjuvant chemotherapy requires a tailored approach,acknowledging the diverse biological behaviors that may emerge.In conclusion,this review aims to provide a comprehensive perspective on the considerations,challenges,and advancements in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for initially resectable CRLM.By combining evidencebased insights with practical experiences,we aspire to contribute to the ongoing discourse on refining treatment paradigms for improved outcomes in patients with CRLM.
基金Supported by the National Project for Clinical Key Specialty Development.
文摘BACKGROUND The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy(ACT)for patients with no evidence of disease after pulmonary metastasis resection(PM)from colorectal cancer(CRC)remains controversial.AIM To assess the efficacy of ACT in patients after PM resection for CRC.METHODS This study included 96 patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy for CRC at a single institution between April 2008 and July 2023.The primary end-point was overall survival(OS);secondary endpoints included cancer-specific survival(CSS)and disease-free survival(DFS).An inverse probability of treat-ment-weighting(IPTW)analysis was conducted to address indication bias.Sur-vival outcomes compared using Kaplan-Meier curves,log-rank test,Cox regre-ssion and confirmed by propensity score-matching(PSM).RESULTS With a median follow-up of 27.5 months(range,18.3-50.4 months),the 5-year OS,CSS and DFS were 72.0%,74.4%and 51.3%,respectively.ACT had no significant effect on OS after PM resection from CRC[original cohort:P=0.08;IPTW:P=0.15].No differences were observed for CSS(P=0.12)and DFS(P=0.68)between the ACT and non-ACT groups.Multivariate analysis showed no association of ACT with better survival,while sublobar resection(HR=0.45;95%CI:0.20-1.00,P=0.049)and longer disease-free interval(HR=0.45;95%CI:0.20-0.98,P=0.044)were associated with improved survival.CONCLUSION ACT does not improve survival after PM resection for CRC.Further well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the optimal ACT regimen and duration.
文摘Despite the fact that gastric cancer is decreasing in incidence in the United States,it remains one of the most commonly diagnosed and most fatal cancers worldwide.In localised disease,surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment.Nevertheless,the low overall survival rates at 5 years due to locoregional and distant recurrences has led to a large debate regarding the role of radiation therapy and chemotherapy in addition to curative resection.Recent data have shown that,even with improved surgical techniques,locoregional failure rates in these patients ranged between 57% and 88%.Failures were noted in the gastric bed,regional nodes,gastric remnant,anastomosis and duodenal stump,all of which can be encompassed in a regional radiation f ield,indicating the need of further locoregional treatment.In this article,a comprehensive literature review of the reliable medical databases of PubMed and Cochrane is made and we present all available information on the role of radiation therapy in the preoperative and postoperative setting of gastric cancer.Data reported show that in locally advanced gastric cancer the addition of radiation therapy post surgery has signif icantly improved diseasefree survival as well as overall survival.Moreover,in unresectable gastric cancer,the combination of radiation therapy with chemotherapy has significantly improvedmean and overall survival rates.The role of radiation therapy in patients with resectable gastric cancer is being further evaluated in ongoing phase Ⅲ trials.
文摘Background: The regional chronomodulated hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is an effective regimen for the treatment of patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer, especially for the conversion into resectability. Aim: To demonstrate that chronomodulated HAI triplet chemotherapy according to OPTILIV protocol is well tolerated and displayed high antitumor activity in this heavily-pretreated patient. Case Presentation: A 54 years old patient from Russia was treated for a tumor in the ascending colon presented with 13 hepatic metastases ranging from 0.3 to 2.7 cm in diameter. He underwent a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, 12 cycles of FOLFIRINOX combined to bevacizumab for the last 5 cycles, resulting in a partial response according to CT scan. It was decided to perform a two-stage hepatectomy at Paul Brousse hospital: left partial hepatectomy allowed the excision of 9 lesions. Radio frequency ablation was performed in 2 nodular lesions. Afterwards, the patient received 5 cycles of chronomodulated triplet chemotherapy into the hepatic artery, according to the OPTILIV protocol design, yet without cetuximab, because of the KRAS mutation in the liver metastases, with a partial re-sponse. The patient could then undergo the second stage of the planned right hepatectomy, which turned out to be an R0 resection followed by receiving three courses of chronomodulated HAIC. Disease progression was documented after 3 months. Chronomodulated FOLFIRI chemotherapy was re-started intravenously, in combination with Aflibercept and it was associated with further disease progression. The genetic analysis of our patient’s cancer revealed a high level of MSI. The patient was included in the Phase 2 CheckMate-142 trial and received nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks within 3 months. Treatment was discontinued due to ineffectiveness. Then the patient underwent radiotherapy geared towards reduction of pain. Afterwards, the patient died from the disease progression 2 years after the beginning of treatment. Conclusion: In this article, the authors report a clinical case with chronomodulated HAIC as rescue therapy in a heavily pretreated patient with metastatic colorectal cancer, allowing to achieve an objective response despite prior progression on FOLFIRINOX (the same triplet chemo by IV route). This strategy permitted to overcome drug resistance and to perform further complete resection of the liver me-tastases with prolonged patient survival. Thus, chronomodulated HAI is useful in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer and de-serves to be further assessed prospectively in clinical trials chemotherapy.
文摘Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer death in the United States. While surgical resection remains the only curative option, more than 80% of patients present with unresectable disease. Unfortunately, even among those who undergo resection, the reported median survival is 15-23 mo, with a 5-year survival of approximately 20%. Disappointingly, over the past several decades, despite improvements in diagnostic imaging, surgical technique and chemotherapeutic options, only modest improvements in survival have been realized. Nevertheless, it remains clear that surgical resection is a prerequisite for achieving longterm survival and cure. There is now emerging consensus that a subgroup of patients, previously considered poor candidates for resection because of the relationship of their primary tumor to surrounding vasculature, may benefit from resection, particularly when preceded by neoadjuvant therapy. This stage of disease, termed borderline resectable pancreatic cancer, has become of increasing interest and is now the focus of a multiinstitutional clinical trial. Here we outline the history, progress, current treatment recommendations, and future directions for research in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.
文摘Pancreatic cancer is difficult to diagnose at an early stage and generally has a poor prognosis. Surgical resection is the only potentially curative treatment for pancreatic carcinoma. To improve the prognosis of this disease, it is essential to detect tumors at early stages, when they are resectable. The optimal approach to screening for early pancreatic neoplasia has not been established. The International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening Consortium has recently finalized several recommendations regarding the management of patients who are at an increased risk of familial pancreatic cancer. In addition, there have been notable advances in research on serum markers, tissue markers, gene signatures, and genomic targets of pancreatic cancer. To date, however, no biomarkers have been established in the clinical setting. Advancements in imaging modalities touch all aspects of the clinical management of pancreatic diseases, including the early detection of pancreatic masses, their characterization, and evaluations of tumor resectability. This article reviews strategies for screening high-risk groups, biomarkers, and current advances in imaging modalities for the early detection of resectable pancreatic cancer.
基金supported by a grant from the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province,China(1408085MKL70)
文摘Background: The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable cholangiocarcinoma remains unclear due to the lack of randomized control studies. This study aimed to investigate the possible benefit of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable cholangiocarcinoma. Data sources: Relevant research articles published before 1 st March 2018 in Pub Med, Embase and the Cochrane library databases were retrieved. Published data were extracted and analyzed by RevMan 5.3, and the results were presented as hazard ratios(HRs) [95% confidence intervals(CI)] and forest plots. Results: One prospective and eighteen retrospective studies were included, with a total number of 11,458 patients, 4696 of whom received postoperative chemotherapy. There was a significant improvement of the overall survival(OS) for patients who underwent operation + adjuvant chemotherapy compared to those who underwent operation alone(HR = 0.61; P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses show that the postoperative chemotherapy group compared with operation alone group are indicated as follows: hilar cholangiocarcinoma group(HR = 0.60; P < 0.001), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma group(HR = 0.60; P < 0.001), R1 resection group(HR = 0.71; P = 0.04), LN-positive diagnosis group(HR = 0.58; P < 0.001), gemcitabine-based chemotherapy group(HR = 0.42; P < 0.001), distal cholangiocarcinoma group(HR = 0.48; P = 0.17), R0 resection group(HR = 0.69; P = 0.43), and 5-flurouracil-based chemotherapy group(HR = 0.90; P = 0.66), respectively. Conclusions: Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy can improve the OS in intrahepatic and hilar cholangiocarcinoma patients. However, distal cholangiocarcinoma patients gain no benefit from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Prospective randomized trials are warranted in order to define the standard chemotherapy regimen.
基金supported by grants from The National Natural Science Foundation of China(81071775,81272659,81101621,81172064,81001068 and 81272425)Key Projects of Science Foundation of Hubei Province(2011CDA030)Research Fund of Young Scholars for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China(20110142120014)
文摘BACKGROUND： The treatment of borderline resectable pancreatic head cancer（BRPHC） is still controversial and challenging. The artery-first approaches are described to be the important options for the early determination. Whether these approaches can achieve an increase R0 rate, better bleeding control and increasing long-term survival for BRPHC are still controversial. We compared a previously reported technique, a modified artery-first approach（MAFA）, with conventional techniques for the surgical treatment of BRPHC.METHODS： A total of 117 patients with BRPHC undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy（PD） from January 2013 to June 2015 were included. They were divided into an MAFA group（n=78） and a conventional-technique group（n=39）. Background characteristics, operative data and complications were compared between the two groups.RESULTS： Mean operation time was significantly shorter in the MAFA group than that in the conventional-technique group（313 vs 384 min; P=0.014）; mean volume of intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the MAFA group than that in the conventional-technique group（534 vs 756 m L; P=0.043）; and mean rate of venous resection was significantly higher in the conventional-technique group than that in the MAFA group（61.5% vs 35.9%; P=0.014）. Pathologic data, early mortality and morbidity were not different significantly between the two groups.CONCLUSIONS： MAFA is safe, simple, less time-consuming, less intraoperative blood loss and less venous resection, and therefore, may become a standard surgical approach to PD for BRPHC with the superior mesenteric vein-portal vein involvement but without superior mesenteric artery invasion.
基金supported by Research Fund of Public Welfare in Health Industry(No.201402015)Research Fund of Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory,Hubei province,China(No.02.03.2015-151)
文摘The treatments of resectable colorectal liver metastases（CRLM） are controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of hepatic resection（HR） and radiofrequency ablation（RFA） for treating resectable CRLM. Between January 2004 and May 2010, the enrolled patients were given hepatic resection（HR group; n=32） or percutaneous RFA（RFA group; n=21） as a first-line treatment for CRLM. All the tumors had a maximum diameter of 3.5 cm and all patients had five or less tumors. The patient background, tumor characteristics, cumulative survival rate and recurrence-free survival rate were assessed in both groups. There were significantly more patients with comorbidities in the RFA group than those in the HR group（17 in RFA group vs. 10 in HR group; P〈0.000）. The mean maximum tumor diameter in the HR group and RFA group was 2.25±0.68 and 1.89±0.62 cm（P=0.054）, and the mean number of tumors was 2.28±1.05 and 2.38±1.12（P=0.744）, respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5-year cumulative survival rates in the HR group were 87.5%, 53.1% and 31.3%, respectively, and those in the RFA group were 85.7%, 38.1% and 14.2%, respectively with the differences being not significant between the two groups（P=0.062）. The 1-, 3- and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates in the HR group were 90.6%, 56.3% and 28.1%, respectively, and those in the RFA group were 76.1%, 23.8% and 4.8%, respectively, with the differences being significant between the two groups（P=0.036）. In conclusion, as HR has greater efficacy than RFA in the treatment of resectable CRLM, we recommend it as the first option for this malignancy.
文摘Background:Previous studies have demonstrated the prognostic significance of pathologic tumor response in pancreatic adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant therapy(NAT).The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of significant pathologic response to NAT in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer(BRPC),and association of NAT regimen and other clinico-pathologic characteristics with pathologic response.Methods:Patients with BRPC who underwent NAT and pancreatic resection between January 2012 and June 2017 were included.Pathologic response was assessed on a qualitative scale based on the College of American Pathologists grading system.Demographics and baseline characteristics,oncologic treatment,pathology,and survival outcomes were compared.Results:Seventy-one patients were included for analysis.Four patients had complete pathologic responses(tumor regression score 0),12 patients had marked responses(score 1),42 had moderate responses(score 2),and 13 had minimal responses(score 3).Patients with complete or marked responses were more likely to have received neoadjuvant gemcitabine chemoradiation(62.5%,38.1%,and 23.1%of the complete/marked,moderate,and minimal response groups,respectively;P=0.04).Of the complete/marked,moderate,and minimal response groups,margins were negative in 75.0%,78.6%,and 46.2%(P=0.16);node negative disease was observed in 87.5%,54.8%,and 15.4%(P<0.01);and median overall survival was 50.0 months,31.7 months,and 23.2 months(P=0.563).Of the four patients with pathologic complete responses,three were disease-free at 66.1,41.7 and 31.4 months,and one was deceased with metastatic liver disease at 16.9 months.Conclusions:A more pronounced pathologic tumor response to NAT in BRPC is correlated with node negative disease,but was not associated with a statistically significant survival benefit in this study.
基金Stefanie Condon-Oldreive founder and director of Craig’s Cause Pancreatic Cancer Society (www.craigscause.ca) for the research scholarship that supported Dr. Sheikh Hasibur Raman while working on this project
文摘The use of neoadjuvant therapies has played a major role for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancers(PCs). For this group of patients, preoperative chemotherapy or chemoradiation has increased the likelihood of surgery with negative resection margins and overall survival. On the other hand, for patients with resectable PC, the main rationale for neoadjuvant therapy is that the overall survival with current strategies is unsatisfactory. There is a consensus that we need new treatments to improve the overall survival and quality of life of patients with PC. However, without strong scientific evidence supporting the theoretical advantages of neoadjuvant therapies, these potential benefits might turn out not to be worth the risk of tumors progression while waiting for surgery. The focus of this paper is to provide the readers an overview of the most recent evidence on this subject.
文摘Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is the fourth leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States in both men and women, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5%. Surgical resection remains the only curative treatment, but most patients develop systemic recurrence within 2 years of surgery. Adjuvant treatment with chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy has been shown to improve overall survival, but the delivery of treatment remains problematic with up to 50% of patients not receiving postoperative treatment. Neoadjuvant therapy can provide benefits of eradication of micrometastasis and improved delivery of intended treatment. We have reviewed the findings from completed neoadjuvant clinical trials, and discussed the ongoing studies. Combinational cytotoxic chemotherapy such as fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin and gemcitabine plus nanoparticle albumin-bound(nab)-paclitaxel, active in the metastatic setting, are being studied in the neoadjuvant setting. In addition, novel targeted agents such as inhibitor of immune checkpoint are incorporated with cytotoxic chemotherapy in early-phase clinical trial. Furthermore we have explored the utility of biomarkers which can personalize treatment and select patients for target-driven therapy to improve treatment outcome. The treatment of resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma requires multidisciplinary approach and novel strategies including innovative trials to make progress.
文摘Despite unquestionable progress has been made inresection of small and large hepatocellular carcinoma'(HCC),the dismal outcome of unresectable HCC remains a great challenge.Fortunately,the progress of multidisciplinary approach,particularly with new treatment modalities,has provided a new hope for unresectable HCC.This paper reports 477 patients with surgically verified unresectable HCC treated by different modalities, sequential resection was done in 55 patients(11.5%)due to marked shrinkage of the tumor.Patients treated with hepatic artery ligation(HAL),cannulation with infusion (HAI)and plus intraarterial targeting therapy(131I-antiHCC Ferritin IgG,131I-antiHCC monoclonal antibody,or 131I-Lipiodol)has higher sequential resection rate(33. 0%,31/94)when compared with other combination treatment(HAL+HAI,HAL+HAI+radiotherapy,11.7% ,22/188),and single treatment group(Cryosurgery,HAL,or HAI,1.0%,2/195). The combination of targeting therapy played an important role to the increasing number of sequential resection during 1978 through 1992.The 5-year survival of the 55 patients with sequential resection was as nigh as 60.8%.By the end of June 1993,13 patients survived more than 5 years, the longest being 15 years.
