Introduction: Childbirth entails many physical, emotional, and societal changes and repercussions, including postpartum depression affecting 20% - 30%, postpartum blues, and post-traumatic stress disorder. We hypothes...Introduction: Childbirth entails many physical, emotional, and societal changes and repercussions, including postpartum depression affecting 20% - 30%, postpartum blues, and post-traumatic stress disorder. We hypothesized that many physical and mental health manifestations of pelvic floor disorders might be masked by the ordinary course of postpartum recovery and not referred out for specialized evaluation. Leveraging our RECOUP (Mothers’ Pelvic Floor Support) Clinic, we explored the referral patterns to this clinic to test our hypothesis. Methods: The study is a single-center observational study including women who presented to the RECOUP Clinic. The clinic’s target patient population includes those with a perineal injury, instrumental delivery, urinary retention, urinary or fecal incontinence, pain, or pelvic pressure associated with childbirth. Results: One hundred and one women were evaluated in the RECOUP Clinic. 45/101 (45%) were not referred but found their way to the clinic through social media and the internet. Very few patients 4/101 (4%) were referred with anal sphincter injuries. (52/101, 51%) were referred after many requests by the patients. Conclusions: Over ninety percent of women evaluated at RECOUP Clinic are self-referred or referred upon the mother’s request. There is an opportunity for physicians and other providers to become more familiar with dedicated clinics for postpartum pelvic floor care. Enhancing such clinical services allows one to reach patients who otherwise will go unserved. Summary: Childbirth is an event with substantial ramifications that should be addressed, and we believe a specialized clinic is an optimal facility, so the RECOUP was founded. In this paper, we explored the referral patterns to our RECOUP clinic.展开更多
Objective To examine general practitioners’(GPs)referral patterns to allied health services for people with dementia compared with those without dementia across two large Australian Primary Health Networks(PHNs).Desi...Objective To examine general practitioners’(GPs)referral patterns to allied health services for people with dementia compared with those without dementia across two large Australian Primary Health Networks(PHNs).Design A retrospective cohort study using routinely collected general practice data.Logistic regression was used to compare odds of allied health referrals,adjusting for age,sex and socioeconomic status.Setting De-identified patient and episode activity data from 537 GP practices across two PHNs in Australia between 2018 and 2023.Participants Data from 1153304 patients and 28667517 GP episodes of care were analysed.After merging records,693328 unique patients were identified,including 16610 patients with dementia.Subcohorts included patients with dementia,stroke,Parkinson’s disease and combinations of these conditions.Results The dementia cohort(n=16610)had a similar overall allied health referral rate(36.1%)to the control cohort(n=48977)(35.4%).Patients with dementia only were significantly less likely to receive any allied health referral compared with those with stroke(adjusted OR(aOR)0.76,95%CI 0.72 to 0.80;p<0.001)or Parkinson’s disease(aOR 0.72,95%CI 0.66 to 0.78;p<0.001).Those with dementia and stroke were also less likely to receive referrals than those with stroke only(aOR 0.71,95%CI 0.61 to 0.82;p<0.001).No significant difference was found between dementia with Parkinson’s and Parkinson’s only groups(p=0.48).Patients with dementia were consistently less likely to be referred to key allied health services(p<0.05).Conclusion Despite strong evidence supporting allied health interventions for dementia,referral rates remain comparatively low.Enhancing GP referral resources and education,integrating dementia-specific care pathways and implementing supportive policy changes are needed to improve access and equity in dementia care.展开更多
文摘Introduction: Childbirth entails many physical, emotional, and societal changes and repercussions, including postpartum depression affecting 20% - 30%, postpartum blues, and post-traumatic stress disorder. We hypothesized that many physical and mental health manifestations of pelvic floor disorders might be masked by the ordinary course of postpartum recovery and not referred out for specialized evaluation. Leveraging our RECOUP (Mothers’ Pelvic Floor Support) Clinic, we explored the referral patterns to this clinic to test our hypothesis. Methods: The study is a single-center observational study including women who presented to the RECOUP Clinic. The clinic’s target patient population includes those with a perineal injury, instrumental delivery, urinary retention, urinary or fecal incontinence, pain, or pelvic pressure associated with childbirth. Results: One hundred and one women were evaluated in the RECOUP Clinic. 45/101 (45%) were not referred but found their way to the clinic through social media and the internet. Very few patients 4/101 (4%) were referred with anal sphincter injuries. (52/101, 51%) were referred after many requests by the patients. Conclusions: Over ninety percent of women evaluated at RECOUP Clinic are self-referred or referred upon the mother’s request. There is an opportunity for physicians and other providers to become more familiar with dedicated clinics for postpartum pelvic floor care. Enhancing such clinical services allows one to reach patients who otherwise will go unserved. Summary: Childbirth is an event with substantial ramifications that should be addressed, and we believe a specialized clinic is an optimal facility, so the RECOUP was founded. In this paper, we explored the referral patterns to our RECOUP clinic.
基金funded by the Australian Government Medical Research Future Fund(MRFF),Grant number 2015947.
文摘Objective To examine general practitioners’(GPs)referral patterns to allied health services for people with dementia compared with those without dementia across two large Australian Primary Health Networks(PHNs).Design A retrospective cohort study using routinely collected general practice data.Logistic regression was used to compare odds of allied health referrals,adjusting for age,sex and socioeconomic status.Setting De-identified patient and episode activity data from 537 GP practices across two PHNs in Australia between 2018 and 2023.Participants Data from 1153304 patients and 28667517 GP episodes of care were analysed.After merging records,693328 unique patients were identified,including 16610 patients with dementia.Subcohorts included patients with dementia,stroke,Parkinson’s disease and combinations of these conditions.Results The dementia cohort(n=16610)had a similar overall allied health referral rate(36.1%)to the control cohort(n=48977)(35.4%).Patients with dementia only were significantly less likely to receive any allied health referral compared with those with stroke(adjusted OR(aOR)0.76,95%CI 0.72 to 0.80;p<0.001)or Parkinson’s disease(aOR 0.72,95%CI 0.66 to 0.78;p<0.001).Those with dementia and stroke were also less likely to receive referrals than those with stroke only(aOR 0.71,95%CI 0.61 to 0.82;p<0.001).No significant difference was found between dementia with Parkinson’s and Parkinson’s only groups(p=0.48).Patients with dementia were consistently less likely to be referred to key allied health services(p<0.05).Conclusion Despite strong evidence supporting allied health interventions for dementia,referral rates remain comparatively low.Enhancing GP referral resources and education,integrating dementia-specific care pathways and implementing supportive policy changes are needed to improve access and equity in dementia care.
