Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of QL1206(a denosumab biosimilar to Xgeva■)in breast cancer patients with bone metastasis(BM)through subgroup analysis of a randomized,double-blind phaseⅢtrial(No.NCT045...Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of QL1206(a denosumab biosimilar to Xgeva■)in breast cancer patients with bone metastasis(BM)through subgroup analysis of a randomized,double-blind phaseⅢtrial(No.NCT04550949).Methods:This subgroup analysis included patients with BM from breast cancer enrolled in a phaseⅢtrial.Patients were randomized(1:1)to receive either three cycles of QL1206 or denosumab(120 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks).Subsequently,they received 10 cycles of QL1206(120 mg)over 40 weeks,followed by a 20-week safety follow-up.The primary endpoint was the percentage changes from baseline to week 13 in urinary Ntelopeptide corrected for creatinine(u NTx/Cr).Results:The breast cancer cohort consisted of 311 patients.Vertebral involvement(66.4%)was the most prevalent BM site at enrollment,while 27.7%of patients presented with≥3 metastatic bone lesions.At week 13,QL1206 demonstrated a median u NTx/Cr reduction of-69.9%(range:-98.1%-568.0%)vs.-74.3%(range:-97.7%-386.3%)for denosumab.The analysis of covariance revealed comparable least-square means for log-transformed changes:-1.416[95%confidence interval(95%CI):-1.736 to-1.096]vs.-1.501(95%CI:-1.824 to-1.178),yielding an between-group difference of 0.085(90%CI:-0.062-0.232;P=0.343).After a 53-week treatment period,83.6%achieved bone density improvement/disease stabilization.Safety profiles were comparable between groups.Conclusions:QL1206 demonstrated similar efficacy and safety to the reference denosumab in patients with BM from breast cancer,supporting QL1206 as a new option for management of BM from breast cancer.展开更多
文摘Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of QL1206(a denosumab biosimilar to Xgeva■)in breast cancer patients with bone metastasis(BM)through subgroup analysis of a randomized,double-blind phaseⅢtrial(No.NCT04550949).Methods:This subgroup analysis included patients with BM from breast cancer enrolled in a phaseⅢtrial.Patients were randomized(1:1)to receive either three cycles of QL1206 or denosumab(120 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks).Subsequently,they received 10 cycles of QL1206(120 mg)over 40 weeks,followed by a 20-week safety follow-up.The primary endpoint was the percentage changes from baseline to week 13 in urinary Ntelopeptide corrected for creatinine(u NTx/Cr).Results:The breast cancer cohort consisted of 311 patients.Vertebral involvement(66.4%)was the most prevalent BM site at enrollment,while 27.7%of patients presented with≥3 metastatic bone lesions.At week 13,QL1206 demonstrated a median u NTx/Cr reduction of-69.9%(range:-98.1%-568.0%)vs.-74.3%(range:-97.7%-386.3%)for denosumab.The analysis of covariance revealed comparable least-square means for log-transformed changes:-1.416[95%confidence interval(95%CI):-1.736 to-1.096]vs.-1.501(95%CI:-1.824 to-1.178),yielding an between-group difference of 0.085(90%CI:-0.062-0.232;P=0.343).After a 53-week treatment period,83.6%achieved bone density improvement/disease stabilization.Safety profiles were comparable between groups.Conclusions:QL1206 demonstrated similar efficacy and safety to the reference denosumab in patients with BM from breast cancer,supporting QL1206 as a new option for management of BM from breast cancer.
