To optimize secondary air nozzle structure in purifying burner,this study focused on the comparison of purification,combustion and NO_(x)emission characteristics of pulverized coal preheated by a 30 kW purifying burne...To optimize secondary air nozzle structure in purifying burner,this study focused on the comparison of purification,combustion and NO_(x)emission characteristics of pulverized coal preheated by a 30 kW purifying burner with coaxial and centrosymmetric structures.Centrosymmetric structure shifted the position of main burning region down in high-temperature reduction unit(HTRU),and the number of branches differently influenced the temperature in different regions with this structure.For reductive gas components,CO concentration with centrosymmetric structure was higher compared to coaxial structure,while the differences in H_(2)and CH_(4)concentrations were smaller.Centrosymmetric structure was more disadvantageous to improve physicochemical properties of pulverized coal compared to coaxial structure,and this structure with four branches further deteriorated its properties compared to two branches.In mild combustion unit(MCU),the temperature at top was lower with centrosymmetric structure,while was higher in the rest.Centrosymmetric structure more effectively reduced NO_(x)emission compared to coaxial structure,but with slight sacrifice of combustion efficiency(η).Moreover,both two-branch and four-branch centrosymmetric structures realized ultra-low NO_(x)emission(<50 mg·m^(-3))with high η of over 98.50%,and the former was more advantageous.With this optimal structure,η and NO_(x)emission were 99.25%and 40.42 mg·m^(-3).展开更多
基金Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of CPSF(GZC20232672)CAS Project for Young Scientists in Basic Research(YSBR-028)the Strategic Priority Research Program(XDA29010200)are gratefully acknowledged.
文摘To optimize secondary air nozzle structure in purifying burner,this study focused on the comparison of purification,combustion and NO_(x)emission characteristics of pulverized coal preheated by a 30 kW purifying burner with coaxial and centrosymmetric structures.Centrosymmetric structure shifted the position of main burning region down in high-temperature reduction unit(HTRU),and the number of branches differently influenced the temperature in different regions with this structure.For reductive gas components,CO concentration with centrosymmetric structure was higher compared to coaxial structure,while the differences in H_(2)and CH_(4)concentrations were smaller.Centrosymmetric structure was more disadvantageous to improve physicochemical properties of pulverized coal compared to coaxial structure,and this structure with four branches further deteriorated its properties compared to two branches.In mild combustion unit(MCU),the temperature at top was lower with centrosymmetric structure,while was higher in the rest.Centrosymmetric structure more effectively reduced NO_(x)emission compared to coaxial structure,but with slight sacrifice of combustion efficiency(η).Moreover,both two-branch and four-branch centrosymmetric structures realized ultra-low NO_(x)emission(<50 mg·m^(-3))with high η of over 98.50%,and the former was more advantageous.With this optimal structure,η and NO_(x)emission were 99.25%and 40.42 mg·m^(-3).