Colorectal cancer remains a major health concern,with colorectal polyps as key precursors.Endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)is a common treatment,but recurrence rates remain high.Traditional surveillance strategies rel...Colorectal cancer remains a major health concern,with colorectal polyps as key precursors.Endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)is a common treatment,but recurrence rates remain high.Traditional surveillance strategies rely on polyp characteristics and completeness of the resection potentially missing key risk factors.Machine learning(ML)offers a transformative approach by integrating patient-specific data to refine risk stratification.Recent studies highlight ML models,such as Extreme Gradient Boosting,which outperform conventional methods in predicting polyp recurrence within one-year post-EMR.These models incorporate factors like age,smoking status,family history,and pathology,optimizing follow-up recommendations and minimizing unnecessary procedures.Artificial intelligence(AI)-driven tools and web-based calculators enhance clinical workflow by providing real-time,personalized risk assessments.However,challenges remain in external validation,model interpretability,and clinical integration.Future surveillance strategies should combine expert judgment with AI insights to optimize patient outcomes.As gastroenterology embraces AI,MLdriven surveillance represents a paradigm shift,advancing precision medicine in colorectal polyp management.This editorial explores AI’s role in transforming post-EMR follow-up,addressing benefits,limitations,and future directions.展开更多
The machine learning model developed by Shi et al for predicting colorectal polyp recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection represents a significant advancement in the field of clinical gastroenterology.By integra...The machine learning model developed by Shi et al for predicting colorectal polyp recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection represents a significant advancement in the field of clinical gastroenterology.By integrating patient-specific factors,such as age,smoking history,and Helicobacter pylori infection,the eXtreme Gradient Boosting algorithm enables precise personalised colonoscopy follow-up planning and risk assessment.This predictive tool offers substantial benefits by optimising surveillance intervals and directing healthcare resources more efficiently toward high-risk individuals.However,real-world implementation requires consideration of the generalisability of our findings across diverse patient populations and clinician training backgrounds.展开更多
BACKGROUND Colon polyps represent a significant clinical challenge in elderly patients.While endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)and argon plasma coagulation(APC)are widely used,their comparative effectiveness in elderly...BACKGROUND Colon polyps represent a significant clinical challenge in elderly patients.While endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)and argon plasma coagulation(APC)are widely used,their comparative effectiveness in elderly populations remains unclear,particularly regarding postoperative recovery and complication profiles.AIM To compare the postoperative recovery,complications and efficacy of EMR and APC in elderly patients with colonic polyps.METHODS We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 224 elderly patients with colon polyps treated at our center between January 2021 and July 2024.All patients were divided into the EMR group and APC group according to the surgical method they received.By comparing the operation time,intraoperative bleeding situation,hospital stays,postoperative inflammatory response index,complication rate and recurrence status of the two groups,the effect of the two surgical methods was comprehensively evaluated.RESULTS The APC group exhibited superior outcomes in terms of operative time(10.63 minutes vs 13.27 minutes,P<0.001),intraoperative bleeding situation(39.00%vs 52.42%,P=0.031),and length of hospital stay(1.63 days vs 3.87 days,P<0.001)compared to the EMR group.The one-time resection rate of the APC group(94.69%)was higher than that of the EMR group(89.14%)(P=0.026).The overall effective rates of the two groups were 94.35%and 92.00%,respectively.Postoperative procalcitonin and C-reactive protein levels were lower in the APC group than in the EMR group(P<0.001).The incidence of complications was comparable between the two groups(P=0.159).The recurrence rate was lower in the APC group(2.00%)than in the EMR group(8.06%)(P=0.045).CONCLUSION For elderly patients with colon polyps,APC showed certain advantages compared with EMR in promoting postoperative recovery,reducing the inflammatory response and the risk of complications.However,the study is limited by its single-center retrospective design and short follow-up period,and further multicenter prospective studies are needed to validate the findings.展开更多
In 2025,Shi et al constructed a model utilizing machine learning techniques to predict the one-year recurrence of colorectal polyps following endoscopic mucosal resection,showing excellent discriminatory performance w...In 2025,Shi et al constructed a model utilizing machine learning techniques to predict the one-year recurrence of colorectal polyps following endoscopic mucosal resection,showing excellent discriminatory performance with an area under the curve exceeding 0.90.However,limitations exist regarding its narrow temporal scope,potential overestimation due to feature collinearity and imputation opacity,and limited generalizability due to single-center derivation and validation.Moreover,no clear clinical implementation strategy was outlined.Prospective multicenter validation and integration of endoscopist variability,longitudinal outcome data,and deployment mechanisms are warranted to ensure broader applicability and clinical utility.展开更多
BACKGROUND Endoscopic cold snare resection(CSP)can enhance postoperative recovery and minimize bleeding risk in patients with 5-15 mm colorectal polyps.However,more detailed evaluations are required to assess their ad...BACKGROUND Endoscopic cold snare resection(CSP)can enhance postoperative recovery and minimize bleeding risk in patients with 5-15 mm colorectal polyps.However,more detailed evaluations are required to assess their advantages over conventional methods.AIM To evaluate the effects of endoscopic CSP on postoperative recovery and bleeding risk in patients with 5-15 mm colorectal polyps.METHODS This randomized controlled study included 193 patients(mean age:57.91±5.41 years;97 men and 96 women)with 5-15 mm colorectal polyps treated at Dongyang People's Hospital between March and June 2023.The patients were randomly assigned to the experimental group(n=100),who underwent CSP,and the control group(n=93),who underwent conventional endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR).Operation time,hospital stay,dietary status,and bleeding rate within 3 days were compared.RESULTS The CSP group had significantly shorter operation times(15.02±2.44 minutes vs 18.78±5.48 minutes,P<0.001)and hospital stays(3.11±1.08 days vs 4.89±1.35 days,P<0.001)than the EMR group.The fasting rate on the day of surgery was also lower in the CSP group(P<0.05).The complete resection rates were similar between groups(98.00%vs 94.62%,P=0.210),and no perforations occurred in either group.The 3-day postoperative bleeding rate was slightly lower in the CSP group(2.00%)than in the EMR group(6.45%),although this difference was not statistically significant(P=0.234),indicating limited clinical relevance.CONCLUSION CSP was safe and efficient for removing 5-15 mm colorectal polyps,offering faster recovery and comparable safety to EMR.The procedural efficiency of CSP supports its broad clinical application.展开更多
BACKGROUND Although substantial evidence supports the advantages of cold snare polypectomy(CSP)in terms of polypectomy efficacy and reduced postoperative adverse events,few studies have examined the cost differences b...BACKGROUND Although substantial evidence supports the advantages of cold snare polypectomy(CSP)in terms of polypectomy efficacy and reduced postoperative adverse events,few studies have examined the cost differences between CSP and traditional endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)for the treatment of intestinal polyps.AIM To compare the efficacy-cost of EMR and CSP in the treatment of intestinal polyps.METHODS A total of 100 patients with intestinal polyps were included in the retrospective data of our hospital from April 2022 to May 2023.According to the treatment methods,they were divided into EMR(n=46)group and CSP(n=54)group.The baseline data of the two groups were balanced by 1:1 propensity score matching(PSM),and the cost-effectiveness analysis was performed on the two groups after matching.The recurrence rate of the two groups of patients was followed up for 1 year,and they were divided into recurrence group and non-recurrence group according to whether they recurred.Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to screen out the influencing factors affecting the recurrence of intestinal polyps after endoscopic resection.RESULTS Significant disparities were observed in the number of polyps and smoking background between the two groups before PSM(P<0.05).Following PSM,the number of polyps and smoking history were well balanced between the EMR and CSP groups.The direct cost incurred by the CSP group was markedly higher than that incurred by the EMR group.Concurrently,the cost-effectiveness ratio in the CSP group was substantially reduced when juxtaposed with that in the EMR group(P<0.05).Upon completion of the 1-year follow-up,the rate of recurrence after endoscopic intestinal polypectomy was 38.00%.Multivariate methods revealed that age≥60 years,male sex,number of polyps≥3,and pathological type of adenoma were risk factors for recurrence after endoscopic intestinal polypectomy(all P<0.05).CONCLUSION CSP was more cost-effective for the treatment of intestinal polyps.An age≥60 years,male sex,having a number of polyps≥3,and pathological type of adenoma are independent influencing factors for recurrence.展开更多
AIM:To evaluate the outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR) for colorectal polyps,with particular regard to procedural complications and recurrence rate,in typical United Kingdom(UK) hospitals that perform an av...AIM:To evaluate the outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR) for colorectal polyps,with particular regard to procedural complications and recurrence rate,in typical United Kingdom(UK) hospitals that perform an average of about 25 colonic EMRs per year.METHODS:A total of 239 colorectal polyps(≥ 10 mm) resected from 199 patients referred to Rochdale Infirmary,Salford Royal Hospital and Royal Oldham Hospital for EMR between January 2003 and January 2009 were studied.RESULTS:The mean size of polyps resected was 19.6 ± 12.4 mm(range 10-80 mm).The overall major complication rate was 2.1%.Complications were less frequent with non-adenomas compared with the other groups(Pearson's χ 2 test,P < 0.0001).Resections of largersized polyps were more likely to result in complications(unpaired t-test,P = 0.021).Recurrence was associated with histology,with carcinoma-in-situ more likely to recur compared with low-grade dysplasia [hazard ratio(HR) 186.7,95% confidence interval(95% CI):8.81-3953.02,P = 0.001].Distal lesions were also more likely to recur compared with right-sided and transverse colon lesions(HR 5.93,95% CI:1.35-26.18,P = 0.019).CONCLUSION:EMR for colorectal polyps can be performed safely and effectively in typical UK hospitals.Stricter follow-up is required for histologically advanced lesions due to increased recurrence risk.展开更多
AIM: To evaluate the safety and outcomes of endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (EPMR) for large sessile colorectal polyps. METHODS: The patients enrolled in this study were 47 patients with 50 large sessile polyps...AIM: To evaluate the safety and outcomes of endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (EPMR) for large sessile colorectal polyps. METHODS: The patients enrolled in this study were 47 patients with 50 large sessile polyps (diameter, 2 cm or greater) who underwent EPMR using a submucosal saline injection technique between December 2002 and October 2005. All medical records, including characteristics of the patients and polyps, complications, and recurrences, were retrospectively reviewed. The first follow-up endoscopic examination was performed at 3-6 mo after initial endoscopic resection, and the second at 12 mo postEPMR. Subsequent surveillance colonoscopic examinations were individualized, taking risk factors into account. RESULTS: The patients were 23 men and 24 women,with a mean age of 60 years. Mean polyp size was 30.1 mm. Of 50 polyps identified, 34 (68%) were benign and 16 (32%) were malignant. There were 6 (12%) cases with EPMR-related bleeding: 5 intra-procedural and 1 early post-procedural bleeding. All bleeding episodes were managed by endoscopic clipping or argon beam coagulation. There were no perforations. Recurrence was identified in 5 cases (12.2%): 4 local recurrences detected at 3 mo post-EPMR and 1 local recurrence detected at 14 mo post-EPMR. The recurrence rate after EPMR was 3.1% for benign polyps and 33.3% for malignant polyps (P < 0.05). Median follow-up time was 37 mo. CONCLUSION: EPMR is safe, but should be applied carefully in malignant polyps. Close follow-up endoscopic examinations are necessary for early detection of recurrence.展开更多
Although uncommon, sporadic nonampullary duodenal adenomas have a growing detection due to the widespread of endoscopy. Endoscopic therapy is being increasingly used for these lesions, since surgery, considered the st...Although uncommon, sporadic nonampullary duodenal adenomas have a growing detection due to the widespread of endoscopy. Endoscopic therapy is being increasingly used for these lesions, since surgery, considered the standard treatment, carries significant morbidity and mortality. However, the knowledge about its risks and benefits is limited, which contributes to the current absence of standardized recommendations. This review aims to discuss the efficacy and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) in the treatment of these lesions. A literature review was performed, using the Pubmed database with the query: "(duodenum or duodenal)(endoscopy or endoscopic) adenoma resection", in the human species and in English. Of the 189 retrieved articles, and after reading their abstracts, 19 were selected due to their scientific interest. The analysis of their references, led to the inclusion of 23 more articles for their relevance in this subject. The increased use of EMR in the duodenum has shown good results with complete resection rates exceeding 80% and low complication risk(delayed bleeding in less than 12% of the procedures). Although rarely used in the duodenum, ESD achieves close to 100% complete resection rates, but is associated with perforation and bleeding risk in up to one third of the cases. Even though literature is insufficient to draw definitive conclusions, studies suggest that EMR and ESD are valid options for the treatment of nonampullary adenomas. Thus, strategies to improve these techniques, and consequently increase the effectiveness and safety of the resection of these lesions, should be developed.展开更多
BACKGROUND Endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)has shown to be effective in management of colorectal neoplasm in the Asian countries,while its implementation in Western countries where endoscopic mucosal resection(EM...BACKGROUND Endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)has shown to be effective in management of colorectal neoplasm in the Asian countries,while its implementation in Western countries where endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)is preferred is still debatable.AIM To compare the surgical,histological,and oncological outcomes between ESD and EMR in the treatment of colorectal polyps,with subgroup analysis comparing the efficacy of ESD and EMR between Japan and the rest of the world.METHODS Embase and Medline databases were searched from inception to October 2020 in accordance with PRISMA guidelines for studies comparing en bloc,complete resection,margin involvement,resection time,need for additional surgery,complications,and recurrence rate of ESD with EMR.RESULTS Of 281344 colorectal polyps from 21 studies were included.When compared to EMR,the pooled analysis revealed ESD was associated with higher en bloc and complete resection rate,and lower lateral margin involvement and recurrence.ESD led to increased procedural time,need for additional surgery,and perforation risk.No significant difference in bleeding risk was found between the two groups.Meta-regression analysis suggested only right colonic polyps correlated with an increased perforation risk in ESD.Confounders including polyp size and invasion depth did not significantly influence the en bloc and complete resection rate,bleeding risk and recurrence.In subgroup analysis,Japan performed better than the rest of the world in both ESD and EMR with perforation risk of 4%and 0.0002%,respectively,as compared to perforation risk of 8%and 1%,respectively,in reports coming from rest of the world.CONCLUSION ESD resulted in better resection outcomes and lower recurrence compared to EMR.With appropriate training,ESD is preferred over EMR as the first-line therapy for resection of colorectal polyps,without restricting to lesions greater than 20 mm and those with high suspicion of submucosal invasion.展开更多
AIM: To investigate whether out-patient based endo-scopic mucosal resection(EMR) for colon polyps ≤ 10 mm is safe.METHODS: Between January 2004 and December 2012, a total of 3015 EMR cases conducted in 1320 patients ...AIM: To investigate whether out-patient based endo-scopic mucosal resection(EMR) for colon polyps ≤ 10 mm is safe.METHODS: Between January 2004 and December 2012, a total of 3015 EMR cases conducted in 1320 patients were retrospectively reviewed. The factors contributing delayed hemorrhage were analyzed. We calculated the probability of delayed bleeding after stratifying conditions of specific risk factors.RESULTS: The size of the polyp(95%CI: 1.096-1.164, P < 0.001) and patients with chronic renal failure(95%CI: 1.856-45.106, P = 0.007) were identified as independent risk factors for delayed bleeding in multi-variate analysis. 95%CI for percent of delayed bleedingaccording to polyp size was determined for the fol-lowing conditions: size ≤ 10 mm, 0.05%-0.43%; 20 mm ≥ size > 10 mm, 0.54%-2.08%; size > 20 mm, 4.22%-11.41%. 95%CI was determined for the risk of serious immediate bleeding for a polyp ≤ 10 mm was 0.10%-0.56%. Finally, 95%CI for percent of incomplete resection was 0.07%-0.49% in polyps ≤ 10 mm. CONCLUSION: It seems acceptable to perform outpa-tient-based EMR for colon polyps ≤ 10 mm.展开更多
BACKGROUND Complete polyp resection is the main goal of endoscopic removal of large colonic polyps.Resection techniques have evolved in recent years and endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD),endoscopic mucosal resecti...BACKGROUND Complete polyp resection is the main goal of endoscopic removal of large colonic polyps.Resection techniques have evolved in recent years and endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD),endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)with margin ablation,cold snare polypectomy(CSP),cold EMR,and underwater EMR have been introduced.Yet,efficacy of these techniques with regard to local recurrence rates(LRRs)vs traditional hot snare polypectomy and standard EMR remains unclear.AIM To analyze LRR of large colonic polyps in a systematic review and meta-analysis.METHODS MEDLINE,EMBASE,EBM Reviews,and CINAHL were searched for prospective studies reporting LRR or incomplete resection rate(IRR)after colonic polypectomy of polyps≥10 mm,published between January 2011 and July 2021.Primary outcome was LRR for polyps≥10 mm.RESULTS Six thousand nine hundred and twenty-eight publications were identified,of which 34 prospective studies were included.LRR for polyps≥10 mm at up to 12 mo’follow-up was 11.0%(95%CI,7.1%-14.8%;15 studies;4904 polyps).ESD(1.7%;95%CI,0%-3.4%;3 studies,221 polyps)and endoscopic mucosal resection with margin ablation(3.3%;95%CI,2.2%-4.5%;2 studies,947 polyps)significantly reduced LRR vs standard EMR without(15.2%;95%CI,12.5%-18.0%;4 studies,650 polyps)or with unsystematic margin ablation(16.5%;95%CI,15.2%-17.8%;6 studies,3031 polyps).CONCLUSION LRR is significantly lower after ESD or EMR with routine margin ablation;thus,these techniques should be considered standard for endoscopic removal of large colorectal polyps.Other techniques,such as CSP,cold EMR,and underwater EMR require further evaluation in prospective studies before their routine implementation in clinical practice can be recommended.展开更多
BACKGROUND Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection(UEMR)of colorectal lesions is emerging as an alternative method to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR);however,it is still controversial whether there is a...BACKGROUND Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection(UEMR)of colorectal lesions is emerging as an alternative method to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR);however,it is still controversial whether there is a difference in the effectiveness between UEMR and EMR.AIM To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of UEMR in the treatment of colorectal polyps.METHODS Clinical studies comparing the effectiveness or safety of UEMR in the treatment of colorectal polyps were searched in medical databases,including Pub Med,Embase,Cochrane Library,CNKI,and Wanfang Data,monographs,theses,and papers presented at conferences.Statistical analyses were performed using Revman 5.3 software.RESULTS Seven non-randomized controlled trials and one randomized controlled trial met the inclusion criteria.In total,1382 patients(1511 polyps)were included in the study,including 722 who received UEMR and 789 who received EMR.In the UEMR and EMR groups,the en bloc resection rates were 85.87%and 73.89%,respectively,with a relative risk(RR)value of 1.14(95%confidence interval[CI]:1.01-1.30;P<0.05).In the sub-group analysis,the en bloc resection rate showed no statistically significant difference between the EMR and UEMR groups for polyps less than 20 mm in diameter.However,a statistically significant difference was found between the EMR and UEMR groups for polyps equal to or greater than 20 mm in diameter.The post-endoscopic resection recurrence rates at 3-6 mo of the UEMR and EMR groups were 3.26%and 15.17%,respectively,with an RR value of 0.27(95%CI:0.09-0.83;P<0.05).The post-endoscopic resection recurrence rates of UEMR and EMR at 12 mo were 6.25%and 14.40%,respectively,with an RR value of 0.43(95%CI:0.20-0.92;P<0.05).Additionally,the incidence of adverse events was 8.17%and 6.21%,respectively,with an RR value of 1.07(95%CI:0.50-2.30;P>0.05).CONCLUSION UEMR is an effective technique for colorectal polyps and appears to have some advantages over EMR,particularly with regard to some treatment outcomes.展开更多
A proportion of neoplastic polyps are incompletely resected, resulting in local recurrence, especially after resection of large polyps or piecemeal resection. Local recurrences that develop after endoscopic resection ...A proportion of neoplastic polyps are incompletely resected, resulting in local recurrence, especially after resection of large polyps or piecemeal resection. Local recurrences that develop after endoscopic resection of intramucosal neoplasms that lacked risk factors for lymph node metastasis or positive vertical margins are usually treated endoscopically. Endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) is indicated for local residual or recurrent early carcinomas after endoscopic resection. However, ESD for such recurrent lesions is technically difficult and is typically a lengthy procedure. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection(UEMR), which was developed in 2012, is suitable for recurrent or residual lesions and reportedly achieves superior en bloc resection rates and endoscopic complete resection rates than conventional EMR. However, a large recurrent lesion is a negative independent predictor of successful en bloc resection and of complete endoscopic removal. We therefore perform UEMR for relatively small(≤ 10-15 mm) recurrent lesions and ESD for larger lesions.展开更多
BACKGROUND The optimal method to remove sessile colorectal lesions sized 10-20 mm remains uncertain.Piecemeal and incomplete resection are major limitations in current practice,such as endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR...BACKGROUND The optimal method to remove sessile colorectal lesions sized 10-20 mm remains uncertain.Piecemeal and incomplete resection are major limitations in current practice,such as endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)and cold or hot snare polypectomy.Recently,EMR with circumferential precutting(EMR-P)has emerged as an effective technique,but the quality of current evidence in comparative studies of conventional EMR(CEMR)and EMR-P is limited.AIM To investigate whether EMR-P is superior to CEMR in removing sessile colorectal polyps.METHODS This multicenter randomized controlled trial involved seven medical institutions in China.Patients with colorectal polyps sized 10-20 mm were enrolled and randomly assigned to undergo EMR-P or CEMR.EMR-P was performed following submucosal injection,and a circumferential mucosa incision(precutting)was conducted using a snare tip.Primary outcomes included a comparison of the rates of en bloc and R0 resection,defined as one-piece resection and one-piece resection with histologically assessed clear margins,respectively.RESULTS A total of 110 patients in the EMR-P group and 110 patients in the CEMR group were finally evaluated.In the per-protocol analysis,the proportion of en bloc resections was 94.3%[95%confidence interval(CI):88.2%-97.4%]in the EMR-P group and 86%(95%CI:78.2%-91.3%)in the CEMR group(P=0.041),while subgroup analysis showed that for lesions>15 mm,EMR-P also resulted in a higher en bloc resection rate(92.0%vs 58.8%P=0.029).The proportion of R0 resections was 81.1%(95%CI:72.6%-87.4%)in the EMR-P group and 76.6%(95%CI:68.8%-84.4%)in the CEMR group(P=0.521).The EMR-P group showed a longer median procedure time(6.4 vs 3.0 min;P<0.001).No significant difference was found in the proportion of patients with adverse events(EMR-P:9.1%;CEMR:6.4%;P=0.449).CONCLUSION In this study,EMR-P served as an alternative to CEMR for removing nonpedunculated colorectal polyps sized 10-20 mm,particularly polyps>15 mm in diameter,with higher R0 and en bloc resection rates and without increasing adverse events.However,EMR-P required a relatively longer procedure time than CEMR.Considering its potential benefits for en bloc and R0 resection,EMR-P may be a promising technique in colorectal polyp resection.展开更多
AIM: To evaluate if traction-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (TA-EMR) is feasible and if it enables en bloc resection of colorectal lesions. METHODS: Seven patients with a total of 12 colorectal adenomas were pr...AIM: To evaluate if traction-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (TA-EMR) is feasible and if it enables en bloc resection of colorectal lesions. METHODS: Seven patients with a total of 12 colorectal adenomas were prospectively enrolled. All lesions were removed by TA-EMR: one hemostatic clip tied to a white silk suture was applied to the base of the lesion to allow traction through the working channel of the colonoscope. A conventional polypectomy snare was mounted over the suture and the lesion was pulled into the snare and resected in one piece. RESULTS: All 12 lesions (nine sessile) were resected en bloc with free lateral and vertical margins by using this novel technique, including five lesions (5/12, 41.6%) in less-accessible positions, where TA-EMR enabled complete visualization of the base before resection. Mean longest lesion and specimen sizes were 9 mm (range: 6-25 mm) and 11 mm in diameter (range: 7-17 mm),respectively. No serious procedure-related complications were observed. CONCLUSION: TA-EMR through the endoscope using a hemostatic clip and suture material is technically feasible. Visualization of colorectal lesions in less-accessible locations can be improved.展开更多
BACKGROUND Colorectal polyps refer to all neoplasms that protrude into the intestinal cavity.Researchers believe that 50%-70%of colorectal cancers originate from adenomatous polyps.AIM To investigate the endoscopic mo...BACKGROUND Colorectal polyps refer to all neoplasms that protrude into the intestinal cavity.Researchers believe that 50%-70%of colorectal cancers originate from adenomatous polyps.AIM To investigate the endoscopic morphologic features,pathologic types,and clinical situation;evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR);and guide clinicians in their daily practice.METHODS Two hundred thirty-four patients who underwent EMR in our hospital from January 1,2018 to December 31,2019 were recruited.Data including sex,age,endoscopic morphology of the polyps,and pathological characteristics were analyzed among groups.RESULTS A total of 295 polyps were resected from the 234 subjects enrolled in the study,of which 4(1.36%)were Yamada type I.There were 75(25.42%)type II,101(34.24%)type III,and 115(38.98%)type IV adenomas.Among them,41 were nonadenomas,110 were low-risk adenomas,139 were high-risk adenomas,and 5 were carcinomas.The differences in distribution were not statistically significant,with P values greater than 0.05.The risk of cancer significantly increased for polyps≥1 cm in diameter(c2=199.825,P=0.00).Regarding the endoscopic morphological features,congestion,erosion,and lobulation were more common on the surface morphology of high-risk adenomas and cancerous polyps(c2=75.257,P=0.00),and most of them were Yamada types III and IV.In all,6 of the 295 polyps could not be removed completely,with a one-time resection rate of 97.97%.There were two cases of postoperative bleeding and no cases of perforation,with an overall complication rate of 0.09%.CONCLUSION Colorectal polyps ranging from non-adenomatous polyps,low-risk adenomas,and high-risk adenomas to adenocarcinomas each has their own endoscopic features,while EMR,as a mature intervention,has good safety and operability and should be promoted clinically,especially at the primary care level.展开更多
BACKGROUND Large appendiceal orifice polyps are traditionally treated surgically.Recently,endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)and endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)have been utilized as alternative resection technique...BACKGROUND Large appendiceal orifice polyps are traditionally treated surgically.Recently,endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)and endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)have been utilized as alternative resection techniques.AIM To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection techniques for the management of large appendiceal orifice polyps.METHODS This was a retrospective observational study conducted to assess the feasibility and safety of EMR and ESD for large appendiceal orifice polyps.This project was approved by the Baylor College of Medicine Institutional Review Board.Patients who underwent endoscopic resection of appendiceal orifice polyps≥1 cm from 2015 to 2022 at a tertiary referral endoscopy center in the United States were enrolled.The main outcomes of this study included en bloc resection,R0 resection,post resection adverse events,and polyp recurrence.RESULTS A total of 19 patients were identified.Most patients were female(53%)and Caucasian(95%).The mean age was 63.3±10.8 years,and the average body mass index was 28.8±6.4.The mean polyp size was 25.5±14.2 mm.74%of polyps were localized to the appendix(at or inside the appendiceal orifice)and the remaining extended into the cecum.68%of polyps occupied≥50%of the appendiceal orifice circumference.The mean procedure duration was 61.6±37.9 minutes.Polyps were resected via endoscopic mucosal resection,endoscopic submucosal dissection,and hybrid procedures in 5,6,and 8 patients,respectively.Final pathology was remarkable for tubular adenoma(n=10)[one with high grade dysplasia],sessile serrated adenoma(n=7),and tubulovillous adenoma(n=2)[two with high grade dysplasia].En bloc resection was achieved in 84%with an 88%R0 resection rate.Despite the large polyp sizes and challenging procedures,89%(n=17)of patients were discharged on the same day as their procedure.Two patients were admitted for post-procedure observation for conservative pain management.Eight patients underwent repeat colonoscopy without evidence of residual or recurrent adenomatous polyps.CONCLUSION Our study highlights how endoscopic mucosal resection,endoscopic submucosal dissection,and hybrid procedures are all appropriate techniques with minimal adverse effects,further validating the utility of endoscopic procedures in the management of large appendiceal polyps.展开更多
BACKGROUND The management of polyps involving the appendiceal orifice(AO)presents notable challenges.Endoscopic resection is frequently hindered by operational complexities,a heightened risk of incomplete removal,and ...BACKGROUND The management of polyps involving the appendiceal orifice(AO)presents notable challenges.Endoscopic resection is frequently hindered by operational complexities,a heightened risk of incomplete removal,and an elevated risk of procedural complications,including appendicitis.Conversely,surgical resection may entail unnecessary excision of intestinal segments,leading to potential morbidity.CASE SUMMARY Here,we reported two patients who presented with polyps deeply situated within the AO,with indistinct boundaries making it challenging to ensure completeness using traditional endoscopic resection.To overcome these challenges,we em-ployed combined endo-laparoscopic surgery(CELS),achieving curative resection without postoperative complications.CONCLUSION The application of CELS in managing polyps involving the AO is emerging as a safe and effective treatment modality.展开更多
BACKGROUND Bile duct polyps are difficult to diagnose and are usually excised by open abdominal surgery or snare polypectomy using choledochoscopy via the T-tube sinus tract. However, these two resection methods requi...BACKGROUND Bile duct polyps are difficult to diagnose and are usually excised by open abdominal surgery or snare polypectomy using choledochoscopy via the T-tube sinus tract. However, these two resection methods require the surgeon to open the abdomen and cut the bile duct to place the “T” tube. Moreover, simple snare polypectomy, without submucosal injection, can only remove pedunculated polyps and not flat polyps. Therefore, a new method is required for the excision of bile duct polyps, including flat polyps. CASE SUMMARY A 63-year-old woman was hospitalized following epigastric pain lasting a month. She had a 30-year history of cholelithiasis and had undergone cholecystectomy because of cholecystolithiasis, and had undergone cholangiolithotomy twice due to choledocholithiasis. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging showed a communication between the bile duct and duodenal bulb. Inside the communication, CT showed a high-density shadow which was a hypointense lesion in T2 weighted image. The lesion showed no enhancement in T1 weighted image contrast enhanced. Gastroscopy revealed an incarcerated bile duct stone in the anterior wall of the duodenal bulb, which was removed with a basket under gastroscopy. Thereafter, a choledochoduodenal fistula was revealed. Finally, a flat polyp was detected in the lower part of the common bile duct and was removed by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) through the fistula. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of the removal of a bile duct polyp using EMR. CONCLUSION EMR is a safe, effective, and low-cost method for the resection of all bile duct polyps.展开更多
基金Supported by Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation,No.FGMF-2025-0003.
文摘Colorectal cancer remains a major health concern,with colorectal polyps as key precursors.Endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)is a common treatment,but recurrence rates remain high.Traditional surveillance strategies rely on polyp characteristics and completeness of the resection potentially missing key risk factors.Machine learning(ML)offers a transformative approach by integrating patient-specific data to refine risk stratification.Recent studies highlight ML models,such as Extreme Gradient Boosting,which outperform conventional methods in predicting polyp recurrence within one-year post-EMR.These models incorporate factors like age,smoking status,family history,and pathology,optimizing follow-up recommendations and minimizing unnecessary procedures.Artificial intelligence(AI)-driven tools and web-based calculators enhance clinical workflow by providing real-time,personalized risk assessments.However,challenges remain in external validation,model interpretability,and clinical integration.Future surveillance strategies should combine expert judgment with AI insights to optimize patient outcomes.As gastroenterology embraces AI,MLdriven surveillance represents a paradigm shift,advancing precision medicine in colorectal polyp management.This editorial explores AI’s role in transforming post-EMR follow-up,addressing benefits,limitations,and future directions.
文摘The machine learning model developed by Shi et al for predicting colorectal polyp recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection represents a significant advancement in the field of clinical gastroenterology.By integrating patient-specific factors,such as age,smoking history,and Helicobacter pylori infection,the eXtreme Gradient Boosting algorithm enables precise personalised colonoscopy follow-up planning and risk assessment.This predictive tool offers substantial benefits by optimising surveillance intervals and directing healthcare resources more efficiently toward high-risk individuals.However,real-world implementation requires consideration of the generalisability of our findings across diverse patient populations and clinician training backgrounds.
文摘BACKGROUND Colon polyps represent a significant clinical challenge in elderly patients.While endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)and argon plasma coagulation(APC)are widely used,their comparative effectiveness in elderly populations remains unclear,particularly regarding postoperative recovery and complication profiles.AIM To compare the postoperative recovery,complications and efficacy of EMR and APC in elderly patients with colonic polyps.METHODS We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 224 elderly patients with colon polyps treated at our center between January 2021 and July 2024.All patients were divided into the EMR group and APC group according to the surgical method they received.By comparing the operation time,intraoperative bleeding situation,hospital stays,postoperative inflammatory response index,complication rate and recurrence status of the two groups,the effect of the two surgical methods was comprehensively evaluated.RESULTS The APC group exhibited superior outcomes in terms of operative time(10.63 minutes vs 13.27 minutes,P<0.001),intraoperative bleeding situation(39.00%vs 52.42%,P=0.031),and length of hospital stay(1.63 days vs 3.87 days,P<0.001)compared to the EMR group.The one-time resection rate of the APC group(94.69%)was higher than that of the EMR group(89.14%)(P=0.026).The overall effective rates of the two groups were 94.35%and 92.00%,respectively.Postoperative procalcitonin and C-reactive protein levels were lower in the APC group than in the EMR group(P<0.001).The incidence of complications was comparable between the two groups(P=0.159).The recurrence rate was lower in the APC group(2.00%)than in the EMR group(8.06%)(P=0.045).CONCLUSION For elderly patients with colon polyps,APC showed certain advantages compared with EMR in promoting postoperative recovery,reducing the inflammatory response and the risk of complications.However,the study is limited by its single-center retrospective design and short follow-up period,and further multicenter prospective studies are needed to validate the findings.
基金Supported by the Wuhu Municipal Science and Technology Bureau Project,No.2024kj072.
文摘In 2025,Shi et al constructed a model utilizing machine learning techniques to predict the one-year recurrence of colorectal polyps following endoscopic mucosal resection,showing excellent discriminatory performance with an area under the curve exceeding 0.90.However,limitations exist regarding its narrow temporal scope,potential overestimation due to feature collinearity and imputation opacity,and limited generalizability due to single-center derivation and validation.Moreover,no clear clinical implementation strategy was outlined.Prospective multicenter validation and integration of endoscopist variability,longitudinal outcome data,and deployment mechanisms are warranted to ensure broader applicability and clinical utility.
文摘BACKGROUND Endoscopic cold snare resection(CSP)can enhance postoperative recovery and minimize bleeding risk in patients with 5-15 mm colorectal polyps.However,more detailed evaluations are required to assess their advantages over conventional methods.AIM To evaluate the effects of endoscopic CSP on postoperative recovery and bleeding risk in patients with 5-15 mm colorectal polyps.METHODS This randomized controlled study included 193 patients(mean age:57.91±5.41 years;97 men and 96 women)with 5-15 mm colorectal polyps treated at Dongyang People's Hospital between March and June 2023.The patients were randomly assigned to the experimental group(n=100),who underwent CSP,and the control group(n=93),who underwent conventional endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR).Operation time,hospital stay,dietary status,and bleeding rate within 3 days were compared.RESULTS The CSP group had significantly shorter operation times(15.02±2.44 minutes vs 18.78±5.48 minutes,P<0.001)and hospital stays(3.11±1.08 days vs 4.89±1.35 days,P<0.001)than the EMR group.The fasting rate on the day of surgery was also lower in the CSP group(P<0.05).The complete resection rates were similar between groups(98.00%vs 94.62%,P=0.210),and no perforations occurred in either group.The 3-day postoperative bleeding rate was slightly lower in the CSP group(2.00%)than in the EMR group(6.45%),although this difference was not statistically significant(P=0.234),indicating limited clinical relevance.CONCLUSION CSP was safe and efficient for removing 5-15 mm colorectal polyps,offering faster recovery and comparable safety to EMR.The procedural efficiency of CSP supports its broad clinical application.
文摘BACKGROUND Although substantial evidence supports the advantages of cold snare polypectomy(CSP)in terms of polypectomy efficacy and reduced postoperative adverse events,few studies have examined the cost differences between CSP and traditional endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)for the treatment of intestinal polyps.AIM To compare the efficacy-cost of EMR and CSP in the treatment of intestinal polyps.METHODS A total of 100 patients with intestinal polyps were included in the retrospective data of our hospital from April 2022 to May 2023.According to the treatment methods,they were divided into EMR(n=46)group and CSP(n=54)group.The baseline data of the two groups were balanced by 1:1 propensity score matching(PSM),and the cost-effectiveness analysis was performed on the two groups after matching.The recurrence rate of the two groups of patients was followed up for 1 year,and they were divided into recurrence group and non-recurrence group according to whether they recurred.Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to screen out the influencing factors affecting the recurrence of intestinal polyps after endoscopic resection.RESULTS Significant disparities were observed in the number of polyps and smoking background between the two groups before PSM(P<0.05).Following PSM,the number of polyps and smoking history were well balanced between the EMR and CSP groups.The direct cost incurred by the CSP group was markedly higher than that incurred by the EMR group.Concurrently,the cost-effectiveness ratio in the CSP group was substantially reduced when juxtaposed with that in the EMR group(P<0.05).Upon completion of the 1-year follow-up,the rate of recurrence after endoscopic intestinal polypectomy was 38.00%.Multivariate methods revealed that age≥60 years,male sex,number of polyps≥3,and pathological type of adenoma were risk factors for recurrence after endoscopic intestinal polypectomy(all P<0.05).CONCLUSION CSP was more cost-effective for the treatment of intestinal polyps.An age≥60 years,male sex,having a number of polyps≥3,and pathological type of adenoma are independent influencing factors for recurrence.
文摘AIM:To evaluate the outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR) for colorectal polyps,with particular regard to procedural complications and recurrence rate,in typical United Kingdom(UK) hospitals that perform an average of about 25 colonic EMRs per year.METHODS:A total of 239 colorectal polyps(≥ 10 mm) resected from 199 patients referred to Rochdale Infirmary,Salford Royal Hospital and Royal Oldham Hospital for EMR between January 2003 and January 2009 were studied.RESULTS:The mean size of polyps resected was 19.6 ± 12.4 mm(range 10-80 mm).The overall major complication rate was 2.1%.Complications were less frequent with non-adenomas compared with the other groups(Pearson's χ 2 test,P < 0.0001).Resections of largersized polyps were more likely to result in complications(unpaired t-test,P = 0.021).Recurrence was associated with histology,with carcinoma-in-situ more likely to recur compared with low-grade dysplasia [hazard ratio(HR) 186.7,95% confidence interval(95% CI):8.81-3953.02,P = 0.001].Distal lesions were also more likely to recur compared with right-sided and transverse colon lesions(HR 5.93,95% CI:1.35-26.18,P = 0.019).CONCLUSION:EMR for colorectal polyps can be performed safely and effectively in typical UK hospitals.Stricter follow-up is required for histologically advanced lesions due to increased recurrence risk.
基金Supported by Grants from the National Cancer Center of Korea, NCC-0710362 and NCC-0910520
文摘AIM: To evaluate the safety and outcomes of endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (EPMR) for large sessile colorectal polyps. METHODS: The patients enrolled in this study were 47 patients with 50 large sessile polyps (diameter, 2 cm or greater) who underwent EPMR using a submucosal saline injection technique between December 2002 and October 2005. All medical records, including characteristics of the patients and polyps, complications, and recurrences, were retrospectively reviewed. The first follow-up endoscopic examination was performed at 3-6 mo after initial endoscopic resection, and the second at 12 mo postEPMR. Subsequent surveillance colonoscopic examinations were individualized, taking risk factors into account. RESULTS: The patients were 23 men and 24 women,with a mean age of 60 years. Mean polyp size was 30.1 mm. Of 50 polyps identified, 34 (68%) were benign and 16 (32%) were malignant. There were 6 (12%) cases with EPMR-related bleeding: 5 intra-procedural and 1 early post-procedural bleeding. All bleeding episodes were managed by endoscopic clipping or argon beam coagulation. There were no perforations. Recurrence was identified in 5 cases (12.2%): 4 local recurrences detected at 3 mo post-EPMR and 1 local recurrence detected at 14 mo post-EPMR. The recurrence rate after EPMR was 3.1% for benign polyps and 33.3% for malignant polyps (P < 0.05). Median follow-up time was 37 mo. CONCLUSION: EPMR is safe, but should be applied carefully in malignant polyps. Close follow-up endoscopic examinations are necessary for early detection of recurrence.
文摘Although uncommon, sporadic nonampullary duodenal adenomas have a growing detection due to the widespread of endoscopy. Endoscopic therapy is being increasingly used for these lesions, since surgery, considered the standard treatment, carries significant morbidity and mortality. However, the knowledge about its risks and benefits is limited, which contributes to the current absence of standardized recommendations. This review aims to discuss the efficacy and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) in the treatment of these lesions. A literature review was performed, using the Pubmed database with the query: "(duodenum or duodenal)(endoscopy or endoscopic) adenoma resection", in the human species and in English. Of the 189 retrieved articles, and after reading their abstracts, 19 were selected due to their scientific interest. The analysis of their references, led to the inclusion of 23 more articles for their relevance in this subject. The increased use of EMR in the duodenum has shown good results with complete resection rates exceeding 80% and low complication risk(delayed bleeding in less than 12% of the procedures). Although rarely used in the duodenum, ESD achieves close to 100% complete resection rates, but is associated with perforation and bleeding risk in up to one third of the cases. Even though literature is insufficient to draw definitive conclusions, studies suggest that EMR and ESD are valid options for the treatment of nonampullary adenomas. Thus, strategies to improve these techniques, and consequently increase the effectiveness and safety of the resection of these lesions, should be developed.
文摘BACKGROUND Endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)has shown to be effective in management of colorectal neoplasm in the Asian countries,while its implementation in Western countries where endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)is preferred is still debatable.AIM To compare the surgical,histological,and oncological outcomes between ESD and EMR in the treatment of colorectal polyps,with subgroup analysis comparing the efficacy of ESD and EMR between Japan and the rest of the world.METHODS Embase and Medline databases were searched from inception to October 2020 in accordance with PRISMA guidelines for studies comparing en bloc,complete resection,margin involvement,resection time,need for additional surgery,complications,and recurrence rate of ESD with EMR.RESULTS Of 281344 colorectal polyps from 21 studies were included.When compared to EMR,the pooled analysis revealed ESD was associated with higher en bloc and complete resection rate,and lower lateral margin involvement and recurrence.ESD led to increased procedural time,need for additional surgery,and perforation risk.No significant difference in bleeding risk was found between the two groups.Meta-regression analysis suggested only right colonic polyps correlated with an increased perforation risk in ESD.Confounders including polyp size and invasion depth did not significantly influence the en bloc and complete resection rate,bleeding risk and recurrence.In subgroup analysis,Japan performed better than the rest of the world in both ESD and EMR with perforation risk of 4%and 0.0002%,respectively,as compared to perforation risk of 8%and 1%,respectively,in reports coming from rest of the world.CONCLUSION ESD resulted in better resection outcomes and lower recurrence compared to EMR.With appropriate training,ESD is preferred over EMR as the first-line therapy for resection of colorectal polyps,without restricting to lesions greater than 20 mm and those with high suspicion of submucosal invasion.
基金Supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science,ICT and Future Planning,No.NRF-2013R1A1A1009682
文摘AIM: To investigate whether out-patient based endo-scopic mucosal resection(EMR) for colon polyps ≤ 10 mm is safe.METHODS: Between January 2004 and December 2012, a total of 3015 EMR cases conducted in 1320 patients were retrospectively reviewed. The factors contributing delayed hemorrhage were analyzed. We calculated the probability of delayed bleeding after stratifying conditions of specific risk factors.RESULTS: The size of the polyp(95%CI: 1.096-1.164, P < 0.001) and patients with chronic renal failure(95%CI: 1.856-45.106, P = 0.007) were identified as independent risk factors for delayed bleeding in multi-variate analysis. 95%CI for percent of delayed bleedingaccording to polyp size was determined for the fol-lowing conditions: size ≤ 10 mm, 0.05%-0.43%; 20 mm ≥ size > 10 mm, 0.54%-2.08%; size > 20 mm, 4.22%-11.41%. 95%CI was determined for the risk of serious immediate bleeding for a polyp ≤ 10 mm was 0.10%-0.56%. Finally, 95%CI for percent of incomplete resection was 0.07%-0.49% in polyps ≤ 10 mm. CONCLUSION: It seems acceptable to perform outpa-tient-based EMR for colon polyps ≤ 10 mm.
文摘BACKGROUND Complete polyp resection is the main goal of endoscopic removal of large colonic polyps.Resection techniques have evolved in recent years and endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD),endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)with margin ablation,cold snare polypectomy(CSP),cold EMR,and underwater EMR have been introduced.Yet,efficacy of these techniques with regard to local recurrence rates(LRRs)vs traditional hot snare polypectomy and standard EMR remains unclear.AIM To analyze LRR of large colonic polyps in a systematic review and meta-analysis.METHODS MEDLINE,EMBASE,EBM Reviews,and CINAHL were searched for prospective studies reporting LRR or incomplete resection rate(IRR)after colonic polypectomy of polyps≥10 mm,published between January 2011 and July 2021.Primary outcome was LRR for polyps≥10 mm.RESULTS Six thousand nine hundred and twenty-eight publications were identified,of which 34 prospective studies were included.LRR for polyps≥10 mm at up to 12 mo’follow-up was 11.0%(95%CI,7.1%-14.8%;15 studies;4904 polyps).ESD(1.7%;95%CI,0%-3.4%;3 studies,221 polyps)and endoscopic mucosal resection with margin ablation(3.3%;95%CI,2.2%-4.5%;2 studies,947 polyps)significantly reduced LRR vs standard EMR without(15.2%;95%CI,12.5%-18.0%;4 studies,650 polyps)or with unsystematic margin ablation(16.5%;95%CI,15.2%-17.8%;6 studies,3031 polyps).CONCLUSION LRR is significantly lower after ESD or EMR with routine margin ablation;thus,these techniques should be considered standard for endoscopic removal of large colorectal polyps.Other techniques,such as CSP,cold EMR,and underwater EMR require further evaluation in prospective studies before their routine implementation in clinical practice can be recommended.
文摘BACKGROUND Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection(UEMR)of colorectal lesions is emerging as an alternative method to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR);however,it is still controversial whether there is a difference in the effectiveness between UEMR and EMR.AIM To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of UEMR in the treatment of colorectal polyps.METHODS Clinical studies comparing the effectiveness or safety of UEMR in the treatment of colorectal polyps were searched in medical databases,including Pub Med,Embase,Cochrane Library,CNKI,and Wanfang Data,monographs,theses,and papers presented at conferences.Statistical analyses were performed using Revman 5.3 software.RESULTS Seven non-randomized controlled trials and one randomized controlled trial met the inclusion criteria.In total,1382 patients(1511 polyps)were included in the study,including 722 who received UEMR and 789 who received EMR.In the UEMR and EMR groups,the en bloc resection rates were 85.87%and 73.89%,respectively,with a relative risk(RR)value of 1.14(95%confidence interval[CI]:1.01-1.30;P<0.05).In the sub-group analysis,the en bloc resection rate showed no statistically significant difference between the EMR and UEMR groups for polyps less than 20 mm in diameter.However,a statistically significant difference was found between the EMR and UEMR groups for polyps equal to or greater than 20 mm in diameter.The post-endoscopic resection recurrence rates at 3-6 mo of the UEMR and EMR groups were 3.26%and 15.17%,respectively,with an RR value of 0.27(95%CI:0.09-0.83;P<0.05).The post-endoscopic resection recurrence rates of UEMR and EMR at 12 mo were 6.25%and 14.40%,respectively,with an RR value of 0.43(95%CI:0.20-0.92;P<0.05).Additionally,the incidence of adverse events was 8.17%and 6.21%,respectively,with an RR value of 1.07(95%CI:0.50-2.30;P>0.05).CONCLUSION UEMR is an effective technique for colorectal polyps and appears to have some advantages over EMR,particularly with regard to some treatment outcomes.
文摘A proportion of neoplastic polyps are incompletely resected, resulting in local recurrence, especially after resection of large polyps or piecemeal resection. Local recurrences that develop after endoscopic resection of intramucosal neoplasms that lacked risk factors for lymph node metastasis or positive vertical margins are usually treated endoscopically. Endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) is indicated for local residual or recurrent early carcinomas after endoscopic resection. However, ESD for such recurrent lesions is technically difficult and is typically a lengthy procedure. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection(UEMR), which was developed in 2012, is suitable for recurrent or residual lesions and reportedly achieves superior en bloc resection rates and endoscopic complete resection rates than conventional EMR. However, a large recurrent lesion is a negative independent predictor of successful en bloc resection and of complete endoscopic removal. We therefore perform UEMR for relatively small(≤ 10-15 mm) recurrent lesions and ESD for larger lesions.
基金the Institutional Review Board of First Affiliated Hospital,School of Medicine,Zhejiang University(No.20191477)Ningbo First Hospital,Zhejiang(No.2020-R013)and other participating institutions.
文摘BACKGROUND The optimal method to remove sessile colorectal lesions sized 10-20 mm remains uncertain.Piecemeal and incomplete resection are major limitations in current practice,such as endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)and cold or hot snare polypectomy.Recently,EMR with circumferential precutting(EMR-P)has emerged as an effective technique,but the quality of current evidence in comparative studies of conventional EMR(CEMR)and EMR-P is limited.AIM To investigate whether EMR-P is superior to CEMR in removing sessile colorectal polyps.METHODS This multicenter randomized controlled trial involved seven medical institutions in China.Patients with colorectal polyps sized 10-20 mm were enrolled and randomly assigned to undergo EMR-P or CEMR.EMR-P was performed following submucosal injection,and a circumferential mucosa incision(precutting)was conducted using a snare tip.Primary outcomes included a comparison of the rates of en bloc and R0 resection,defined as one-piece resection and one-piece resection with histologically assessed clear margins,respectively.RESULTS A total of 110 patients in the EMR-P group and 110 patients in the CEMR group were finally evaluated.In the per-protocol analysis,the proportion of en bloc resections was 94.3%[95%confidence interval(CI):88.2%-97.4%]in the EMR-P group and 86%(95%CI:78.2%-91.3%)in the CEMR group(P=0.041),while subgroup analysis showed that for lesions>15 mm,EMR-P also resulted in a higher en bloc resection rate(92.0%vs 58.8%P=0.029).The proportion of R0 resections was 81.1%(95%CI:72.6%-87.4%)in the EMR-P group and 76.6%(95%CI:68.8%-84.4%)in the CEMR group(P=0.521).The EMR-P group showed a longer median procedure time(6.4 vs 3.0 min;P<0.001).No significant difference was found in the proportion of patients with adverse events(EMR-P:9.1%;CEMR:6.4%;P=0.449).CONCLUSION In this study,EMR-P served as an alternative to CEMR for removing nonpedunculated colorectal polyps sized 10-20 mm,particularly polyps>15 mm in diameter,with higher R0 and en bloc resection rates and without increasing adverse events.However,EMR-P required a relatively longer procedure time than CEMR.Considering its potential benefits for en bloc and R0 resection,EMR-P may be a promising technique in colorectal polyp resection.
文摘AIM: To evaluate if traction-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (TA-EMR) is feasible and if it enables en bloc resection of colorectal lesions. METHODS: Seven patients with a total of 12 colorectal adenomas were prospectively enrolled. All lesions were removed by TA-EMR: one hemostatic clip tied to a white silk suture was applied to the base of the lesion to allow traction through the working channel of the colonoscope. A conventional polypectomy snare was mounted over the suture and the lesion was pulled into the snare and resected in one piece. RESULTS: All 12 lesions (nine sessile) were resected en bloc with free lateral and vertical margins by using this novel technique, including five lesions (5/12, 41.6%) in less-accessible positions, where TA-EMR enabled complete visualization of the base before resection. Mean longest lesion and specimen sizes were 9 mm (range: 6-25 mm) and 11 mm in diameter (range: 7-17 mm),respectively. No serious procedure-related complications were observed. CONCLUSION: TA-EMR through the endoscope using a hemostatic clip and suture material is technically feasible. Visualization of colorectal lesions in less-accessible locations can be improved.
文摘BACKGROUND Colorectal polyps refer to all neoplasms that protrude into the intestinal cavity.Researchers believe that 50%-70%of colorectal cancers originate from adenomatous polyps.AIM To investigate the endoscopic morphologic features,pathologic types,and clinical situation;evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR);and guide clinicians in their daily practice.METHODS Two hundred thirty-four patients who underwent EMR in our hospital from January 1,2018 to December 31,2019 were recruited.Data including sex,age,endoscopic morphology of the polyps,and pathological characteristics were analyzed among groups.RESULTS A total of 295 polyps were resected from the 234 subjects enrolled in the study,of which 4(1.36%)were Yamada type I.There were 75(25.42%)type II,101(34.24%)type III,and 115(38.98%)type IV adenomas.Among them,41 were nonadenomas,110 were low-risk adenomas,139 were high-risk adenomas,and 5 were carcinomas.The differences in distribution were not statistically significant,with P values greater than 0.05.The risk of cancer significantly increased for polyps≥1 cm in diameter(c2=199.825,P=0.00).Regarding the endoscopic morphological features,congestion,erosion,and lobulation were more common on the surface morphology of high-risk adenomas and cancerous polyps(c2=75.257,P=0.00),and most of them were Yamada types III and IV.In all,6 of the 295 polyps could not be removed completely,with a one-time resection rate of 97.97%.There were two cases of postoperative bleeding and no cases of perforation,with an overall complication rate of 0.09%.CONCLUSION Colorectal polyps ranging from non-adenomatous polyps,low-risk adenomas,and high-risk adenomas to adenocarcinomas each has their own endoscopic features,while EMR,as a mature intervention,has good safety and operability and should be promoted clinically,especially at the primary care level.
文摘BACKGROUND Large appendiceal orifice polyps are traditionally treated surgically.Recently,endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)and endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)have been utilized as alternative resection techniques.AIM To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection techniques for the management of large appendiceal orifice polyps.METHODS This was a retrospective observational study conducted to assess the feasibility and safety of EMR and ESD for large appendiceal orifice polyps.This project was approved by the Baylor College of Medicine Institutional Review Board.Patients who underwent endoscopic resection of appendiceal orifice polyps≥1 cm from 2015 to 2022 at a tertiary referral endoscopy center in the United States were enrolled.The main outcomes of this study included en bloc resection,R0 resection,post resection adverse events,and polyp recurrence.RESULTS A total of 19 patients were identified.Most patients were female(53%)and Caucasian(95%).The mean age was 63.3±10.8 years,and the average body mass index was 28.8±6.4.The mean polyp size was 25.5±14.2 mm.74%of polyps were localized to the appendix(at or inside the appendiceal orifice)and the remaining extended into the cecum.68%of polyps occupied≥50%of the appendiceal orifice circumference.The mean procedure duration was 61.6±37.9 minutes.Polyps were resected via endoscopic mucosal resection,endoscopic submucosal dissection,and hybrid procedures in 5,6,and 8 patients,respectively.Final pathology was remarkable for tubular adenoma(n=10)[one with high grade dysplasia],sessile serrated adenoma(n=7),and tubulovillous adenoma(n=2)[two with high grade dysplasia].En bloc resection was achieved in 84%with an 88%R0 resection rate.Despite the large polyp sizes and challenging procedures,89%(n=17)of patients were discharged on the same day as their procedure.Two patients were admitted for post-procedure observation for conservative pain management.Eight patients underwent repeat colonoscopy without evidence of residual or recurrent adenomatous polyps.CONCLUSION Our study highlights how endoscopic mucosal resection,endoscopic submucosal dissection,and hybrid procedures are all appropriate techniques with minimal adverse effects,further validating the utility of endoscopic procedures in the management of large appendiceal polyps.
基金Supported by the National High-Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding,No.2022-PUMCH-B-024 and No.2022-PUMCH-A-020Undergraduate Teaching Reform and Innovation Project,No.2022zlgc0108.
文摘BACKGROUND The management of polyps involving the appendiceal orifice(AO)presents notable challenges.Endoscopic resection is frequently hindered by operational complexities,a heightened risk of incomplete removal,and an elevated risk of procedural complications,including appendicitis.Conversely,surgical resection may entail unnecessary excision of intestinal segments,leading to potential morbidity.CASE SUMMARY Here,we reported two patients who presented with polyps deeply situated within the AO,with indistinct boundaries making it challenging to ensure completeness using traditional endoscopic resection.To overcome these challenges,we em-ployed combined endo-laparoscopic surgery(CELS),achieving curative resection without postoperative complications.CONCLUSION The application of CELS in managing polyps involving the AO is emerging as a safe and effective treatment modality.
文摘BACKGROUND Bile duct polyps are difficult to diagnose and are usually excised by open abdominal surgery or snare polypectomy using choledochoscopy via the T-tube sinus tract. However, these two resection methods require the surgeon to open the abdomen and cut the bile duct to place the “T” tube. Moreover, simple snare polypectomy, without submucosal injection, can only remove pedunculated polyps and not flat polyps. Therefore, a new method is required for the excision of bile duct polyps, including flat polyps. CASE SUMMARY A 63-year-old woman was hospitalized following epigastric pain lasting a month. She had a 30-year history of cholelithiasis and had undergone cholecystectomy because of cholecystolithiasis, and had undergone cholangiolithotomy twice due to choledocholithiasis. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging showed a communication between the bile duct and duodenal bulb. Inside the communication, CT showed a high-density shadow which was a hypointense lesion in T2 weighted image. The lesion showed no enhancement in T1 weighted image contrast enhanced. Gastroscopy revealed an incarcerated bile duct stone in the anterior wall of the duodenal bulb, which was removed with a basket under gastroscopy. Thereafter, a choledochoduodenal fistula was revealed. Finally, a flat polyp was detected in the lower part of the common bile duct and was removed by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) through the fistula. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of the removal of a bile duct polyp using EMR. CONCLUSION EMR is a safe, effective, and low-cost method for the resection of all bile duct polyps.
