In the paper, two theoretical poroelastic osteon models are presented to compare their poroelastic behaviors, one is the hollow osteon model （Haversian fluid is neglected） and the other is the osteon model with Have...In the paper, two theoretical poroelastic osteon models are presented to compare their poroelastic behaviors, one is the hollow osteon model （Haversian fluid is neglected） and the other is the osteon model with Haversian fluid con- sidered. They both have the same two types of imperme- able exterior boundary conditions, one is elastic restraint and the other is displacement constrained, which can be used for analyzing other experiments performed on similarly shaped poroelastic specimens. The obtained analytical pressure and velocity solutions demonstrate the effects of the loading fac- tors and the material parameters, which may have a signifi- cant stimulus to the mechanotransduction of bone remodel- ing signals. Model comparisons indicate： （1） The Haversian fluid can enhance the whole osteonal fluid pressure and ve- locity fields. （2） In the hollow model, the key loading fac- tor governing the poroelastic behavior of the osteon is strain rate, while in the model with Haversian fluid considered, the strain rate governs only the velocity. （3） The pressure ampli- tude is proportional to the loading frequency in the hollow model, while in the model with Haversian fluid considered, the loading frequency has little effect on the pressure ampli- tude.展开更多
基金supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(11032008 and 11302143)
文摘In the paper, two theoretical poroelastic osteon models are presented to compare their poroelastic behaviors, one is the hollow osteon model （Haversian fluid is neglected） and the other is the osteon model with Haversian fluid con- sidered. They both have the same two types of imperme- able exterior boundary conditions, one is elastic restraint and the other is displacement constrained, which can be used for analyzing other experiments performed on similarly shaped poroelastic specimens. The obtained analytical pressure and velocity solutions demonstrate the effects of the loading fac- tors and the material parameters, which may have a signifi- cant stimulus to the mechanotransduction of bone remodel- ing signals. Model comparisons indicate： （1） The Haversian fluid can enhance the whole osteonal fluid pressure and ve- locity fields. （2） In the hollow model, the key loading fac- tor governing the poroelastic behavior of the osteon is strain rate, while in the model with Haversian fluid considered, the strain rate governs only the velocity. （3） The pressure ampli- tude is proportional to the loading frequency in the hollow model, while in the model with Haversian fluid considered, the loading frequency has little effect on the pressure ampli- tude.
