<span style="font-family:Verdana;"><strong>Objective</strong><strong>:</strong> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">To explore the effect of perioper...<span style="font-family:Verdana;"><strong>Objective</strong><strong>:</strong> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">To explore the effect of perioperative pain intervention on postoperative rehabilitation of patients who underwent thoracoscopic partial resection of lung cancer.</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Methods:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> From January 2021 to May 2021, 100 patients with primary lung cancer who underwent thoracoscopic partial lung resection in Cardiopulmonary Department II of</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Cancer Center in our hospital were selected. They were divided into observation group and control group by random number table</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. Routine nursing after surgery was used in both groups, the observation group was given perioperative pain intervention nursing on the basis of routine nursing, and the postoperative pain (6</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">h, 12</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">h, 24</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">h, 48</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">h after operation), the rate of out-of-bed activity within 24</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">h after operation,</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">lien chest tube time, the incidence of postoperative complications, the influence of pain on daily life, the satisfaction of patients with pain control methods and pain education and the satisfaction of discharged patients were observed and recorded. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">There was no significant difference in general data (age, sex, educational level, course of disease, TNM stage of lung cancer, maximum diameter of tumor (CM), surgical site) between the two groups (P > 0.05);the NRS scores of the observation group at 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours after operation were all lower than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05);after operation, the rate of 24</span></span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">h out-of-bed activity in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, the lien chest tube time was shorter than the control group,</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and the incidence of postoperative complications was lower than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05);after operation, the effect level of pain in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the satisfaction of pain health education, pain control methods and discharged patients w</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">as</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> higher than that in the control group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusion: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Perioperative pain intervention can effectively relieve postoperative pain state of patients, promote patients’ early out of bed and conducive to lung expansion, shorten the time of lien chest tube, reduce postoperative complications and the impact of pain on daily life, help patients recover as soon as possible, and improve the satisfaction of patients for medical treatment.</span></span>展开更多
Objective: to evaluate the satisfaction of the cases of knee replacement. Methods: a total of 70 knee replacement cases participated in this study. The first case was admitted in May 2019, and the last case was admitt...Objective: to evaluate the satisfaction of the cases of knee replacement. Methods: a total of 70 knee replacement cases participated in this study. The first case was admitted in May 2019, and the last case was admitted in July 2019. All the subjects were divided into two groups, including 34 in group A and 36 in group B. In the centralized care mode, one group administered routine form care (Group B) and the other group performed a comprehensive pain intervention (Group A). The treatment efficacy and satisfaction, bad mood, pain, comfort, and quality of survival scores were compared between pre-and post-treatment 70 patients. Results: in the comparison of the treatment effect, the results in group A is significantly better than those in group B, with large differences (P <0.05). The comparison of nursing satisfaction data showed that group A was at a high level with a statistic of P <0.05. In Group A, the bad mood score and pain score were significantly lower than in group B, and the comfort score and quality of survival score were significantly higher than in group B, with P <0.05, showing significant differences between the data. Conclusion: in the centralized care mode, the comprehensive pain intervention for patients with knee replacement has a good treatment effect and high satisfaction. This method is very effective and worth application.展开更多
Objective: to use pain nursing for surgical patients and observe the effect of intervention. Methods: the patients in our department were divided into two groups, using pain nursing intervention and routine nursing in...Objective: to use pain nursing for surgical patients and observe the effect of intervention. Methods: the patients in our department were divided into two groups, using pain nursing intervention and routine nursing intervention, with 51 cases in each group. Results: (1) The VAS score and the time of using analgesic drugs in the pain intervention group were significantly better than those in the general group (P < 0.05). (2) The nursing satisfaction of the pain intervention group was 96.07% and that of the general group was 82.35%, there was a difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion: the effect of pain nursing intervention in thoracic surgery patients is excellent, which is worthy of clinical recommendation.展开更多
文摘<span style="font-family:Verdana;"><strong>Objective</strong><strong>:</strong> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">To explore the effect of perioperative pain intervention on postoperative rehabilitation of patients who underwent thoracoscopic partial resection of lung cancer.</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Methods:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> From January 2021 to May 2021, 100 patients with primary lung cancer who underwent thoracoscopic partial lung resection in Cardiopulmonary Department II of</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Cancer Center in our hospital were selected. They were divided into observation group and control group by random number table</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. Routine nursing after surgery was used in both groups, the observation group was given perioperative pain intervention nursing on the basis of routine nursing, and the postoperative pain (6</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">h, 12</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">h, 24</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">h, 48</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">h after operation), the rate of out-of-bed activity within 24</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">h after operation,</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">lien chest tube time, the incidence of postoperative complications, the influence of pain on daily life, the satisfaction of patients with pain control methods and pain education and the satisfaction of discharged patients were observed and recorded. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">There was no significant difference in general data (age, sex, educational level, course of disease, TNM stage of lung cancer, maximum diameter of tumor (CM), surgical site) between the two groups (P > 0.05);the NRS scores of the observation group at 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours after operation were all lower than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05);after operation, the rate of 24</span></span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">h out-of-bed activity in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, the lien chest tube time was shorter than the control group,</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and the incidence of postoperative complications was lower than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05);after operation, the effect level of pain in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the satisfaction of pain health education, pain control methods and discharged patients w</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">as</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> higher than that in the control group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusion: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Perioperative pain intervention can effectively relieve postoperative pain state of patients, promote patients’ early out of bed and conducive to lung expansion, shorten the time of lien chest tube, reduce postoperative complications and the impact of pain on daily life, help patients recover as soon as possible, and improve the satisfaction of patients for medical treatment.</span></span>
文摘Objective: to evaluate the satisfaction of the cases of knee replacement. Methods: a total of 70 knee replacement cases participated in this study. The first case was admitted in May 2019, and the last case was admitted in July 2019. All the subjects were divided into two groups, including 34 in group A and 36 in group B. In the centralized care mode, one group administered routine form care (Group B) and the other group performed a comprehensive pain intervention (Group A). The treatment efficacy and satisfaction, bad mood, pain, comfort, and quality of survival scores were compared between pre-and post-treatment 70 patients. Results: in the comparison of the treatment effect, the results in group A is significantly better than those in group B, with large differences (P <0.05). The comparison of nursing satisfaction data showed that group A was at a high level with a statistic of P <0.05. In Group A, the bad mood score and pain score were significantly lower than in group B, and the comfort score and quality of survival score were significantly higher than in group B, with P <0.05, showing significant differences between the data. Conclusion: in the centralized care mode, the comprehensive pain intervention for patients with knee replacement has a good treatment effect and high satisfaction. This method is very effective and worth application.
文摘Objective: to use pain nursing for surgical patients and observe the effect of intervention. Methods: the patients in our department were divided into two groups, using pain nursing intervention and routine nursing intervention, with 51 cases in each group. Results: (1) The VAS score and the time of using analgesic drugs in the pain intervention group were significantly better than those in the general group (P < 0.05). (2) The nursing satisfaction of the pain intervention group was 96.07% and that of the general group was 82.35%, there was a difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion: the effect of pain nursing intervention in thoracic surgery patients is excellent, which is worthy of clinical recommendation.
