In order to quantitatively measure the degree of pain during mammography, we used a visual analog scale (VAS) and a device for quantitative analysis of perception and pain and performed regression analysis of the rela...In order to quantitatively measure the degree of pain during mammography, we used a visual analog scale (VAS) and a device for quantitative analysis of perception and pain and performed regression analysis of the relationship between pain degree and VAS score. Twenty-four subjects underwent a typical mammogram and we found no correlation between pain degree using the device compared with VAS scoring. It is presumed that the system enables quantitative measurement and comparison more accurately than subjective markers such as VAS in quantitation of a pain produced in an examination with clearly defined physical size (such as mammography).展开更多
目的:干针治疗被广泛应用于各种肌筋膜疼痛综合征,该文旨在系统评价干针治疗膝关节疾病的临床效果。方法:检索PubMed、EBSCO、ScienceDirect、Web of Science、CINAHL、Cochrane Library、中国知网等数据库中发表的文献,选取随机对照试...目的:干针治疗被广泛应用于各种肌筋膜疼痛综合征,该文旨在系统评价干针治疗膝关节疾病的临床效果。方法:检索PubMed、EBSCO、ScienceDirect、Web of Science、CINAHL、Cochrane Library、中国知网等数据库中发表的文献,选取随机对照试验且使用干针作为主要治疗手段,并纳入诊断为膝关节疾病的患者。由2位评估人独立筛选文章,对方法学质量进行评分,并提取数据。主要指标有目测类比评分,次要指标主要有西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分、压痛阈值、膝关节活动度和Kujala评分(膝关节功能评分量表)。结果:Meta分析共纳入15项随机对照试验,涉及698例患者。Meta分析结果显示,与非干针治疗组相比,干针治疗组目测类比评分、WOMAC疼痛评分与WOMAC僵硬度评分存在明显优势(MD=-0.63,95%CI:-1.06至-0.19,P=0.005;MD=-0.74,95%CI:-1.32至-0.17,P=0.01;MD=-0.43,95%CI:-0.77至-0.09,P=0.01),WOMAC总评分、WOMAC功能评分、压痛阈值、膝关节活动度、Kujala评分没有明显优势。结论:干针可以有效治疗膝关节疼痛和僵硬度,然而在改善其他膝关节功能障碍方面的临床优势及随访效果证据不足。所以,对于一些年龄较大患有膝关节慢性疼痛或关节僵硬的患者,可以谨慎考虑使用干针治疗。展开更多
文摘In order to quantitatively measure the degree of pain during mammography, we used a visual analog scale (VAS) and a device for quantitative analysis of perception and pain and performed regression analysis of the relationship between pain degree and VAS score. Twenty-four subjects underwent a typical mammogram and we found no correlation between pain degree using the device compared with VAS scoring. It is presumed that the system enables quantitative measurement and comparison more accurately than subjective markers such as VAS in quantitation of a pain produced in an examination with clearly defined physical size (such as mammography).
文摘目的:干针治疗被广泛应用于各种肌筋膜疼痛综合征,该文旨在系统评价干针治疗膝关节疾病的临床效果。方法:检索PubMed、EBSCO、ScienceDirect、Web of Science、CINAHL、Cochrane Library、中国知网等数据库中发表的文献,选取随机对照试验且使用干针作为主要治疗手段,并纳入诊断为膝关节疾病的患者。由2位评估人独立筛选文章,对方法学质量进行评分,并提取数据。主要指标有目测类比评分,次要指标主要有西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分、压痛阈值、膝关节活动度和Kujala评分(膝关节功能评分量表)。结果:Meta分析共纳入15项随机对照试验,涉及698例患者。Meta分析结果显示,与非干针治疗组相比,干针治疗组目测类比评分、WOMAC疼痛评分与WOMAC僵硬度评分存在明显优势(MD=-0.63,95%CI:-1.06至-0.19,P=0.005;MD=-0.74,95%CI:-1.32至-0.17,P=0.01;MD=-0.43,95%CI:-0.77至-0.09,P=0.01),WOMAC总评分、WOMAC功能评分、压痛阈值、膝关节活动度、Kujala评分没有明显优势。结论:干针可以有效治疗膝关节疼痛和僵硬度,然而在改善其他膝关节功能障碍方面的临床优势及随访效果证据不足。所以,对于一些年龄较大患有膝关节慢性疼痛或关节僵硬的患者,可以谨慎考虑使用干针治疗。
