期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
A novel method for EPID transmission dose generation using Monte Carlo simulation and deep learning
1
作者 Tao Qiu Ning Gao +3 位作者 Yan-Kui Chang Xi Pei Huan-Li Luo Fu Jin 《Nuclear Science and Techniques》 2026年第4期41-52,共12页
This study aimed to integrate Monte Carlo(MC)simulation with deep learning(DL)-based denoising techniques to achieve fast and accurate prediction of high-quality electronic portal imaging device(EPID)transmission dose... This study aimed to integrate Monte Carlo(MC)simulation with deep learning(DL)-based denoising techniques to achieve fast and accurate prediction of high-quality electronic portal imaging device(EPID)transmission dose(TD)for patientspecific quality assurance(PSQA).A total of 100 lung cases were used to obtain the noisy EPID TD by the ARCHER MC code under four kinds of particle numbers(1×10^(6),1×10^(7),1×10^(8)and 1×10^(9)),and the original EPID TD was denoised by the SUNet neural network.The denoised EPID TD was assessed both qualitatively and quantitatively using the structural similarity(SSIM),peak signal-to-noise ratio(PSNR),and gamma passing rate(GPR)with respect to 1×10^(9)as a reference.The computation times for both the MC simulation and DL-based denoising were recorded.As the number of particles increased,both the quality of the noisy EPID TD and computation time increased significantly(1×10^(6):1.12 s,1×10^(7):1.72 s,1×10^(8):8.62 s,and 1×10^(9):73.89 s).In contrast,the DL-based denoising time remained at 0.13-0.16 s.The denoised EPID TD shows a smoother visual appearance and profile curves,but differences between 1×10^(6)and 1×10^(9)still remain.SSIM improves from 0.61 to 0.95 for 1×10^(6),0.70 to 0.96 for 1×10^(7),and 0.90 to 0.97 for 1×10^(8).PSNR increases by>20%for 1×10^(6)and 1×10^(7),and>10%for 1×10^(8).GPR improves from 48.47%to 89.10%for 1×10^(6),61.04%to 94.35%for 1×10^(7),and 91.88%to 99.55%for 1×10^(8).The method that combines MC simulation with DL-based denoising for EPID TD generation can accelerate TD prediction and maintain high accuracy,offering a promising solution for efficient PSQA. 展开更多
关键词 psqa EPID Monte Carlo Deep learning
在线阅读 下载PDF
基于快速蒙特卡罗软件和放疗记录的质子放疗患者个体质控工具开发和验证
2
作者 冯虹瑛 彭天宇 +4 位作者 单杰 张永红 张彬航 袁显宝 刘伟 《复旦学报(医学版)》 北大核心 2025年第4期550-559,共10页
目的开发并验证基于快速蒙特卡罗(Monte Carlo,MC)方法的、使用治疗照射记录的、可以用于在线自适应笔型束扫描放疗(online adaptive ratiotherapy for pencil beam scanning proton therapy,PBSPT-ART)方案的患者个体质控(patient-spec... 目的开发并验证基于快速蒙特卡罗(Monte Carlo,MC)方法的、使用治疗照射记录的、可以用于在线自适应笔型束扫描放疗(online adaptive ratiotherapy for pencil beam scanning proton therapy,PBSPT-ART)方案的患者个体质控(patient-specific quality assurance,PSQA)工具。方法首先通过PBSPT的治疗记录,逆推生成重构PBSPT(reconstructed PBSPT,rPBSPT)治疗计划,并利用妙佑国际医疗内部开发完成的图形处理单元(graphic processing unit,GPU)加速的虚拟粒子快速蒙特卡罗(virtual particle MC,VPMC)软件计算rPBSPT剂量。然后,将VPMC计算的rPBSPT剂量与独立MC程序(MCsquare)计算的rPBSPT剂量做比较,并进行3D gamma分析,验证VPMC计算的rPBSPT剂量的准确性。之后以治疗前MCsquare的二次剂量检验计算为参考,对VPMC计算的rPBSPT剂量做3D gamma分析,以此对开发的PSQA工具做演示并验证该工具的可行性。3D gamma分析选取标准2 mm/2%/10%。选取20个具有不同病灶的患者来评估此工具的准确性和效率。结果在准确性验证中,VPMC计算单个rPBSPT剂量的时长为(5.88±4.00)s,与MCsquare计算rPBSPT剂量相比的3D gamma通过率为99.47%±0.72%;在开发的PSQA工具工作流程展示中,VPMC计算单个rPBSPT剂量与MCsquare计算PBSPT剂量相比的3D gamma通过率为98.91%±0.92%。结论该工具的准确性和效率可满足在线PBSPT-ART工作流程中PSQA的要求。 展开更多
关键词 患者个体质控(psqa) 质子在线自适应放疗 GPU加速蒙卡 治疗记录
暂未订购
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部