Non-ergot dopamine agonists have become popular for treating motor complications associated with long-term use of levodopa-containing drugs. We conducted a retrospective study in which we identified clinical problems ...Non-ergot dopamine agonists have become popular for treating motor complications associated with long-term use of levodopa-containing drugs. We conducted a retrospective study in which we identified clinical problems related to use of non-ergot dopamine agonists. The study included 38 patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) who suffered the wearing-off phenomenon and had thus been under non-ergot dopamine receptor agonist therapy for 1 - 2 years. Some presented with problems such as major symptoms of PD (30.3%), psychiatric symptoms (24.2%), and postural dysfunction (21.2%). Comparison between two different non-ergot drugs showed the levodopa dosage to be greater among patients taking ropinirole than among those taking pramipexole. In patients with advanced PD, various problematic symptoms can develop early after administration of a non-ergot dopamine agonist to treat the wearing-off phenomenon, necessitating identification and treatment of such symptoms on a patient-to-patient basis.展开更多
目的运用Meta分析的方法,系统评价长效非麦角类多巴胺受体激动剂(NEDA)与标准NEDA在帕金森病(PD)中的有效性、耐受性和安全性。方法制定检索策略后,检索PubMed,EMBASE,Cochrane图书馆和Web of Knowledge等数据库,同时进行参考文献的追...目的运用Meta分析的方法,系统评价长效非麦角类多巴胺受体激动剂(NEDA)与标准NEDA在帕金森病(PD)中的有效性、耐受性和安全性。方法制定检索策略后,检索PubMed,EMBASE,Cochrane图书馆和Web of Knowledge等数据库,同时进行参考文献的追溯和手工检索(截至2019年8月15日)。按照纳入标准和排除标准进行文献筛选,然后进行文献质量评价和数据提取。采用权重均数差(WMD)、相对危险度(RR)以及95%CI作为统计量,运用Cochrane协作网提供的RevMan 5.3软件和Stata 12.0对数据进行分析。结果(1)共纳入11个随机对照研究,共3280例患者。(2)Meta分析结果如下。有效性方面:长效NEDA与标准NEDA间在减少UPDRSⅡ部分评分(WMD=-0.15,95%CI:-0.63~0.33),Ⅲ部分评分(WMD=0.04,95%CI:-0.24~0.33)和UPDRSⅡ+Ⅲ部分总和评分(WMD=0.12,95%CI:-1.25~1.49)上差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。耐受性方面:两种制剂在总的退出人数(RR=1.11,95%CI:0.95~1.31)、因为不良事件退出的人数(RR=1.14,95%CI:0.90~1.45)上,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。安全性方面:两种制剂在总的不良事件的发生风险(RR=1.02,95%CI:0.97~1.07)和严重不良事件(RR=0.96,95%CI:0.73~1.26)的发生风险上,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论对PD患者,长效NEDA与标准NEDA在有效性、耐受性和安全性上相似。展开更多
文摘Non-ergot dopamine agonists have become popular for treating motor complications associated with long-term use of levodopa-containing drugs. We conducted a retrospective study in which we identified clinical problems related to use of non-ergot dopamine agonists. The study included 38 patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) who suffered the wearing-off phenomenon and had thus been under non-ergot dopamine receptor agonist therapy for 1 - 2 years. Some presented with problems such as major symptoms of PD (30.3%), psychiatric symptoms (24.2%), and postural dysfunction (21.2%). Comparison between two different non-ergot drugs showed the levodopa dosage to be greater among patients taking ropinirole than among those taking pramipexole. In patients with advanced PD, various problematic symptoms can develop early after administration of a non-ergot dopamine agonist to treat the wearing-off phenomenon, necessitating identification and treatment of such symptoms on a patient-to-patient basis.
文摘目的运用Meta分析的方法,系统评价长效非麦角类多巴胺受体激动剂(NEDA)与标准NEDA在帕金森病(PD)中的有效性、耐受性和安全性。方法制定检索策略后,检索PubMed,EMBASE,Cochrane图书馆和Web of Knowledge等数据库,同时进行参考文献的追溯和手工检索(截至2019年8月15日)。按照纳入标准和排除标准进行文献筛选,然后进行文献质量评价和数据提取。采用权重均数差(WMD)、相对危险度(RR)以及95%CI作为统计量,运用Cochrane协作网提供的RevMan 5.3软件和Stata 12.0对数据进行分析。结果(1)共纳入11个随机对照研究,共3280例患者。(2)Meta分析结果如下。有效性方面:长效NEDA与标准NEDA间在减少UPDRSⅡ部分评分(WMD=-0.15,95%CI:-0.63~0.33),Ⅲ部分评分(WMD=0.04,95%CI:-0.24~0.33)和UPDRSⅡ+Ⅲ部分总和评分(WMD=0.12,95%CI:-1.25~1.49)上差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。耐受性方面:两种制剂在总的退出人数(RR=1.11,95%CI:0.95~1.31)、因为不良事件退出的人数(RR=1.14,95%CI:0.90~1.45)上,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。安全性方面:两种制剂在总的不良事件的发生风险(RR=1.02,95%CI:0.97~1.07)和严重不良事件(RR=0.96,95%CI:0.73~1.26)的发生风险上,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论对PD患者,长效NEDA与标准NEDA在有效性、耐受性和安全性上相似。
