Background: Mobile males are vulnerable to HIV and are potential bridge for HIV transmission to their sex partners, including spouses. To understand how mobility accentuates vulnerability to HIV, we assessed the assoc...Background: Mobile males are vulnerable to HIV and are potential bridge for HIV transmission to their sex partners, including spouses. To understand how mobility accentuates vulnerability to HIV, we assessed the association of degree of male mobility with paid sex, alcohol use and condom use at all places visited by migrants in past two years. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was done among male migrant workers [n = 2991] in five high in-migration districts of Maharashtra in India during 2007-08. Results: Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that higher mobility [moving 3+ places in the past two years] was associated with “sexual debut” in paid sex [3.7% Vs 6.9%, AOR = 1.70, p < 0.001] and having sex with sex worker at the current place of destination [8.7% Vs 16.9%, AOR = 2.10, p < 0.001], at the previous place of destination [7.2% Vs 15.1%, AOR = 2.05, p < 0.001], and at the place of origin [0.6% Vs 1.6%, AOR = 2.31, p < 0.001]. However, higher mobility was associated with unpaid sex with non-marital female partners [28.4% Vs 37.2%, AOR = 1.48, p < 0.001] and less consistent condom use at the current place [26.6% Vs 23.4%, AOR = 0.45, p < 0.05] as well as at place of origin [12.2% Vs 7.2%, AOR = 0.48, p < 0.01]. In addition, alcohol use prior to sex was more among more mobile migrants relative to less mobile migrants at current place [6.1% Vs 11.2%, AOR = 1.82, p < 0.001] and previous place [7.0% Vs 13.0%, AOR = 1.77, p < 0.001] of destination. Conclusion: Findings suggest that compared to the less mobile, highly mobile men report higher HIV risk behaviours: paid sex, alcohol use prior to paid sex and inconsistent condom use, at all locations along the routes of mobility. Interventions need to target men who are highly mobile along the routes of mobility and not at destination sites alone.展开更多
目的了解2011-2015年芜湖市男男性行为人群(men who have sex with men,MSM)安全套使用情况及其影响因素,为当地制订该人群的艾滋病防治措施提供依据。方法利用《全国艾滋病哨点监测方案》的问卷,在2011-2015年哨点监测期内对约400例MS...目的了解2011-2015年芜湖市男男性行为人群(men who have sex with men,MSM)安全套使用情况及其影响因素,为当地制订该人群的艾滋病防治措施提供依据。方法利用《全国艾滋病哨点监测方案》的问卷,在2011-2015年哨点监测期内对约400例MSM进行问卷调查,收集有关艾滋病知识、高危行为等资料,并采集血液进行艾滋病、梅毒、丙肝检测。结果 5年共调查MSM 2 037例。调查对象中最近半年发生肛交性行为安全套每次使用率分别是23.24%、38.13%、37.41%、47.15%和82.22%,呈现逐年上升趋势(X_(趋势)~2=266.778,P<0.001);多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示最近半年发生同性商业性行为、与女性发生性行为、最近一年诊断过性病的调查对象最近半年每次肛交性行为坚持使用安全套比例较低;血清学检测结果显示调查对象艾滋病、梅毒和丙肝检测阳性率分别是5.84%、12.37%和0.69%,5年的艾滋病阳性率分别是4.36%、3.36%、6.48%、6.48%和8.64%。结论芜湖市MSM安全套使用率有所提升,但仍然不高;艾滋病、梅毒感染率还在逐年上升,应继续加强该人群针对性宣传教育和行为干预工作。展开更多
目的了解MSM(men who have sex with men)人群性行为状况,为实施有针对性的干预措施和制定相应的防治策略提供科学的依据。方法对MSM进行面对面的问卷调查,资料经SPSS12.0进行统计分析。结果共计调查1000名MSM,平均年龄(27.8±9.1)...目的了解MSM(men who have sex with men)人群性行为状况,为实施有针对性的干预措施和制定相应的防治策略提供科学的依据。方法对MSM进行面对面的问卷调查,资料经SPSS12.0进行统计分析。结果共计调查1000名MSM,平均年龄(27.8±9.1)岁。调查发现,78.6%的MSM与男性有过肛交性行为,近6个月的男性性伴数平均是(3.62±4.73)人。最近1次与男性性伴发生肛交时,56.4%的人都使用了安全套,最近6个月只有31.6%的MSM每次都使用了安全套。24.3%的MSM在最近6个月有与女性发生性行为史,最近1次与女性性伴发生性行为时,只有36.5%的使用了安全套,最近6个月与女性发生性关系时,只有22.4%的人每次都使用了安全套。结论MSM人群多性伴,与男性发生肛交时安全使用率低,与女性性伴发生性行为时安全套使用率更低,这些因素将促使HIV在MSM人群中的传播和蔓延,急需开展针对MSM人群的干预工作。展开更多
目的了解男男性行为者(men who have sex with men,MSM)安全套使用状况,并分析影响因素。方法通过MSM同伴招募调查对象,在MSM活动场所进行安全套使用等相关因素的匿名现场问卷调查。结果共调查400人,最近1次、近6个月不同性伴肛交/阴道...目的了解男男性行为者(men who have sex with men,MSM)安全套使用状况,并分析影响因素。方法通过MSM同伴招募调查对象,在MSM活动场所进行安全套使用等相关因素的匿名现场问卷调查。结果共调查400人,最近1次、近6个月不同性伴肛交/阴道交安全套使用率差异均有统计学意义(分别有χ2=21.82,P<0.001和χ2=28.26,P<0.001),男性、男男卖性使用率较高(73.8%、66.7%,45.5%、46.2%),男男买性、女性使用率较低(47.1%、47.9%,29.4%、30.1%)。单因素分析显示,不同年龄、近6个月男男肛交数,近1年是否做过HIV检测并知道结果、接受润滑剂免费发放、接受过同伴教育,艾滋病知识是否来源于咨询服务、宣传材料发放,是否知道性伴从不用安全套、是否知道性伴健康状况,不同场所寻找性伴这10个方面近6个月男男肛交安全套坚持使用率差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.043、9.850、6.663、7.525、5.213、4.208、10.042、4.121、12.319、8.456,均有P<0.05)。多因素非条件Logistic回归分析中,最终进入回归模型的有年龄、做过HIV检测并知道结果、艾滋病知识来源于宣传材料发放、不知道性伴健康状况、寻找性伴的场所,近1年做过HIV检测并知道结果(OR=0.074)、艾滋病知识来源于宣传材料发放(OR=0.409)、以酒吧/歌舞厅/会所(OR=10.495)、浴室/公园/公厕(OR=36.601)、互联网(OR=10.807)为主要性伴寻找场所者近6个月男男肛交安全套坚持使用率较高,年龄≥35岁(OR=0.330)、不知道性伴健康状况(OR=0.892)安全套坚持使用率较低。结论 MSM人群安全套使用较低,受年龄、预防性服务、健康意识等多种因素影响,应针对性加大行为干预力度。展开更多
文摘Background: Mobile males are vulnerable to HIV and are potential bridge for HIV transmission to their sex partners, including spouses. To understand how mobility accentuates vulnerability to HIV, we assessed the association of degree of male mobility with paid sex, alcohol use and condom use at all places visited by migrants in past two years. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was done among male migrant workers [n = 2991] in five high in-migration districts of Maharashtra in India during 2007-08. Results: Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that higher mobility [moving 3+ places in the past two years] was associated with “sexual debut” in paid sex [3.7% Vs 6.9%, AOR = 1.70, p < 0.001] and having sex with sex worker at the current place of destination [8.7% Vs 16.9%, AOR = 2.10, p < 0.001], at the previous place of destination [7.2% Vs 15.1%, AOR = 2.05, p < 0.001], and at the place of origin [0.6% Vs 1.6%, AOR = 2.31, p < 0.001]. However, higher mobility was associated with unpaid sex with non-marital female partners [28.4% Vs 37.2%, AOR = 1.48, p < 0.001] and less consistent condom use at the current place [26.6% Vs 23.4%, AOR = 0.45, p < 0.05] as well as at place of origin [12.2% Vs 7.2%, AOR = 0.48, p < 0.01]. In addition, alcohol use prior to sex was more among more mobile migrants relative to less mobile migrants at current place [6.1% Vs 11.2%, AOR = 1.82, p < 0.001] and previous place [7.0% Vs 13.0%, AOR = 1.77, p < 0.001] of destination. Conclusion: Findings suggest that compared to the less mobile, highly mobile men report higher HIV risk behaviours: paid sex, alcohol use prior to paid sex and inconsistent condom use, at all locations along the routes of mobility. Interventions need to target men who are highly mobile along the routes of mobility and not at destination sites alone.
文摘目的了解2011-2015年芜湖市男男性行为人群(men who have sex with men,MSM)安全套使用情况及其影响因素,为当地制订该人群的艾滋病防治措施提供依据。方法利用《全国艾滋病哨点监测方案》的问卷,在2011-2015年哨点监测期内对约400例MSM进行问卷调查,收集有关艾滋病知识、高危行为等资料,并采集血液进行艾滋病、梅毒、丙肝检测。结果 5年共调查MSM 2 037例。调查对象中最近半年发生肛交性行为安全套每次使用率分别是23.24%、38.13%、37.41%、47.15%和82.22%,呈现逐年上升趋势(X_(趋势)~2=266.778,P<0.001);多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示最近半年发生同性商业性行为、与女性发生性行为、最近一年诊断过性病的调查对象最近半年每次肛交性行为坚持使用安全套比例较低;血清学检测结果显示调查对象艾滋病、梅毒和丙肝检测阳性率分别是5.84%、12.37%和0.69%,5年的艾滋病阳性率分别是4.36%、3.36%、6.48%、6.48%和8.64%。结论芜湖市MSM安全套使用率有所提升,但仍然不高;艾滋病、梅毒感染率还在逐年上升,应继续加强该人群针对性宣传教育和行为干预工作。
文摘目的了解MSM(men who have sex with men)人群性行为状况,为实施有针对性的干预措施和制定相应的防治策略提供科学的依据。方法对MSM进行面对面的问卷调查,资料经SPSS12.0进行统计分析。结果共计调查1000名MSM,平均年龄(27.8±9.1)岁。调查发现,78.6%的MSM与男性有过肛交性行为,近6个月的男性性伴数平均是(3.62±4.73)人。最近1次与男性性伴发生肛交时,56.4%的人都使用了安全套,最近6个月只有31.6%的MSM每次都使用了安全套。24.3%的MSM在最近6个月有与女性发生性行为史,最近1次与女性性伴发生性行为时,只有36.5%的使用了安全套,最近6个月与女性发生性关系时,只有22.4%的人每次都使用了安全套。结论MSM人群多性伴,与男性发生肛交时安全使用率低,与女性性伴发生性行为时安全套使用率更低,这些因素将促使HIV在MSM人群中的传播和蔓延,急需开展针对MSM人群的干预工作。
文摘目的了解男男性行为者(men who have sex with men,MSM)安全套使用状况,并分析影响因素。方法通过MSM同伴招募调查对象,在MSM活动场所进行安全套使用等相关因素的匿名现场问卷调查。结果共调查400人,最近1次、近6个月不同性伴肛交/阴道交安全套使用率差异均有统计学意义(分别有χ2=21.82,P<0.001和χ2=28.26,P<0.001),男性、男男卖性使用率较高(73.8%、66.7%,45.5%、46.2%),男男买性、女性使用率较低(47.1%、47.9%,29.4%、30.1%)。单因素分析显示,不同年龄、近6个月男男肛交数,近1年是否做过HIV检测并知道结果、接受润滑剂免费发放、接受过同伴教育,艾滋病知识是否来源于咨询服务、宣传材料发放,是否知道性伴从不用安全套、是否知道性伴健康状况,不同场所寻找性伴这10个方面近6个月男男肛交安全套坚持使用率差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.043、9.850、6.663、7.525、5.213、4.208、10.042、4.121、12.319、8.456,均有P<0.05)。多因素非条件Logistic回归分析中,最终进入回归模型的有年龄、做过HIV检测并知道结果、艾滋病知识来源于宣传材料发放、不知道性伴健康状况、寻找性伴的场所,近1年做过HIV检测并知道结果(OR=0.074)、艾滋病知识来源于宣传材料发放(OR=0.409)、以酒吧/歌舞厅/会所(OR=10.495)、浴室/公园/公厕(OR=36.601)、互联网(OR=10.807)为主要性伴寻找场所者近6个月男男肛交安全套坚持使用率较高,年龄≥35岁(OR=0.330)、不知道性伴健康状况(OR=0.892)安全套坚持使用率较低。结论 MSM人群安全套使用较低,受年龄、预防性服务、健康意识等多种因素影响,应针对性加大行为干预力度。
