The ongoing SARS-CoV-2 outbreak has rapidly increased the desire to manage bioaerosol exposures in indoor settings. Studies using chlorine dioxide gas (ClO<sub>2</sub>) at low concentrations have shown thi...The ongoing SARS-CoV-2 outbreak has rapidly increased the desire to manage bioaerosol exposures in indoor settings. Studies using chlorine dioxide gas (ClO<sub>2</sub>) at low concentrations have shown this intervention to be an effective mitigation strategy against viral, bacterial, and fungal elements in ambient air. There is an array of available products for generating ClO<sub>2</sub> gas however most involve the use of expensive or sophisticated technology that makes their applicability limited to specialized consumers. The purpose of this study was to determine the virucidal efficacy of three pragmatic and affordable, ClO<sub>2</sub> generating products using an aerosolized MS2 surrogate in a sealed chamber room under five different scenarios. The products tested included: Ultrashock—a ClO<sub>2</sub> releasing pod (30 ppmv), Filter Media—a ClO<sub>2</sub> impregnated zeolite media made to fit into an air blower housing (<0.01 ppmv) and Flow Stick—a smaller ClO<sub>2</sub> impregnated media filled air reactor tube (<0.01 ppmv). Testing scenarios included product deployment post MS2 bioaerosol introduction (Ultrashock and Filter Media), during MS2 bioaerosol introduction (Filter Media and Flow Stick) and prior to MS2 bioaerosol introduction (Filter Media). MS2 surface samples were collected using sterile petri-dishes and MS2 and ClO<sub>2</sub> air samples were collected from sampling ports on the outer chamber wall at 0, 90 and 180 minutes. The Ultrashock and Filter Media with air flow in the rapid sweep scenario showed the greatest reduction in air MS2 (T<sub>180</sub> = 99.992% and T<sub>180</sub> = 99.996% respectively) compared to the control (T<sub>180 </sub>= 99.6%). When compared to the control results, the filter media with air flow engaged prior to the introduction of MS2 yielded reductions of 99.87% and 99.93% in air and on surfaces respectively at T<sub>0</sub>, demonstrating the protective effect residual ClO2 has against air and surface contamination. These product formats have potential uses as remedial and preventative interventions against viral constituents in air and should undergo further evaluation to determine efficacy and human health risk.展开更多
文摘The ongoing SARS-CoV-2 outbreak has rapidly increased the desire to manage bioaerosol exposures in indoor settings. Studies using chlorine dioxide gas (ClO<sub>2</sub>) at low concentrations have shown this intervention to be an effective mitigation strategy against viral, bacterial, and fungal elements in ambient air. There is an array of available products for generating ClO<sub>2</sub> gas however most involve the use of expensive or sophisticated technology that makes their applicability limited to specialized consumers. The purpose of this study was to determine the virucidal efficacy of three pragmatic and affordable, ClO<sub>2</sub> generating products using an aerosolized MS2 surrogate in a sealed chamber room under five different scenarios. The products tested included: Ultrashock—a ClO<sub>2</sub> releasing pod (30 ppmv), Filter Media—a ClO<sub>2</sub> impregnated zeolite media made to fit into an air blower housing (<0.01 ppmv) and Flow Stick—a smaller ClO<sub>2</sub> impregnated media filled air reactor tube (<0.01 ppmv). Testing scenarios included product deployment post MS2 bioaerosol introduction (Ultrashock and Filter Media), during MS2 bioaerosol introduction (Filter Media and Flow Stick) and prior to MS2 bioaerosol introduction (Filter Media). MS2 surface samples were collected using sterile petri-dishes and MS2 and ClO<sub>2</sub> air samples were collected from sampling ports on the outer chamber wall at 0, 90 and 180 minutes. The Ultrashock and Filter Media with air flow in the rapid sweep scenario showed the greatest reduction in air MS2 (T<sub>180</sub> = 99.992% and T<sub>180</sub> = 99.996% respectively) compared to the control (T<sub>180 </sub>= 99.6%). When compared to the control results, the filter media with air flow engaged prior to the introduction of MS2 yielded reductions of 99.87% and 99.93% in air and on surfaces respectively at T<sub>0</sub>, demonstrating the protective effect residual ClO2 has against air and surface contamination. These product formats have potential uses as remedial and preventative interventions against viral constituents in air and should undergo further evaluation to determine efficacy and human health risk.
