生物质燃烧向大气中排放大量痕量气体和颗粒物,源排放清单是深入研究生物质燃烧环境气候效应的重要基础数据。利用全球火排放数据库GFED(Global Fire Emissions Database)、NCAR全球火排放清单FINN(Fire INventory from NCAR)和中国露...生物质燃烧向大气中排放大量痕量气体和颗粒物,源排放清单是深入研究生物质燃烧环境气候效应的重要基础数据。利用全球火排放数据库GFED(Global Fire Emissions Database)、NCAR全球火排放清单FINN(Fire INventory from NCAR)和中国露天生物质燃烧排放清单MEIC(Multi-resolution Emission Inventory for China),对2008~2017年中国地区生物质燃烧源排放的空间分布、季节和年际变化特征以及不同清单间的异同进行分析研究。3个清单都显示生物质燃烧释放的黑碳(BC)、有机碳(OC)、空气动力学粒径小于2.5μm的颗粒物(PM2.5)和一氧化碳(CO)在中国东北、长江和黄河下游之间地区和中国南方的排放量较高,与我国的主要农作物产地和森林地区分布一致。FINN清单排放量在华南地区与西南地区比其他两个清单高,而GFED清单排放量在长三角地区比其他两个清单排放量高。中国地区平均生物质燃烧排放量在春季出现峰值,而在不同的生物质燃烧地区峰值出现的季节不同,与各地农作物播种、收获时节和农耕习惯不同有关。2008~2017年,中国地区年平均生物质燃烧排放量的峰值主要出现在2014年,但各地区峰值出现的年份明显不同,东北、华中/东、华南和西南地区分别在2015年、2013年、2008年和2010年排放量达到最大。对于BC、OC和PM2.5,GFED和MEIC清单中的排放量比较接近,而FINN中的排放量是GFED和MEIC中的2~3倍;3个清单中CO的排放量比较接近。2014年生物质燃烧源排放与人为源排放的对比分析表明,所有物种中,生物质燃烧排放的OC和PM2.5相对于人为源排放量占比最大,3个清单中占比分别为9%~24%和5%~16%,说明生物质燃烧排放的OC和一次PM2.5是中国气溶胶的重要来源。展开更多
Anthropogenic emission inventory for aerosols and reactive gases is crucial to the estimation of aerosol radiative forcing and climate effects.Here,the anthropogenic emission inventory for AerChemMIP,endorsed by CMIP6...Anthropogenic emission inventory for aerosols and reactive gases is crucial to the estimation of aerosol radiative forcing and climate effects.Here,the anthropogenic emission inventory for AerChemMIP,endorsed by CMIP6,is briefly introduced.The CMIP6 inventory is compared with a country-level inventory(i.e.,MEIC)over China from 1986 to 2015.Discrepancies are found in the yearly trends of the two inventories,especially after 2006.The yearly trends of the aerosol burdens simulated by CESM2 using the two inventories follow their emission trends and deviate after the mid-2000s,while the simulated aerosol optical depths(AODs)show similar trends.The difference between the simulated AODs is much smaller than the difference between model and observation.Although the simulated AODs agree with the MODIS satellite retrievals for country-wide average,the good agreement is an offset between the underestimation in eastern China and the overestimation in western China.Low-biased precursor gas of SO_(2),overly strong convergence of the wind field,overly strong dilution and transport by summer monsoon circulation,too much wet scavenging by precipitation,and overly weak aerosol swelling due to low-biased relative humidity are suggested to be responsible for the underestimated AOD in eastern China.This indicates that the influence of the emission inventory uncertainties on simulated aerosol properties can be overwhelmed by model biases of meteorology and aerosol processes.It is necessary for climate models to perform reasonably well in the dynamical,physical,and chemical processes that would influence aerosol simulations.展开更多
文摘生物质燃烧向大气中排放大量痕量气体和颗粒物,源排放清单是深入研究生物质燃烧环境气候效应的重要基础数据。利用全球火排放数据库GFED(Global Fire Emissions Database)、NCAR全球火排放清单FINN(Fire INventory from NCAR)和中国露天生物质燃烧排放清单MEIC(Multi-resolution Emission Inventory for China),对2008~2017年中国地区生物质燃烧源排放的空间分布、季节和年际变化特征以及不同清单间的异同进行分析研究。3个清单都显示生物质燃烧释放的黑碳(BC)、有机碳(OC)、空气动力学粒径小于2.5μm的颗粒物(PM2.5)和一氧化碳(CO)在中国东北、长江和黄河下游之间地区和中国南方的排放量较高,与我国的主要农作物产地和森林地区分布一致。FINN清单排放量在华南地区与西南地区比其他两个清单高,而GFED清单排放量在长三角地区比其他两个清单排放量高。中国地区平均生物质燃烧排放量在春季出现峰值,而在不同的生物质燃烧地区峰值出现的季节不同,与各地农作物播种、收获时节和农耕习惯不同有关。2008~2017年,中国地区年平均生物质燃烧排放量的峰值主要出现在2014年,但各地区峰值出现的年份明显不同,东北、华中/东、华南和西南地区分别在2015年、2013年、2008年和2010年排放量达到最大。对于BC、OC和PM2.5,GFED和MEIC清单中的排放量比较接近,而FINN中的排放量是GFED和MEIC中的2~3倍;3个清单中CO的排放量比较接近。2014年生物质燃烧源排放与人为源排放的对比分析表明,所有物种中,生物质燃烧排放的OC和PM2.5相对于人为源排放量占比最大,3个清单中占比分别为9%~24%和5%~16%,说明生物质燃烧排放的OC和一次PM2.5是中国气溶胶的重要来源。
基金supported by the State Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No.41830966)supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant Nos.2017YFC1501403,42030606,and 41705125)。
文摘Anthropogenic emission inventory for aerosols and reactive gases is crucial to the estimation of aerosol radiative forcing and climate effects.Here,the anthropogenic emission inventory for AerChemMIP,endorsed by CMIP6,is briefly introduced.The CMIP6 inventory is compared with a country-level inventory(i.e.,MEIC)over China from 1986 to 2015.Discrepancies are found in the yearly trends of the two inventories,especially after 2006.The yearly trends of the aerosol burdens simulated by CESM2 using the two inventories follow their emission trends and deviate after the mid-2000s,while the simulated aerosol optical depths(AODs)show similar trends.The difference between the simulated AODs is much smaller than the difference between model and observation.Although the simulated AODs agree with the MODIS satellite retrievals for country-wide average,the good agreement is an offset between the underestimation in eastern China and the overestimation in western China.Low-biased precursor gas of SO_(2),overly strong convergence of the wind field,overly strong dilution and transport by summer monsoon circulation,too much wet scavenging by precipitation,and overly weak aerosol swelling due to low-biased relative humidity are suggested to be responsible for the underestimated AOD in eastern China.This indicates that the influence of the emission inventory uncertainties on simulated aerosol properties can be overwhelmed by model biases of meteorology and aerosol processes.It is necessary for climate models to perform reasonably well in the dynamical,physical,and chemical processes that would influence aerosol simulations.
