Objective: to explore the application effect of MDT nursing model in type 2 diabetes care. Methods: 80 patients with type 2 diabetes were selected and divided into control group and test group according to the random ...Objective: to explore the application effect of MDT nursing model in type 2 diabetes care. Methods: 80 patients with type 2 diabetes were selected and divided into control group and test group according to the random number method. 40 patients in each group had routine care intervention, and MDT care mode was added on the basis of routine care to compare the relevant indicators of the two groups. Results: we found that the patients in the MDT care model were better than those in terms of blood glucose index, self-care ability and quality of life, with significant differences (P <0.05). Conclusion: with the help of MDT care model, the indicators of type 2 diabetes patients can be effectively improved, making patients gain high clinical efficacy, and improve patients self-care ability and quality of life, which is worth popularizing in clinical practice.展开更多
目的探讨与分析美国国立综合癌症网络(National Comprehensive Cancer Network,NCCN)指南结合多学科协作诊疗模式(multi-disciplinary team,MDT)在住培学员结直肠癌诊疗教学中的应用价值。方法研究对象选取2017年7月—2021年12月在广州...目的探讨与分析美国国立综合癌症网络(National Comprehensive Cancer Network,NCCN)指南结合多学科协作诊疗模式(multi-disciplinary team,MDT)在住培学员结直肠癌诊疗教学中的应用价值。方法研究对象选取2017年7月—2021年12月在广州医科大学附属第一医院进行住培的139名学员,其中2017年7月—2020年6月的住培学员69名(对照组),2020年7月—2021年12月的住培学员70名(多学科协作诊疗模式组)。对照组给予NCCN指南的常规结直肠癌诊疗教学,多学科协作诊疗模式组在对照组教学的基础上给予基于多学科协作诊疗模式的结直肠癌诊疗教学,两组教学时间持续3个月。比较两组的教学效果。结果教学后多学科协作诊疗模式组的自我动机信念、任务分析、自我监控及调节、自我评价等自我学习能力评分都高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组教学前后的理论成绩与操作成绩都高于教学前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),多学科协作诊疗模式组也高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。教学后多学科协作诊疗模式组对于教学方法、教学效果、教学氛围的满意度为100%、100%、98.57%,均明显高于对照组的81.16%、81.61%、79.71%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论NCCN指南结合MDT模式在住培学员结直肠癌诊疗教学中的应用能提高自我学习能力,也可提高学员的理论成绩与操作成绩,提高住培学员的满意度。展开更多
文摘Objective: to explore the application effect of MDT nursing model in type 2 diabetes care. Methods: 80 patients with type 2 diabetes were selected and divided into control group and test group according to the random number method. 40 patients in each group had routine care intervention, and MDT care mode was added on the basis of routine care to compare the relevant indicators of the two groups. Results: we found that the patients in the MDT care model were better than those in terms of blood glucose index, self-care ability and quality of life, with significant differences (P <0.05). Conclusion: with the help of MDT care model, the indicators of type 2 diabetes patients can be effectively improved, making patients gain high clinical efficacy, and improve patients self-care ability and quality of life, which is worth popularizing in clinical practice.
文摘目的探讨与分析美国国立综合癌症网络(National Comprehensive Cancer Network,NCCN)指南结合多学科协作诊疗模式(multi-disciplinary team,MDT)在住培学员结直肠癌诊疗教学中的应用价值。方法研究对象选取2017年7月—2021年12月在广州医科大学附属第一医院进行住培的139名学员,其中2017年7月—2020年6月的住培学员69名(对照组),2020年7月—2021年12月的住培学员70名(多学科协作诊疗模式组)。对照组给予NCCN指南的常规结直肠癌诊疗教学,多学科协作诊疗模式组在对照组教学的基础上给予基于多学科协作诊疗模式的结直肠癌诊疗教学,两组教学时间持续3个月。比较两组的教学效果。结果教学后多学科协作诊疗模式组的自我动机信念、任务分析、自我监控及调节、自我评价等自我学习能力评分都高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组教学前后的理论成绩与操作成绩都高于教学前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),多学科协作诊疗模式组也高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。教学后多学科协作诊疗模式组对于教学方法、教学效果、教学氛围的满意度为100%、100%、98.57%,均明显高于对照组的81.16%、81.61%、79.71%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论NCCN指南结合MDT模式在住培学员结直肠癌诊疗教学中的应用能提高自我学习能力,也可提高学员的理论成绩与操作成绩,提高住培学员的满意度。
