This paper attempts to explore interdisciplinary integration from four aspects:the necessity of interdisciplinary integration between legal studies and auditing,the difficulties and challenges encountered in this inte...This paper attempts to explore interdisciplinary integration from four aspects:the necessity of interdisciplinary integration between legal studies and auditing,the difficulties and challenges encountered in this integration,the ideas for teaching reform in the context of interdisciplinary integration,and the expected outcomes.The aim is to achieve an organic integration of legal studies and auditing through systematic teaching reforms,thereby providing students with comprehensive and integrated knowledge and skills training,ensuring the quality of talent cultivation,and adapting to the needs of social development.展开更多
Law is all but not known for innovation.This is also true for studies in Roman private law,which have followed a system that is imagined to derive from the 2nd century AD jurist Gaius and late antique Justinianic codi...Law is all but not known for innovation.This is also true for studies in Roman private law,which have followed a system that is imagined to derive from the 2nd century AD jurist Gaius and late antique Justinianic codification.The shaping hands of the ancient codifiers and those of the medieval,early modern and 19th century jurists on Roman private law and the related legal discourses have been identified and studied at length.However,a real shift to discover the ways in which Roman private law became formed and was practiced has not been undertaken in comprehensive manner until the publication of the Handbook of Roman Private Law which is reviewed in the following from the perspective of an ancient historian.展开更多
Critical Legal Scholarship was first introduced to Chinese legal academia in late 1980＇s, and gained great attentions in the following decade. Later on, however, Chinese jurists showed little interest in exploring mo...Critical Legal Scholarship was first introduced to Chinese legal academia in late 1980＇s, and gained great attentions in the following decade. Later on, however, Chinese jurists showed little interest in exploring more of Critical Legal Scholarship because of their oversimplification of Critical Legal Scholars as indeterminists, deconstructionists, extremists and nihilists. This article points out the typical, gross misconceptions of Chinese jurists to Critical Legal Scholarship, and explores the reasons of such misconceptions. The author of this article hopes that his representation of Critical Legal Scholarship would help to reopen the door for further communications between the Critical Legal Scholarship and their audiences in China. Remarks on how to approach Critical Legal Scholarship further from a Chinese perspective are provided at the end of this article.展开更多
Academic evaluation is the baton and wind vane for academic development, and the establishment of a scientific and authoritative evaluation system is crucial to establishing a robust academic research ecology. To puri...Academic evaluation is the baton and wind vane for academic development, and the establishment of a scientific and authoritative evaluation system is crucial to establishing a robust academic research ecology. To purify the academic atmosphere, cultivate the academic ecology, and promote academic innovation, the General Office of the Communist Party of China Central Committee and the General Office of the State Council jointly issued the Opinions on Strengthening Legal Education and Legal Theoretical Research in the New Era. It put forward precise requirements and made specific deployments to improve the scientific research assessment and evaluation system, which pointed out the direction for reforming the academic evaluation system in legal studies. It is necessary to grasp the historical trend, take the initiative to seek changes, shoulder our responsibility, address pain points and difficulties in the academic research evaluation system in an innovative way, and build an academic evaluation system and academic evaluation institutions in line with the characteristics of the discipline of law and the needs of the times, thereby promoting the prosperous development of legal studies.展开更多
Innovative development of the legal theory research system requires strengthening research on the basic theory of law.Promoting research on the basic principles of Marxist jurisprudence is the fundamental premise for ...Innovative development of the legal theory research system requires strengthening research on the basic theory of law.Promoting research on the basic principles of Marxist jurisprudence is the fundamental premise for adapting Marxism to the Chinese context and the needs of the times.XI Jinping Thought on the Rule of Law is the fundamental criterion for the innovative development of the basic theory of law of contemporary China in the new era,and the adaptation of Marxism to the Chinese context and the needs of the times is the essential requirement for the innovative breakthrough of the basic theory of law of contemporary China.展开更多
The aim of this study is to understand the judicial reasoning process of anti-discrimination jurisprudence by utilizing a hybrid computational model.The advancement of hybrid computational legal studies that combine“...The aim of this study is to understand the judicial reasoning process of anti-discrimination jurisprudence by utilizing a hybrid computational model.The advancement of hybrid computational legal studies that combine“law-as-code”and“law-as-data”approaches have led to promising techniques for tackling complex legal reasoning tasks as multifactor judicial reasoning standards.Following this hybrid model,this study conducts a statistical and multilayer perceptron(MLP)analysis of the judicial reasoning process of the multifactor Arlington Heights discriminatory purpose test based on an original hand-coded dataset of discrimination cases.The results of the study show that“sequence of events”predominates the other factors for predicting the outcome of discrimination cases,with“statistical impact”and“historical background”showing particularly weak effect on the outcome.Results show that completely removing the factor of disparate statistical impact(Impact)actually improves confidence in predicting discrimination.The conclusion of the study suggests that courts fail to give either disparate statistical impact or historical record of discrimination any meaningful cumulative import in determining discriminatory purpose.I conclude by observing the benefits of hybrid computational legal studies on interrogating more normative values in the law like transparency,fairness,and procedural justice.展开更多
India boasts a long legal history with unique characteristics and a wide influence.It is one of the major legal civilizations in the world.This book represents a significant contribution to the studies of Indian law b...India boasts a long legal history with unique characteristics and a wide influence.It is one of the major legal civilizations in the world.This book represents a significant contribution to the studies of Indian law by the Chinese legal community.展开更多
文摘This paper attempts to explore interdisciplinary integration from four aspects:the necessity of interdisciplinary integration between legal studies and auditing,the difficulties and challenges encountered in this integration,the ideas for teaching reform in the context of interdisciplinary integration,and the expected outcomes.The aim is to achieve an organic integration of legal studies and auditing through systematic teaching reforms,thereby providing students with comprehensive and integrated knowledge and skills training,ensuring the quality of talent cultivation,and adapting to the needs of social development.
文摘Law is all but not known for innovation.This is also true for studies in Roman private law,which have followed a system that is imagined to derive from the 2nd century AD jurist Gaius and late antique Justinianic codification.The shaping hands of the ancient codifiers and those of the medieval,early modern and 19th century jurists on Roman private law and the related legal discourses have been identified and studied at length.However,a real shift to discover the ways in which Roman private law became formed and was practiced has not been undertaken in comprehensive manner until the publication of the Handbook of Roman Private Law which is reviewed in the following from the perspective of an ancient historian.
文摘Critical Legal Scholarship was first introduced to Chinese legal academia in late 1980＇s, and gained great attentions in the following decade. Later on, however, Chinese jurists showed little interest in exploring more of Critical Legal Scholarship because of their oversimplification of Critical Legal Scholars as indeterminists, deconstructionists, extremists and nihilists. This article points out the typical, gross misconceptions of Chinese jurists to Critical Legal Scholarship, and explores the reasons of such misconceptions. The author of this article hopes that his representation of Critical Legal Scholarship would help to reopen the door for further communications between the Critical Legal Scholarship and their audiences in China. Remarks on how to approach Critical Legal Scholarship further from a Chinese perspective are provided at the end of this article.
文摘Academic evaluation is the baton and wind vane for academic development, and the establishment of a scientific and authoritative evaluation system is crucial to establishing a robust academic research ecology. To purify the academic atmosphere, cultivate the academic ecology, and promote academic innovation, the General Office of the Communist Party of China Central Committee and the General Office of the State Council jointly issued the Opinions on Strengthening Legal Education and Legal Theoretical Research in the New Era. It put forward precise requirements and made specific deployments to improve the scientific research assessment and evaluation system, which pointed out the direction for reforming the academic evaluation system in legal studies. It is necessary to grasp the historical trend, take the initiative to seek changes, shoulder our responsibility, address pain points and difficulties in the academic research evaluation system in an innovative way, and build an academic evaluation system and academic evaluation institutions in line with the characteristics of the discipline of law and the needs of the times, thereby promoting the prosperous development of legal studies.
基金supported by the major special project"Adhering to the Construction of a Socialist Rule of Law System with Chinese Characteristics,Deepening the Practice and Research of Law-Based Governance in All Fields",Ministry of Education in China Philosophy and Social Science Foundation(No.2022JZDZO02).
文摘Innovative development of the legal theory research system requires strengthening research on the basic theory of law.Promoting research on the basic principles of Marxist jurisprudence is the fundamental premise for adapting Marxism to the Chinese context and the needs of the times.XI Jinping Thought on the Rule of Law is the fundamental criterion for the innovative development of the basic theory of law of contemporary China in the new era,and the adaptation of Marxism to the Chinese context and the needs of the times is the essential requirement for the innovative breakthrough of the basic theory of law of contemporary China.
文摘The aim of this study is to understand the judicial reasoning process of anti-discrimination jurisprudence by utilizing a hybrid computational model.The advancement of hybrid computational legal studies that combine“law-as-code”and“law-as-data”approaches have led to promising techniques for tackling complex legal reasoning tasks as multifactor judicial reasoning standards.Following this hybrid model,this study conducts a statistical and multilayer perceptron(MLP)analysis of the judicial reasoning process of the multifactor Arlington Heights discriminatory purpose test based on an original hand-coded dataset of discrimination cases.The results of the study show that“sequence of events”predominates the other factors for predicting the outcome of discrimination cases,with“statistical impact”and“historical background”showing particularly weak effect on the outcome.Results show that completely removing the factor of disparate statistical impact(Impact)actually improves confidence in predicting discrimination.The conclusion of the study suggests that courts fail to give either disparate statistical impact or historical record of discrimination any meaningful cumulative import in determining discriminatory purpose.I conclude by observing the benefits of hybrid computational legal studies on interrogating more normative values in the law like transparency,fairness,and procedural justice.
文摘India boasts a long legal history with unique characteristics and a wide influence.It is one of the major legal civilizations in the world.This book represents a significant contribution to the studies of Indian law by the Chinese legal community.
