期刊文献+
共找到16篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
雷迪帕韦—索非布韦治疗丙型肝炎肝硬化患者有效性及安全性的Meta分析
1
作者 严茜 万彬 +5 位作者 赵霞 吴春陶 苏丹 曾艳 杨文璐 谢鹏 《临床合理用药》 2025年第3期21-25,35,共6页
目的 采用Meta分析法评价雷迪帕韦—索非布韦治疗丙型肝炎肝硬化的有效性及安全性。方法 计算机检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台及维普网,收集雷迪帕韦—索非布韦治疗丙型肝炎... 目的 采用Meta分析法评价雷迪帕韦—索非布韦治疗丙型肝炎肝硬化的有效性及安全性。方法 计算机检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台及维普网,收集雷迪帕韦—索非布韦治疗丙型肝炎肝硬化患者的随机对照试验或回顾性队列研究,检索时间为建库至2023年3月。采用RevMan 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果 最终纳入10篇符合标准的文献,共包含1 185例患者,试验组504例,对照组681例。Meta分析结果显示,试验组SVR12应答率高于对照组[OR=2.54,95%CI(1.59,4.04),P<0.05];试验组天冬氨酸氨基转移酶低于对照组[MD=-5.91,95%CI(-8.75,-3.06),P<0.05]、总胆红素低于对照组[MD=-3.10,95%CI(-4.50,-1.70),P<0.05]、层粘连蛋白低于对照组[MD=-51.01,95%CI(-78.74,-23.28),P<0.05];试验组不良反应发生率低于对照组[OR=0.34,95%CI(0.15,0.78),P=0.01]。2组Ⅳ型胶原、透明质酸、Ⅲ型前胶原比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 雷迪帕韦—索非布韦治疗丙型肝炎肝硬化可提高SVR12应答率,改善肝功能和层粘连蛋白水平,且安全性较高。 展开更多
关键词 丙型肝炎肝硬化 雷迪帕韦—索非布韦 SVR12应答率 肝功能 META分析
原文传递
基于美国FAERS数据库索磷布韦/维帕他韦和来迪派韦/索磷布韦不良反应信号分析 被引量:2
2
作者 韩丽 陈力 +1 位作者 陈乾 肖洪涛 《中国药物警戒》 2024年第4期440-446,共7页
目的挖掘和分析索磷布韦/维帕他韦(SOF/VEL)和来迪派韦/索磷布韦(LED/SOF)上市后的不良反应(ADR)信号,为两药临床安全合理使用提供参考。方法采用报告比值比(ROR)法和信息成分(IC)法对美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数... 目的挖掘和分析索磷布韦/维帕他韦(SOF/VEL)和来迪派韦/索磷布韦(LED/SOF)上市后的不良反应(ADR)信号,为两药临床安全合理使用提供参考。方法采用报告比值比(ROR)法和信息成分(IC)法对美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库2017年1月1日至2021年9月30日接收的不良事件(ADE)报告进行数据挖掘,使用《监管活动医学词典》(MedDRA)术语对报告中ADE描述用语进行标准化,筛选出有信号的ADR进行对比分析。结果最终得到SOF/VEL信号16个,LED/SOF信号18个。两者ADE重叠信号7个,主要为全身、胃肠、肝胆、神经及精神系统损害,且均有HBV再激活风险。SOF/VEL较为特异的ADR有食欲增加、酒精滥用和月经出血过多;LED/SOF较为特异的ADR有非急性卟啉病、胆管上皮细胞癌和冷球蛋白血症。结论该研究有效利用ROR法和IC法挖掘出SOF/VEL和LED/SOF的ADR风险信号,为两药临床安全合理使用提供了新的证据支持。 展开更多
关键词 索磷布韦/维帕他韦 来迪派韦/索磷布韦 信号 数据挖掘 报告比值比法 信息成分法 美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统
暂未订购
基于BCPNN法对来迪派韦/索磷布韦药物警戒信号的挖掘 被引量:11
3
作者 陈欢 文朋 《中国医院药学杂志》 北大核心 2021年第16期1631-1636,共6页
目的:利用贝叶斯置信传播神经网络法(Bayesian confidence propagation neural network,BCPNN)挖掘来迪派韦/索磷布韦上市后的安全警戒信号,以期为临床合理用药提供参考。方法:检索2014年10月10日至2020年9月29日期间美国食品药品监督... 目的:利用贝叶斯置信传播神经网络法(Bayesian confidence propagation neural network,BCPNN)挖掘来迪派韦/索磷布韦上市后的安全警戒信号,以期为临床合理用药提供参考。方法:检索2014年10月10日至2020年9月29日期间美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统数据库(FDA adverse event reporting system,FAERS)中以来迪派韦/索磷布韦为首要怀疑对象的药品不良事件(adverse drug events,ADEs),运用BCPNN法进行药物警戒信号挖掘,信号生成条件为信息因子(information component,IC)的95%CI下限>0且报告数a≥3。结果:共检索得到来迪派韦/索磷布相关ADEs 18492份,利用BCPNN法识别得到20个来迪派韦/索磷布韦药物警戒相关信号,其中有9个是药品说明书中未出现的可疑药物警戒信号,分别为:肾小球滤过率降低、脑病、耳鸣、便秘、血肌酐升高、流感样病例、异常做梦、口渴、色尿症。结论:挖掘来迪派韦/索磷布韦可疑药物安全警戒信号可为国内临床合理安全用药提供参考依据。 展开更多
关键词 来迪派韦/索磷布韦 贝叶斯置信传播神经网络法 信号挖掘 合理用药
原文传递
雷迪帕韦-索非布韦治疗丙肝肝硬化的临床分析 被引量:10
4
作者 李洪军 《中国现代药物应用》 2017年第1期145-147,共3页
目的探析雷迪帕韦-索非布韦治疗丙型病毒性肝炎(丙肝)肝硬化的临床效果。方法选取100例丙肝肝硬化患者作为研究对象,按疾病严重程度分为肝硬化失代偿期组(53例)和肝硬化代偿期组(47例)。两组患者均给予雷迪帕韦-索菲布韦进行治疗,对患... 目的探析雷迪帕韦-索非布韦治疗丙型病毒性肝炎(丙肝)肝硬化的临床效果。方法选取100例丙肝肝硬化患者作为研究对象,按疾病严重程度分为肝硬化失代偿期组(53例)和肝硬化代偿期组(47例)。两组患者均给予雷迪帕韦-索菲布韦进行治疗,对患者血清中丙肝病毒(HCV-RNA)水平进行定量分析,同时对患者的病毒学应答情况进行检测,对肝纤维化标志物水平进行分析,并对患者不良反应情况进行统计比较。结果两组患者HCV-RNA转阴率及病毒学应答情况比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗前,肝硬化代偿期组血清中透明质酸以及Ⅲ型前胶原的含量分别为(319.6±40.7)、(109.2±8.6)μg/L;肝硬化失代偿期组血清中透明质酸以及Ⅲ型前胶原的含量分别为(318.7±38.6)、(104.2±8.1)μg/L。治疗后,肝硬化代偿期组血清中透明质酸以及Ⅲ型前胶原的含量分别为(150.7±20.3)、(50.2±6.1)μg/L;肝硬化失代偿期组血清中透明质酸以及Ⅲ型前胶原的含量分别为(98.4±18.7)、(33.4±5.8)μg/L;治疗后两组血清中透明质酸以及Ⅲ型前胶原的含量均低于治疗前,且肝硬化失代偿期组低于肝硬化代偿期组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。肝硬化代偿期组不良反应发生率为4.26%,肝硬化失代偿期组不良反应发生率为5.66%,比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论通过为丙肝肝硬化患者提供雷迪帕韦-索菲布韦进行治疗,可提高该病的临床治疗效果,减少不良反应的出现,其临床价值值得肯定。 展开更多
关键词 雷迪帕韦-索非布韦 丙肝病毒 丙肝肝硬化代偿期 丙肝肝硬化失代偿期
暂未订购
索非布韦联合雷迪帕韦治疗慢性丙型肝炎患者疗效研究 被引量:7
5
作者 郑淑颖 郭欢欢 +1 位作者 程长浩 冯珍珍 《实用肝脏病杂志》 CAS 2022年第1期26-29,共4页
目的探讨应用索非布韦(SOF)联合雷迪帕韦(LDV)治疗慢性丙型肝炎(CHC)患者的疗效。方法2017年8月~2020年8月我院诊治的CHC患者116例,给予SOF联合LDV治疗3个月。计算肝纤维化四指数(FIB-4),采用RT-PCR法检测HCV RNA,采用单因素和多因素Log... 目的探讨应用索非布韦(SOF)联合雷迪帕韦(LDV)治疗慢性丙型肝炎(CHC)患者的疗效。方法2017年8月~2020年8月我院诊治的CHC患者116例,给予SOF联合LDV治疗3个月。计算肝纤维化四指数(FIB-4),采用RT-PCR法检测HCV RNA,采用单因素和多因素Logistic回归分析影响CHC患者获得持续病毒学应答(SVR)的影响因素,应用受试者工作曲线(ROC)分析指标的预测效能。结果在治疗结束后随访6个月,116例CHC患者血清ALT、AST和外周血PLT计数分别为(32.4±6.8)U/L、(36.5±9.2)U/L和(224.6±31.9)×10^(9)/L,显著低于治疗结束时【分别为(56.6±11.7)U/L、(64.7±11.8)U/L和(262.3±41.7)×10^(9)/L,P<0.05】或治疗前【分别为(204.3±41.6)U/L、(131.2±26.5)U/L和(313.7±53.6)×10^(9)/L,P<0.05】;FIB-4和HCV RNA水平分别为(0.9±0.1)和(1.1±1.2)lgU/mL,显著低于治疗结束时【分别为(1.2±0.2)和(1.9±1.1)lgU/mL,P<0.05】或治疗前【分别为(1.4±0.2)和(6.4±1.3)lgU/mL,P<0.05】;本组CHC患者获得快速病毒学应答率(RVR)为75.0%,治疗结束时病毒学应答率(ETVR)为89.7%,SVR为82.0%;多因素Logistic回归分析显示,FIB-4和血清HCV RNA是影响CHC患者获得SVR的独立影响因素(P<0.05);联合治疗前FIB-4<1.65和血清HCV RNA载量为(6.6±0.8)lgU/mL为截断点,其预测CHC患者在治疗后获得SVR的AUC为0.875,敏感性为83.2%,特异性为90.5%。结论SOF联合LDV治疗CHC患者可获得很好的治疗效果,FIB-4水平低和血清HCV RNA载量低的患者可能获得更好的抗病毒效果。 展开更多
关键词 慢性丙型肝炎 索非布韦 雷迪帕韦 肝纤维化四指数 治疗
暂未订购
Safety and efficacy of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir on hepatitis C eradication in hepatitis C virus/human immunodeficiency virus co-infected patients 被引量:2
6
作者 Xiaoping He Lynne Hopkins +4 位作者 George Everett Willie M Carter Cynthia SchroppDyce Khalid Abusaada Vincent Hsu 《World Journal of Hepatology》 CAS 2017年第30期1190-1196,共7页
AIM To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir on hepatitis C eradication in patients with hepatitis C virus(HCV)/human immunodeficiency virus(HIV) co-infection in an urban HIV clinic.METHODS A retro... AIM To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir on hepatitis C eradication in patients with hepatitis C virus(HCV)/human immunodeficiency virus(HIV) co-infection in an urban HIV clinic.METHODS A retrospective cohort study of 40 subjects co-infected with HIV-1 and HCV treated with the fixed-dose combination of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for 12 wk from 2014 to 2016.All patients included were receiving antiretroviral therapy(ART) with HIV RNA values of 100 copies/m L or fewer regardless of baseline HCV RNA level.The primary end point was a sustained virologic response of HCV at 12 wk(SVR12) after the end of therapy.RESULTS Of the 40 patients enrolled,55% were black,22.5% had been previously treated for HCV,and 25% hadcirrhosis.The patients were on a wide range of ART.Overall,39 patients(97.5%) had a SVR 12 after the end of therapy,including rates of 97.1% in patients with HCV genotype 1 a and 100% in those with HCV genotype 1 b.One patient with HCV genotype 3 a was included and achieved SVR12.Rates of SVR12 were similar regardless of previous treatment or the presence of compensated cirrhosis.Only 1 patient experienced relapse at week 12 following treatment and deep sequencing didn't reveal any resistance associated mutation in the NS5A or NS5B region.Interestingly,7(17.5%) patients who were adherent to ART experienced HIV viral breakthrough which resolved after continuing the same ART regimen.Two(5%) patients experienced HIV-1 virologic rebound due to noncompliance with HIV therapy,which resolved after resuming the same ART regimen.No severe adverse events were observed and no patient discontinued treatment because of adverse events.The most common adverse events included headache(12.5%),fatigue(10%),and diarrhea(2.5%).CONCLUSION This retrospective study demonstrated the high rates of SVR12 of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir on HCV eradication in patients co-infected with HCV and HIV,regardless of HCV baseline levels,HCV treatment history or cirrhosis condition.The oral combination of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir represents a safe and well tolerated HCV treatment option that does not require modification for many of the common HIV ART.Occasional HIV virologic rebound occurred but later resolved without the need to change ART. 展开更多
关键词 Hepatitis C Human immunodeficiency virus Ledipasvir Sofosbuvir
暂未订购
Hepatitis C cirrhosis: New perspectives for diagnosis and treatment 被引量:3
7
作者 Vikas Khullar Roberto J Firpi 《World Journal of Hepatology》 CAS 2015年第14期1843-1855,共13页
Chronic hepatitis C infection is the leading cause of chronic liver disease, cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma as well as the primary indication for liver transplantation in the United States. Despite recent advance... Chronic hepatitis C infection is the leading cause of chronic liver disease, cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma as well as the primary indication for liver transplantation in the United States. Despite recent advances in drugs for the treatment of hepatitis C, predictive models estimate the incidence of cirrhosis due to hepatitis C infection will to continue to rise for the next two decades. There is currently an immense interest in the treatment of patients with fibrosis and early-stage cirrhosis as treatment can lead to decrease in the rates of decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and need for liver transplantation in these patients. The goal of this paper is to provide clinicians and health care professionals further information about the treatment of patients with hepatitis C infection and cirrhosis. Additionally, the paper focuses on the disease burden, epidemiology, diagnosis and the disease course from infection to treatment. We provide an overview of multiple studies for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection that have included patients with cirrhosis. We also discuss the advantages and disadvantages of treatment in cirrhotic patients and focus on the most up to date guidelines available for treatment. 展开更多
关键词 CIRRHOSIS Diagnosis Treatment Simeprevir Sofosbuvir Ledipasvir LIVER TRANSPLANTATION HEPATITISC VIRUS
暂未订购
Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir:Interferon free therapy for hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection 被引量:2
8
作者 Yasir Waheed 《World Journal of Virology》 2015年第1期33-35,共3页
Hepatitis C virus(HCV) has infected more than 200 million people around the globe. From 2001-2011, interferon plus ribavirin remained the standard of care for patients with HCV infection. The therapy had a limited res... Hepatitis C virus(HCV) has infected more than 200 million people around the globe. From 2001-2011, interferon plus ribavirin remained the standard of care for patients with HCV infection. The therapy had a limited response with a number of side effects. Recently, results for phase III trials of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir combination therapy have been announced. In treatmentnave patients, 12 wk of therapy with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir showed a sustained virological response(SVR) rate of 99%. In treatment experienced patients, 12-24 wk of therapy with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir in the absence or presence of ribavirin showed an SVR rate of 94%-99%. In cirrhotic patients the rate of SVR was 86% and 99% for 12 and 24 wk of therapy, respectively. The ledipasvir and sofosbuvir therapy showed very good results in different subgroups of patients regardless of patient's race, alanine aminotransferase levels, sex and host genetic factors. The combination therapy was well tolerated with no emergence of resistant mutants. The most common adverse effects were nausea, headache and fatigue. With the availability of interferon free therapy with minimal adverse effects, it will be easy to decrease the future morbidity and mortality caused by HCV infection. 展开更多
关键词 HEPATITIS C INTERFERON Ledipasvir Sofosbuvir GENOTYPE
暂未订购
Hepatitis C virus genotype 3: Meta-analysis on sustained virologic response rates with currently available treatment options 被引量:1
9
作者 Javier Ampuero K Rajender Reddy Manuel Romero-Gomez 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2016年第22期5285-5292,共8页
AIM: To address the therapeutic efficacy of various treatment regimens in genotype 3 selecting randomized clinical trials and prospective National Cohort Studies.METHODS:(1) PEG-INF-based therapy including sofosbuvir(... AIM: To address the therapeutic efficacy of various treatment regimens in genotype 3 selecting randomized clinical trials and prospective National Cohort Studies.METHODS:(1) PEG-INF-based therapy including sofosbuvir(SOF) + RBV for 12 wk vs SOF + RBV 24 wk;(2) SOF + RBV therapy 12 wk/16 wk vs 24 wk; and(3) the role of RBV in SOF + daclatasvir(DCV) and SOF + ledipasvir(LDV) combinations. This metaanalysis provides robust information with the intention of addressing treatment strategy for hepatitis C virus genotype 3.RESULTS: A combination treatment including SOF + RBV + PEG-IFN for 12 wk notes better SVR than with only SOF + RBV for 12 wk, although its association with more frequent adverse effects may be a limiting factor. Longer duration therapy with SOF + RBV(24 wk) has achieved higher SVR rates than shorter durations(12 or 16 wk). SOF + LDV are not an ideal treatment for genotype 3. CONCLUSION: Lastly, SOF + DCV combination is probably the best oral therapy option and the addition of RBV does not appear to be needed to increase SVR rates substantially. 展开更多
关键词 HEPATITIS C GENOTYPE 3 Sofosbuvir Daclatasvir Ledipasvir
暂未订购
Impact of interferon-free antivirus therapy on lipid profiles in patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1b 被引量:2
10
作者 Daisuke Endo Kenichi Satoh +2 位作者 Noritomo Shimada Atsushi Hokari Yoshio Aizawa 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2017年第13期2355-2364,共10页
AIM To investigate the influence of interferon-free antivirus therapy on lipid profiles in chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1b(HCV1b) infection.METHODS Interferon-free antiviral agents were used to treat 276 patient... AIM To investigate the influence of interferon-free antivirus therapy on lipid profiles in chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1b(HCV1b) infection.METHODS Interferon-free antiviral agents were used to treat 276 patients with chronic HCV1 b infection, and changes in serum lipids of those who achieved sustained virologic response(SVR) were examined. The treatment regimen included 24 wk of daclatasvir plus asunaprevir(DCV + ASV) or 12 wk of sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir(SOF + LDV). SVR was achieved in 121(85.8%) of 141 patients treated with DCV + ASV and 132(97.8%) of 135 patients treated with SOF + LDV. In the two patient groups(DCV + ASV-SVR and SOF + LDV-SVR), serum total cholesterol(TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol(LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol(HDL-C), and triglycerides were measured at baseline during treatment and at 4 and 12 wk after treatment. Then, longitudinal changes in lipid profiles were analyzed.RESULTS Serum levels of TC, LDL-C, and HDL-C were significantly increased throughout the observation period in both the DCV + ASV-SVR and SOF + LDV-SVR groups. During antivirus treatment, the increases in TC and LDL-C were significantly greater in the SOF + LDVSVR group than in the DCV + ASV-SVR group(P < 0.001). At 4 and 12 wk after the therapy, serum levels of TC and LDL-C were similar between the two groups and were significantly greater than those at baseline. Approximately 75%-80% of the increase in TC was derived from an increased LDL-C. In multiple regression analysis, the difference in therapy protocol(DCA + ASV or SOF + LDV) was an independent predictor that was significantly associated with the increase in TC and LDL-C at 4 wk of therapy.CONCLUSION Serum cholesterol significantly increased during SOF + LDV treatment. After treatment, HCV elimination was associated with a similar increase in cholesterol regardless of the therapy protocol. 展开更多
关键词 Chronic hepatitis C Daclatasvir Asunaprevir Sofosbuvir Ledipasvir Total cholesterol Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
暂未订购
Second-generation direct-acting-antiviral hepatitis C virus treatment: Efficacy, safety, and predictors of SVR12 被引量:2
11
作者 Christoph R Werner Julia M Schwarz +4 位作者 Daniel P Egetemeyr Robert Beck Nisar P Malek Ulrich M Lauer Christoph P Berg 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2016年第35期8050-8059,共10页
AIM To gather data on the antiviral efficacy and safety of second generation direct acting antiviral(DAA) treatment with respect to sustained virological response(SVR) 12 wk after conclusion of treatment, and to deter... AIM To gather data on the antiviral efficacy and safety of second generation direct acting antiviral(DAA) treatment with respect to sustained virological response(SVR) 12 wk after conclusion of treatment, and to determine predictors of SVR12 in this setting.METHODS Two hundred and sixty patients treated with SOF combination partners PR(n = 51), R(n = 10), SMV(n = 30), DCV(n = 81), LDV(n = 73), or 3D(n = 15).144/260 were pre-treated, 89/260 had liver cirrhosis, 56/260 had portal hypertension with platelets < 100/nL, 25/260 had a MELD score ≥ 10 and 17/260 were postliver transplantation patients. 194/260 had HCV GT1, 44/260 HCV GT3.RESULTS Two hundred and forty/256(93.7%) patients achieved SVR12(m ITT); 4/260 were lost to follow-up. SVR12 rates for subgroups were: 92% for SOF/DCV, 93% for each SOF/SMV, SOF/PR, 94% for SOF/LDV, 100% for 3D, 94% for pretreated, 87% for liver cirrhosis, 82% for patients with platelets < 100/n L, 88% post-liver transplantation, 95% for GT1 a, 93% for GT1 b, 90% for GT3, 100% for GT2, 4, and 6. 12 patients suffered from relapse, 6 prematurely discontinued treatment, of which 4 died. Negative predictors of SVR12 were a platelet count < 100/nL, MELD score ≥ 10(P < 0.0001), liver cirrhosis(P = 0.005) at baseline. In Interferonfree treatment GT3 had significantly lower SVR rates than GT1(P = 0.016). Side effects were mild. CONCLUSION Excellent SVR12 rates and the favorable side-effect profile of DAA-combination therapy can be well translated into "real-world". Patients with advanced liver disease, signs of portal hypertension, especially with platelets < 100/n L and patients with GT3 are in special need for further research efforts to overcome comparatively higher rates of virological failure. 展开更多
关键词 Sofosbuvir Simeprevir Ledipasvir Hepatitis C Liver transplant Sustained virological response Liver cirrhosis Side effects Resistance Daclatasvir
暂未订购
雷迪帕韦-索非布韦联合利巴韦林治疗丙型肝炎肝硬化患者的疗效分析 被引量:3
12
作者 武宏宾 《口岸卫生控制》 2019年第6期37-39,共3页
目的分析雷迪帕韦-索非布韦联合利巴韦林治疗丙型肝炎肝硬化患者的疗效。方法选取我院88例丙型肝炎肝硬化患者(2016年12月~2018年8月),简单随机化分组,各44例。对照组给予常规治疗,在此基础上,实验组给予雷迪帕韦-索非布韦+利巴韦林,均... 目的分析雷迪帕韦-索非布韦联合利巴韦林治疗丙型肝炎肝硬化患者的疗效。方法选取我院88例丙型肝炎肝硬化患者(2016年12月~2018年8月),简单随机化分组,各44例。对照组给予常规治疗,在此基础上,实验组给予雷迪帕韦-索非布韦+利巴韦林,均治疗6个月。观察2组不良反应,对比治疗3个月后、治疗6个月后HCV-RNA转阴率及肝功能指标[天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)、总胆红素(TBIL)]。结果与对照组比较,治疗3个月后、6个月后实验组HCV-RNA转阴率较高(P<0.05);与对照组比较,治疗3个月后、6个月后实验组AST、TBIL水平较低(P<0.05);实验组不良反应发生率15.91%与对照组11.36%比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论丙型肝炎肝硬化采用雷迪帕韦-索非布韦联合利巴韦林治疗,可提高HCV-RNA转阴率,改善肾功能,且安全性较高。 展开更多
关键词 丙型肝炎 肝硬化 雷迪帕韦-索非布韦 利巴韦林
暂未订购
来迪派韦/索磷布韦对比艾尔巴韦/格拉瑞韦治疗基因1b型慢性丙型肝炎疗效分析 被引量:3
13
作者 陈海艳 李晓峰 +4 位作者 童照威 钟剑峰 曾庆球 张宪山 王伟洪 《中华临床感染病杂志》 CAS CSCD 2022年第2期119-124,共6页
目的对比来迪派韦/索磷布韦(Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir,LDV/SOF)与艾尔巴韦/格拉瑞韦(Elbasvir/grazoprevir,EBR/GZR)治疗初治慢性丙型肝炎(Chronic hepatitis C,CHC)患者的临床疗效及安全性。方法回顾性分析2020年1月至2021年12月在湖州... 目的对比来迪派韦/索磷布韦(Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir,LDV/SOF)与艾尔巴韦/格拉瑞韦(Elbasvir/grazoprevir,EBR/GZR)治疗初治慢性丙型肝炎(Chronic hepatitis C,CHC)患者的临床疗效及安全性。方法回顾性分析2020年1月至2021年12月在湖州市中心医院诊治的143例基因1b型CHC初治患者临床资料,根据治疗方案的不同分为LDV/SOF组(n=74)和EBR/GZR组(n=69),比较两组患者治疗4、12周及停药后12周的病毒学应答情况,以及治疗前后的血清学和肝脏炎症指标等。采用SPSS 25.0软件对数据进行统计学分析。结果治疗4、12周及治疗结束后12周时,LDV/SOF组和EBR/GZR组的病毒学应答率分别为97.30%和98.55%,98.65%和100.00%,97.30%和98.55%,两组差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗终点时,两组患者肝脏炎症指标丙氨酸转氨酶、天冬氨酸转氨酶、γ-谷氨酰转肽酶均明显低于治疗基线水平(Z=-7.470和-6.974,-9.757和-6.832,-3.578和-4.054,P<0.01);两组各项指标对比差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者的不良反应均轻微,无严重不良事件发生。结论LDV/SOF和EBR/GZR治疗基因1b型初治CHC患者均具有较好的临床疗效,耐受性良好。 展开更多
关键词 丙型肝炎 慢性 基因1b型 直接抗病毒药物 来迪派韦/索磷布韦 艾尔巴韦/格拉瑞韦
原文传递
雷迪帕韦-索非布韦治疗丙型肝炎病毒/人类免疫缺陷病毒共感染者肝纤维化的疗效及安全性 被引量:2
14
作者 卜岚 白轩 《中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版)》 CAS 2018年第5期488-493,共6页
目的探讨雷迪帕韦(LDV)-索非布韦(SOF)治疗丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)和人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)共感染者肝纤维化的疗效及安全性。方法选取2014年3月至2015年6月西安市第八医院收治的HCV/HIV共感染者60例,根据患者是否有肝纤维化分为肝纤维化组(3... 目的探讨雷迪帕韦(LDV)-索非布韦(SOF)治疗丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)和人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)共感染者肝纤维化的疗效及安全性。方法选取2014年3月至2015年6月西安市第八医院收治的HCV/HIV共感染者60例,根据患者是否有肝纤维化分为肝纤维化组(30例)和无肝纤维化组(30例)。肝纤维化组和无肝纤维化组患者均采用LDV/SOF固定剂量400 mg/d和常规抗HIV治疗方案分别治疗24周和12周。比较两组患者抗HCV治疗结束后病毒学应答(EOT)、持续病毒学应答12(SVR12)、持续病毒学应答24(SVR24)、不良反应以及生命健康评估(SF-12)情况。结果随访期间,失访8例,失访率为13.3%。无肝纤维化组和肝纤维化组患者治疗结束后EOT、SVR12、SVR24病毒学应答率差异均无统计学意义(P均> 0.05)。两组患者均出现不良反应,不良反应发生率为100%;两组患者常见不良反应差异均无统计学意义(P均> 0.05)。随访12周和24周,两组患者躯体健康评分和心理健康评分差异均无统计学意义(P均> 0.05)。治疗结束时患者SF-12评估身体健康评分差异有统计学意义(Z=-2.125、P=0.028)。结论 LDV/SOF用于治疗HCV/HIV共感染者SVR较高。虽然治疗后不良反应发生率较高,但可通过对症治疗缓解。 展开更多
关键词 人类免疫缺陷病毒 肝炎病毒 丙型 共感染 雷迪帕韦 索非布韦 肝纤维化
原文传递
Sofosbuvir, a Significant Paradigm Change in HCV Treatment 被引量:4
15
作者 Thomas McQuaid Carolyn Savini Star Seyedkazemi 《Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology》 SCIE 2015年第1期27-35,共9页
Nucleotide compounds like sofosbuvir,acyclovir,and tenofovir have proven to be amongst the most potent orally available antiviral treatments.These drugs exhibit high efficacy and a wide therapeutic index,with demonstr... Nucleotide compounds like sofosbuvir,acyclovir,and tenofovir have proven to be amongst the most potent orally available antiviral treatments.These drugs exhibit high efficacy and a wide therapeutic index,with demonstrated utility in a number of chronic viral infections.The approval of SovaldiTM,brand name for sofosbuvir,by the U.S.Food and Drug Administration heralded improvements in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment.Sofosbuvir was originally discovered by Pharmasset Corporation and named PSI-7977.It was subsequently acquired and advanced through phase 3 development by Gilead Sciences,Inc.In Sofosbuvir both a unique pharmacology and a high specificity for the HCV ribonucleic acid polymerase are present in a molecule that is well tolerated and highly efficacious.Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials have consistently demonstrated durable and high rates of sustained virologic response (SVR),curing patients in excess of 80% in all genotypes and >90% in treatment-na(i)ve subjects being administered combination therapy with other agents.Harvoni~ is the combination of sofosbuvir and the NS5A inhibitor ledipasvir in a fixed-dose oral tablet,and it has demonstrated high SVR rates in patients infected with HCV genotype 1,without the need for exogenous interferon and/or ribavirin.Here,we discuss the discovery,development,pharmacologic characterization,and results from the phase 3 trials of sofosbuvir.Hepatitis C is a chronic disease,for which most patients have been undiagnosed,are unwilling to start treatment,or are ineligible for treatment because of the high toxicity and low efficacy of interferon and ribavirin-based therapy.Clinical studies with sofosbuvir have demonstrated significant improvement over the prior standard of care,thus ushering in a new paradigm of HCV treatment and an update of treatment guidelines. 展开更多
关键词 Ledipasvir Sofosbuvir Direct acting antivirals
原文传递
以索磷布韦为基础的直接抗病毒方案治疗慢性丙型肝炎儿童及青少年的疗效和安全性分析 被引量:1
16
作者 刘立 李梅 +6 位作者 常丽仙 方铭 李惠敏 牟春燕 张映媛 李俊义 刘春云 《中华传染病杂志》 CAS CSCD 2023年第5期320-325,共6页
目的探索以索磷布韦为基础的直接抗病毒方案对慢性丙型肝炎(CHC)儿童及青少年的疗效和安全性。方法纳入2018年1月至2022年8月就诊于昆明市第三人民医院和富源县人民医院的52例3~17岁CHC儿童和青少年患者,收集其基本资料,给予索磷布韦/... 目的探索以索磷布韦为基础的直接抗病毒方案对慢性丙型肝炎(CHC)儿童及青少年的疗效和安全性。方法纳入2018年1月至2022年8月就诊于昆明市第三人民医院和富源县人民医院的52例3~17岁CHC儿童和青少年患者,收集其基本资料,给予索磷布韦/维帕他韦(SOF/VEL)或来迪派韦/索磷布韦(LDV/SOF)±利巴韦林治疗12周,观察患儿治疗前、治疗后和停药随访12周的生物化学指标、病毒学指标。主要疗效指标为治疗结束后随访12周时患儿获得持续病毒学应答(SVR)和治疗期间的不良事件发生情况。统计学分析采用非参数检验。结果52例CHC患儿中,儿童38例,青少年14例;男31例,女21例;年龄为9(7,12)岁。52例患儿中,1b型7例,2a型11例,3型2例,3a型5例,3b型18例,6a型1例,6k型3例,6n型4例,6v型1例。垂直传播12例(23.1%),家庭间水平传播21例(40.4%),血液传播2例(3.8%),不详17例(32.7%)。与基线相比,患儿治疗12周、停药12周后总胆红素、丙氨酸转氨酶、天冬氨酸转氨酶水平均下降,差异均有统计学意义(F=12.71、30.23、42.52,均P<0.05)。截至2022年9月30日,100.0%(52/52)的患儿在治疗结束时获得SVR,完成12周随访的患儿中,95.8%(46/48)获得SVR。治疗期间常见的不良事件包括乏力[11.5%(6/52)]、头痛[5.8%(3/52)]、头晕[1.9%(1/52)]、腹痛[3.8%(2/52)]、腹泻[1.9%(1/52)]、皮疹[1.9%(1/52)]、皮肤瘙痒[1.9%(1/52)],无患儿因为不良反应停药。结论以索磷布韦为基础的直接抗病毒方案治疗CHC儿童及青少年的疗效和耐受性良好,没有因不良事件导致的停药。 展开更多
关键词 丙型肝炎病毒 儿童 青少年 索磷布韦 维帕他韦 来迪派韦
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部