期刊文献+
共找到7篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
LILRB1和LILRB4在单核细胞分化急性髓系白血病诊断中的意义
1
作者 饶若 王述文 +3 位作者 吴莉芳 王照良 唐瑞梅 林慧 《现代肿瘤医学》 CAS 北大核心 2023年第24期4582-4586,共5页
目的:探讨LILRB1和LILRB4在单核细胞分化急性髓系白血病(M-AML)诊断中的意义。方法:通过直接荧光标记流式细胞术检测109例急性白血病患者白血病细胞LILRB1、LILRB4、CD64和CD14的表达。结果:LILRB1在M-AML、NM-AML和ALL患者中表达阳性... 目的:探讨LILRB1和LILRB4在单核细胞分化急性髓系白血病(M-AML)诊断中的意义。方法:通过直接荧光标记流式细胞术检测109例急性白血病患者白血病细胞LILRB1、LILRB4、CD64和CD14的表达。结果:LILRB1在M-AML、NM-AML和ALL患者中表达阳性率分别为81.6%(31/38)、0(0/49)、27.3%(6/22),差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),其中M-AML组的阳性率明显高于NM-AML组和ALL组,ALL组阳性率明显高于NM-AML组;LILRB4在M-AML组中的表达阳性率为81.6%(31/38),在NM-AML和ALL组中均不表达(0/49,0/22),差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);单独检测LILRB1、LILRB4诊断M-AML敏感性均为81.6%,联合检测的敏感性为86.8%,特异性均为100%,优于CD64(86.8%,61.2%)、CD14(31.6%,100%)。结论:LILRB1、LILRB4单独检测或联合检测对检出M-AML均具有极高的灵敏度和特异度,可作为诊断M-AML的新指标。 展开更多
关键词 LILRB1 lilrb4 急性髓系白血病 单核细胞分化 流式细胞术
暂未订购
白细胞免疫球蛋白样受体LILRB4条件表达小鼠模型的构建 被引量:1
2
作者 王磊 赵志玲 +1 位作者 连霞 金昌洙 《滨州医学院学报》 2022年第5期321-324,354,共5页
目的将灵长类动物lilrb4基因表达在小鼠髓系细胞表面,以构建人白细胞免疫球蛋白受体亚家族成员B4(LILRB4)免疫耐受小鼠,为LILRB4功能研究提供小鼠模型。方法利用NCBI数据库分析人lilrb4与小鼠Gp49b基因的同源性。在小鼠rose26基因位点... 目的将灵长类动物lilrb4基因表达在小鼠髓系细胞表面,以构建人白细胞免疫球蛋白受体亚家族成员B4(LILRB4)免疫耐受小鼠,为LILRB4功能研究提供小鼠模型。方法利用NCBI数据库分析人lilrb4与小鼠Gp49b基因的同源性。在小鼠rose26基因位点通过同源重组的方式,定点插入含有LoxP位点的人lilrb4基因编码序列,获得Rosa26^(LSL/LSL)小鼠,与Lyz2-Cre小鼠进行杂交,在小鼠髓系细胞切除LoxP序列,进而启动下游人lilrb4基因的表达。应用PCR进行小鼠基因型鉴定,通过流式细胞仪检测Rose26^(LSL/LSL);Cre小鼠外周血以及骨髓中髓系细胞人LILRB4的水平。结果人lilrb4与小鼠Gp49b基因比对结果表明,无论是碱基还是氨基酸序列,两者都存在较大差异,无明显同源性。PCR结果表明,Rose26^(LSL/LSL);Cre小鼠能够检测到相应的目的条带,而且在髓系细胞条件表达人lilrb4基因,不影响小鼠的表型。流式细胞仪检测结果显示,Rose26^(LSL/LSL);Cre小鼠的髓系细胞特异性表达人LILRB4。结论Rose26^(LSL/LSL);Cre小鼠的髓系细胞中能够检测到人LILRB4的表达,本研究成功构建了人LILRB4耐受的基因敲入小鼠模型。 展开更多
关键词 免疫抑制受体 lilrb4 条件表达 髓系细胞
暂未订购
孕期刚地弓形虫感染致滋养层细胞LILRB4表达变化及对妊娠的影响
3
作者 张帆 牟汝涛 +4 位作者 张振东 刘现兵 张海霞 胡雪梅 李志丹 《中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志》 2026年第1期85-93,共9页
目的 探讨孕期刚地弓形虫感染后滋养层细胞表面白细胞免疫球蛋白样受体B4(LILRB4)的表达水平变化,以及对滋养层细胞功能及妊娠的影响。方法 将人原代滋养层细胞培养于细胞培养皿中(1×10^(7)个/皿),分为对照组和感染组。感染组按细... 目的 探讨孕期刚地弓形虫感染后滋养层细胞表面白细胞免疫球蛋白样受体B4(LILRB4)的表达水平变化,以及对滋养层细胞功能及妊娠的影响。方法 将人原代滋养层细胞培养于细胞培养皿中(1×10^(7)个/皿),分为对照组和感染组。感染组按细胞与弓形虫1∶1感染,加入别藻蓝蛋白(APC)标记的抗人LILRB4单克隆抗体,固定破膜后加入别藻蓝蛋白偶联花青7染料(APC-Cy7)标记的抗人细胞角蛋白7(CK7)单克隆抗体和Alexa Fluor 488标记抗人波形蛋白单克隆抗体,流式细胞术检测LILRB4表达情况。取对数生长期的HTR-8/SVneo细胞接种于24孔板中(2×10^(5)个/孔),分为对照组和感染组。感染组按细胞与弓形虫1∶1感染,加入鼠抗人LILRB4单克隆抗体(1∶200)、Elab Fluor 647标记的羊抗鼠IgG抗体(1∶200)孵育,封片后使用激光共聚焦显微镜拍照,Image J软件分析LILRB4蛋白表达的荧光强度。C57BL/6J野生型雌鼠40只与雄鼠20只、LILRB4^(-/-)雌鼠40只与雄鼠20只分别按雌雄比2∶1随机合笼过夜,次晨发现阴栓的雌鼠为孕0 d。野生型孕鼠随机分为野生型对照组和野生型感染组,LILRB4^(-/-)孕鼠随机分为LILRB4^(-/-)对照组和LILRB4^(-/-)感染组,每组6只。孕8 d,野生型感染组和LILRB4^(-/-)感染组孕鼠腹腔注射300个弓形虫速殖子,对照组注射等量生理盐水。孕14 d,解剖各组孕鼠子宫,观察胎盘、胎鼠发育情况。免疫组化检测野生型对照组和野生型感染组小鼠胎盘组织中LILRB4蛋白表达,Image J软件分析LILRB4蛋白阳性表达情况。蛋白质免疫印迹(Western blotting)检测野生型对照组和野生型感染组小鼠胎盘组织中LILRB4蛋白相对表达水平,以及野生型对照组、野生型感染组和LILRB4^(-/-)感染组小鼠胎盘组织中白细胞介素-10(IL-10)和IL-12蛋白的相对表达水平。将HTR-8/SVneo细胞接种于细胞培养皿中(1×10^(7)个/皿),分为对照组、感染组和LILRB4阻断加感染组,LILRB4阻断加感染组加入LILRB4中和抗体预处理2 h,感染组和LILRB4阻断加感染组按细胞与弓形虫1∶1感染,Western blotting检测3组HTR-8/SVneo细胞中IL-10和IL-12蛋白的相对表达水平。Transwell法检测弓形虫感染后HTR-8/SVneo细胞侵袭功能。所有数据均采用GraphPad Prism 9.0软件统计分析,两组比较采用独立样本t检验,多组比较采用单因素方差分析和Tukey事后检验。结果 流式细胞术结果显示,对照组人原代滋养层细胞中LILRB4阳性细胞比例为(26.10±1.99)%,高于感染组的(18.60±1.13)%(t=15.00,P<0.01)。免疫荧光结果显示,感染组LILRB4蛋白的平均荧光强度为122.56±5.24,弱于对照组的149.27±3.50(t=5.36,P<0.05)。野生型对照组和LILRB4^(-/-)对照组孕鼠毛发有光泽,精神正常,胎盘和胎鼠发育良好;野生型感染组和LILRB4^(-/-)感染组孕鼠萎靡不振、毛发蓬松粗糙,胎盘缺血且胎鼠发育不良。野生型感染组胎盘和胎鼠体质量分别为(54.82±7.12)和(140.59±3.19) mg,低于野生型对照组的(72.51±1.11)和(201.03±17.37) mg(t=4.25、5.92,P<0.05、0.01);LILRB4^(-/-)感染组胎盘和胎鼠体质量分别为(41.24±2.80)和(68.25±11.55) mg,均低于野生型感染组(t=3.07、10.45,P<0.05、0.01)。免疫组化结果显示,野生型对照组小鼠胎盘组织内高表达LILRB4蛋白,主要集中在细胞膜,野生型感染组LILRB4蛋白表达较少。野生型感染组LILRB4蛋白阳性表达率为(16.13±2.55)%,低于野生型对照组的(36.64±6.62)%(t=5.00,P<0.01)。Western blotting结果显示,野生型对照组小鼠胎盘内LILRB4蛋白相对表达水平为1.15±0.05,高于野生型感染组的0.78±0.10(t=5.40,P<0.05)。野生型感染组小鼠胎盘组织内IL-10蛋白相对表达水平为0.93±0.09,低于野生型对照组的1.28±0.16(Tukey事后检验,P<0.05);LILRB4^(-/-)感染组小鼠胎盘组织内IL-10蛋白相对表达水平为0.61±0.10,低于野生型感染组(Tukey事后检验,P<0.05)。野生型感染组小鼠胎盘组织内IL-12蛋白相对表达水平为1.08±0.11,高于野生型对照组的0.55±0.18(Tukey事后检验,P<0.05);LILRB4^(-/-)感染组小鼠胎盘内IL-12蛋白相对表达水平为1.67±0.29,高于野生型感染组(Tukey事后检验,P<0.05)。感染组HTR-8/SVneo细胞内IL-10蛋白相对表达水平为0.85±0.05,低于对照组的1.15±0.06(Tukey事后检验,P<0.05);LILRB4阻断加感染组IL-10蛋白相对表达水平为0.72±0.04,低于感染组(Tukey事后检验,P<0.05)。感染组HTR-8/SVneo细胞内IL-12蛋白相对表达水平为0.89±0.高于对照组的0.52±0.14(Tukey事后检验,P<0.05);LILRB4阻断加感染组IL-12蛋白相对表达水平为1.21±0.04,高于感染组的0.89±0.10(Tukey事后检验,P<0.05)。感染组HTR-8/SVneo细胞侵袭细胞数为(178±21)个,低于对照组的(278±18)个(t=45.60,P<0.01),LILRB4阻断加感染组侵袭细胞数为(119±9)个,较感染组侵袭细胞数量进一步减少(t=5.50,P<0.05)。结论 弓形虫感染可致人滋养层细胞和小鼠胎盘组织LILRB4蛋白表达水平显著下调,LILRB4下调可促进IL-12表达,抑制IL-10产生,减弱滋养层细胞侵袭功能。 展开更多
关键词 刚地弓形虫 滋养层细胞 白细胞免疫球蛋白样受体B4 细胞因子 不良妊娠
原文传递
LILRB4, an immune checkpoint on myeloid cells 被引量:4
4
作者 Ting Yang Yixin Qian +3 位作者 Xiaoting Liang Jianbo Wu Ming Zou Mi Deng 《Blood Science》 2022年第2期49-56,共8页
Leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor B4(LILRB4)is an inhibitory receptor in the LILR family mainly expressed on normal and malignant human cells of myeloid origin.By binding to ligands,LILRB4 is activated and subseq... Leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor B4(LILRB4)is an inhibitory receptor in the LILR family mainly expressed on normal and malignant human cells of myeloid origin.By binding to ligands,LILRB4 is activated and subsequently recruits adaptors to cytoplasmic immunoreceptor tyrosine inhibitory motifs to initiate different signaling cascades,thus playing an important role in physiological and pathological conditions,including autoimmune diseases,microbial infections,and cancers.In normal myeloid cells,LILRB4 regulates intrinsic cell activation and differentiation.In disease-associated or malignant myeloid cells,LILRB4 is significantly correlated with disease severity or patient survival and suppresses T cells,thereby participating in the pathogenesis of various diseases.In summary,LILRB4 functions as an immune checkpoint on myeloid cells and may be a promising therapeutic target for various human immune diseases,especially for cancer immunotherapy. 展开更多
关键词 Autoimmune disease CANCER Immune checkpoint IMMUNOTHERAPY Inhibitory receptor LILR lilrb4 MDSC Myeloid cell TAM
原文传递
LILRB4 ITIMs mediate the T cell suppression and infiltration of acute myeloid leukemia cells 被引量:2
5
作者 Zunling Li Mi Deng +7 位作者 Fangfang Huang Changzhu Jin Shuang Sun Heyu Chen Xiaoye Liu Licai He Ali HSadek Cheng Cheng Zhang 《Cellular & Molecular Immunology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2020年第3期272-282,共11页
We recently demonstrated that leukocyte Ig-like receptor 4(LILRB4)expressed by monocytic acute myeloid leukemia(AML)cells mediates T-cell inhibition and leukemia cell infiltration via its intracellular domain.The cyto... We recently demonstrated that leukocyte Ig-like receptor 4(LILRB4)expressed by monocytic acute myeloid leukemia(AML)cells mediates T-cell inhibition and leukemia cell infiltration via its intracellular domain.The cytoplasmic domain of LILRB4 contains three immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motifs(ITIMs);the tyrosines at positions 360,412,and 442 are phosphorylation sites.Here,we analyzed how the ITIMs of LILRB4 in AML cells mediate its function.Our in vitro and in vivo data show that Y412 and Y442,but not Y360,of LILRB4 are required for T-cell inhibition,and all three ITIMs are needed for leukemia cell infiltration.We constructed chimeric proteins containing the extracellular domain of LILRB4 and the intracellular domain of LILRB1 and vice versa.The intracellular domain of LILRB4,but not that of LILRB1,mediates T-cell suppression and AML cell migration.Our studies thus defined the unique signaling roles of LILRB4 ITIMs in AML cells. 展开更多
关键词 lilrb4 ITIM motifs AML T cell suppression INFILTRATION
暂未订购
Leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor B4(LILRB4)in acute myeloid leukemia:From prognostic biomarker to immunotherapeutic target
6
作者 Muzi Li Xiangyu Zhao 《Chinese Medical Journal》 CSCD 2024年第22期2697-2711,共15页
Leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor(LILR)B4(also known as ILT3/CD85k)is an immune checkpoint protein that is highly expressed in solid tumors and hematological malignancies and plays a significant role in the patho... Leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor(LILR)B4(also known as ILT3/CD85k)is an immune checkpoint protein that is highly expressed in solid tumors and hematological malignancies and plays a significant role in the pathophysiology of cancer.LILRB4 is highly expressed in acute myeloid leukemia(AML),and this phenotype is associated with adverse patient outcomes.Its differential expression in tumors compared to normal tissues,its presence in tumor stem cells,and its multifaceted roles in tumorigenesis position it as a promising therapeutic target in AML.Currently,several immunotherapies targeting LILRB4 are undergoing clinical trials.This review summarizes advancements made in the study of LILRB4 in AML,focusing on its structure,ligands,expression,and significance in normal tissues and AML;its protumorigenic effects and mechanisms in AML;and the application of LILRB4-targeted therapies in AML.These insights highlight the potential advantages of LILRB4 as an immunotherapeutic target in the context of AML. 展开更多
关键词 lilrb4 Leukemia myeloid acute Immune checkpoint Tumor microenvironment Immunotherapy
原文传递
Gene mutations in a patient with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia and changes upon progression to acute myeloid leukemia and during treatment 被引量:2
7
作者 Jiaming Li Sujiang Zhang 《Oncology and Translational Medicine》 2019年第1期30-32,共3页
Objective Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia(CMML) has been categorized as an uncommon hematological malignancy with overlapping features of myelodysplastic syndromes(MDS) and myeloproliferative neoplasms that have an in... Objective Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia(CMML) has been categorized as an uncommon hematological malignancy with overlapping features of myelodysplastic syndromes(MDS) and myeloproliferative neoplasms that have an inherent risk of progressing to acute myeloid leukemia(AML). Methods This study presents a case of confirmed CMML combined with M protein, in which the molecular changes upon progression to AML and under decitabine(DAC) plus bortezomib therapy were reported by tracking variant allele frequency(VAF) of mutations in a series of bone marrow samples. Results First, variable sensitivity of clones was observed during DAC treatment, and incomplete mutation clearance may be associated with low overall response rate and unsustained response. Secondly, DAC cannot prevent the new genetic alterations and accumulation of genetic progression on treatment, leading to acute transformation. Finally, autoimmunity was found to have acted as an important pathogenetic factor, increasing the additive mutations that further drive the clonal evolution in CMML. Conclusion Overall, changes in mutations and clonal architecture during CMML progression or treatment are predictive of an early evaluation of therapeutic strategies in CMML. 展开更多
关键词 chronic myelomonocytic LEUKEMIA acute MYELOID LEUKEMIA mutation DECITABINE BORTEZOMIB PLATELETS SETD2 lilrb4
暂未订购
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部