期刊文献+
共找到3篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Accelerated Hypofractionated Radiotherapy and Concurrent Etoposide/Cisplatin in Patients with Limited-Disease SCLC (LD-SCLC)
1
作者 Wessam Elghamry Ali Azmy +2 位作者 Iman Fouad Zeinab Elsayed Sherif Abdelwahab 《Journal of Cancer Therapy》 2020年第11期683-694,共12页
<strong>Background</strong><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><strong>: <... <strong>Background</strong><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><strong>: </strong></span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The optimal TRT dose/fraction for LD-SCLC remains debatable, and due to increasing number of population in Egypt and number of patients as well, so reducing the duration of radiation therapy is favored. This study was conducted using etoposide and cisplatin (EP) concurrently with accelerated hypofractionated TRT to evaluate the response and toxicity of this protocol in the treatment of patients with limited-disease small cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC).</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Patients and Methods</span></b></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">: </span></b></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Thirty patients with previously untreated LD-SCLC were enrolled into this study between June 2012 and February 2015. All patients received etoposide 100 mg/m</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> days 1 to 3 and cisplatin 25 mg/m</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> days 1 to 3 with start of accelerated hypofractionated thoracic radiation therapy on first day of the second cycle of chemotherapy of 55 Gy,</span></span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2.5 Gy/fraction over 30 days. Chemotherapy was given 4</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">6 cycles. Prophylactic cranial irradiation 25 Gy/10 fractions w</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ere</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> given for patient</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">s</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> who achieved complete remission.</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results</span></b></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">: </span></b></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The median age was 60 years;28 patients (93%) were men. ECOG PS was 0 in 5 (17%) patients and 1 in 12 (40%) patients. Four (13%) patients achieved a complete response (CR), 17 (57%) patients achieved a partial response (PR), while 7 patients (23%) had progressive disease (PD), </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the ORR was 90%. The median survival time was 26.4 months. The median PFS was 16.7 months. Among the hematologic toxicities neutropenia was the most prevalent toxicity and it was evident as grade 3</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">4 in 12 (40%) patients. Grade 3</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">4 Asthenia was the most prevalent nonhematological toxicity, in 12 (40%) patients;esophagitis occurred in 7 (23%) patients. No treatment-related deaths (due to sepsis or bleeding) were reported in the study. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusion</span></b></span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">: </span></b></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Using etoposide and cisplatin concurrently with accelerated hypofractionated thoracic radiation therapy for the treatment of patients with LD-SCLC showed an encouraging outcome and acceptable toxicity and warrants further research.</span></span></span> 展开更多
关键词 ld-sclc ETOPOSIDE CISPLATIN Accelerated Radiation Therapy
暂未订购
扶正抗瘤方辅助伊立替康及顺铂治疗局限期小细胞肺癌疗效及对患者生活质量的影响 被引量:5
2
作者 李琛 杨晓光 +2 位作者 苏菁 冯平 侯海军 《世界中西医结合杂志》 2020年第4期701-705,共5页
目的探讨扶正抗瘤方辅助伊立替康及顺铂治疗局限期小细胞肺癌(Limited stage small cell lung cancer,LD-SCLC)疗效及对患者生活质量的影响。方法将2014年3月—2016年3月期间收治的180例LD-SCLC患者为研究对象,按随机数字表法分为治疗组... 目的探讨扶正抗瘤方辅助伊立替康及顺铂治疗局限期小细胞肺癌(Limited stage small cell lung cancer,LD-SCLC)疗效及对患者生活质量的影响。方法将2014年3月—2016年3月期间收治的180例LD-SCLC患者为研究对象,按随机数字表法分为治疗组(90例)和对照组(90例)。对照组采用伊立替康+顺铂(IP)化疗方案治疗,治疗组在此基础上加用扶正抗瘤方进行治疗,化疗3周为1个疗程,连续治疗2个化疗周期后对两组患者疗效、免疫功能、血清肿瘤标志物水平以及生活质量进行比较。结果治疗组患者总有效率为83.33%,对照组为65.56%,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);免疫功能:经治疗,两组CD3+、CD4+、CD4+/CD8+比值均有明显上升,CD8+水平明显下降(P<0.05);与对照组相比,治疗组CD3+、CD4+与CD4+/CD8+比值明显升高,CD8+水平明显降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);血清肿瘤标记物:经治疗,两组患者血清中癌胚抗原(carcino-embryonic antigen,CEA)与神经元特异性烯醇化酶(neuron-specific enolase,NSE)浓度均显著降低,与对照组相比,治疗组明显低于对照组(P<0.05);生活质量:经治疗,治疗组患者在躯体、角色、社会、情绪、认知功能5方面评分均明显优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论扶正抗瘤方与IP治疗方案联合应用可以明显提高LD-SCLC患者的机体免疫力,降低血清肿瘤标记物的水平,改善患者的生活质量,因此对LD-SCLC具有积极的治疗效果。 展开更多
关键词 扶正抗瘤方 局限期小细胞肺癌 免疫功能 血清肿瘤标志物 生活质量
暂未订购
大分割同期放化疗对局限期SCLC临床价值的Meta分析 被引量:2
3
作者 杨海霞 邵秋菊 +2 位作者 齐宇红 王启明 梁军 《现代肿瘤医学》 CAS 2019年第4期598-603,共6页
目的:应用Meta分析评估大分割同期放化疗在局限期小细胞肺癌(limited disease small-cell lungcancer,LD-SCLC)中的价值。方法:检索中国生物医学文献数据库、中国学术期刊全文数据库、Cochrane Li-brary、Pub Med、Medline、Web of scie... 目的:应用Meta分析评估大分割同期放化疗在局限期小细胞肺癌(limited disease small-cell lungcancer,LD-SCLC)中的价值。方法:检索中国生物医学文献数据库、中国学术期刊全文数据库、Cochrane Li-brary、Pub Med、Medline、Web of science、Embase国内外数据库有关局部局限期SCLC患者大分割同期放化疗与常规分割/超分割同期放化疗对比的文献,依据入选和排除标准收集各项研究的近期疗效及生存情况,应用Meta分析方法评价大分割同期放化疗的临床疗效。结果:纳入符合标准的国内外文献5篇,共包括837例患者。大分割放疗与常规或超分割放疗相比,无进展生存时间相似(P=0. 95);大分割放疗可延长局限期小细胞肺癌患者的总生存期(P=0. 03);同时,大分割放疗不增加急性放射性食管炎和肺炎的发生率(RR=0. 95,95%CI:0. 63~1. 42,P=0. 79; RR=0. 77,95%CI:0. 39~1. 51,P=0. 44)。结论:大分割较常规分割/超分割同步放化疗延长总生存时间,不增加毒性,可作为局限期小细胞肺癌治疗的选择模式。 展开更多
关键词 局限期小细胞肺癌 大分割同期放化疗 常规分割/超分割 META分析
暂未订购
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部